The documents WikiLeaks published, obtained by Chelsea Manning, revealed evidence
of serious criminal wrongdoing by the United States armed forces. They
shined a crucial light on some of our government’s ugliest actions
abroad. Because the US government does not like to have its secrets
exposed, and needs to send a message to anyone who undermines its
authority, it needs to prove that its security state has global reach
and that even people outside the US will be seized.
This prosecution is about silencing dissent rather than enforcing the
law. The accusation against Assange is that nearly 10 years ago he
tried unsuccessfully to assist in breaking a government password. How
often does doing this result in a years-long federal investigation and
an extradition request? Or US senators declaring a foreign national the
“property” of this country? The Obama administration fished for years
to find a charge that would stick to Assange, but ultimately couldn’t
find a way of going after him that wouldn’t also criminalize ordinary
acts of journalism. Donald Trump’s government is less scrupulous.
Some have argued that Assange isn’t under attack for “journalism”, but for “activism”. Frida Ghitis of CNN wrote
that Assange “is not a journalist and therefore not entitled to the
protections that the law – and democracy – demand for legitimate
journalists”. This is a dangerous position. Generally, the law doesn’t
actually distinguish between “journalists” and “non-journalists”, giving
everyone the same protections. This is for good reason: if such a
distinction becomes legally relevant, it means the government is
empowered to decide who the True Journalists are.
-- Nathan Robinson, "Many Democrats and liberals are cheering Assange's arrest. That's foolish" (GUARDIAN).