Sunday, May 21, 2006

Humor Spotlight: Wally on the do-as-I-say or as-he-meant-to-say Bully Boy

As we stated earlier, five days a week, you can turn to Wally for a humorous take on the news.  He takes on something that's breaking in a way that underscores how insane the administration and its policies are.  What's more insane than pushing the English-as-official-language debate?  How about when the misLeader is famous for mangling the English language?
 
 

THIS JUST IN! NO BULLY BOY LEFT BEHIND!

BULLY BOY PRESS - DC.

THIS JUST IN!

NO BULLY BOY LEFT BEHIND!

WHITE HOUSE JOKE TONY SNOW ANNOUNCED THE WHITE HOUSE'S SUPPORT FOR MAKING ENGLISH THE LAW OF THE LAND.

"IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE DATE, PEOPLE WHO LEARN ENGLISH TEND TO BE MORE PROSPEROUS (AND) TEND TO BE BETTER AT THEIR JOBS," TONY SNOW DECLARED AS HANDS SHOT UP IN THE PRESS CORPS.

JUST THEN BULLY BOY WALKED INTO THE BRIEFING ROOM AND WHISPERED INTO THE EAR OF A NODDING SNOW.

"LADIES AND GENTELMEN OF THE PRESS," SNOW STATED SMILING, "ON THE SUBJECT OF IMMIGRATION, THE BULLY BOY OF THE UNITED STATES WOULD LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS."

GRINNING, BULLY BOY STEPPED IN FRONT OF THE PODIUM, CLEARED HIS THROAT AND SAID, "I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT FOR THIS GREAT STATE OF BASEBALL TO REACH OUT TO THE PEOPLE OF ALL WALKS OF LIFE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE SPORT IS INCLUSIVE. THE BEST WAY TO DO IT IS TO CONVINCE LITTLE KIDS HOW TO . . . THE BEAUTY OF PLAYING BASEBALL!"

AS THE PRESS STARED AT THE BULLY BOY IN SHOCK, SNOW GULPED AND LOOKED AROUND NERVOUSLY.

WARMING TO THE QUIET IN THE ROOM, THINKING THEY WERE SPELL BOUND, BULLY BOY OFFERED THOUGHTS ON ANOTHER PROGRAM, "I'M GOING TO SPEND A LOT OF TIME ON SOCIAL SECURITY. I ENJOY IT. I ENJOY TAKING ON THE ISSUE. I GUESS, IT'S THE MOTHER IN ME."

AS SNOW STOOD PARALYZED, LIFE COACH KAREN HUGHES TOOK CONTROL OF THE SITUATION AND BEGAN STRIDING TOWARDS THE PODIUM.

"AH, LOOK, IT'S KAREN HUGHES," BULLY BOY SAID POINTING. "KAREN'S A WEST TEXAS GIRL, JUST LIKE ME."

KAREN HUGHES ANNOUNCED THAT THE BULLY BOY HAD TO LEAVE FOR AN IMPORTANT NAP AND A QUICK MEETING. WAVING AT EVERYONE AND BLOWING KISSES, BULLY BOY EXITED THE ROOM.

"JUST TO REPEAT," HUGHES DECLARED GRUFFILY, "THE WHITE HOUSE BELIEVES THAT PEOPLE WHO LEARN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEND TO BE BETTER AT THEIR JOBS."

"KAREN HUGHES," CALLED OUT A WOMAN. "HELEN THOMAS, KING FEATURES SYNDICATE . A QUESTION. IF THE WHITE HOUSE BELIEVES LEARNING ENGLISH HELPS PEOPLE BE BETTER AT THEIR JOBS, WHEN DO THEY PLAN ON TEACHING ENGLISH TO THE BULLY BOY?"



Recommended: "And the war drags on (Indymedia Roundup)"
"Surprise interview"
"Democracy Now: Eduardo Galeano"
"rebecca winters has a warning"
"Other Items"
"Dry Drunk Bully Boy"
"Hayden Defends Domestic Spy Program At Confirmation Hearing"
"The (Other) Story Judith Miller Didn't Write"
"Phone Spies"


Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

Humor Spotlight: Betty on Thomas Friedman's leather Prada pumps and tears

Betty's chapter from Tuesday.  One that had us laughing for days.  It's humor, folks, as Betty reminds at her website.

Leather Prada pumps and tears

My husband Thomas Friedman continues to play mum on what he meant by his mysterious remarks about Nicky K.

I'm not sure how much of that has to do with why he left in the first place last week and how much that has to do with the fact that he's pouting still over my comments last Friday?

On the former, Thomas Friedman is the Global Drama Queen -- so his storming out on that line or any other doesn't necessarily mean anything other than the fact that melodrama pumps through his veins.

On the latter?

Was I too harsh?

He went into the closet on Tuesday of last week after writing Wednesday's column. I kept trying to coax him out. Not because I needed him for anything, please -- we're talking about Thomas Friedman, but because he had a column due for Friday's paper.

So when he wouldn't come out by noon Thursday, I moved the computer into the closet. I would have thought he'd have sobered up from his heavy drinking at the Russian embassy; however, that didn't happen. I opened the door and was hit with a heavy blast of vodka fumes. It reminded me of a documentary I heard on KPFA about how moth balls have chemicals in them that build up in the closed closet. So I guess Thomas Friedman was basically a fumes huffer. Look for the soon to be written column on that.

He was wearing my Judith Miller wig which he'd put into cornrows. He claimed it was just a hat because he was cold (which doesn't explain why he was wearing one of my mini-skirts) but I didn't even care.

"Write the damn column," I told him, stepping out of the closet.

He did and he e-mailed it on to Gail Collins who, no doubt, was tickled pink because she loves to hand over prime print real estate to recollections about personal friends.

Then he wanted me to read it. And I wanted him to tell me what he meant by the Nicky K remarks.

Neither of us was budging. Finally, Sunday night, he said, "Betinna, what we have here is a Mexican standoff and, in case you haven't heard, Bully Boy's sending troops to the Mexican border."

He laughed so hard he was rolling around on the carpet. He laughed so hard, I was afraid he was going to soil himself.

Finally, he stopped rolling around and laughing. Right after he soiled himself.

He asked and I said no. Hell no. He wasn't wearing a diaper. I wasn't wearing the Peggy Noonan mask and he hadn't been playing William Safire.

I hate that sex game anyway but, with a little notice, I can numb myself inside enough to play it. (Which really is the story of our marriage.)

He decided to wear a pair of frilly panties (he said he was cold in just the thong) and he'd made the mess, so he could clean it up.

"Two people!" he screamed at me as he stormed off to the bathroom. "It takes two people for a marriage to work!"

Like much of my life before mid-2005, I don't remember my wedding. (With regards to the wedding, that may be God being merciful.)

So I shouted out through the closed bathroom door, "I seriously doubt I made a vow to love, honor and wipe your ass!"

Oh, he was mad when he came out.

He yelled about how easy I had it and how hard he worked. I offered back, in loud tones, that he wouldn't even have a job if it weren't for me. Not only did I beg Gail Collins to forgive him every time he got on her bad side (which might not be all Thomas Friedman's fault -- in all the time I've know Gail and looked at her, I've never found her good side -- a problem professional photographers have as well), but I was also the only one forcing him to write those full of beans columns.

"Full of beans!" Thomas Friedman cried, seizing on the phrase. "I knew you read 'Shoe Leather and Tears'!"

"I never said I didn't," I shot back. "In fact, the empty container of Dramamine should have been your first clue that I did wade through that nonsense!"

"Nonsense!" Thomas Friedman gasped, his large hand thrown back against his forehead.

"Shall I get the vapors, Blanche?"

"You continue to fail to grasp that you are married to a creative person," Thomas Friedman snarled at me.

"And you continue to fail to grasp that no one opens the op-ed page to hear itty bitty Tommy Friedman thinks all Arabs are bad! But at least that racist nonsense beats your wasting everyone's time with obits or didn't you know that the paper already has an obituary section? Apparently Gail Collins didn't know either which is why we also got an editorial shoved off on us!"

"You just take that back!" Thomas Friedman said waving his finger at me.

"Or what? You'll burst into tears and go back to hiding in the closet!"

It was getting very Thomas Friedman in the living room. Translation, ugly, real ugly.

"I am a professional reporter!" Thomas Friedman hollered as he stamped his foot repeatedly on the carpet.

"Oh, who told you that? Dexter Filkins!"

"A.M. Rosenthal was a great man!"

"He was an anti-Arab racist! And what kind of a name is A.M. Rosnethal? Was he twins? Did they name his brother P.M.?"

"You are speaking of the dead! How dare you! He was no more racist than I!"

"You're a racist too! That's why you got along!"

"Excuse me, Betinna, I cannot be a racist, I am married to a colored woman! I mean that in a 'woman of color' way before you get all high and mighty! A racist does not marry out of his own race!"

"Well alert the NAACP and see if you can get an Image award off that!"

"I am not a racist!" Thomas Friedman yelled as he began pacing around the living room.

"Racist and drama queen!"

"Just because I sometimes enjoy a nice Prada pump does not make me a queen!" Thomas Friedman insisted. "I have flat feet! I need the built in arches! You have never understood me! Never!"

"And you've never understood that inventing a cabbie who you claim carries your columns around with him isn't talking to real people! Where do you get off slamming bloggers who you feel don't do reporting? For someone who writes War! War! War! all the time, maybe you should take your fat ass to peace rally -- like the kids did and reported on it while the lousy paper you work for wrote a bad sampler and then basically ignored it!"

"I cannot believe you said that!" Thomas Friedman squealed as he stopped pacing and clutched his chest.

"Well, it's true. You write about war all the time and you can't be bothered to attend a peace rally. How is that living up to your hero Leon Daniel's idea of being out and about and writing of what you see?"

"I cannot believe you said that!" Thomas Friedman repeated, his eyes welling with tears.

I started thinking: Geez, maybe Leon Daniels was actually a person who meant more to Thomas Friedman than Thomas Friedman meant to Thomas Friedman?

I was starting to feel a little guilty. But then I stopped.

"How dare you, Bettina! How dare you! How dare you call me a," here Thomas Friedman's face screwed into a mask of rage as he sapt out the end of the sentence, "fat ass!"

Sobbing and wailing, he ran to the bedroom and slammed the door.

"Shoe Leather and Tears"? Try leather Prada pumps and tears. The column he wrote for tomorrow should be quite interesting. "Interesting." I didn't say good.











 


Be a chatter box. Enjoy free PC-to-PC calls with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

Humor Spotlight: Wally on Desperate Congress Members

Wally provides laughter and commentary five days a week.  Here's his take on Arlen Specter snit-fit this week.
 

THIS JUST IN! DESPERATE CONGRESS MEMBERS!

BULLY BOY PRESS - DC.

THIS JUST IN!

DESPERATE CONGRESS MEMBERS!

WHILE MICHAEL HAYDEN'S GIRLISH, JOHN MCCAIN VOICE HELD THE ATTENTION OF THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, THINGS WERE HEATING UP ON THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.

ARLEN SPECTER, STILL LOOKING FOR THE MAGIC BULLET AFTER ALL THESE YEARS, DECIDED TO HOLD A VOTE ON A PROPOSAL HE DOESN'T SUPPORT: A BAN ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.

WHEN THE RIGHT, RIGHTEOUS RUSS CALLED HIM ON IT, SENATOR SPECTER PLAYED THE LOVER SPURNED.

"IF YOU WANT TO LEAVE, GOOD RIDDANCE!" SCREAMED ARLEN AS HE LOOKED FOR A KNICK KNACK TO THROW.

FINDING NONE, HE LEPT TO HIS FEET AND, IN HIS BEST NICOLETTE SHERIDAN, THREW HIS HEAD BACK, PUT HANDS ON HIPS AND SCREAMED, "YOU AIN'T ALL THAT, RUSS FEINGOLD! YOU AIN'T ALL THAT!"

IGNORING ARLAN'S ATTEMPT AT DESPERATE CONGRESS MEMBERS, RUSS FEINGOLD BLEW HIM OFF WITH A "SEE 'YA."

"HOW DARE HE!" SCREAMED AN ENRAGED ARLEN GRABBING FOR A PITCHER OF WATER AND THROWING IT TO THE FLOOR WHILE JOE BIDEN RUSHED OVER IMMEDIATELY, READY TO DELIVER A SERIES OF LENGTHY, PREPARED REMARKS. LINDSEY GRAHAM TOOK A FEW MINUTES TO SMOOTH HIS CRINOLINE PETTICOAT AND FINISH HIS MINT JULIP BEFORE STRUTTING OVER.

ARLEN WAS CRYING ON JOE'S SHOULDER. JOE HAD BEEN TALKING NONSTOP FOR 5 MINUTES. LINDSEY KNEW THE MILK TRAIN DIDN'T STOP HERE NO MORE.

"LET IT GO, ARLY," LINDSEY ADVISED.

"LET IT GO! HE HUMILIATED ME!" SCREAMED ARLEN. "HE WALKED ALL OVER ME! HE TREATED ME LIKE A TISSUE! USING ME AND THEN DISCARDING ME! WHO DOES HE THINK HE IS? JAMIE DENTON? DID YOU SEE HIM STOMPING OUT OF HERE? STOMPING ACROSS THE FLOOR LIKE HE STOMPED ACROSS MY HEART? STOMPING ACROSS THE FLOOR LIKE HE THOUGHT HE WAS DOING IT A FAVOR?"

WIPING THE TEARS FROM HIS EYES, ARLEN TOOK A DEEP BREATH, THEN LOOKED AROUND THE ROOM.

"IS ANYONE ELSE TURNED ON?" ARLEN ASKED.


Recommended: "Other Items (mini-'And the war drags on')"
"Democracy Now: NSA, Hayden and more (plus, here, Iraq Snapshot and NSA commentary)"
"michael hayden hearing broadcast live on kpfa thursday"
"KPFA broadcasts the Michael Hayden hearing Thursday morning LIVE"
"Live coverage of the Michael Hayden hearing on KPFA (9:00 a.m. ET)"
"NYT: Like an unnamed Dem is all excited and giddy about being invited!"
"Will the Public Lose its Right to Know About Toxic Releases by Industry?"
"Confirmation Hearing Opens for CIA Nominee and Former NSA-Head Michael Hayden"


Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

Humor Spotlight: Attn Pat Robertson, Rebecca Winters has a warning

We love humorous entries and the next series of highlights focuses on those.  First up, Rebecca.
 

rebecca winters has a warning

last night, janis joplin, if i heard her right, said pat robertson needed to have some good sex. also last night, jim morrison, if i heard him right, said pat robertson needed to take up drinking or, if he already has, needs to get sober.

what am i talking about?

god's personal best friend, pat robertson, if he heard the lord correctly, has been told by god, that america is going to be hit with storms and possibly a tsunami.

now the singing nun told me that god's getting really tired of pat robertson.

and mama cass told me a) don't call her 'mama' and b) that god finds pat robertson to be 1 of the worst social climbers in the world and is very weary of the way pat robertson drops HER name all the time.

cass elliot added that god's heard pat robertson even uses HER name to cut in line at amusement parks and bank lines but st. peter, heaven's bouncer, has already been warned that, despite all the name dropping, god is not friends with pat robertson and, in fact, never talks to robertson. st. peter has been instructed to tell pat robertson a) that his name is not on the list and b) there's a thin line between worship and stalking so god's taken out a restraining order to prevent pat robertson from ever being closer to god than 500 feet.

jimi hendrix explained to me that what really ticked god off was pat robertson's attempt to market himself as a weather forecaster off of god's good name.

check out wally's 'THIS JUST IN! DESPERATE CONGRESS MEMBERS!'


How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Recipe Spotlight: Cole slaw in the Kitchen

Trina's latest, written with an eye for Memorial Day gatherings.

Cole slaw in the Kitchen

Memorial Day is coming up and, for many, that means gatherings. There were a few e-mails asking for a recipe of a dish they could take -- always great to plan ahead. Samantha wrote to say she wanted to take cole slaw because it wouldn't require cooking.

Here's the problem I had, I really don't care for most cole slaw. Most of the time, you're dealing with some cabbage smothered in mayo. I mentioned to Wally's mother and Krista how I'd be providing a recipe but didn't really care for cole slaw and they both ended up providing recipes for cole slaw "you'll love!" This is a combination of two of their best recipes and it's actually very good.

I e-mailed Samantha to make sure she hadn't signed up to bring cole slaw and she wrote back that her family was "way too casual" for signing up. Which makes this dish even better. Why's that?

Picture cole slaw. You probably see green cabbage. This recipe uses red cabbage. So if you show up with the dish, it's different enough that if four people brought cole slaw, yours will still stand out. Krista told a horror story, it's why she uses red cabbage, that Wally's mother and I still can't get over. At a July 4th gathering on her father's side, one of her aunts ("who just took charge") was quite rude about the dishes brought. There were a number of cole slaw dishes and a number of baked beans. The aunt dumped all the baked beans dishes into one pot and all the cole slaw dishes into one container. Why? "They're all the same."

That is so insulting to anyone who brought the dish and since everyone has their own favorite ingredients, I can't imagine the combined dishes of either baked beans or cole slaw tasting anything but generic (unless they just ended up tasting bad).

The only one that didn't get combined, Krista said, was the red cabbage cole slaw that a cousin had brought. Both Krista and Wally's mother report that red cabbage cole slaw usually gets a little more attention if there are several cole slaws present -- just due to its color and the fact that everyone's expecting green cabbage.

Like green cabbage, red cabbage if packed with vitamins, minerals and a good source of fiber. In addition to that, red cabbage is also a source of anthocyanins which is an antioxidants. The jury may not have come back with the final verdict on antioxidants but it's thought that it might be able to slow the cross-linking that occurs within our cells as we age.

Thanks to my family, who are not fans of cole slaw either, for tasting variations and to Krista and Wally's mother for making their own version of the final recipe we're going with to make sure they, cole slaw lovers, enjoyed it as well.

Here's what you need:

2 medium red cabbages, shredded
2 bell peppers, thinly sliced or diced
4 medium stalks celery, thinly sliced and chopped
2 medium carrots, sliced and diced or strips


Two medium red cabbages? If you're an expert at shredding and see a large cabbage that's perfect, grab it. But for someone who may not be used to using cabbage, I think they'll be able to shred the medium ones easier. Krista worried about that as well and said for anyone who's confused, just do this: slice a head of cabbage into strips, then chop the strips into smaller pieces.

Bell peppers really bring a new taste to the dish. (Both Wally's mother and Krista use bell peppers.) In terms of appearance, they're shinier than carrots and give the dish a nice look as well as a wonderful taste.

Celery should be simple enough. Carrots? With all ingredients remember to rinse them first. In addition, you'll need to peel the outer layer off the carrots. You can buy carrots that are peeled but they're often smaller carrots. If you go with the already peeled carrots (still remember to rinse them off) buy eight of the small ones. Then chop them into small pieces or use a peeler to get strips.

That's the dry dish. Cole slaw requires a dressing. If you're pulling this together for the first time and your mind is reeling, Krista recommends Kraft's Cole Slaw Dressing which you buy in the bottle and then just follow the recommended directions on the back of the bottle for how much to use.

If you'd like to make your own dressing, here's an easy one that will bring out the taste of the dish:

1 cup sour cream
1/2 cup mayonnaise
1/4 teaspoon cayenne pepper
1/4 cup white wine vinegar
2 tablespoons sugar
dash of salt
dash of pepper


Combine the above in a small bowl and then stir until it has a smooth texture. Add to the cole slaw ingredients and toss to spread the dressing. Now you can use low fat or no fat sour cream and mayo. If you're worried about sugar intake or have diabetes (or you know someone attending does), you can use a sugar substitute. You can even substitute red wine vinegar if you prefer.

If you've done all the above, you're done. But, if you'd like to do a little extra, bring a container of raisins or cranberries (or both). Don't add them to the dish. Not everyone likes them and you'll end up with at least one person complaining, "Raisins!" Just provide them on the side and people can add them to their portion if they choose.

My family enjoyed adding them and the cranberries was the only thing that convinced my son Mike to eat Friday's round of cole slaw. None of them are big fans and we had cole slaw all week as I attempted to find a recipe that everyone could enjoy.

By bringing the dish, with or without raisins and/or cranberries, chances are that even if others bring cole slaw, your dish will be different enough due to the red cabbage that there won't be an attitude of "Another cole slaw dish."

I'd thought there would be something to pull from this morning's Boston Globe but there isn't anything that really reached me. (My son has highlighted which is a nice op-ed, but I was hoping for some news in the news section.) So instead, I'm offering up three headlines from Democracy Now! which can be expected to highlight the stories we need to know about. I'm pulling from the best of Maria offers each week at The Common Ills (sometimes Miguel or Francisco does the selection and they'll be doing it this summer when Maria takes a vacation with her family to Mexico). If you've never looked over the summary, please do because the point of it, the reason all three take the time to highlight it, is because Democracy Now! is providing daily headlines in Spanish and English.

"Senate Vote Makes English US "National Language" (Democracy Now!):
On Capitol Hill, the Senate voted Thursday to make English the "national language" of the United States. The measure affirms that that no one has a right to federal communications or services in a language other than English except those already guaranteed by law. Immigrant-rights activists called the vote a major defeat.

"
Senate Votes To Build 370-Mile Border Fence" (Democracy Now!):
The Senate has voted to build a fence along parts of the Mexico border to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country. In total, 370 miles of triple-layered barriers would be added near San Diego and in the Arizona desert. Senators also approved a provision that would prevent illegal immigrants from petitioning for a guest-worker permit without the sponsorship an employer. And in a unanimous vote, Senate accepted an amendment that would bar granting work permits to undocumented immigrants convicted of either a felony or at least three misdemeanors. The measure would effect even those who ignored a court-deportation order.

"
Bush: 6,000 National Guard Troops to Be Deployed to Border" (Democracy Now!):
President Bush has called for 6,000 National Guard troops to be deployed to the U.S.-Mexican border. Bush's proposal came during a rare prime-time address during which he also called on Congress to find a way to agree on immigration reform.
President Bush: "The United States must secure its borders. This is a basic responsibility of a sovereign nation. It is also an urgent requirement of our national security. Our objective is straightforward: the border should be open to trade and lawful immigration and shut to illegal immigrants, as well as criminals, drug dealers and terrorists." President Bush's call for National Guard troops on the Mexican border has already been widely criticized. Mexican President Vicente Fox called the White House on Sunday to express concern over the increased militarization of the border. In Washington numerous politicians said the National Guard is already stretched too thin.
Democratic Senator Richard Durbin: "How much more are we going to ask our National Guard? They have shown they will do everything asked of them to protect and defend this nation. They have demonstrated that in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Gulf Coast after Katrina, but our Guards and reserves are stretched dangerously thin."
According to the Los Angeles Times, members of the Guard will be deployed to the border for two-week shifts during a period when they would normally be in training. By losing two weeks of training, Bush's plan might result in Guard troops being less prepared for their primary roles -- responding to natural and other disasters.


Read all three of those and you see that the most pressing issue on the mind of Bully Boy and his supporters is attacking and scapegoating. The war must be going so well, I guess. (It's not, read C.I.'s "Democracy Now: Eduardo Galeano" for the details from Friday.) The economy must be booming, right? Wrong. But apparently attacking gays and lesbians might not fuel election hopes for 2006 so they need something to add to the mix. When you have nothing to offer the nation, you find someone to attack, in this case immigrants, so it's look like you're actually addressing the most pressing issues.

I'll add that I've always voted for Ted Kennedy and I'm glad to have him as my senator but he's dead wrong on the immigration bill. It really saddens me to see him, hear him or read of him endorsing the bill the Senate passed that does not provide any help to immigrants but does create a new hurdle for them. (Read C.I.'s "NYT: Carl Hulse provides the primer on advocacy journalism.")

Some of the things I enjoyed online this week:

"THIS JUST IN! NO BULLY BOY LEFT BEHIND!"
"Surprise interview"
"rebecca winters has a warning"
"Leather Prada pumps and tears"
"NYT: Like an unnamed Dem is all excited and giddy about being invited!"
"NYT continues to play silent and stupid on the NSA scandals""Leather Prada pumps and tears"
"Helen Reddy, Burger King, Music"
"Church Committee Counsel Frederick Schwarz on Corporate Involvement in Government Spying"
"We hold the Iraqi government and the occupiers responsible for this brutal atrocity"
"Pearl Jam does Pearl Jam"
"Who exactly are the outlaws?"
 


Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better.

Sunday, May 14, 2006

A Note to Our Readers

Hey --
Happy Mother's Day.

We're off to . . . sleep? We wish.

We're beginning to feel like Meg Tilly in The Two Jakes, asking Jack Nicholson if it ever gets better? How about just done sooner?

This edition, we offer the following reposts (and thank everyone for permission):

Music Spotlight: Kat's Korner on Pink's I'm Not Dead
NYT Criticque via C.I.
Blog Spotlight: Kat on Rolling Stone, Guns & Butter and more
Humor Spotlight: Wally on Hillary's faves
Humor Spotlight: Betty on Thomas Friedman's visit to the Russian Embassy
Empresas de telecomunicaciones ayudaron a la NSA a espiar a millones de ciudadanos estadounidenses
Music Spotlight: Kat's Korner on Josh Ritter's The Animal Years
Blog Spotlight: Mike discusses tax breaks and Barry Bonds
Music Spotlight: Kat on Pearl Jam
Blog Spotlight: Rebecca on Alphonso Jackson of HUD
Blog Spotlight: Rebecca on the head liar at HUD
Blog Spotlight: Cedric wonders if we close Guantanamo, where will we put Bully Boy?
Music Spotlight: Kat on The Millennium Collection of Richie Havens
Mother's Day Spotlight: Trina's Kitchen

We also offer new content:

"Editorial: Could it be true? Rove indicted?" -- really, can it be true?

"TV Review: When it's time to go -- That 70s Show" Ava and C.I.'s latest. They say right now that they have no idea what they wrote. But they say fans of the show should watch the finale this week, the series ender. You've been given your heads up.

"Who exactly are the outlaws?" is an essay pulling together a number of threads to ask those calm, self-satisified, Sunny Side of the Street types, exactly why aren't you frightened to death?

"2 Books, many minutes " -- write enough e-mails demanding that it return and you get your wish. We've limited the amount to two books in an attempt to make it more manageble.

"About that 'fan mail'" -- what got noticed by most non-regular readers? You can probably guess. Ty wants it noted that he's African-American. That's a point he meant to bring up in this, that e-mailers complaining that issues of race are noted assume that everyone involved in this edition is White. C.I. and Ava want it noted that people can have whatever opinion they wish and express themselves however they want. "Just don't expect us to read any of it," Ava adds.

"Professional Slime Mike McCurry stabs Milano in the back" -- Dems like McCurry think play it forward, like life, is not a beach. In their efforts to get their way through distortion, they aren't above sliming someone who did her part for the Party. Note, they'll court the anti-choice crazies, but they'll happily smear someone whose given of her time.

"Laura Flanders spoke with Cindy Sheehan on Saturday's Radio Nation With Laura Flanders" -- you shouldn't have missed Laura and, hopefully, you didn't. This is us focusing on our favorite segment from last night and, remember, it airs again tonight. (C.I. adds, "Tonight in the Eastern time zone. Adjust time for your own areas.")

"Mark Danner discusses impeachment with Larry Bensky today on KPFA's Sunday Salon" is a quick note noting Pacifica and Sunday Salon.

We had plans for other features, when time ran out, so did the plans.

The following worked on the features in this edition (except TV commentary which was done solely by Ava and C.I.):

The Third Estate Sunday Review's Dona, Jess, Ty, Ava and Jim;
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude;
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man;
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review;
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills);
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix;
Mike of Mikey Likes It!;
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz;
and Wally of The Daily Jot.

We thank everyone for their help and that includes Dallas for hunting down links.

We checked the spam folder in our e-mail account in the midst of writing this edition. ____ had written and as a result, we killed a piece that we had completed (our first completed for this edition in fact). We noted that today was a day of peace and while we disagree with the person's take, we'd kill the piece we'd planned in honor of that day.

We're a bunch of smart asses so when we pull a sincere move it may be confusing, but if ___ is reading this (no reason ___ should be), that was a sincere e-mail (look at the contents and you'll see the feature isn't up).

On this day, if there's something you can pull (not your beliefs, just possibly a criticism, perhaps, that you'd already made so on this day of peace, you can avoid not to air it again), pull it. If you're lucky enough to have a mother who is alive, take a moment to appreciate that and, most of all, appreciate her while you figure out what a day of peace means to you and for you.

Peace will come, according to plan (as Melanie sang and wrote). "With a velvet hill in the small of my back . . ."

-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.

Editorial: Could it be true? Rove indicted?

Saturday night on RadioNation with Laura Flanders Cindy Sheehan stated, of the administration, "I've been saying for a long time that I think they'll be hung by the end of this year." Could Sheehan and the rest of us be getting our wish before the November elections?

Jason Leopold, who's followed the Plamegate case closely and has a strong record of accuracy, reported on Friday:

Within the last week, Karl Rove told President Bush and Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten, as well as a few other high level administration officials, that he will be indicted in the CIA leak case and will immediately resign his White House job when the special counsel publicly announces the charges against him, according to sources.
Details of Rove's discussions with the president and Bolten have spread through the corridors of the White House where low-level staffers and senior officials were trying to determine how the indictment would impact an administration that has been mired in a number of high-profile political scandals for nearly a year, said a half-dozen White House aides and two senior officials who work at the Republican National Committee.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, sources confirmed Rove's indictment is imminent. These individuals requested anonymity saying they were not authorized to speak publicly about Rove's situation. A spokesman in the White House press office said they would not comment on "wildly speculative rumors."


And on Saturday, Jason Leopold wrote on the topic again:

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald spent more than half a day Friday at the offices of Patton Boggs, the law firm representing Karl Rove.
During the course of that meeting, Fitzgerald served attorneys for former Deputy White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove with an indictment charging the embattled White House official with perjury and lying to investigators related to his role in the CIA leak case, and instructed one of the attorneys to tell Rove that he has 24 hours to get his affairs in order, high level sources with direct knowledge of the meeting said Saturday morning.
Robert Luskin, Rove's attorney, did not return a call for comment. Sources said Fitzgerald was in Washington, DC, Friday and met with Luskin for about 15 hours to go over the charges against Rove, which include perjury and lying to investigators about how and when Rove discovered that Valerie Plame Wilson was a covert CIA operative and whether he shared that information with reporters, sources with direct knowledge of the meeting said.
It was still unknown Saturday whether Fitzgerald charged Rove with a more serious obstruction of justice charge. Sources close to the case said Friday that it appeared very likely that an obstruction charge against Rove would be included with charges of perjury and lying to investigators.


Could it really be true? Could one aspect of The Long Nightmare (a term we find more appropriate than Rumsfeld's The Long War) really be ending? No disrespect intended to Leopold, we're just a little guarded because, if it happened, this is really big.

Bully Boy's Brain, that's what Karl Rove was supposed to be. He wasn't. He was good at manipulating messages for campaigns (somewhat) but he was mainly good at going on attack. (Karen Hughes was far more involved in the message to the public. As one person wrote to the White House in a still mentioned letter from 2003, "She's us [the people] only smarter." Well, definitely smarter than the person who wrote the letter. But even the clueless didn't rush to pen lauditory notes about how Rove represented the best in all of us.)

He's a smear merchant, that's all he's ever really excelled at. Smear Max Clealand, smear John Kerry, smear anyone who speaks out. His feces is smeared all over the walls of America which is why it's difficult to believe there are none of his finger prints in the attacks and smears of Joseph Wilson that included, but were not limited to, outing his wife, Valerie Plame (who was a CIA agent).

Rove knows how to do the set up and how to do the sucker punch. Whether he was the one who put out the rumors of Bully Boy's cocaine use, as James Hatfield (the late author of Fortunate Son) asserted, it always played like Rove. Whether it was a plan that was set up ahead of time or one he stumbled upon when he'd fallen out of the Bully Boy's good graces during the first campaign for the presidency, it read like a Rove trademark.

Set up an author, whose background can be used to smear him, with the story of Bully Boy's cocaine use and then, when it gets attention from the press, bring up the author's background and ask how can someone like that be trusted?

It's not a denial of cocaine use. But it strikes some as a denial. The same way when Mary Mapes 60 Minutes II story aired asserting that Bully Boy didn't fulfill his obligations in the National Guard, the defense of Bully Boy was left to his demented fans because Bully Boy wasn't about to go on record with specifics.

Operating under the belief of "Why take the high road or the low road when the gutter's right there?" the whole thing smells of Rove.

And if Rove goes down, a lot of others should follow. As we noted last July in "Editorial: What did Hadley know and what did he do?"

Karl Rove's latest defense (as pointed out by The Common Ills) is that after speaking with Matt Cooper when Valerie Plame's name came up he immediately e-mailed then deputy national security advisor Stephen J. Hadley. And then what?
And then what?Did the e-mail confuse Hadley? Was their a follow up conversation of "Karl, what's this e-mail about?" Did Hadley immediately notify his boss (Condi Rice) what was going on? Did she follow up by notifying the Bully Boy?
[. . .]
We're not foolish enough to think the White House wasn't orchestrating the outing of Plame. But if that's going to be the spin point ("I prove I'm not guilty with my e-mail to Hadley!") then let's examine that spin point.
The spin argues Rove passed the news on up. Did it stop there? If so Hadley didn't do his job.Did it go higher? How much higher? A CIA agent was a national security issue. The outing of an agent was a national security issue.
No one's attempting to say Rove's absolved and innocent. We think he's neither. But if he's going to push this latest point, then we say let's explore it.

Now we're in the hallway and can't even see the tree, let alone the gifts beneath it, so we may be getting a little ahead of ourselves. If it's only Rove that gets indicted, we'll say, "Thank you! It's just what I wanted!" with real meaning.

We don't think Leopold's made anything up. We just know that until we shake the box and we tear back a little piece of the wrapping paper, Santa might have brought us a dopey sweater and forgotten to deliver one of the really important things at the top of our Christmas lists.

In comic books, movies and TV shows, we're told time and again that good triumphs over evil. We haven't seen much to indicate that this assertion is much more than a plot device. But, as Mama Cass/Cass Elliot once sang, "I can dream, can't I?"

We'll keep Grand Jury Dreamin' on this Mother's Day.

But we won't let the dream distract us from what's needed right now at this moment. As Cindy Sheehan writes in "The One Message That Politicians Fear" (BuzzFlash):

Now we are faced with the modern carnage of the occupation of Iraq, and still there are threats of another war of aggression in Iran. The Iraq policy is fatally flawed, especially for the nearly 2500 US deaths and for every one of these there has been 100 dead Iraqi civilians. We have to do something to build a peace movement that can stop blood-bathed foreign policy. We've demonstrated, written letters, sung songs, engaged in civil disobedience and traveled far and wide engaging our fellow Americans to demand that the troops come home.
[. . .]
The November elections are rapidly approaching, and the primary races come even sooner. Many are close elections where every vote is important. Candidates are jockeying for your support. We must tell them -- 'you don't get my vote unless you oppose the occupation of Iraq and will work to prevent future wars of aggression.'

We can dream (and we can dream big, a world beyond Bully Boy, Rove, et al) but we can also make sure not to take things for granted. (That is, after all, the role the Democratic Party has assigned itself in the last four elections. We'd hate to rob them of their chosen role.) Make demands, make your voice heard. Let every politician know that that votes are not automatic and that the people will be listened to, must be listened to.

TV Review: When it's time to go -- That 70s Show

The tail end of spring . . . when many a creative mind turns to thoughts of . . . "I kill those bastards for not renewing us!"

But it's all smiles in front of the cameras. A number of shows are winding down. On Fox tonight, Malcolm in the Middle takes its final bow. Thursday sees the final episodes of That 70s Show (one hour) and Will & Grace (two hours). Not today, but next Sunday, sees the final episode of Charmed. All but Malcolm started in 1998 (Malcolm debuted in 2000). We've seen a number of episodes of all four and we quizzed friends this week on which they'd miss?

We were surprised by the hostility towards That 70s Show . . . and then we watched. We stopped after viewing six of this year's episodes in one day.

Malcolm had to deal with the fact that child actors age (and some are no longer children) which had at least the same impact on the show as Dewey beginning to speak. Will & Grace? It rebounded, thankfully. If it had continued down the road of Grace as fashion plate . . . We'll save our thoughts because we may review it next Sunday. But it rebounded. Of the four, Charmed is the one that's remained truest to its original premise. (Yes, some would say "most true" but "truest" is a false rhyme with "premise.") Shannen Doherty left and that could have been the end of the show. Rose McGowan came in and had to deal with an audience used to Pru, suddenly learning of Paige and not sure if they were going to care.

McGowan made the role her own and fit in onscreen. There's a reason for that. How much of it was Aaron Spelling's doing and how much of it was McGowan's is open to debate. But McGowan came on as the kid sister, a little unsure, a little nervous. It's the same technique that allowed Cheryl Ladd to replace Farrah Fawcett (then Farrah Fawcett-Majors and the most popular TV actress of that season). Those were big shoes to fill. You don't do it by clomping around.

That 70s Show didn't grasp that. Josh Meyers came on at the very end of last season playing Randy Pearson, a character you never heard of before and one you weren't going to grow very fond of no matter how much the show tried to push him off on you. Meyers came in calling attention to himself, strutting around. (In fairness, that was partly the writing.)

Topher Grace had left the show and they felt the need for a new character. They seemed to feel the need for a new "Eric" and the audience never accepts that. Cheryl Ladd didn't play a character like Fawcett's Jill. Kris was Jill's younger sister. You didn't catch her on skateboard. Kris lacked Jill's atheleticism and other qualities. Cheryl Ladd introduced you to Kris' qualities.

That 70s Show elected to go another way. They brought on Meyers and had him playing pranks with Fez (Wilmer Valderrama), kidding Red (Kurtwood Smith) and generally drawing attention to himself, too much attention, at a time when Topher Grace's character is being eased out of the show. No wonder the audience hated Randy and lost interest in the show.

If you give hours to a favorite show, give years, the characters can become like family. If you feel like you're saying goodbye to your brother you really don't need some clown butting in on the big scenes. You also recoil if your "brother"'s girlfriend is immediately paired with him and, yes, the writers paired up Randy and Donna (Laura Prepon).

Creative geniuses seemed to think they could grow an insta-Eric overnight and they didn't get how opposed the audience was to that notion. Though Charlie's Angels successfully replaced Farrah Fawcett, they had a nightmare replacing Kate Jackson with Shelly Hack (and then a bigger nightmare when Tanya Roberts, who had a regular role on That 70s Show until 2001, replaced Hack). Hack didn't come on like the kid sister who was nervous and hoping you would like her. Hack came on like a functioning adult and the character was written distant and detached (someone thought that equaled "class"). The audience, that never bonded with Hack, was left to wonder "Who is this person thinking she knows everything and can just walk in here like she owns the place?"

Similar questions resulted from attempting to make Randy insta-Eric. Whether he's a lousy actor or not isn't known. (Hack was actually a good actress.) The writing has been so bad on this character that it doesn't really matter. Audiences were destined to hate Randy from the start due to the way he was shoved off on them while a popular character left.

It was a mistake to attempt to replace Grace. His character was the focal point of the show. This wasn't, as with Charmed or Charlie's Angels, a case where one important person of a trio left the show. This was the lead character. Episode after episode, Eric was the point of reference. Is Eric in trouble? Did he kill Grandma? Did he end up in jail due to a prank? Did he and Donna make out? Did he lose Donna to Casey?

All of the characters were important to the show and some could argue (convincingly) that other characters were more popular, but Eric was the point of reference similar to the way Richie was the point of reference for many episodes of Happy Days. But Ron Howard didn't leave that show overnight. He scaled back his appearances and the writers had time to shift the focus to characters already on the show. (Fonzie? Henry Winkler's character was probably more popular than Ron Howard's just as Ashton Kutcher's Kelso was probably more popular than Eric.)

No matter what else it did or didn't do, the show always had a light touch. There wasn't a lot of moralizing or life lessons showing up in the final scene. Even Grandma's death resulted in laughs. (Grandma was played by Marion Ross who, of course, played Richie's mother on Happy Days.) Supposedly, there was a panic because Grace's departure at the end of last season was to be followed by Kutcher's which left everyone worried that, as one person with the show said to us, "We'd be left with After M*A*S*H."

That shouldn't have been a concern. All the characters were likeable (the same can't be said for After M*A*S*H) and the setting wasn't changing. They could have made Stephen (Danny Masterson) the focal point or Fez or, if they truly wanted to reflect the time period the show is set in, Donna. (We think Mila Kunis' Jackie could have been the focal point as well but it would have required great skill on the part of the writers due to the character's history.) Instead, as Eric is leaving, the audience gets Randy shoved off on them and, when the final season starts up, they're still getting Randy shoved off on them as Kelso's leaving.

It never would have worked, even if Meyers had been incredibly attractive and the role written very funny. But the show went with it and that, combined with the ever changing time slot and air date, helped kill enthusiasm for a show that brought a lot of joy and laughs to the screen at a time when it seemed like every other show was either solving a murder or trying the suspect.

The show still has it moments but they're killed when Meyers is onscreen. In the most recent episode that aired (second to last episode of the series), he talked Donna into moving in with him (something the audience was never going to "aaaaawwwwwe" over) and then had a line where he held a dog and told the dog to meet its new Mommy. It fell flat. Grace could have made it funny. He'd make the line funny and he'd make Eric's realization that he'd just freaked out Donna funny as well. Meyers just stood there looking confused. In his next scene, he had a line about how, if it was the dog calling her "Mommy" that freaked her out, she should know that it wasn't actually the dog speaking, it was him. Eric's nervousness could have made that moment funny. Even if it hadn't been that funny, people might have laughed because they know Eric. This stranger who looked like he was so amused himself at that moment didn't win over anyone.

When a character's not working with the audience, you don't have to fire them. You can just make the character creepy and let the audience laugh at what they're already thinking. Once they were stuck with the character of Randy and he wasn't working, the writers should have made him the butt of every joke. Fez sighing "Oh here comes Randy who thinks everyone just loves him and wants to be his friend" in a bitter voice would have gotten laughs because it's what many people watching were thinking.

Instead, a badly written character who never fit in is seen "Hanging out . . . down the street" (as the theme song would tell it) and the whole illusion that the cast has created over the years is blown to hell. You're no longer thinking, "Oh look, it's Kitty and Eric and Donna and . . ." Instead, you're thinking, "I hate that actor." When the audience's (natural) reaction is ignored, you can't count on them to play make believe for a half hour each week.

For future reference, when you add a new character to a long running show and the audience doesn't embrace him or her, don't think that's going to change. Don't think, "I'll give the character a tender moment and everything will change." It won't, not on a comdey. The only thing that will save the character is to give it a laugh. You have to build on the audience's expectations and, if they have low expectations of the character, funny lines won't cut it, you have to make him or her the butt of jokes. That's how you can turn a despised dreamboat into a character the audience will enjoy -- the way they enjoyed Louie on Taxi or Mimi on The Drew Carey Show. If you start trying to prove to the audience that their gut was wrong and this character is noble and loveable, it won't work.

The Foreman's house could have caught fire and Kitty and Red could both be passed out in it. We could have seen Randy, and only Randy, have the bravery to rush into the house and save them. The audience's reaction would have been "eh" because they don't care about Randy. They don't like him.

With Jackie going from bitch to a little more complex and Fez going from stupid to soulful, the audience could have enjoyed a character who got on all the other characters nerves. Instead a season was wasted with writers lecturing and hectoring an audience, saying basically, "Yes, you will eat your spinach! And you'll like it!"

This Thursday, if you were a fan of the show, you will laugh at the last episode, you'll probably get a little misty-eyed as well. They could have gone into that on their "behind the scenes" tribute but they didn't. It's too bad because some word of mouth might have helped build an audience for the final episode. Instead, unless audiences decides that two hours is too much of Will & Grace & Karen & Jack, the show's going to go out with a ratings whimper.

That 70s Show didn't always have the funniest joke or the most original (the Annie Hall rip-off a few years back was neither fresh nor that funny) but what put it over was the cast. They were all convincing in their roles and you really believed these characters would interact with one another. Because the writers and producers didn't believe in the cast as much as the audience did you've now got seven strong seasons for syndication and one season that will find audiences grabbing the remote and hollering, "Honey, it's a Randy episode! Want to watch . . . Empty Nest is on! How about we watch that instead?"

That's really a shame because the characters remained strong (in writing and in performance) and this last season could have been about exploring them. That Donna's only just now grasping that she's put her life on hold may be the most shocking thing about the character after the change in hair color. For two years now, she's had her life on hold. (Two years of episodes. The time span that's covered within the show we have no idea. When the show premiered the year was supposed to be 1976. They've all graduated high school, two seasons ago, and it's eight seasons since the show debuted so who knows how they track time?)

Kitty (Debra Jo Rupp) has been entertaining throughout. But it was a mistake in one episode (we have no idea when it aired, but it aired this season, it was one of the six we watched in one day last week) to have Kitty rip into Donna ("slut") because Randy and Donna were an item. The audience wasn't thinking "Donna, you slut." They were thinking, "Who is this creep hanging around Donna?" Had the writers given Kitty a "Now you just back off, buster . . ." type line the audience would have laughed, hooted and applauded. Kitty, who always became the voice of truth on the show when she was ticked off, would have been the perfect character to say what was already on the minds of everyone watching. And because it was Eric's mother, it would have really resonated with the audience.

But no one grasped that. The point here is that, as the seasons mulitply, audiences often know better what makes a show work and what doesn't. What happened in season eight indicates that the show needs to shut down, that it should have ended in season seven (but again, long time fans of the show, even if you've tuned out this year, you'll want to see the final episode, that's all we're saying). With a long running show, many times the characters wear out their welcome. You're bored with them, you're tired of them. This is especially true when a performer begins to think they're cute. (Yes, we're thinking of Scrubs but many shows fit in here.)

That didn't happen with That 70s Show. If you ask people who stopped watching, you didn't hear, "Oh, Kitty just got on my nerves this last season!" Or, "Stephen's doing the same thing he always does!" (We did hear from one person, a large person size wise, that everyone had gotten "fat." We're not really sure what show the person thinks they were watching but we did make a point to check out weight since that was the only person who now "hated" the characters. ) People still liked the characters. We had questions of, "What's going on with Jackie and Fez?" and "What funny thing did Red say lately?" (We weren't able to answer in the middle of the week -- we hadn't sat down to watch the show -- but we did call everyone this weekend and tell them they really needed to watch the final episode.)

One person put it best, in our opinion, when she said that she didn't "stop" watching, she was "driven away." (By the introduction of Randy.) So the point here is that everything has an ending, a time to go. It's time for That 70s Show to go before writing does more damage to your memories of it as a funny, fast paced show populated with characters you liked and wanted to spend time with. If you were a fan, watch the last episode to get the real goodbye the show owes you. (They pay up.)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }