Last week, Joe Biden, presumed Democratic Party presidential nominee, announced that he was picking Senator Kamala Harris as his running mate.  The other presidential campaigns reacted.
Libertarian Party presidential candidate Jo Jorgensen  issued the following statement:
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden,
 who has stressed that he wanted to pick a running mate who is 
“simpatico” with his own views, has chosen former prosecutor Sen. Kamala
 Harris. By choosing her, Biden, who was the architect of the 1994 crime
 bill, has “doubled down on his penchant for using the law against 
people who commit nonviolent, victimless crimes,” said Dr. Jo Jorgensen,
 the Libertarian candidate for president.
During
 her tenure as attorney general for California, Kamala Harris oversaw 
the incarceration of over 1,500 people convicted of cannabis violations.
“What
 Kamala Harris did in the courtroom would put her in good company with 
the most brutal police on the streets,” said Jorgensen. “She is guilty 
of prosecutorial brutality, the silent partner of police brutality.”
“Compare
 a typical episode of police brutality–getting slapped around and thrown
 in jail for a night–with being thrown in prison for ten years,” said 
Jorgensen. “That’s the kind of prosecutorial brutality for which Kamala 
Harris is notorious.”
In 
1998, Daniel Larson was wrongfully charged and convicted of possession 
of a knife. After ten years in prison, the Innocence Project took his 
case and got him exonerated. Kamala Harris fought his release every step
 of the way. To add insult to injury, her office put the kibosh on 
Larson’s suit to get compensation for wrongful incarceration.
Harris
 also liked using her power as a D.A. to threaten parents whose kids 
were absent from school. From 2004-2011, she sent a letter to every San 
Francisco parent of public-school students, threatening to prosecute 
them for truancy under a law that punishes the parents if their child is
 more than 30 minutes late for school, 20 times.
“Kamala
 Harris’s idea of helping kids who don’t show up for public school is to
 threaten their parents with a $2,500 fine or jail time,” said 
Jorgensen.
“The president 
sets the tone for law enforcement in our country, and the vice-president
 is next in line,” said Jorgensen. “If we want to put an end to police 
brutality, the last thing we need is a champion of prosecutorial 
brutality one heartbeat away from the White House.
Green Party presidential candidate Howie Hawkins offered:
Former Vice President Joe Biden’s 
selection of Senator Kamala Harris as his running mate shows Biden 
doubling down on his long history of excessive law enforcement and 
support for the war on drugs. 
In a year of national uprising 
against police violence, Kamala Harris who spent 25 years in law 
enforcement is an ironic selection. Her campaign for president ended 
quickly as she dropped out of the race two months before the Iowa Caucus
 and three days before the filing deadline to be on the ballot in her 
home state of California, where she was behind in the polls. Part of her
 decline was caused by voter dismay at her reversal on Medicare For All,
 when she flip-flopped to a policy that subsidized private health insurance and misleadingly continued to call it Medicare for All.
While Joe Biden was the principal legislative architect
 of the drug war and mass incarceration from his time on the Senate 
Judiciary Committee, Harris’s record as a prosecutor and Attorney 
General was as a foot soldier in the drug war and mass incarceration. As
 the San Francisco  District Attorney drug-related prosecutions 
increased from 56 percent in 2003 to 74 percent in 2006. In 2019, she 
admitted smoking marijuana in college but while Attorney General of 
California from 2011-2017, Harris sent at least 1,560 people to prison 
over marijuana-related offenses. In 2014, a week after the New York 
Times called for legal marijuana, Harris laughed when asked if she 
supported it. Now, she supports ending federal laws against marijuana, a
 position not held by Biden.
While Biden sponsored mandatory 
sentencing, Harris defended one of the worst mandatory sentencing laws 
in the US, California’s ‘three strikes law’ that also applied to “minor”
 felonies. She campaigned against a voter initiative that would have 
reformed this to require serious or violent felonies for life sentences.
 Harris did not take a position on two ballot initiatives in 2012 and 
2014 that would have reduced punishment for low-level crimes and given 
judges more flexibility at sentencing. Both initiatives passed without 
her support.
After the killing of Michael Brown in
 Ferguson, MO, police accountability was on the agenda in the California
 legislature. Harris refused to take a position on racial profiling by police.
 As Attorney General she refused to investigate highly questionable 
police shootings in Los Angeles 2014 and in San Francisco in 2015.
The Socialist and Equality Party's presidential candidate Joseph Kishore wrote a column:
With the selection of Kamala Harris to be the running mate of Joe 
Biden, the framework of the 2020 elections has been set. As was to be 
expected, the Democrats have chosen the most right-wing candidates to 
run the most right-wing campaign possible.
There is a certain inevitability to the choice of Harris. In July of last year, the World Socialist Web Site—based
 on a survey of who would be the worst, most reactionary and at the same
 time most suitable choice for second spot on the Democratic Party 
ticket—predicted
 that Harris would most likely be named the vice presidential candidate 
if she failed to win the nomination. She had all the ruthlessness, 
narcissism and careerism requisite for the job, plus the ethnic 
background to suit the Democrats’ obsession with racial and gender 
identity.
Kamala Harris is a dyed-in-the wool political reactionary.
This year has seen mass demonstrations throughout the country in 
response to the police murder of George Floyd. As a direct result of the
 policies of the ruling class, nearly 170,000 people have died to date 
in the coronavirus pandemic, with the daily death toll now at more than 
1,000. There is growing anger in workplaces over the homicidal 
back-to-work campaign and broad opposition among teachers to the efforts
 to reopen the schools. Tens of millions of people are unemployed, and 
they have been cut off from federal benefits and face being evicted from
 their homes.
In the midst of this monumental political, economic and social 
crisis, and against the backdrop of so much suffering, the American 
people are to be offered the “choice” between the fascistic Trump, the 
conman from New York, and a Democratic Party ticket headed by a 
corporate shill from Delaware and an ex-prosecutor from California. This
 says everything about the degraded state of American politics.
Following the announcement by Biden on Tuesday, the media leapt into 
action with its nauseating effusion of state propaganda. The selection 
of Harris has been universally proclaimed to be “historic,” a watershed 
moment.
In terms of her politics, there is clearly nothing “historic” about 
Harris. As district attorney in San Francisco (2004-2011), attorney 
general in California (2011-2017), and, finally, US senator (2017 to the
 present), Harris has compiled a track record of backing the police, 
locking up workers and immigrants, covering up for the banks and 
supporting militarism and war.
Wall Street is certainly happy with the choice. “A VP pick that big 
business can back,” ran a headline on the inside pages of the New York Times.
 As for the military, its main concern is what will happen if the aging 
Biden doesn’t make it through a full term. Since the beginning of the 
Trump administration, opposition from the Democratic Party has been 
focused on issues of foreign policy. Harris, who has no other agenda 
than her own self-promotion, will be silly putty in the hands of the 
military-intelligence apparatus.
The “historic” character of the Harris nomination is premised 
entirely on her race and gender. She would be the “first 
African-American vice president,” the “first Asian-American vice 
president” and the “first female vice president.” She already is the 
“first Black woman on the national ticket of the Democrats or 
Republicans.” Everything is about the symbolism involved in the choice 
of Harris, with not a word about the program of a Democratic Party 
administration.
As if any of this makes a bit of difference for workers, whatever 
their race, gender or ethnicity. As if, moreover, the world has not 
already had the example of Obama, not to mention Clarence Thomas, 
Condoleezza Rice, Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton and many others.
The selection of Harris exposes the utterly reactionary character of 
politics that bases itself on race, gender and other forms of 
identity—anything but class. In response to the eruption of protests 
against police violence, the Democrats did everything they could to 
obscure the class issues, promote racial divisions and propagate the lie
 that the violence of the police is an expression of the oppression of 
“black America” by “white America.” The outcome of this racialist 
campaign is the selection as their vice-presidential candidate of a 
right-wing ex-prosecutor who once covered up evidence to keep an 
innocent man on death row and worked to tear immigrant children from 
their parents.
Those invested in the racialist campaign have jumped on the bandwagon
 to declare the selection of Harris “historic.” Ibram Kendi, author of How to Be An Antiracist and one of the chief inspirers of the New York Times’
 1619 Project, wrote on Twitter that “the Democrats now have a 
presidential ticket that reflects the American people better than the 
GOP ticket and every presidential ticket in US history.”
According to Kendi, politicians “reflect” the American people not 
because of the socioeconomic forces they represent, but solely by their 
racial and ethnic background and their gender. Interests are determined 
by race. This is not progressive politics, but right-wing and racialist 
politics, which shares much in common with the fascistic politics of 
Donald Trump.
Black Lives Matter activist Shaun King wrote that he was “incredibly 
proud to see a brilliant Black woman, and HBCU [historically black 
colleges and universities] grad, chosen as a vice presidential nominee.”
 This was, he added, the stuff “dreams are made of.”
Commenters on Twitter quickly pointed to the contrast between this 
statement and his declaration in November 2018 that he would never 
support Biden or Harris because “they both helped build & advance 
mass incarceration.”
Political principles have never been a strong suit of Democratic 
Party hacks. They look forward to positions within the Biden 
administration and other opportunities that will reap financial rewards.
Then there is Bernie Sanders. In the Democratic Party primaries, 
Sanders won widespread support for his attacks on social inequality and 
his calls for a “political revolution” against the establishment. On 
this basis, he emerged as the main contender against Biden for the 
Democratic Party nomination. In the end, however, the “Sanders wing” of 
the Democratic Party got nothing.
This has not, however, stopped Sanders from praising the outcome. 
Sanders tweeted that Harris “will make history as our next vice 
president.”
Since packing in his campaign in mid-March, Sanders has assumed his 
assigned role as principal cheerleader for the Biden campaign, along 
with Elizabeth Warren, et. al. The more that social anger grows, and the
 more the Democrats are exposed, the more determined is his support for 
the Democratic Party.
What an exposure of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Jacobin
 magazine and other political agents of the Democratic Party who claimed
 that Sanders was the path to the transformation of American politics 
and even the realization of socialism! They make fools of themselves 
every election. They will tag along with the Democratic Party in one 
form or another, no doubt accompanied by talk about how they are 
building a “progressive movement” inside that party of American 
imperialism, along with other varieties of political fraud. Every four 
years, the same play is performed.
There is something incredibly degrading and shameful about the whole 
process, testifying to the intellectual and cultural collapse of 
American politics.
Certain conclusions must be drawn from this experience, not only 
about Sanders, but about an entire type of pragmatic politics that hopes
 for easy answers to the crisis confronting the working class without a 
direct challenge to capitalism and its state apparatus.
The politics of the working class must begin with a serious 
theoretical understanding, rooted in a Marxist and class analysis. The 
Democratic Party is a party of Wall Street and the military-intelligence
 apparatus. The politics of race and gender identity, which it 
relentlessly promotes, gives expression to the interests of layers of 
the upper-middle class, which employ this right-wing ideology in their 
fight for positions of power and privilege in the state, academia and 
corporate boardrooms. The pseudo-left, including the DSA and associated 
organizations, represent this social layer.
All of this is directed against the working class and the development
 of a genuine movement for socialism. Objective conditions, however, 
have created the conditions for a powerful eruption of class struggle, 
in the United States and internationally. The coronavirus pandemic, as 
the Socialist Equality Party has explained,
 is a “trigger event in world history that is accelerating the already 
far-advanced economic, social, and political crisis of the world 
capitalist system.”
Nothing progressive will emerge except through the intervention—the 
interference—of the working class. The Socialist Equality Party and our 
election campaign are oriented to the development of a socialist 
leadership in the working class. Our campaign is the only campaign that 
raises critical questions of perspective, exposing the reactionary 
promoters of racial conflict and the cheerleaders of Sanders’ “political
 revolution.”
The SEP is spearheading the organization of workers against the 
homicidal policy of the ruling elite, in opposition to all factions of 
the ruling class, on the basis of a revolutionary program to put an end 
to inequality, war, dictatorship and the capitalist system. This is the 
way forward.
To support our election campaign and join the SEP, visit  socialism2020.org.
  
    
Joseph Kishore—SEP candidate for US president
The author also recommends:
      Biden picks former law-and-order prosecutor Kamala Harris to be his Democratic running mate
      
[12 August 2020]
    
  
    
  
    
      Who is Democratic Senator Kamala Harris?
      
[12 August 2020]