Sunday, April 09, 2006

Blog Spotlight: Kat recapping KPFA's Guns and Butter and noting the reaction of some

Jess forwarded the e-mails that came into The Common Ills public e-mail account at Kat's request.  He was shocked by them and Kat took it in stride.  No surprise.  She says she'll continue to cover Guns and Butter and if anyone has a problem with that too bad.  Kat: "If I got them, I'll assume Bonnie Faulkner gets them and if she can keep doing her thing, I will keep doing mine."

Guns and Butter and David Ray Griffin

I'd hoped to blog last night but I was so tired. And that was just hanging around with Ava, Jess and C.I. in the morning. (My work, listening to Guns and Butter, meant I had to bail in time for that.) I did log on and mainly just stared at the screen.

Today, I was a little better and that's partly because Wally came out to join us. Wally is too funny and you can't be dragging when Wally's there making you laugh.

We all went out to dinner and that was fun as well. But news? I can tell you about what I saw going on, I can talk about the committment of the youth of California to fighting for fair treatment for undocumented immigrants. That's where I was today and that's what I saw. I did hear Democracy Now! this morning. Everyone came over right after it started (or started on KPFA which airs it twice in the morning, I'm referring to the first broadcast) and we were listening while I finished getting dressed. I can tell you NBC is replacing Katie Couric with the woman from The View. I know that because every other time C.I.'s cell phone rang it was someone with the inside dirt. I can tell you some at NBC are thinking it's a mistake. And I heard C.I. dictating the entry at The Common Ills. Gloria Steinem won an award. I remember that and I'll copy and paste it at the end. That did excite me.

But let's talk about Guns and Butter. Wednesday, it aired a speech by David Ray Griffin where he questioned the official 9-11 narrative. I wonder how he handles that? I've gotten some nasty e-mail lately just from noting the show.

Jess has forwarded the e-mails from people who track me down via The Common Ills. "How can you write this? You should be ashamed!" That's what one e-mail said. Another told me that there was no way the government could keep a secret.

Believe what you want. I'm highlighting a show. If it makes you uncomfortable, don't stand behind Alice while she's starting at the looking glass.

David Ray Griffitn dealt with that by basically noting if something was kept secret how would we know about it? He also noted that people with knowledge would either be people who had proven they could keep secrets and those who had something to hide (to avoid prison or worse).

As for the government not keeping a secret, what decade are papers on the Kennedy assasination due to be released? I forget. I know it wasn't in the sixties because they still haven't been released. And I'm getting that Joan Mellen probably really got attacked for her book. I know she got trashed by the writer for The Nation but I'm pretty sure it went beyond that. Does no one know what happened in Central America during the eighties?

So if my noting what's on Guns and Butter upsets you so much, just move along. I'd think that most people who didn't believe in what's presented on the show would either not read or just read with "Oh that's not true, but it's interesting." I thought wrong. It's much more fun to attack apparently. Jess forwarded those, at my request, because he knew I'd shurg them off and I have and will continue to.

But if you're interested in hearing something that you're not hearing on every NPR program (they all seem to cover the same exact stories, don't they?), then you should check out Guns and Butter.

The e-mails actually reminded me of Gary Hart on The Morning Show. I read Elaine's write up yesterday and, while I was staring at the computer, I listened to the show. Gary Hart says he can't give out favorite websites because he's not up on the web. That's cool. That didn't bother me. But when asked about the voting machines, he thinks it might be a concern but he hasn't studied up on it. What?

If he thinks it might be a concern, shouldn't he study up on it? Especially when he's writing about politics?

The lack of paper trail for electronic voting won't go away just because we don't look into the issue.

So that's only one reason I love Bonnie Faulkner and her show. She's not afraid to pursue something. Even if it means that she probably gets hate mail or whatever.

When I asked Ruth how I could help her out, we knew it was going to be KPFA. I listen to it over the airwaves. (Last night, listening to The Morning Show, was the first time I'd listened online. The sound quality was really good.)

Condi Rice said "No one could have guessed . . ." Do you believe that? Even now, knowing that there were games to test such an excecise, that there were reports warning of such a target (hypothetical ones going back before Bully Boy came into office)? How about knowing that infamous August 2001 PDB was titled "Bin Laden Determined To Strike"?

As for the 9-11 commission, have you forgotten Max Cleland's complaints before he quit the commission?

I'm not debating these topics, I'm noting what Guns and Butter covers. I enjoy the show. If you don't, you don't. I should take a moment to say that I heard from members who were already listening to the show and were glad that I was going to be noting it and from members (and one visitor) who weren't aware of the program but were going to start listening.

David Ray Griffin dealt with the supposed extreme religion of the hijackers by noting that, among other things, many met in Vegas and enjoyed lap dances. Unless I'm mistaken, I read about that 2 years ago in Vanity Fair. Griffin asked why the names of the hijackers weren't on the flight manifesto. I've never had any problems flying but I never do it last minute. In the movie Bounce, a big deal is made about the need to get the flight manifesto right. So why aren't the names of the hijackers on the flight manifestos.

And where is the proof that the administration promised? David Ray Griffin noted that the proof was never provided. The administration claimed to have proof before we went to war on Afghanistan. Where's the proof? Not a video after the fact, but the proof before we went to war?

These are questions. I don't claim to have any answers. If the questions bother you, maybe it's because of the potential answers?

But again, there were nice e-mails, encouraging ones and thank you to those people who wrote. One person, the visitor, wrote, "I don't know what happened but I don't think I ever will if I'm not willing to listen." I agree with that.

Stopping because I hear a car and I'm betting it's Betty and her kids. She wanted to see what was going out here with the immigration battle and she also wanted to visit just to visit.

Got up to open the door. It is Betty and she says "HI" to everyone. Her kids are zonked out so we're going to relax and listen to music. She may or may not blog tonight. (She can use this computer whenever she needs.) She's got an entry she just needs to read over before she posts. So you may read a new entry tonight or you may not. It is what it is.

Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Poll1 { display:none; }