Monday, April 11, 2016

Sanders Challenges Clinton on Social Security

  

disgusting


From Bernie Sander's presidential campaign:



Sanders Challenges Clinton on Social Security


NEW YORK – U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders on Saturday called for raising Social Security benefits to help seniors make ends meet. He also urged Hillary Clinton to back a plan endorsed by leading Democrats and seniors’ advocates to strengthen the retirement program.


Sanders’ stops at Bronx Community College and at the United Palace in Manhattan’s Washington Heights neighborhood were part of a presidential campaign tour of New York City boroughs.


More than 1,000 backers turned out to hear Sanders in Washington Heights and more than 800 supporters in the Bronx packed an auditorium in the Gould Memorial Library and an overflow room at the college.


Sanders said seniors in New York and across the United States don’t have enough income to heat their homes or feed themselves and many are forced to cut their pills in half to save money on prescription drugs. “These are the people who built this country – our parents, our grandparents. We should not be treating them that way.”


Clinton, Sanders’ rival for the Democratic Party nomination, has refused to back Sanders’ plan to strengthen Social Security. In fact, Clinton has left open the possibility that she would support raising the retirement age at which seniors become eligible for Social Security. “I would consider it,” she told a town meeting in New Hampshire last Oct. 28.


In New York, more than 3.5 million seniors, orphans, widows, widowers and disabled people received Social Security benefits last year. The average annual benefit totaled only $15,000.


Without Social Security, more than 43 percent of the elderly in New York, including more than 48 percent of senior women, would be living in poverty. With Social Security, the elderly poverty rate in New York is 11.6 percent.


Sanders has introduced legislation to make the wealthiest Americans who make more than $250,000 a year pay the same share of their income into the retirement system as everyone else. Current law now caps the amount of income subject to payroll taxes at $118,500.


Under Sanders’ plan, a senior making less than $16,000 a year would see income go up by more than $1,300 a year.


The measure also would increase cost-of-living adjustments. This year, for only the third time in four decades, seniors on Social Security did not receive a cost-of-living increase. Sanders’ legislation would increase COLAs by more accurately measuring the spending patterns of seniors. Under current law, the consumer price index used to calculate annual benefit adjustments does not accurately reflect how inflation in health care costs and prescription drug prices impact seniors.


The proposal to lift the cap would raise taxes only on the wealthiest 1.5 percent of Americans.

Sanders’ plan is patterned after a proposal to scrap the cap first brought forward by President Barack Obama in 2008.


According to new estimates from the Social Security Administration, Sanders’ plan would extend the solvency of Social Security until the year 2074.



The senator from Vermont who was born and raised in Brooklyn was headed later Saturday to a third rally in Queens before capping the day with a nighttime event at the Apollo Theater in Harlem.




Miller Statement on Newly Released VA IG Wait-Time Manipulation Reports

 







US House Rep Jeff Miller (above) is the Chair of the House Veterans Affairs Committee.  His office issued the following last week:


Miller Statement on Newly Released VA IG Wait-Time Manipulation Reports


Apr 8, 2016

Today, Chairman Miller released the following statement regarding newly released Department of Veterans Affairs Inspector General reports documenting patient wait-time manipulation at 40 VA facilities in 19 states.


"These reports document dysfunction on the part of both the Department of Veterans Affairs and its inspector general. The fact that the IG only released these documents after public pressure from the media as well as Democrats and Republicans in both the House and Senate is proof that it still has much more to learn when it comes to providing the oversight VA needs and the transparency taxpayers deserve. Nevertheless, the reports outline a host of serious scheduling issues that masked wait times at VA facilities around the country. And in classic VA fashion, almost no one has been seriously held accountable for any of this wrongdoing. In fact, according to VA’s own data, the department has successfully fired just four low-level employees for wait-time manipulation. Right now it’s incumbent on VA leaders to explain why that’s the case given the IG’s findings of widespread wait-time manipulation and other serious problems. And in the meantime, the Senate needs to get in step with veterans service organizations and taxpayers and get behind commonsense legislation like the House-passed VA Accountability Act, which would make it easier for the department to swiftly discipline corrupt and incompetent employees. Until those who caused the wait-time scandal are purged from the VA payroll, the department will never be fixed. Unfortunately, Senate inaction is currently preventing that from happening.” – Rep. Jeff Miller, Chairman, House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs


Related


The VA Accountability Act (H.R. 1994) passed the House in July of 2015 and is pending in the Senate. It would give the VA secretary the authority to swiftly fire or demote any employee for poor performance or misconduct while protecting whistleblowers and limiting the agency’s ability to place misbehaving employees on paid leave. It would also give VA the ability to recover annuities on pensions of VA senior executives convicted of felonies committed on the job.

GP ADVISORY Info for media: 2016 Green Convention in Houston, Aug. 4-7

Don't be a Debra Messing, grasp that the United States includes The Green Party -- and they're holding their national convention this August.





GP ADVISORY Info for media: 2016 Green Convention in Houston, Aug. 4-7

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Green Party's 2016 Presidential Nominating Convention will take place on Saturday, August 6, during the party's Annual National Meeting in Houston, Texas. Green candidates, delegates, and others will meet from Thursday, August 4 through Sunday, August 7, on the campus of the University of Houston, 4800 Calhoun Road in Houston ( http://www.uh.edu ).

"Following the Republican and Democratic conventions, the Green convention will be watched closely because of widely anticipated dissatisfaction with the projected nominees of both of the established parties," said Tamar Yager, co-chair of the Green Party of the United States and co-chair of the party's Annual National Meeting Committee. "We look forward to welcoming many Bernie Sanders supporters if he doesn't emerge from the DNC as the nominee, as well as other voters who are considering alternatives to the two corporate-money parties and their candidates."

Along with the nomination, the Green convention will feature panels, workshops, plenary sessions of the Green National Committee, and other events. Many of these events will be open to the media and public.

The party will hold press conferences featuring Green candidates, especially those running for the presidential nomination and for public office in Texas. Members of the media may register for credentials here ( http://www.gp.org/media-credentials ) as well as on site during the convention.

The theme of the Green convention is "Houston, We Have A Solution: Vote Green 2016."

"Texas Greens are excited to host this historic convention, which will bring attention to so many critical issues in a city that lies at the heart of the corporate empire. We believe Houston is uniquely situated to influence the national political dialogue, and to help lead the way in finding solutions for the future," said Laura Palmer, co-chair of the Green Party of Texas State Executive Committee.

TENTATIVE SCHEDULE of press conferences, subject to change:


Thursday, August 4: Introduction to the convention, 4 p.m.

Friday, August 5: Green candidates running for local and statewide office in Texas and across the U.S., 9 a.m. and 11 a.m.

Saturday, August 6: Presidential candidates' press conference in the morning; presidential nominee's press conference late in the afternoon, times to be announced. Media are invited to cover the nomination process during the day.

Green candidates will be available for interview during the convention. For contact and other information about the presidential candidates, see these pages ( http://gpus.org/committees/presidential-campaign-support/2016-recognized-candidates and http://gpus.org/committees/presidential-campaign-support/2016-candidates-seeking-gpus-nomination ).


The convention web site ( http://www.gp.org/pnc-2016 ) includes detailed information about transportation, housing, and registration for participants, observers, and media. More information about the schedule of events will be announced and posted as the meeting draws nearer.


The Green Party's 2012 convention took place in Baltimore, Maryland. Green nominees in previous presidential election years were Jill Stein and Cheri Honkala (2012), Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente (2008), David Cobb and Pat LaMarche (2004), and Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke (2000 and 1996).


Information and events for media at the Green Party's 2016 Presidential Nominating Convention in Houston, Texas, Aug. 4-7

Location: Campus of the University of Houston, 4800 Calhoun Road, Houston, Texas

Date: August 4-7; Green presidential nomination on Saturday, August 6
2016 Green Presidential Nominating Convention site: http://www.gp.org/pnc-2016

Media credentialing page: http://www.gp.org/media-credentials

Convention theme: "Houston, We Have A Solution: Vote Green 2016"

MORE INFORMATION

Green Party of the United States http://www.gp.org
202-319-7191


Green candidate database and campaign information: http://www.gp.org/elections
Ballot Access Page http://www.gp.org/ballotaccess
Green Pages: The official publication of record of the Green Party of the United States
http://www.greenpagesnews.org


~ END ~



Green Party of the United States
http://www.gp.org 

For Immediate Release:
Monday, April 4, 2016

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-904-7614, mclarty@greens.org
Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, starlene@gp.org
Tamar Yager, Co-chair of the Annual National Meeting Committee, 540-631-7222, 502-296-3849 (cell), tamaryager@gp.org

Highlights

This piece is written by Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude, Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix, Kat of Kat's Korner, Betty of Thomas Friedman is a Great Man, Mike of Mikey Likes It!, Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz, Ruth of Ruth's Report, Marcia of SICKOFITRADLZ, Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends, Ann of Ann's Mega Dub, Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts and Wally of The Daily Jot. Unless otherwise noted, we picked all highlights.

"Iran and the US work together to prop up Haider (a..." -- most requested highlight by readers of this site.


"Kat's Korner: Diana Ross releases a masterpiece (b..."-- Kat reviews Diana's latest.


"abby, karen and valenie (knots landing)," "The Originals (Freya bound)," "Crooked Hillary, MARVEL AGENTS OF SHIELD, Diana Ross" and "ABC's highest rated sitcom" -- Rebecca, Marcia, Mike and Stan cover TV.



"BATMAN V. SUPERMAN, women, comedy," "Is The Boss a children's movie?," 'the boss' (spoilers)" and "THE BOSS" -- Stan, Ann and Rebecca go to the movies.



"Where's Maxwell?," "diana ross' new masterpiece," "Diana Ross, Bernie Sanders," "Diana Ross is The Wiz!!!!,"  "Great new album I'm in love with!!!!!" and "A classic album" -- music coverage in the community.


"Your Server Barack" -- Isaiah digs into the archives.

 "Record number of exections" -- Mike notes it.


"Starving the poor and needy," "Things to read" and "The better choice is Bernie" -- political coverage in the community.







Sunday, April 03, 2016

Truest statement of the week

It’s hard to imagine that the country that controls so much nuclear firepower and drops so many bombs every day is unwilling to educate its children and house its own people.
The poor have been with us since there was an “us.” And, as much as I would like to see zero poverty in the United States, a country that spends trillions on its domestic and international security apparatuses, I know that the political will for such policies is just not there today. This, despite the efforts of thousands of people just like me all over the country to alleviate the unnecessary suffering of the poor in the US. Instead, it has become clear from the rhetoric of the 2016 Presidential campaigns, that it is easier to preen oneself by boasting of increasing such security spending, and almost never to decrease it. Not even Democratic Party presidential candidate Bernie Sanders discusses cutting back on military spending and cutting weapons systems. Thus, we can have a presidential election and not one word is uttered about the criminalization of the poor and now the crisis of homelessness that afflicts a growing number of cities on the west coast of the US.
It is hard to estimate the number of homeless people in the US, but one indicator is the number of school children who do not have an address. According to the Child Trends Databank, at the start of the 2013 – 2014 academic year, there were approximately 1.4 million children in the United States who reported to school and did not have an address to give to school authorities. Child Trends asserts that while reporting has improved and can provide some background for the increased numbers, the sad fact is that the instance of homelessness among children is increasing.


-- Cynthia McKinney, "America, We Have a Problem: Homelessness is Out of Control" (BLACK AGENDA REPORT).










Truest statement of the week II

I think that what’s going on now—if you think that it’s pragmatic to shore up the status quo right now, then you’re not in touch with the status quo. The status quo is not working. And I think it’s dangerous to think that we can continue the way we are, with the militarized police force, with privatized prisons, with the death penalty, with a low minimum wage, with threats to women’s rights, and think that you can’t do something huge to turn that around, because the country is not in good shape. If you’re in the middle class, it’s disappearing.

-- Academy Award winning actress and activist Susan Sarandon on ALL IN WITH CHRIS HAYES (an appearance that got her named TRUTHDIGGER OF THE WEEK.)








A note to our readers

Hey --


A Sunday.
 




First, we thank all who participated this edition which includes Dallas and the following:





The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen,
Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.



And what did we come up with:


Cynthia McKinney gets another truest.
And Susan Sarandon gets a truest. 
You're being 'steered' by the media when it comes to Iraq -- steered yet again.
Ava and C.I. take on media 'critiques,' Bob Somerby, Debra Messing, Hillary Clinton and much more in this hard hitting piece.

A song says it all.
Hillary's on a streak -- a losing streak!!!
Yeah, it's Ralph Nader's fault -- and the dog really did eat your homework!!!

It says it all, doesn't it?
For more Iraq coverage, we repost C.I.'s critique of Moqtada.
Margaret Kimberley makes some excellent points in this video.
What we listened to while we were writing.
Repost from UK Socialist Worker.
The oil and gas lobby queen.
Mike and the gang wrote this and we thank them for it.





Peace.




-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.




Editorial: What the media forgot to tell you about Iraq

So much, so very much isn't told to you.

bairaq

The US installed prime minister of Iraq, Haider al-Abadi, is breaking the Constitution of Iraq and doing so to please the White House.

Therefore, western media doesn't want to tell you (a) how bad that is and (b) how objections are being raised by Iraqi lawmakers.


From Saturday's "Iraq snapshot," here's a few truth bombs the western media is sitting on:





One member of the Cabinet can be ousted this way:


Eighth:
A. The Council of Representatives may withdraw confidence from one of the Ministers by an absolute majority and he is considered resigned from the date of the decision of confidence withdrawal. The issue of no confidence in the Minister may be tabled only on that Minister's wish or on a signed request of fifty members after an inquiry discussion directed at him. The Council of Representatives shall not issue its decision regarding the request except after at least seven days of its submission. 


The entire Cabinet can be ousted this way:


D. In case of a vote of withdrawal of confidence in the Cabinet as a whole, the Prime Minister and the Ministers continue in their positions to run everyday business for a period not to exceed thirty days until a new cabinet is formed in accordance with the provisions of article 73 of this constitution. 


But since when does the US government, the White House, really support rule of law in Iraq?


Never.

The only way a new Cabinet can be proposed is following elections.

Otherwise?

Otherwise, the Cabinet has to be shut down by Parliament via a vote withdrawing confidence.


Where is the faith in rule of law?

The US State Dept loves to give lip service to the rule of law in Iraq when it benefits their goals, otherwise they stay silent.

The United Nations and the White House could've called for new elections in Iraq if they wanted a new Cabinet.

But,per the Constitution, short of that the only way a new Cabinet comes about is via a vote of no-confidence in the Parliament.

The rule of law is followed or it's not.

AL MADA notes that the proposed Cabinet was greeted earlier this week by a statement from KRG president Massoud Barzani who declared Haider's proposal had no importance and that it was long ago cleared there was no true partnership in the current government.

What's really amazing is how little objections to Haider's proposed Cabinet is covered by the international press.


There was an election in Iraq today.  Ammar al-Hakim was re-elected as the leader of the (Shi'ite) political body the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq.  And ISCI issued a statement that any political reforms (the Cabinet) should not weaken the law or increase political differences.


ALL IRAQ NEWS notes Ammar issued a statement as well when he noted reform did not equal proposing a new Cabinet.

Ammar held a press conference today where he expressed surprise by Haider al-Abadi's proposal to reform the Cabinet.  This as NATIONAL IRAQI NEWS AGENCY reports that there is strong division in Parliament over Haider's proposed Cabinet with some likening Haider's proposals to the start of a "dictatorship."

Meanwhile AL MADA notes that the Kurds continue to demand 20% of the positions on any new Cabinet while Haider's nominees are facing criticism from Sunni political blocs.

But it's the Shi'ite criticism that's emerging and the most vocal.  IRAQ TIMES notes State of Law MP Kazem al-Sayadi has declared that, no way, no how, will any former member of the Ba'ath Party sit in the Cabinet.

In addition, ALSUMARIA reports that the Coalition of National Forces are also voicing objection to Haider's proposal with MP Khaled Mafraji declaring that what Haider has done is both incorrect and illegal.

As if Haider's proposal didn't have enough problems to face, it's already minus one.


NATIONAL IRAQI NEWS AGENCY reports Nazar Muahmmad Salim al-Numan withdrew his name from consideration on Friday.  Haider had nominated him on Thursday to be the Minister of Oil.  He stated he was withdrawing his name due to a "lack of political consensus."

IRAQ TIMES notes additional criticism of Haider's proposal -- MP Ghaida Kmbh has come out against Haider's proposal to eliminate some ministries and combine others.


This was supposed to be an easy move.

But someone in the US government forgot that there are no easy moves in Iraq.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }