With Where to Invade Next’s potted racialist history of the
US and its view that women should rule the world, Moore has, of course,
added identity politics into the mix in his “happy film,” as he calls
it.
It is hardly accidental that Moore has been so inactive since Barack Obama took office in early 2009. (Capitalism: A Love Story
came out that year.) His new movie is a ludicrous attempt to cover for
the Democratic Party, hoping against hope that he can convince it to
adopt policies that, he takes pains to point out, all originated in the
US. Moving the Democratic Party to the left is the most hopeless and
pathetic of perspectives.
Moore has become a sometime critic of the Obama administration, after
endorsing the Democratic presidential candidate in 2008 and supporting
the auto bailout in 2009, which halved autoworkers’ pay. However, he is
hopelessly tied to the Democratic Party and capitalist politics by a
thousand strings. While excoriating Obamacare, for example, as “a
pro-insurance-industry plan,” he termed the plan a “godsend” because it
provides a start “to get what we deserve: universal quality health
care.”
The filmmaker is a seriously compromised and increasingly discredited figure.
-- Joann Laurier, "Charlie Kaufman's often charming, moving Anomalisa (and Michael Moore's feeble Where To Invade Next)" (WSWS).