A relevant critique of the relationship between the American presidency,
 white supremacy, antiradicalism, and capitalist exploitation is 
possible. During the height of McCarranism and McCarthyism, Claudia Jones 
 contended that Harry Truman and his anticommunist regime found her 
threatening because she was a “Negro woman” that “dared to challenge the
 civil rights lip-service cry of his reactionary administration which 
[was] yet to lift a finger to prosecute the lynchers, the Ku Klux Klan, 
or the anti-Semites.” She also argued 
 that Cold War immigration laws, which restricted immigration from all 
Caribbean islands to a mere 100 persons per year, were not only racist, 
but were also antiradical, insofar as they aimed to drive out 
“progressive ideas.” Moreover, she linked U.S. governmentality to that 
of Hitler’s Germany, because both repressed labor, trampled upon 
democratic rights, murdered and jailed communists and other radicals, 
promoted war and militarization, and of course, oppressed Black and 
other racialized folk. For Jones ,
 white supremacy was not a matter of attitude or morals, but rather of 
property rights, access to resources, and the hierarchical organization 
of American society. In fact, she rejected the idea 
that racism and discrimination were acts of individual choice, and 
stressed that they were forms of structural domination that needed to be
 eradicated if liberation for all people was to be achieved.
While virtually all of Jones’ critiques of the Truman administration are
 applicable to the current presidency—take for example the immigration 
ban, the suspension of DACA, threats to invade Venezuela and North 
Korea, the pardoning of Joe Arpaio, and the failure to condemn white 
terrorism in Charlottesville—Coates zeros in on what he perceives to be 
the moralistic failures of voters whose actions represented a 
commitment to white fantasy. This is not withstanding the social and 
political economic exigencies that have given rise to right populism not
 only in the United States, but also in parts of Latin America and 
Europe.
-- Charisse Burden-Stelly, "Why Claudia Jones Will Always Be More Relevant than Ta-Nehisi Coates" (BLACK AGENDA REPORT).
 
 
