CNN and Facebook co-sponsored last week’s Democratic presidential
frontrunners’ “debate.” After the event, CNN conducted a poll. “Who won
the debate?” it asked. The result: 83% Bernie Sanders; 12% Hillary
Clinton.
Facebook also took a poll. “Who do you think won?” Over 79% responded, “Bernie Sanders.”
The CNN editors’ take? “CLINTON’S CONFIDANT SWEEP.”
Slate conducted a poll. “Who won the presidential debate?” asked the
magazine. 75% of respondents said Bernie Sanders; 18% gave it to Hillary
Clinton.
“Hillary Clinton won,” reported Slate “senior writer” Josh Vorhees exuberantly. “She just needed to be solid in the debate. Instead, she was spectacular.”
Spectacular! with 18% of Slate’s own polling numbers. Go figure.
“Who do you think won?” asked Time Magazine. The response? Bernie Sanders: 70%, Hillary Clinton 16%.
The Time headline: “CLINTON IN CONTROL.”
-- Gary Leupp, "Why Hillary Won the Debate (Even though She Didn’t)" (Dissident Voice).
NEW YORK — The Intercept
released documents today showing that the government’s targeted killing
operations are rife with intelligence shortcomings and frequent
civilian casualties. The papers also reveal that the reality of the
operations is far from the public picture presented by the government.
Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union National Security Project, had this reaction:
“These eye-opening disclosures make a mockery of U.S. government
claims that its lethal force operations are based on reliable
intelligence and limited to lawful targets. In fact, the government
often claims successes that are really tragic losses. The Obama
administration’s lethal program desperately needs transparency and
accountability because it is undermining the right to life and national
security.”
The ACLU is currently litigating several Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to uncover more about who the government has killed and why, as well as the legal basis for its operations.