Sunday, August 13, 2006

Blog Spotlight: Elaine reporting on a friend's speech

Elaine reporting on a friend's speech.
 

Iraq

Another day where Iraq vanishes from the coverage. Unless, possibly, you think the most important coverage of Iraq is who wins the Democratic primary in Conn. If that's Iraq coverage for you, then maybe you got a taste of it today. If you think that's the weakest nonsense in the world and you're disgusted that independent media has given up on Iraq, then you probably aren't very pleased with the coverage. I'm not. Please visit Mikey Likes It! for Mike's thoughts.

"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Chaos and violence continue in Iraq today, Tuesday, August 8, 2006. Bombings, a bank robery . . . all part of what the
AFP term "Bloody Day in Baghdad." And while people continue to dicker in the United States with games of "Is it or isn't it a civil war," Mohammed A. Salih (IPS) reports on Iraqi politicians who "way that the country is in civil war already." This as the so-called 'crackdown' (in beefed up form) appears to . . . crack apart.
Strongest dose of
reality comes from Patrick Cockburn (CounterPunch): "The vast city of seven million people, almost the size of London, is breaking up into a dozen cities, each one of which is becoming a heavily armed Shia or Sunni stronghold. Every morning brings its terrible harvest of bodies. Many lie in the streets for hours, bloating in the 120F heat, while others are found floating in the Tigris river."
Bombings?
In the captial,
ITV notes "three near-simulaneous bomb explosins near the Interior Ministry building." Police officer Bilal Ali Majid tells the AP that at least 10 are dead and at least 8 wounded from the three bombs. Al Jazeera puts the toll at nine and notes "[t]wo roadside bombs exploded in the main Shurja market in central Bagdad within minutes of each other, killing 10 civilians and injuring 50". CBS and AP place the death toll at 10 for each bombing (20 total). AFP notes that ths market blast "set fire to several shops."
This is the AP in case anyone's confused (some early reports lumped the two attacks together): "Three bombs exploded simultaneously near the Interior Ministry buildings in central Baghdad, killing 10 people and wounding eight, police Lt. Bilal Ali Majid said. A couple of hours later, two roadside bombs ripped through the main Shurja market, also in central Baghdad, killing 10 civilians and wounding 50, police Lt. Mohammed Kheyoun said."
Reuters notes a police officer was wounded by a roadside bomb "in the eastern Zayouna district of Baghdad"; in Iskandariya, two people were wounded by a roadside bomb; and, in Tikrit, a police officer was killed by a roadside bomb (eight people wounded "including a child").
Shootings?
Reuters notes two civilians were shot to death in Rashad, "a police lieutenant colonel" was shot dead in Falluja (his brother was wounded), and two were shot dead in Mosul.
CNN reports that, in Muqdadiya, three people were shot dead (including a teacher) and that drive-by shootings claimed two lives in Baquba. AP notes "two Sunni brothers . . . slain in their car repair shop in southwestern Baghdad:.
In addition to the above, the
BBC notes the death of "three security guards and two bank officials" during a bank robbery in Baghdad today. AFP notes that the robbery of the al-Rasheed Bank utilized three cars and that the interior ministry is saying it only netted "seven million dinars (less than $5,000)". The AP states it was two cars.
Corpses?
CBS and AP note the discovery of nine "bullet-riddled" corpses in Kut. AFP notes that at least seven were "Iraqi border guards." Reuters notes that seven corpses were found "south of Baghdad" and that they were "wearing military uniforms". And the AP notes two corpses found in Baghdad ("shot in the head").
In addition, the
BBC reports: "Also on Tuesday, a US soldier died of wounds sustained in fighting, the US military said"; while CBS and AP report: "Two Iraqi journalists were killed in separate incidents in Baghdad, police said Tuesday. Mohammed Abbas Hamad, 28, a journalist for the Shiite-owned newspaper Al-Bayinnah Al-Jadida, was shot by gunmen at he left his home Monday in western Baghdad, police Lt. Mohammed Khayoun said. Late Monday, police found the bullet-riddled body of freelance journalist Ismail Amin Ali, 30, about a half mile from where he was abducted two weeks ago in northeast Baghdad, Lt. Ahmed Mohammed Ali said. The body showed sign of torture, he added." The AP reminds that the two are "among more than 100 Iraqi and foreign media workers slain here since the U.S.-led invasion of 2003."
Mohammed A. Salih (IPS) notes that Nouri al-Maliki (prime minister and puppet of the occupation) no longer pushes the "reconcilation project" and that Abdullah Aliawayi (Iraqi parliamentary member) describes it as "failed." Nouri al-Maliki's criticism of the "U.S.-Iraqi attack on Mahdi Army's stronghold in Baghdad's Sadr City" continues. Jeffrey Fleishman (Los Angeles Times) writes of the attack: "Families sleeping on rooftops to escape the summer heat were startled early Monday by helicoprters and gunfire" and that the action "killed three people, destroyed three homes and sent families scurrying for cover." (For those who wonder about the heat, a friend says it is 110 degrees in Baghdad right now). As AFP noted yesterday: "An AFP journalist in Sadr City reported that the raid on the area, a stronghold of the firebrand cleric, was accompanied by air strikes." Today AFP notes: "Coalition aircraft were called into action after the Iraqi army snatch squad came under fire, and at least three civilians were killed." Coalition aircraft would most likely mean US military aircraft. Elsa McLaren (Times of London) notes Times' colleague James Hider's observation that "This security plan is basically the last chance to save the country from civil war. It seems like he [al-Maliki] is trying to distance himself. There is a very fine line between sending your troops out to attack militia that are linked to a government party." Hider himself writes that "a clear rift" has opened between puppet al-Maliki "and the American military" which leads to "doubts about whether the security forces would have the political backing required to tackle powerful militias beholden to parties in the governing coalition."
In Baghdad, the trial into the murder of
Abeer Qasim Hamza and three of her family members continue (as well as into the alleged rape of Abeer). This is the case that yesterday, as Reuters notes: "A US military court heard graphic testimony about how US soldiers took turns to hold down and rape a 14-year-old Iraqi girl and murderer her and her family." Ryan Lenz (AP) reports that the attornies for the four troops currently serving (James Barker, Paul E. Cortez, Jesse V. Spielman and Bryan L. Howard; Steven D. Green is no longer in the military) accused of rape, murder and arson are calling for "a new hearing, accusing Yrbie's counsel of deliberately asking incriminating questions. A ruling was expected later in the day." Anthony Yribe is accused of dereliction of duty for alleged failure to report the incident, he is not accused of rape, murder or arson. Also, CNN reports that a witness testified of "colleagues who drank whiskey and cough syrup and swallowed painkillers to cope with their jobs." The witness, Justin Cross, was asked if Steven D. Green could have done the crimes by himself and Cross responded, "Green does nothing by himself."
In the United States, peace activist Cindy Sheehan and others continue their protests in Crawford, TX.
Sheehan is quoted as saying of the Bully Boy, "He can shorten his vacations or not show up at all, but he's not hiding from the truth." Camp Casey III is up and going again this summer. Writing of Sheehan and the first Camp Casey last year, Tom Hayden noted: "Cindy Sheehan inhabits an alternative world of meaning that more Americans need to experience before this war can end. She represents the survivors' need to define a meaning in her son's death -- and her life -- that is counter to the meaning offered by President Bush. That is why she refuses any condolences, and why she continues to ask the President what was the 'noble purpose' for which Casey Sheehan died."
In
an interview with Dan Bacher (Toward Freedom), Sheehan spoke of the Troops Home Fast action and noted, "We hope the fast will galvanize public attention, invigorate the peace movement, build pressure on elected officials, and get our troops back home." Troops Home Fast continues with at least 4,549 people taking part today from around the world.
In other peace news,
Edwin Tanji (The Maui News) reports that Bob Watada, father of Ehren Watada, is getting the word out on his son (first known commissioned officer to refuse to deploy to Iraq) and will appear at Maui Bookseller (Wailuku) today at four p.m. as well as on the TV program Crossroads tonight at 7:00 p.m. Maui Democratic Party leader Lance Holter says of Ehren Watada: "I'm awe-struck by this man's bravery. He has taken on the entire American military machine and standing up for principles of honor and justice and American patriotism. There is no more patriotic man than this person."
Courage to Resist and ThankYouLt.org are calling for a "National Day of Education" on August 16th, the day before Ehren Watada would be due to "face a pre-trial hearing for refusing to deploy to Iraq." ThankYouLt.Org notes: "On August 16, the day prior to the hearing, The Friends and Family of Lt. Ehren Watada are calling for a 'National Day of Education' to pose the question, 'Is the war illegal?' This day can also serve to anchor a 'week of outreach' leading up to the pre-trial hearing."
In Australia,
AAP reports "Soldier 14" will be the next to testify into the April 21st death of Jake Kovco in Baghdad. In addition to Soldier 14 testifying in person, AAP reports: "The inquiry is also this week expected to hear more evidence about the bungled repatriation of Pte Kovco's body from witnesses appearing on a video link from the Middle East." Last week, one of Kovco's former roommates testified that the repatriation was contracted out and done on the cheap, tying that into the mix up that led to the body of Bosnian capenter Juso Sinanovic being sent to Australia instead of Jake Kovco. Those remembering how the scene of Jake Kovco's death was cleaned up before the investigation into what happened began won't be surprised by Ian McPhedran (Australia's Courier-Mail) report that it's happened again -- in this instance David Nary ("father-of-five SAS Warrant Officer") died in Kuwait last November and the military board's finding include "criticism for the lack of procedures to preserve an incident site."
In election news in the United States, as Ned Lamont challenges Joe Lieberman (polls close at 8:00 pm EST) for the Senate seat currently occupied by Lieberman, commentators sees the race as a sign post.
Stephen Schlesinger (Huffington Post) draws comparison to Eugene McCarthy and LBJ in 1968 and offers that: "A Lamont triumph or near success will make (and is already making) Democrats like Senators Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden shift progressively more in favor of withdrawal from Iraq and is certainly going to alter the entire spectrum of political views over the issue of Iraq, not only for Democrats, but for Republicans, too. In short, this is likely to be the turning point". Arianna Huffington (Huffington Post) takes a look at Lieberman's "strategy" noting: "Anxious to move Iraq to the backburner, Lieberma dug deep into his long history in the Senate to find a reason why Connecticut voters shouldn't send him packing tomorrow. The biggest selling point he came up with? 'I don't hate Republicans,' he said while arguing that he wasn't President Bush's 'best friend and enabler.' Talking points for the ages."


Are we the United States of Israel (some might argue we are and I could see their point based upon the weapons and other support we provide)? Last time I checked we were officially the United States of America. My point is that a war the US declares, an illegal war, that continues, that drags on, seems like a story that independent media would be interested in. But they aren't.

I was going to write about Abeer tonight but I got a call and someone else wants to grab that. I'll highlight the post tomorrow and my lips are sealed other than that. I was happy to say, "Grab it" because I actually had something else I wanted to write about as well.

A friend who served in Iraq (not a patient, he's a friend and I referred him to others when he got back because I didn't think it would help him to have me as a therapist) gave his first speech today. I had blocked out my schedule so I could go this afternoon. Sunny wanted to go as well (and I should have thought to invite her ahead of time, my bad) so we went ahead and closed the office.

This was the first time he was going to be speaking to anyone that wasn't his therapist, a friend or a support group of fellow vets and he was nervous. Do you know what he was most nervous about?

That no one would care. That no one would be interested. What gave him that idea?

Sunny and I weren't surprised when he said, "Well it's not really a topic these days."

We assured him it was a topic. It's not one the media cares about but people do. I have never seen him as nervous as he was before the speech and I attended his wedding. He is a very shy person. Happy to blend in with a group, never one to attempt to grab the spotlight.

He was speaking to a group of kids that will likely be increasingly targeted by recruiters this year (they were all high school students, with parents who live paycheck to paycheck in an econmy that provides less and less of a safety net).

For about the first two minutes, his voice was shaking. Then he got into the speech and by the time he was taking questions, he was completely over his fear. (But he told us after, he thought he would be as nervous if he spoke again. He has a thing next week that's been lined up by someone at his church, high school kids again, and he's already nervous about that.)

The kids loved it. They loved that he didn't pull punches. He went over all the empty promises they'll hear and the reality. He spoke of how while he was over there, all those empty promises didn't help a bit and his wife had to go on food stamps. (Which I hadn't known. She and I get together about once a month. After the speech, I asked about that and he said she was too embarrassed and he was as well. So if you know someone who has a husband or wife serving in Iraq, don't be an idiot like I was an assume that if they need something they will ask. Offer. Offer repeatedly. It may not be needed. But better to offer something that's not needed than to assume there is no need.)

He was injured over there and he talked about that and the kids had a lot of questions about injuries in general. One young man said that, more than anything else, that's what he feels the media doesn't cover "unless there are just like five people injured a year, you know?" His point was he can usually find coverage of that, five injuries, a year. He wondered what it was like in the hospital and how many people were there. He was the one who asked the question but you could just feel the room lean collectively forward as the question was answered at length.

The young man had a follow up question (putting him miles ahead of most 'reporters') which was why that wasn't covered? My friend responded that if it were covered, it would hurt recruitment. There was a lot of physical nodding to that and verbal was well (example, shouts of "Word" and "I hear that").

A young woman, and there weren't that many young women attending which surprised me because they are targets for recruiters, talked about how the calls were already coming, she's going into her senior year this year, and that they'd only picked up over the summer. So my friend asked for a show of hands for who had a been called at their home by a recruiter and every hand in the room went up. There was one young man who didn't look very old to me and I did ask him after how old he was? He was fifteen-years-old and he's already been called twice -- once by the Army, once by the Navy.

I do a group, volunteer, with young women and we decided to take the summer off but when that starts back up, my friend's already agreed to speak to them. (I told him we'd all be sitting in a circle and that eased the pressure. He hates the focus that standing in front of a group brings.)

He did a wonderful job speaking. I'll be at the second engagement and report how that goes. He's going to bring some photos of when he was wounded and during his recovery because he was surprised the kids were interested in that. (Why was he surprised? Because no one talks about it -- I mean the media.)

The other big question that he was asked was if he knew why the US was over there? He was shipped over early on and he talked about how the reasons had changed and, that by the time he left, most people had stopped wondering or citing any reason because "they'd all fallen through and you're over there just trying to stay alive, just trying to make it through each day, counting them down."

He brought up the 172nd Stryker Brigade (which was supposed to be home this month but Donald Rumsfeld extended their year of duty by a year) and how that just "freaks with your mind because you've been telling yourself '30 more days, 20 more days' and the end is in sight when all the sudden the count starts all over."

Please check out Wally's "JOE LIEBERMAN SUDDENLY CARES ABOUT THE DISENFRANCHISED!" and Kat's "I love KPFA but I can't take any more of this 'THE ONLY STORY IS ISRAEL!'."


Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

NYT Criticism (via C.I.) It takes . . . a paper of Hazels

NYT: It takes a paper of Hazels to clean up the crimes against Abeer

In this morning's New York Times, Paul von Zielbauer's "Bank Robbery and Bombs Kill 24 in Iraq" continues the paper's traditions with regards to the Article 32 hearing into the murder of
Abeer Qasim Hamza and three of her family members as well as the alleged rape of Abeer Qasim Hamza:

*Don't name the dead, it might provoke outrage and we can't do that because --
*We're schilling for the defense at the paper of record

Saturday, of course, presented the defense argument in text form, before the defense was even able to argue it.

Abeer Qasim Hamza? Not covered. Not named, not discussed. Has a murder victim in a case the Times has covered ever been so unexplored? Or so buried in the paper. Think back to their non-stop, every day, usually front page coverage when Michael Jackson stood trial.

They've explored the accused (even digging through Steven D. Green's adolescent wrap sheet), offered testimonials on how hard things were for the US soldiers accused. (On the latter, long before the trial began.) But fourteen-year-old Abeer? A question remark the paper refuses to explore. They don't even print her name anymore. Go to clamp down on any outrage Americans might have apparently.

Outrage? The Times worries far too much, media has abandoned Iraq. Press criticism has as well which is why the Times can render Abeer Qasim Hamza invisible day after day and know that few will bother to call them on it.

Details from the case, when they make it into the paper, are watered down. After all, it was Reuters, and not the New York Times, that penned this statement: "A US military court heard graphic testimony about how US soldiers took turns to hold down and rape a 14-year-old Iraqi girl and murderer her and her family." In the Times we never get how brutal the rape of Abeer was. It always get cleaned up and von Zielbaur is far from the only Hazel but he's proven himself quite adept at grabbing the dust mop.

von Zielbaur offers this today:

Several soldiers testified Sunday and Monday that a former member of Company B, Steven D. Green, thought up the plan to attack the family and rape the girl, and persuaded the other four, during card games and while driving golf balls, to go along with it.

If von Zielbaur is going play catch up, where's the chicken? CBS and AP (and everyone else that's done even a half-way decent job reporting this story) noted what Zielbaur "reports" today but did so on Monday:

U.S. soldiers accused of raping and murdering a 14-year-old Iraqi girl in the town of Mahmoudiya last March drank alcohol and hit golf balls before the attack, and one of them grilled chicken wings afterward, an investigator told a U.S. military hearing Monday, citing a soldier's sworn statement.


And it was the Times of London and not the Times of New York that reported the following (on Monday):

Barker said that he held the girl's hands while Sergeant Paul Cortez raped her or tried to rape her. Barker then switched positions with Cortez and attempted to rape the girl, but said he was not sure if he had done so, Special Agent Bierce told the hearing.

What's going on? Does the New York Times have a horny foreign correspondent who's identifying with the accused, who is thinking, "Well fourteen is only four years from eighteen . . ."? What is going on because you damn well better believe that if this happened in Chicago or Atlanta, there would be so much outrage and disgust but for Abeer? Only silence.

What happened to Abeer was disgusting. What the Times (and some of the others in the press) are doing to her now is inexcusable. Where is the outrage? Or is the fact that we'd have to have coverage for their to be outrage?

It can't be the "alleged" issue because Abeer, her five-year-old sister and her two parents were murdered. That's not alleged. From details of her condition when discovered, she was raped. From statements made in the hearing (including the confession that the military investigator testified about -- from Barker), she was raped. At what point in the coverage is Abeer presented?

von Zielbaur's so busy with his dust mop he can't even report on yesterday's testimony about the drinking, using cough syrup to get high, et al. von Zielbauer offers:

Several soldiers also testified to a grisly tale of how Mr. Green tossed a puppy off the roof of a building and set it on fire.

That is appalling. Possibly von Zielbaur had a puppy growing up so he can identify with violence aimed at an animal. It's too bad he and others at the Times are so uninterested in reporting on the testimony that soldiers took turns holding down Abeer and raping her or attempting to.

Martha notes Andy Mosher's "At Rape Hearing, U.S. Soldiers Describe Stress of War" (Washington Post):

Eugene Fidell, a Washington military law expert, said Tuesday that the defense attorneys were most likely emphasizing combat stress to argue that their clients not face a possible death penalty in the event of a court-martial. "This is not a defense known to the law," Fidell said. "But this kind of evidence could come in during the court-martial, and it might be pertinent to the sentence. They could be setting the stage to avoid a death penalty."

von Zielbaur misses that too but, then, he and the paper have been too busy presenting the defense's argument.

Rebecca's back from her break and her latest is "raped and murdered, 14 year old abeer can't defend herself, who's going to step up to the plate?" and Kat notes that today "on KPFA's The Morning Show, 'after the 8:30 headlines,' Iraq will be a topic discussed. 'A look at US media coverage of Iraq.'" That's 8:30 a.m. PST.

Blog Spotlight: Cedric Explains It All (on the importance of Ehren Watada)

Cedric breaks it down on the importance of Ehren Watada's stand and the importance of others standing with him.
 

Iraq & Ehren Watada

"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills)
Chaos and violence continue in Iraq today, Thursday, August 10, 2006. At least 35 die in a bombing, Ehren Watada supporters try to raise awareness of his upcoming Article 32 hearing, no one appears to be watching the American fatality count and a witness in the death of Jake Kovco tells the military inquiry, of his statement, "
That's the words that were already on the computer" -- not what he actually told investigators.
As all things media big and small go breathless and stupid over the fact that 4 captors or "captors" of Jill Carroll may or may not have been arrested (three of which would have been arrested back in May) reality's out there and two families in America probably won't be joining the blather.
Yesterday the American military announced that on Tuesday a "60 Blackhawk helicopter from 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing" crashed. The crew numbered six. Four were found (injured). Two were missing.
As some blather on over (at best) a three month old bust, the US military sneaks out the whisper that the two missing are dead. As well as those two dead,
KUNA reports US army publicist Barry Johnson announced "three soldiers died in attacks in Al-Anabar." Of the three, Reuters reports they "were assigned to the 1st Brigade, 1st Armoured Division". We're going to drop back to June 15, 2006 for a moment when the Pentagon announced that 2500 American troops had died in Iraq.
For over six weeks, as big media and indy media have provided their wall-to-wall, non-stop coverage of Israel's armed aggression, would you guess that the body count is up to
2597.
Let's repeat that. On June 15, 2006 the Pentagon announced 2500.
97 American troops have died since then -- and where is the coverage?
Big media, little media, do American news consumers grasp that since June 15, the number of US troops killed has risen by 97?
Starting with peace news, though many in the media continues to ignore
Camp Casey III, the Green Party has announced that "Greens Join Cindy Sheehan at Camp Casey." Bill Holloway states: "We stand by Cindy Sheehan and the Gold Star Families for Peace in calling for an immediate end to the U.S. occupation of Iraq. The Green Party has opposed the war from the beginning, before the invasion was launched."
In other peace news,
Karen Button (uruknet.info) interviews war resister Kyle Snyder who went on self-leave from the US army a year ago and is now in Canada. Snyder addresses his time in the military (including being prescribed Lorazipam and Paxyl for grief -- grandfather passed away, fiancee miscarried) and the 'reconstruction' he saw: "I was in Mosul. I was in Baghdad. I was in Stryker. I was in Scania. I was in Tikrit. . . Iraq is the size of Texas, it's a small country. People need to realise that. There were reconstructions of forward operating bases and military bases, but no city work being done. I mean, none of that. So, why are engineers there."
Ehren Watada is the first known commissioned officer to refuse to deploy to Iraq. In exactly six days
Courage to Resist and ThankYouLt.org are calling for a "National Day of Education" on August 16th, the day before Ehren Watada would be due to "face a pre-trial hearing for refusing to deploy to Iraq." ThankYouLt.Org notes: "On August 16, the day prior to the hearing, The Friends and Family of Lt. Ehren Watada are calling for a 'National Day of Education' to pose the question, 'Is the war illegal?' This day can also serve to anchor a 'week of outreach' leading up to the pre-trial hearing."
Rod Ohira (Honolulu Advertiser) reports on the upcoming rallies and speaks with Michael McPhearson who speaks of the issue of consciousness being raised by Ehren Watada's actions: "That's the most dangerous to the pro-war people." Lester Chang (Kauai Garden Island News) reports that Watada's mother, Carolyn Ho, will visit Kauai September 10th (5:30 pm, United Church of Christ in Hanapepe) to talk "to Kaua'i folks about my son's stand and issues that surround that particular stand, and why he thinks the way he does." On this visit and the actions taking place to support Ehren Watada, his attorney tells Chang: "It is important that public opinion supports Lt. Watada. I think it will have impact on how the case proceeds."
Turning to the violence and chaos in Iraq, we'll start with news of bombings.
Of the reported violence today, the one most covered is the one that
Elsa McLaren (Times of London) describes this way: "A suicide bomber has killed at least 35 people and wounded 90 near a sacred Shia shrine in the city of Najaf in southern Iraq today."
The explosion occurred,
BBC's Mike Wooldridge reports, as "the streets leading to the shrine were packed with pilgrims and shoppers in the middle of the morning". CBS and the AP quote a man injured during the explosion: "Before I reached the checkpoint, only a few (feet) from the shrine, I heard a huge explosion. Something hit me on the head and I fell. I couldn't hear for a while but I saw bodies and human flesh everywhere." Elsa McLaren (Times of London) reports: "Television footage of the devastation showed the body of a child being laid besides other bloodied corpses on a patch of ground beside a hospital. The dead were marked and numbered with white labels on their foreheads for identification." AFP notes: "The attacker detonated an explosives-packed vest at a police checkpoint in the historic city of Najaf, a short distance from the mausoleum of Imam Ali, one of the most revered figures of the Shiite faith, police said Thursday." Reuters reports: " Ambulances drove through the streets of Najaf appealing for blood donations as the scale of the carnage became clear."
Reuters notes that a roadside bomb in Hawija killed two police officers and left two more wounded. Reuters reports: "Six people were killed by a bomb in a restaurant in southern Baghdad". In Baghdad, three people died and at least five were wounded when mortar bomb landed on a restaurant (this is not the same incident as the bomb that killed six in southern Baghdad).
Shootings?
Reuters reports a police officer shot to death in Falluja, a civilian killed in Mosul and "Maad al-Saadoun, a brother of Sunni legislator Mudhhir al-Saadoun, was shot dead by gunmen in his car in the town of Muqdadiya". CBS and AP report four police officers were shot dead in Baghdad, AFP puts the number at seven (citing "security and medical sources")..
Corpses?
The
AP notes that five corpses were found today. From AFP: "Baghdad's main morgue last month handled the corpses of 1,850 people from its immediate region alone, most of them gunshot victims, Iraqi health ministry spokesman Qasim Yahia told AFP." Reuters notes: "The July morgue toll of 1,815 marked a big jump over the 1,595 in June and is the largest since the aftermath of the February bombing of the Shiite Golden Mosque of Samarra, which triggered an explosion of sectarian violence.:
On April 21st, Jake Kovco died in Baghdad. How he died is the main issue of an inquiry currently going in Australia. Other issues include why the death scene was cleaned up before investigators arrived, how a Bosnian carpenter was confused with Kovco and shipped to his grieving family in Australia (Shelley Kovco, widow and mother of their three children; parents Judy and Martin Kovco). Soldiers serving in Iraq have been brought before the hearing in person and via "video-link" testimony. Soldiers are identified not by name but given a number.
Yesterday, "Soldier 14" dropped a bombshell.
Peter Charlton (Courier-Mail) reports that the soldier "told the inquiry that a statement he made to military investigators was not accurate." The so-called buddy system policy (where they were paired up and responsible for checking each other's weapons to be sure they were unloaded at the end of their shift) doesn't appear to exist. Which is strange considering how much the hearing had previously heard of it. Tom Allard (Sydney Morning Herald) notes that Soldier 14 "is the second soldier in Iraq to say their statements were strongly guided by military police." Allard reports of Soldier 14's statements: "His testimony came as more irregularities about the investigation emerged, with the military failing to pass on to police in NSW a second weapon in the room when Private Kovco died from a gunshot wound to the head."
Dan Box (The Australian) reminds that "Military police investigators also failed to conduct any forensic tests, while the army's decision to clean the room in which Kovco died and the clothes his roommates were wearing meant potentially vital forensic evidence was lost." The AAP reports that Soldier 30 has spoken (via video-link) to the hearing ("Jake Kovco's commanding officer") and he is claiming that the orders not to preserve the death/crime scene came from him because he saw it as a way "to help boost the morale of his soldiers." Which is either the biggest lie or the most frightening thing about the hearing this week.
In America, the legal news is over Nathan Phan will face charges. As
reported by Josh White and Sonya Geis (Washington Post), Lt. Phan is rumored to soon be facing charges for an April 26th incident in Hamdaniyah where US Marines alleged "grabbed an Iraqi man from his home, bound his arms and legs and shot him in the face." Daniel Strumpf (voiceofsandiego.org) traces the other allegations against Kilo Company (Phan is "the commanding officer of the Camp Pendleton based 2nd Platoon of Kil Company in the 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment") noting "seven Marines and a Navy corpsman . . . were charged with murder, kidnapping and conspiracy, in connection with the April 26 death of Hashim Ibrahim Awad . . . in Hamdaniya"; and that "six Marines from Kilo Company, three of whom were already charged in Awad's death . . . were accused of assaulting three Iraqi men on April 10".
Finally, in election news,
Derrick DePledge (Honolulu Advertiser) reports that Dennis Kucinich (who came in second in ""Hawai'i presedential cacus two years ago") is in Hawaii to campaign for US senator Daniel Akaka. Next month, Akaka faces Ed Case in a primary race. Case doesn't support a withdrawal of troops from Iraq and though Case would no doubt call it a 'tremendous oversimplification,' he's a War Hawk. His motto "The Time is Now!" apparently refers to dragging the illegal war on: "The Time is Now to Continue The Illegal War!" Like a Little Joe Lieberman, Case flounders while Akaka makes Iraq a central campaign issue. Ad DePledge notes, Daniel Akak was one of thirteen senators on June 22nd willing to call for the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq by July 2007.

I told C.I. I was going to write about Ehren Watada and C.I. forwarded me an e-mail which I'll post in full after I'm done writing. It's about the ways you can support Ehren Watada and was sent out by Courage to Resist.

But let's talk first. Where is the coverage of Ehren Watada? You read the snapshot. His mother is working hard to get the word out. You know his father is from previous snapshots. Who in independent media is interviewing them? Who isn't?

Does press make a difference? Yes, it does. If you're not covered, your issue isn't known. In seven days, Ehren Watada faces an Article 32 hearing for refusing to ship over to the illegal war in Iraq. He's offered various other things. He'd be willing to go to Afghanistan (which isn't peaceful). He's offered to take forms of discipline. All the military wants is to send him to an illegal war. They don't want anyone telling them "no."

When we say "no" the war ends. So it's important to support Ehren with his "no." If you've ever protested or signed a petition or done anything to try to stop this illegal war, then you must believe that you can make a difference.

Ehren is saying "no." He can make a difference. He is making a difference but it will be a huge difference with quick impact if we show our support.

If we don't, he stands alone.

We have come together for rallies. We've shown our strength in many ways.

If we stand with Ehren, we make his "no" stronger.

If we don't stand with him, we not only fail him, we fail the effort to stop the war.

Think about all the men and women serving and realize that some have to feel like Ehren does. They may be thinking about taking their own stand. If they see Ehren standing alone after doing such a brave thing, they're not going to feel that support will be there for them.

Did you ever take a stand? If you did, think about that. Did other people support you on it?

In 3rd grade there was this kid Toby who had been left back twice and was a tall kid and pretty huge. He would boss everyone around. He'd tell you to get out of the sandbox and boys and girls would do it. He'd tell you, "Get out of that swing!" and kids would.

One day, I was in line on the slide. Toby comes up and goes, "Get out of my way." There were people behind me and I was about to get to climb the ladder to the top of the slide. People always got out of line when he'd do that.

It was a long line. I might just want to go down the slide for the whole recess and try nothing else and would only get two turns because the line was so long.

So when he came up to me and said that, I didn't want to get out of line.

I was a lot smaller than Toby, a lot smaller. He was probably a foot or more taller than me.

But I'd been waiting to go down the slide and I didn't feel like giving that up because some bully wanted his way.

So I said "no."

He got in my face and snarled, "What did you say?"

He had to lean in and bend because he was so much taller. I remember his breath was like sour milk and he looked mad.

I just repeated "no." The kids were all talking about it in line and people were coming over to see what was going on.

"Get out of line!"

I told him to go to the end of the line because I'd been waiting and so had other kids.

One kid piped up (he became my best friend in school) saying, "Yeah, go to the end of the line."

All it took was one other kid. Suddenly everyone in line was chanting, "Go to the end of the line!"

Now I took my mini-playground stand and didn't know how it would turn out. It worked. He went to the end of the line. But even if he'd punched my lights out, it still would have been worth it because it was something to see everybody on the playground start chanting that. It went from my future best friend to everyone in line and then all the kids on the playground.

It was powerful for playground moments.

If we could do something like that with Ehren Watada, just stand with him saying "no" -- it would make such a huge difference.

So, if you ever took a stand, think about it. Did you get support? If you didn't, realize how lonely you probably felt. If you got support, remember how good that felt.

Ehren said no to fighting in an illegal war because he knows it's illegal. Now the Tobys want to come up and say, "You'll do what I say!" We can stand up because it's not just about Ehren. It's about all of us saying no to the war.

Here's a copy and paste of the forwarded e-mail:

Help support Lt. Watada during his pre-trial hearing
Be part of the Aug. 16 "National Day of Education" (& action)!

On August 17, U.S. Army First Lieutenant Ehren Watada will face a pre-trial hearing for refusing to deploy to Iraq. “It is my conclusion as an officer of the armed forces that the war in Iraq is not only morally wrong but a horrible breach of American law. The war and what we’re doing over there is illegal,” explained the first military officer to publicly take such a stand.
The Friends & Family of Lt. Watada call for a National Day of Education to pose the question, “Is the war illegal?” This day can also serve to anchor a “week of outreach” leading up to the pre-trial hearing.
Teach-in's, house parties & outreach
On Wednesday, August 16 – the day prior to Lt. Watada’s pretrial court hearing – we are asking friends to organize house parties or larger public gatherings to look at the facts. This could be as simple as hosting a potluck, showing a video and sending around a petition and a collection for Lt. Watada’s legal defense fund.
A few examples
Fort Lewis, WashingtonOn Aug. 16, at the Interstate 5, Exit 119 Bridge at the entrance to Fort Lewis supporters will gather beginning at 4 PM with a 6 PM rally. Seattle’s local Support Lt. Watada Committee is helping to organize carpools. For carpool information, or to hook up the Seattle committee contact Cindy Sousa at 206.734.5040.
Lancaster, PennsylvaniaPresident Bush will visit the Eden Host Resort in Lancaster on Aug. 16th for a political fundraiser. The
Lancaster Coalition for Peace and Justice will host a peaceful demonstration outside of the Eden beginning at 5:30 PM to protest illegal war and to support Lt. Watada.
Los Angeles, California
Nikkei for Civil Rights and Redress and the Asian-American Vietnam Vets Organization is holding a press conference to express support for Lt. Watada. Speakers will include Vietnam War veterans, local religious leaders, and a WWII Japanese-American draft resister. Aug. 16, 9:30 AM at the JACCC plaza in Little Tokyo.
Let us know what you’re planning!Please use visit
www.ThankYouLt.org and select Contact Us (Subject: "Other") to tell us about your upcoming event in support of the National Day of Education.
Order or download materials
Check out
www.thankyoult.org for videos of Lt. Watada’s statements, flyers, petitions to gather signatures, resource lists and information packets. Click on Resource Toolkit for additional materials.
Order t-shirts, posters, stickers, buttons, postcards, and info cards in time for the Aug. 16 National Day of Education. Order today to ensure you get your stuff by next Wednesday! All orders placed by Thursday morning, August 10 will ship that afternoon. All orders include free shipping, and orders of $20 or more ship 2-3 day USPS Priority Mail.
We also suggest showing a film like “Sir! No Sir!”, Voices of Patriots, or Why We Fight (available via Netflix and Blockbuster).
Help Lt. Ehren Watada put the war on trial!
Your donation toward Lt. Watada's defense is urgently needed.
Friends and Family of Lt. Watada
www.ThankYouLt.org


Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

Blog Spotlight: Mike with a few questions for NYT

Mike asking a question that needed asking.
 

Is NYT's Paul von Zielbauer's a pervert?

Blogger/Blogspot was down so Wally, Tony and I went to the movies. I'm starting late and I know the title's "provacative." Is he a pervert, a pedophile, a rapist or just a really bad reporter. (I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and go with "bad reporter.") Guess what? NYT brought it on themselves.

Paul von Zielbuaer's "Bank Robbery and Bombs Kill 24 in Iraq" is one in a series of article by him and others (are Carolyn Marshall and Robert F. Worth pedophiles/perverts/rapists) that the paper's run supposedly about Abeer Qasim Hamza but they never are and they don't name her. Note this from CNN: "Iraqi authorities have identified the girl who was raped and shot to death as Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi. Her father, mother and 5-year-old sister were also killed, and the 14-year-old's body was set on fire after she was killed." Wow. Abeer has a name.

Not in The New York Times. Each day they cover it, they fail to mention her name. They don't provide details about her. They don't provide much of anything. Except they offer the defense's version of the events. That the four soldiers who were accused in the Article 32 hearing (which just concluded and will have a verdict of whether or not there is enough evidence to charge them with rape, murder and arson) were stressed and tired.

You know what, though? The New York Times argued that (in a news article, with all these friends and fellow soldiers of the accused) before the defense ever did. They did that in Robert F. Worth and Carolyn Marshall's "G.I. Crime Photos May Be Evidence." How obvious was the one-sided "reporting"? So obvious that on that morning, C.I. wrote this:

Is the insanity defense going to be used because they'd have to be at least temporarily insane to think rape was okay (one they plotted for some time allegedly). And the rape victim was a fourteen-year-old girl. That's disgusting and the fact that the paper of record can't name her, can't try to report on her story from her angle is disgusting.

Did you catch Andy Mosher's "At Rape Hearing, U.S. Soldiers Describe Stress of War" in The Washington Post this morning? He wrote:

Eugene Fidell, a Washington military law expert, said Tuesday that the defense attorneys were most likely emphasizing combat stress to argue that their clients not face a possible death penalty in the event of a court-martial. "This is not a defense known to the law," Fidell said. "But this kind of evidence could come in during the court-martial, and it might be pertinent to the sentence. They could be setting the stage to avoid a death penalty."

"This is not a defense known to the law." But somehow Robert F. Worth and Carolyn Marshall knew about it. Did the defense help them write that article or do they just know how to think like a child molestor? Which is it, help me out here? Maybe they're not pedophiles, maybe they just like to argue the case for pedophiles?

It's a defense not known to law says a legal expert. But before the defense argued their case and presented this "not known to law" defense, Robert F. Worth and Carolyn Marshall had already provided it in The New York Times. That seems strange to me. How did they know? How did they just happen to know? Hmmm.

It's strange too how details get reported in other outlets like The Washington Post (disclosure: through C.I. I know some people at the Washington Post, I wouldn't say "friends" because I don't know them that well but I'll note that I know them and seem like good people) and the Associated Press and Reuters and The Times of London never make it into The New York Times. It's funny because these are always details that present the accused as people not under stress but as craven criminals.

Now why is that left out? I just have to wonder again if pedophiles are writing these defense pieces for the accused? Does The Times employ pedophiles? Can Bill Keller look into that? Can he figure out why the victim goes unnamed and unexplored but we've got the violins playing overtime for the accused day after day?

I can't figure it out. I can't figure out why an Article 32 hearing into murder, rape and arson isn't front page but a dumb ass story that cell phones are "cool" in Iraq is a front page story. Can you figure that out?

I'm stuck wondering how a supposed newspaper can offer story after story that gives you all the defense points (even before they're presented) in a case but never tell you about the victim or even offer her name. Maybe they aren't pedophiles? Maybe they're just rapists or rape friendly? There has to be some sort of explanation for it, right?

So what is it? Are they the pro-rape paper, the pro-pedophile paper, the water carries for the defense paper or just a really crappy newspaper with crappy reporters? My guess? They are a real crappy newspaper with crappy reporters.

Will they quote the closing argument tomorrow? I don't see how, it's a slam on every report they've run on this case where they've told you over and over about the stress and bad times: "Murder, not war. Rape, not war. That's what we're here talking about today. Not all that business about cold food, checkpoints, personnel assignments. Cold food didn't kill that family. Personnel assignments didn't rape and murder that 14-year-old little girl."

Geez, sounds like the prosecution's been reading the whining from NYT reporters.

By the way, I was supposed to cover Jake Kovco tonight. I called C.I. and apologized on that. C.I. was speaking today and had to get the snapshot done quickly and I'd said last night, "I'll grab Kovco." I looked and it's a lot. I called C.I. and said, "It's late here but I can cover it if you'll talk me through some points." C.I. asked what else I was writing about and I said, "The New York Times." C.I. said just cover that and the snapshot will pick up Kovco tomorrow. Jake Kovco's an important issue. I can follow all the ins and outs in the snapshot because C.I. breaks it down (and would say, "I usually have help breaking that down" -- yeah, right :D) but today's news was about the whole first investigation and pretty intense. Tomorrow C.I. will walk us all through and I'll feel like a dope but I'd rather not make a mistake on the Kovco case because it's important.

Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" and then I'm going to bed (it's 11: 31 right now as I'm about to copy and paste and I've got work and school tomorrow):

Today, Wednesday, August 9, 2006, violence and chaos continue in Iraq with Allister Bull (Reuters) noting that the central morgue in Baghdad received nearly 2,000 bodies in July while Centcom's announced that a US helicopter crashed Tuesday in the Anbar province ("60 Blackhawk helicopter from 3rd Marine Aircrwaft Wing") which had six crew members of which two are still missing.
Elsa McLaren (Times of London) reports: "A desperate hunt is under way in Iraq today for two American servicemen whose helicopter crashed inside the 'triangle of death' west of Baghdad." As the search goes on, an Article 32 hearing concludes into the murders of Abeer Qasim Hamza and three of her family members with military prosecutor Captain Alex Pickands arguing of the four US troops accused of rape, murder and arson, "They gathered over cards and booze to come up with a plan to rape and murder that little girl. She was young and attractive. They knew where she was because they had seen her on a previous patrol. She was close. She was vulnerable."
Speaking with Andrea Lewis today on
KPFA's The Morning Show, John Stauber discussed the results of a recent Harris Poll which found 50% of all respondents wrongly believed that Iraq had WMD which is "an increase from 36 prercent in February 2005." Stauber noted the pre-war coverage (unquestioning) and pre-war propaganda (which never panned out.) "If voices of authority repeat a huge lie [. . .] that gets people supporting a war [ . . .] then that lie sticks. And this war was sold to the American public on two huge lies: that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and that he was behing 9-11."
"What is going on here?" wondered Andrea Lewis. Which is a good question. Stauber pointed to Rick Santorum falsely claiming that WMDs were found and Fox "News" and the right-wing echo chamber running with the lie. Because, not stated, the right-wing will continue to sell this war and peddle lies. While the coverage of Iraq vanishes from the media (in all its forms) it doesn't vanish from the right-wing echo chamber..
Note this finding from the poll: "
Seventy-two percent believe that the Iraqis are better off now than they were under Saddam Hussein (slightly down from February 2004 when 76 percent said this was true)." Why would poll respondents think that when the UN estimates 100 Iraqis die each day from violent attacks? Don't they know the reality and status of the 'reconstruction' projects? No. They generally don't and when the media decides they need to ALL pick up and go after another story, when the coverage of Iraq is a one-story-a-day thing (New York Times) or one topic a week (radio, magazines, etc -- once a week when we're lucky -- we're supposed to be grateful for the once a week treatment of an illegal war launched by the US administration) then the problem really isn't the people -- the problem's the media. One quite proud to pat themselves on the back in every venue and forum but not too interested in focusing on Iraq.
People care about this topic (now more than ever as
a CNN poll demonstrates most recently), it's the media that either is bored or just doesn't give a damn. Elaine (Like Maria Said Paz) reported yesterday on the surprise of a returning Iraqi vet who spoke to a group of young adults -- his surprise that they were interested in the topic and interested in his injuries and all the injuries that the press doesn't have time to cover.
Bombings?
Al Jazeera reports on a mortar attack in Baghdad which "collapsed a three-storey building" and left some worried that "some people were still trapped in the rubble." Five people are known to have died. Reuters reports three Iraqi police officers dead in Habaniya from a roadside bomb; the death of a civilian in Kirkuk from a roadside bomb; the death of a civilian by a roadside bomb in Baghdad; three civilians wounded by a roadside bomb in Ramadi; and, in Kirkuk, a roadside bomb wounded three Iraqi soldiers. Also CBS and AP note that, in Samarra, a police officer died on Tuesday while attempting "to defuse a roadside bomb" and another police officer was injured in the blast. Associated Press reports that a US solider was wounded by a roadside bomb in eastern Baghdad
Shootings?
Pay attention here because you know
the New York Times doesn't bother to include shooting fatalities in their 'rounded' daily undercount these days. Reuters reports the death of "Army Colonel Qasim Abdul Qadir" in Basra ("on his way to work"). CBS and AP report that Abedl-Qadir was attacked by "gunmen on two motorcycles". Reuters notes that, in western Baghdad, five civilians were shot dead.
Corpses?
Reuters reports that, in Baghdad, nine corpses were discovered ("killed by gunshots"), two corpses ("shot in the head and chest") were found in Dour. and, in al-Zab, a behaded corpse was discovered.
In the case of
Abeer Qasim Hamza? From CNN: "Iraqi authorities have identified the girl who was raped and shot to death as Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi. Her father, mother and 5-year-old sister were also killed, and the 14-year-old's body was set on fire after she was killed." The Article 32 hearing has concluded. CNN reports Alex Pickands (military prosecutor) making his closing argument with the following: "Murder, not war. Rape, not war. That's what we're here talking about today. Not all that business about cold food, checkpoints, personnel assignments. Cold food didn't kill that family. Personnel assignments didn't rape and murder that 14-year-old little girl." As the BBC notes, the Article 32 hearing was to determine whether or not should be charged with rape, murder and arson. CNN notes that the deterimination will be made by "investigating officer, Col. Dwight Warren" and that' "Warren's report will likely be at least a few days in coming".
Ehren Watada is the first known commissioned officer serving in the US military to have refused to deploy to Iraq.
Gregg K. Kakesako (Honolulu Star-Bulletin) reports: "The army has rejected 1st Lt. Ehren Watada's offer to resign instead of facing a possible court-martial for refusing to deploy to Iraq." The HawaiiChannel.com concludes: "[i]t's looking more likely that Honolulu Army Lt. Ehren Watada will be court martialed for refusing to serve in Iraq." Hoyt Zia (publisher of Hawaii Business Magazine) addresses the case of Ehren Watada with "Having the Courage of Your Convictions."
Kakesako notes: "Army 1st Lt. Ehren Watada is scheduled to face an Article 32 pretrial hearing at Fort Lewis, Wash., on Aug. 17. That hearing is equivalent to a preliminary hearing in a civilian criminal court, and is expected to last a few days."
The 17th is when the hearing is scheduled to begin. Remember
Courage to Resist and ThankYouLt.org are calling for a "National Day of Education" on August 16th, the day before Ehren Watada would be due to "face a pre-trial hearing for refusing to deploy to Iraq." ThankYouLt.Org notes: "On August 16, the day prior to the hearing, The Friends and Family of Lt. Ehren Watada are calling for a 'National Day of Education' to pose the question, 'Is the war illegal?' This day can also serve to anchor a 'week of outreach' leading up to the pre-trial hearing."
Cindy Sheehan is in Crawford, TX with Camp Casey. Why? As
Missy Comley Beattie (OpEdNews) writes: "Thousands of Iraqis are dying each month. Coalition troops are perceived not as liberators of grateful Iraqis free at last from the grip of a tyrant. Instead, we are occupiers and our incursion has unleashed sectarian violence that shows no sign of abating. Life is so bad in Iraq that its citizens long for the days when Saddam Hussein was in power." For those reasons and many more, Camp Casey III matters. Alison Sterling Nichols tells Chris Durant (The Times-Standard) that, "There are more people here than there were in the first few days last year."
Today is day 37 of the
Troops Home Fast action which will continue until September 21st. Today, 4, 549 people are taking part from across the world. Remember you can do a one-day fast, a one-day-a-week fast or longer. More information is available at Troops Home Fast.
With
CNN reporting the results of their latest poll -- "Sixty percent of Americans oppose the U.S. war in Iraq, the highest number since polling on the subject began with the commencement of the war in March 2003" -- the sea of change on the Iraq war is obvious to all but the Bully Boys and Joe Liebermans.


Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

Humor Spotlight: Wally explains troops can't leave but Bully Boy can run

Wally tackles the Bully Boy on the Run.
 

TROOPS CAN'T LEAVE IRAQ BUT BULLY COY CAN RUN FROM CRAWFORD!

BULLY BOY PRESS - CRAWFORD, TX.

THIS JUST IN!

TROOPS CAN'T LEAVE IRAQ BUT BULLY BOY CAN RUN FROM CRAWFORD!

WHILE MAINTAINING THE U.S. SOLDIERS SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE WALKING TARGETS IN IRAQ WITH NONSENSE THAT TO WITHDRAW U.S. TROOPS WOULD BE "CUTTING AND RUNNING," BULLY BOY DID A LITTLE CUTTING AND RUNNING OF HIS OWN.

PICTURED BELOW IN A PHOTO OF HIS MORNING JOG, BULLY BOY'S SIMPLE JOG TURNED INTO A MAD DASH WHEN HE THOUGHT HE SAW CINDY SHEEHAN IN THE DISTANCE.








EVEN THE BELLY SHIRT HE WORE DIDN'T STOP HIM FROM SWEATING LIKE A PIG WHEN HE THOUGHT CINDY SHEEHAN MIGHT BE AROUND.

SO IT'S PROBABLY A GOOD THING THAT THE CHICKEN PRINCE WHO MADE OUT LIKE BUNNY-FU-FU SCAMPERING AROUND THE NATION ON 9-11 IS PLANNING ON LEAVING CRAWFORD AUGUST 10.

WHILE BULLY ON THE RUN CAN'T FACE THE WOMAN WHO LOST HER SON IN HIS ILLEGAL WAR, HE EXPECTS U.S. TROOPS TO CONTINUE SERVING AS WALKING TARGETS BECAUSE, AS HE PUT IT, "I CAN'T TALK! I CAN'T TALK! I KNOW THAT SHEEHAN WOMAN IS AROUND HERE SOMEWHERE! HELP ME HIDE! HELP ME HIDE!"







Recommended: "Iraq snapshot"
"And the war drags on"
"NYT: Continuing render Abeer Qasim Hamza invisible"
"Other Items"
"NYT: Dexy puts on his black gymnastic tights and plays Big Sis"
"Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts 'Bully Boy on the Run'"
"NYT: Rendering Abeer Qasim Hamza invisible again"
"Jess' Summer Vegetable Blend in the Kitchen"
"Friday night"
"Law and Disorder on tasers, Iraq"
"Bully Boy on the run but the press is too busy playing Red Cross"
"Law and Disorder, Three Cool Old Guys, Iraq"
"Quick Saturday post"

Humor Spotlight: "Thomas Friedman

With Cynthia McKinney losing the runoff, Betty wasn't sure she could be funny this week.  But she tried and she was.  Here's the latest chapter from the ongoing novel of Betinna ("WIfe of the not so great Thomas Friedman).
 

"Nobody pushes Thomas Friedman around!"

It's been a crazy two weeks. I'm so far behind in this journal.

I'll try to catch up through last Friday.

Last Friday, my husband Thomas Friedman broke with the "New York Times." Thomas Friedman is calling it his "Jane Fonda moment."

Well, he's calling it his "moment like that actress." Ever since she "block-blocked" him, Thomas Friedman refers to her as "the actress."

"Block-blocked" meaning when she was holding on to the number one spot on the "New York Times" bestseller list with her book "My Life So Far" while his brand new book, "My Head Is Fat", was left to linger lower on the chart.

"Block-blocked" him from penning an instant chart topper. He's still very bitter about it. For Thomas Friedman, a grudge, like his overhanging gut, isn't something easily gotten rid of.

But he's convinced he's now like "that actress." That he's done an act of bravery.

"Watch and see, Betinna," he said to me, "I'll look as good as 'that actress' 20 years from now."

Really?

Because he doesn't look as good now.

But here's how it started. Thursday morning, I left for classes early. I did have a test but mainly didn't enjoy sitting with him at the table, trying to eat my breakfast, while he plopped one of his clown feet on the table and began cleaning underneath his toe nails with a fork.

Shortly after I left, he tried on his new foundation garmets and then a mumu dress (white) that he tries to swear is just like one Marilyn Monroe wore in a film but he can never remember the name of the film and stalls when you press him on it.

He'd used gym socks to round out his "bosom" He just focused on size and ended up with "lumpy" breasts. He applied his make up and then put on his wig.

Normally, he then plops himself in front of the TV with his "Saved By the Bell" DVDs. But he was so pleased with his lipstick, that he just had to show someone.

Not having any friends left, that left him with either waiting around until I came home at the end of the day or modeling the 'new look' for his co-workers.

Unwisely, he elected to go into the office.

As I've pointed out many times before, Marilyn Monroe didn't have a mustache. But that was far from the only problem my pudgy husband Thomas Friedman had when it came to dressing up like Marilyn Monroe.

He swears the cab driver (who, naturally, he also swears is from China and grew up reading all of his columns and, naturally, clipped some -- which he carries around in his wallet in case he ever meets Thomas Friedman) thought he was Marilyn Monroe. He finally had to tell the Chinese man that he wasn't Marilyn Monroe because he was so convincing.

At which point, he immediately pulled columns he'd clipped out of his wallet and began praising Thomas Friedman for his "insight," "wisdom" and "charisma."

Some people might believe that -- I mean some actually believe his columns so they'll swallow anything. I chose to let it pass because, when I later found him, he was enraged.

What enraged him?

Gail Collins and Bill Keller.

The way he tells it, David Brooks also thought Thomas Friedman was Marilyn Monroe. David Brooks was convinced and taken in and, appparently, taken with MM.

As David Brooks flirted suggestively with Thomas/Marilyn, Gail Collins had a snit fit.

Supposedly, Gail Collins marched over, grabbed a sock-full of boob and insisted, "They aren't even real. Mine are!" To which David Brooks asked, "Where are they?" causing him and Thomas Friedman to burst into giggle spasms.

Offended, Gail screamed for Bill Keller and insisted that she couldn't have anyone on the op-ed pages with bigger breasts than her's (does that mean John Tierney is fired?) so Bill Keller berated Thomas Friedman for "showing Gail up, showing Gail what a real woman really looks like."

Thomas Friedman said he stormed out of there.

Now I spoke with Bob Herbert because I called to compliment him on Monday's column and his first words were, "I did not laugh at him. I felt sorry for him, went into my office, closed the door and didn't come out until the whole thing was over."

The whole thing?

As Bob Herbert tells it, Gail Collins thought Thomas Friedman was in costume for a column he planned to write about how trans-national was similar to transvestites. She was actually excited and had unearther a mother lode of information about transvestites in the 19th century. She went to go get her research as David Brooks came over.

"My, you're a big girl," Brooks reportedly said to a sheepisly giggling Thomas Friedman.

As Gail returned, she found Thomas Friedman singing "My Heart Belongs to Daddy" to an increasingly uncomfortable David Brooks.

"What the hell is going on here?" she snarled.

"Don't be a jealous hefer," Thomas Friedman snapped.

Gail apparently tore off his wig and told him, "Keep your hands off the Brooks."

Insisting that he couldn't help it if men found him desirable and "Gimmie back my wig!" with a few swear words tossed in for good measure, Thomas Friedman grabbed Gail's hair (which really isn't a wig) and tugged hard.

A fight ensued and who knew Gail had a mean right hook? Mealy Mouthed Baby, if not Million Dollar.

Thomas Friedman was on the floor screeching in pain when Bill Keller wandered out of his office asking, "What happened? Did Arthur increase our co-pay again?"

Seeing Thomas Friedman and his get-up, Bill told him the outfit was disruptive to the office and that he couldn't wear it to work again.

"Nobody pushes Thomas Friedman around!" he shouted as he left amidst vows of revenge.

Which is how he came to write Friday's column, "Time for Plan B." See, the "New York Times" had planned to call for a withdrawal of troops from Iraq when "the time is right." Which Gail had estimated would be 2012. She's even decided on a title which seemed strangely familiar though she swore it had come to her during a book club meeting with her prayer group ("Should This Marriage Be Saved?"). Thomas Friedman decided to beat them by six years.

He couldn't stop laughing at the thought of Gail missing several weeks worth of "Sex in the City" in syndicated repeats as she desparately attempted to fill the hole left in her editorial schedule.

It was a bitter laughter as she'd never returned his wig.

Thomas Friedman always has to have the last word, but usually he's comfortable letting someone else have the last laugh -- he is, after all, Thomas Friedman. But the wig was important to him. Not having it drove home the concept of "loss" to him resulting in that op-ed.

But soon after it ran, he replaced the wig. Then the 'fun' really began but that's for another day.


How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Blog Spotlight: Betty filling in for Rebecca

Wrapping up her stint filling in for Rebecca,  Betty  had a number of topics she wanted to address.
 
 

Cynthia McKinney & other things (including Iraq)

Still Betty here, filling in for the honeymooning Rebecca. Tomorrow, Cynthia McKinney faces a runoff and I support her. I think she has a lot of support.

I also know she has a lot of attackers (like the Atlanta Journal Constitution and the faux Black Cynthia Tucker). But she's stood up time and again.

I help out with The Third Estate Sunday Review (and am glad to do it, it's a lot of fun, they brought me in before I started my own site because I was curious about what I was getting myself into). I always get feedback from family and friends on stuff that goes up there. The one that my family loved the most recently was "McKinney v. Lieberman -- who you gonna root for?" and I kept being asked about that and told (not asked), "I know you pushed for that!"

Actually, I didn't. I wish I could claim credit. It was C.I. who raised the topic and we all agreed.
I think it's an important piece and am proud to have participated. But I usually don't suggest things. I've usually got my kids and my sister's kids (unless we've flip-flopped which night we're grabbing) and if you ever read something there about children's DVDs or snacks, that'll be me.
When things are tossed around, I'm usually still getting the kids settled. That's what's on my mind.

I wish I had thought of it and would love to be able to say I had. Ty throws out a lot of ideas but usually he's going by the e-mails. Cedric will toss stuff out. Wally does toss out ideas. He always will then toss to me because Wally and I both have sites where we're trying to be funny. So there are things that we really can't cover. And if the pitch session was later in the evening, I would probably have ideas. But most of the time, I'm on the phone listening and standing in the kitchen passing out juice boxes.

But I am proud of participating in that.

There's a lot more that goes into the print edtion (and poor's Ty's significant other is stuck distributing that right now, around the campus, because everyone else is in California) and my mother loves the print edition. I get a copy mailed because I asked for one early on. Now I get one because my mother wants to read it. She loves it and thinks some of the best things go in there. Usually, if something goes there only, it's because it didn't quite come together or it's something we want to say (for example about the minimum wage proposal) but don't want to give Republicans ammo. (That always has to do with pending legislation.)

The most popular feature in my family is always Ava and C.I.'s TV reviews. When the print edition arrives and I drop it off with my mother, I'll find my father a day or two later, in the living room in his chair, laughing out loud at one of those reviews and he's read it days before but he's still laughing. He will read my things from my site to his friends and he reads the TV reviews to his friends. He prints my stuff up and keeps it in a folder. He's a proud and loving father. But with Ava and C.I., he's just a fan. When Ava and Jess visited this summer, he was on the phone to his friends, telling them to come over and meet Ava. He made her read a few paragraphs. Dad's one of the few people who reads their things right. I mean when he reads it aloud. He has their rhythms down pat. A lot of people will read (and laugh) but they don't do the pauses or inflections that Ava and C.I. do.

I told C.I. that once and Dad demonstrated and explained that he loves comedy and wore out his comedy albums in the days of vinyl due to playing them over and over. Dad could probably do standup and that's something I didn't grasp until I had my first child. He was caring and loving but oh so serious. My mother's funny. And was funny in front of us. But once I became a mother, Dad said I'd entered the parent club and he could treat me as an adult and not a child. (I belive that would have come later regardless of whether I had a child or not. But I had my first child at nineteen. )

Sherry wondered about "the father or fathers" of my children? It's one man. He's not involved with them and he prefers it that way. I prefer not to talk about him because I wouldn't have much to say. He thought he wanted to be a father and then, years later, decided he didn't. He's stuck with that decision.

I don't run him down to the kids. If they ask, which they usually don't anymore, I'll note that everyone makes choices of how to use their time. That's all I say to them that's negative. His parents love their grandchildren. I probably don't talk about him for that reason as well, there's no point in having them put on the spot. (He also decided that he'd done too much for everyone and that included his parents. He has no contact with them either.)

In his view, he was used by everyone. That includes me and our children. That's his view. I obviously disagree. My life didn't end nor did the children's. His involvement did. That's the way it goes.

I've said more here than I've ever said in one sitting in real life. (If my best friend since jr. high reads this, she'll be shocked because she always tells me, "You need to let it out and get it out.")
I e-mailed Sherry back (a little less than this) but figured if she was asking, others might be wanting some sort of answer as well so that's going to have to be it.

I spent my day at work, came home and fed the kids, then went out with a friend in Cynthia McKinney's district and went door to door for a few hours reminding people to vote tomorrow.
So I'm really tired and keep stopping to yawn. (You're probably yawning as you read this.) So I'll go ahead and start winding down. If you're in McKinney's district, please turn out tomorrow. We have a lot of yes-men in Congress. We need strong people who will stand up and speak up and Cynthia McKinney has never been afraid to that. She didn't wait for polls to speak out against the war on Iraq and she didn't wait for polls to speak out against the Bully Boy.

Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" and it's covering a lot:

Chaos and violence continue in Iraq today, Monday, August 7, 2006 -- even if the "world's eyes" (media) elect to focus elsewhere.
While the failed "crackdown" attempts to beef up Baghdad and
George Casey ("Top U.S. commander in Iraq") holds a press conference to proclaim the military equivalent of "Check's in the mail!" (Casey claims things will be okey-dokey by the end of September) reality suggests otherwise with the AFP reports at least 26 Iraqis dead on Monday and BBC correspondent Paul Wood noting "of John Abizaid ("head of US Central Command") "that this is the first time the generals are talking openly about the possibility of a civil war." And more details emerge into the death of Abeer Qasim Hamza and her family as a US military investigator testifies before the Article 32 hearing.
Before turning to today's violence, we'll note the latest peace news.
On Sunday, Cindy Sheehan returned to Crawford, Texas for Camp Casey III. Last summer, the first Camp Casey's were set up to honor her son Casey Sheehan who died April 4, 2004 as well as the other lost lives of this illegal war.
W. Leon Smith (Lonestar Iconoclast) reports on (and from) the new location for Camp Casey (several acres owned by Sheehan) and notes Sheehan's belief that the new location "will be safer than where we were before, and we won't be in the way as much as we were before. We are good neighbors. . . . If they can't put up with our presence for a few weeks, when our soldiers and the people of Iraq are suffering constantly because of what our other neighbor George Bush did, then I think they need to learn to relax a little bit and learn to live with us because, I promise you, I love Crawford and we will be good neighbors."
As The Lonestar Iconclast notes "
Bush Is Back . . . But So Is Sheehan" which reports this is Bully Buy's "59th" trip to the ranch and that "[a]s of Saturday, he had spent all or part of 384 days (more than a year of his presidency) in the area, which has drawn considerable criticism among those who believe that presidential vacations should be limited, especially when catastrophes abound throught the world."
This August, Bully Boy cuts his vacation short because he's a "
Bully on the Run" ("Bully on the Run") with Sheehan back in Crawford. Angela K. Brown (AP) reports that, on Sunday, "Sheehan and more than 50 demonstrators again marched a mile and a half toward Bush's ranch, stopping at a roadblock" and that the activists began a chant of "This is what democracy looks like! This is what democracy sounds like!"
As the
AFP notes, Cindy Sheehan's return to Camp Crawford follows her trip to Jordan with other activists (including Medea Benjamin, Tom Hayden, Ann Wright, Diane Wilson and others) where ""We met with Iraqi parliamentarians, elected officials, who have peace plans and goals that they want to accomplish in Iraq, and all of them said the occupation is the cause of the problem and the occupation has to end."
For the Bully Boy, the only thing ending is his retreat to Crawford since he will now spend precious few days at his ranchette but
will weekend in Maine this month and hang out at Camp David. Clayton Hallmark (North Texas Indymedia) reports on the Bully Boy's ranchette, which used to be a hog farm (and still house a pig -- at least during vacations), noting that "[t]he new main house is built like a motel but with porch on the back instead of the front"; that the "style is that of an office factory" and that it "was built by a religious commune from nearby Elm Mott, TX (the FBI-decimated Branch Davidians were from Elk, also nearby), out of yellow-beige native limestone".
While Bully Boy is planning on pulling a disappearance stunt (shades of his releationship with the National Guard),
Richard Benedetto (USA Today) reports that Sheehan intends to stay in Crawford until September 3rd.
When Sheehan returned to Camp Casey, others on the
CODEPINK and Global Exchange sponsored trip to Amman, Jordan are hoping to arrive in Lebanon today -- those include Medea Benjamin and Ann Wright. Australia's Sunday Times reports:
"Medea said the group wanted to press congress, ahead of November elections, to support calls for 'a fixed timetable for the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq and a commitment not to have permanent US bases in Iraq'." (
Marjorie Cohn noted on WBAI's Law and Disorder this morning that "we are now building six to fourteen permanent military bases" in Iraq.)
Jodie Evans reports on the first meeting in Jordan and notes some of the statements made by Iraqis including: "We witnessed with our own experience how American tanks used to break Universities and asked people to loot them. These people who started looting in the beginning were not from Iraq but other countries, Kuwait was involved." CODEPINK's Evans also notes the large number of Iraqis fleeing their country as the illegal war wages on and estimates that the city of Amman contains "about 500,000 Iraqis seeking safe harbor." Along with Evans, Hayden, Wright, Wilson and Benjamin, others on the trip to Jordan were: Dal LaMagna, Franciscan priest Louie Vitale, Gael Murphy, Jeeni Criscenzo, Raed Jarrar, Geoffrey Millard and Barbara Briggs-Letson.
The meeting in Amman is thought to have come about from the
Troops Home Fast actions. The fast continues and it is on day 35 with 4,549 people from around the world participating. The action started July 4th and continues through September 21st. If you're interested in participating, it is an ongoing fast and you can join at any time for a one-day strike, a one-day-a-week strike, or whatever works best for you. More information can be found at Troops Home Fast.
Bombings?
Rawya Rageh (AP) reports on a "suicide truck bomber" in Samarra whose actions have resulted in the death of nine Iraqi troops as well as ten civilians wounded. CBS and AP report two bombs in Baghdad, on Palestine Street ("major shopping area of Baghdad"), resulted in ten people being injured. Reuters reports a roadside bomb near Khalis killed four civilians and wounded at least seven; a bomb in Khan Bani Saad killed two (police officer and a civilians) and left seven more wounded; and, in Faulluja, a roadside bomb claimed the lives of six civilians leaving two more wounded.
Shootings?
Reuters reports that an attack by armed assailants in Baquba resulted in the death of six Iraqi soldiers and fifteen more wounded. The Associated Press notes fighting going on in Iraq, cites Col. Hassan Chaloub (police chief of Sadr City -- a district in Baghdad) noting that three people have died "including a woman and a 3-year-old girl" while "three cars and three houses also were destroyed."
AP also notes that two cars did a drive-by aimed at a barbershop in Baghdad and resulting in the death of "the owner and four customers"; while in Mosul, two police officers in a taxi were shot to death.
I believe the above incidents add up to 35 reported dead in Iraq (and that's not touching on US military claims of "insurgents" killed). Corpses?
AP notes that two corpses were discovered in Baghdad ("hancuffed . . . shot in the head").
From corpses to courts . . . New reports are coming out of the military inquiry into the death and alleged rape of
Abeer Qasim Hamza, the fourteen-year-old Iraqi girl who was killed along with three family members reported by US troops. Reuters reports that the "U.S. military court heard graphic testimony on Monday on how U.S. soldiers took turns holding down and raping" Abeer Sasim Hamza. Elsa McLaren "and agencies" (Times of London) reports that Benjamin Bierce testified on what James Barker told him when he (Bierce) began investigating the incident: " Barker said that he held the girl's hands while Sergeant Paul Cortez raped her or tried to rape her. Barker then switched positions with Cortez and attempted to rape the girl, but said he was not sure if he had done so, Special Agent Bierce told the hearing." After this, Bierce testifies, Steven Green came into the room "put down an AK-47 assault rifle and raped the girl while Cortez held her down". CBS and AP report that: "U.S. soldiers accused of raping and murdering a 14-year-old Iraqi girl in the town of Mahmoudiya last March drank alcohol and hit golf balls before the attack, and one of them grilled chicken wings afterward, an investigator told a U.S. military hearing Monday, citing a soldier's sworn statement."
In peace news,
Caroline Aoygi-Stom (New America Media) notes that the national JACL (Japanese American Citizens League) has taken a non-stand on Ehren Watada (sitting out another issue they could be impacting) despite the fact that "the Honolulu JACL has come out in full support of Watada, backing his decision to refuse deployment to Iraq." Watada is the first commissioned US officer known to have refused deployment in Iraq. Aoygi-Stom notes the latter's statement: "'The JACL Hawai'i, Honolulu chapter supports Lt. Ehren Watada's thoughtful and deliberate act of conscience. We believe Lt. Watada's refusal to participate in a war that violates the U.S. Constitution and international law is a principled act of patriotism,' the chapter said in their statement. 'We believe a staunch defense of the Constitution is in keeping with JACL Hawai'i's primary mission of protecting the civil and human rights of all'."
To read the national JACL's statement you
can click here (PDF format).
Remember that
Courage to Resist and ThankYouLt.org are calling for a "National Day of Education" on August 16th, the day before Ehren Watada would be due to "face a pre-trial hearing for refusing to deploy to Iraq." ThankYouLt.Org notes: "On August 16, the day prior to the hearing, The Friends and Family of Lt. Ehren Watada are calling for a 'National Day of Education' to pose the question, 'Is the war illegal?' This day can also serve to anchor a 'week of outreach' leading up to the pre-trial hearing."
Finally,
Meredith May (San Francisco Chronicle) reports on the war resistance movement and notes that attorneys in "Toronto and Vancouver . . . compared numbers" and estimate they've advised 200 Americans soldiers who've gone AWOL. War resister Brandon Hughey is quoted saying: "I've always believed if you need to defend yourself or your family from killing, then killing could be justified, but I can't kill someone without a good reason." May also speaks to Patrick Hart, Ryan Johnson, Darryl Anderson and others and May's report is also available as a podcast.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }