Sunday, November 05, 2006

Blog Spotlight: Elaine talks about the risk of cancer from the environment

Elaine asked that we consider this for a highlight because cancer caused by environmental factors remains an under-discussed topic. We couldn't agree more.

Breast cancer and Iraq


Kyle Snyder gave an interview today and Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez have it. There's information about it in the snapshot which I will post in full as the third highlight.

But first, I need to take care of some old business. Thursday, Sunny pointed me towards C.I.'s "Kyle Snyder self-checks out again after the military tries to burn him again" and to this specifically:

I'm talking lifestyle pieces and any listener to KPFA knows just what I mean. This week, thirty minutes to tell us smoking is bad for you. Thank you, call it breaking news!

C.I. was talking about The Morning Show which Sunny knew because she listens to it due to C.I.'s recommendation. She'll have it on in the office (online, we're not in California). The piece was on smoking and lung cancer, Sunny said. She didn't think it had much to offer. But wondered why, since it was cancer, C.I. was so bothered by it?

That's my fault that she wondered because C.I. faxed me an article some time ago. I was going to write about it here but it wasn't online and the issue of the magazine wasn't out on the stands. I've had the issue for at least a week, maybe two. I just kept forgetting to write about it. Here is an excerpt of the story that's available online.

"The Geography of Breast Cancer" (Francesca Lyman, Ms. magazine):
Living on the wild, craggy elbow of Cape Cod, Jane Chase feels lucky to have spent 50 years in a house facing Nantucket Sound. "We love it here," she says, looking out over a marsh at a spectacular sunset on Red River Beach, where the water gleams with kayakers, sailors and fishermen. It wasn't until a few years ago, when a community effort was launched to understand the strangely high rate of breast cancer on Cape Cod, that the mother of six considered her South Harwich, Mass., home to be anything other than a bucolic haven.
The two-time breast cancer survivor might never have linked her disease to the environment had she not joined a local cancer group and later enlisted in a household health study. She then learned that her classic colonial garrison house harbored lurking toxins, and that her idyllic neighborhood had likely been aerially sprayed with now-banned organochlorine pesticides such as DDT.


With illustrations, the article is six pages long and it's in the Fall 2006 issue of Ms. (which is out now). The point is, and it's the point C.I. was making, cigarettes are an easy scapegoat. We've all heard the warnings. If someone chooses to smoke, I don't condemn them. (Rebecca smokes. I smoked in college and quit two weeks after graduation.) But breast cancer isn't about smoking and all these b.s. ordinances that make people feel smug and safe don't address the reality of breast cancer which, as Sunny knows, C.I. takes very seriously.

The comment later on about how you could hear the nonsense (the report on The Morning Show) on Today, Good Morning America, etc. was getting to the point that the easiest way to cover cancer is to talk smoking. That might have been brave back in the 1950s, it's easy today. It's so easy that it's honestly embarrassing. Brave would be bringing Fancesca Lyman on the program to discuss the realities of breast cancer which big media doesn't really want to get into.
Independent media would cover this topic. I firmly believe it. I also firmly believe that most people don't know about it. C.I. had talked about it back during the cancer scare (if I'm vague here and visitors are confused, tough -- this is for members and if anyone else can't follow, I don't care). Now KPFA airs in the Bay Area of California. It airs over the air waves in that area. That is it's audience. This is from page 48:

As more hot spots were identified, each touched off a surge of interest. "When a group of advocates got their hands on an incidence and mortality report from Northern California," says Janice Barlow of the Marin Country based group Zero Breast Cancer (formerly Marin Breast Cancer Watch), "it began an arc of advocacy that spread across the Bay Area."

The secondhand smoke stories are pretty much useless. Cigarette smoking stories have been done to death for the last fifty years. I say they're worthless because most are aware of the risks. (That is not saying anyone who smokes gets what they deserve.) The thing that's effecting us today, especially women in terms of breast cancer, is our environments. It's not that somebody puffed in our area. It's a real easy out to blame an individual and their cigarette smoke when the reality is that we are all facing the threat of cancer due to the way our environments have been polluted.

Like C.I., I don't care for those stories. I don't see the use in them. They may make one person stop smoking and maybe that's to be hailed as a "miracle!" In the meantimes, all of us, smokers and nonsmokers, are at risk because of the environments in which we live. It shouldn't be that way. We hear about Bhopal and think, "Oh how tragic." It is. But you don't have to go to India to discover corporations polluting and poisoning areas where people live.

If there's a desire for those smoking stories, do them on National Smoke Out Day. But that topic's been covered. If you've paid attention at all, you've been warned. Breast cancer, despite the vast array of pink products in my (and I'm guessing your) supermarket right now, doesn't get addressed seriously. You're told have a mammogram. I'm sure KPFA has covered this topic before and wouldn't be at all surprised to find out Andrea Lewis has conducted interviews on this topic. But the point is, if you're going to talk cancer, especially during Breast Cancer Month or whatever it's been dubbed, then you need to tackle the big issues and there are warnings on packs of cigarettes. There aren't signs in your neighborhood that warn you: "Breathing this air may be hazardous to your health. Drinking this water may result in cancer."

Sunny hadn't read the article. Maybe you haven't as well? If so, you need to. If you can't afford a copy of Ms. ($5.95 in the US), you can go to the library or a bookstore (if you're lucky, I'm sure some areas can't) and you can read the article while you're standing there. (If you are a community member and you do not have access to the article because Ms. is not available in your area, e-mail me and I will scan it and mail it to you.)

Fifty years from now, this won't be so important hopefully. We'll have learned how deadly and dangerous it is to allow corporations to pollute. But in the meantime, a lot of people will be getting cancer. A lot of women will be getting breast cancer. Until this can be talked about with the same frequency, in big media and small, that cancer from smoking is today, cancer causing environments are the bigger issue. Too many people are unaware of it and too many people refuse to talk about it for fear of offending sponsors or owners. Today, owned by GE, probably can't tackle this topic.

So if anyone else was wondering, the way Sunny did, what was so bothersome about spending thirty minutes on smoking, it's the fact that we're informed on that. We're not being given the same information, in the same quantity, about environmental causes of cancer.

I am trying to wrap this up because tonight's the Iraq study group but I want to point again to this "individual" nonsense. Smokers are individuals. It's very easy to scapegoat them for the rise in cancer rates among nonsmokers and we can all feel smug and better that we "did something." But the reality is that smugness comes from ignorance. We're not doing anything when we're back patting over a smoking ban or something similar. We are focusing on individuals and we are letting corporations off the hook.

No one deserves to get cancer. Whether they smoke or live in one of the high risk areas. (Read the Ms. article and find out whether you're in a high risk area.) But I really think the message is out that smoking is bad for you. I think even smokers know that today. Emphasizing that requires no bravery and, my opinion, no thought. It's a no-brainer.

The story that needs to be told, by all outlets but independent media would have to lead strongly to get the mainstream media to cover it, is the number of cancers being caused by the environments in which we live -- environments that once were healthy but, thanks to big business, no longer are. That's the story of the next fifty years as people scratch their heads and wonder how they ended up with cancer.

"Baghdad is Surrounded" (Mike Whitney, CounterPunch):
Don Rumsfeld is not a good leader. In fact, he is a very bad leader. Leadership is predicated on three basic factors: Strong moral character, sound judgment, and the ability to learn from one's mistakes. None of these apply to Rumsfeld. As a result, every major decision that has been made in Iraq has been wrong and has cost the lives of countless Iraqis and American servicemen. This pattern will undoubtedly continue as long as Rumsfeld is the Secretary of Defense.
Here's a simple test: Name one part of the occupation of Iraq which has succeeded?
Security? Reconstruction? De-Ba'athification? Dismantling the Iraqi military? Protecting Saddam's ammo-dumps? Stopping the looting? Body armor? Coalition government? Abu Ghraib? Falluja? Even oil production has been slashed in half.
Every facet of the occupation has been an unmitigated disaster. Nothing has succeeded. Everything has failed.
Everything.
Never the less, Rumsfeld assures us that "these things are complicated" and that we should just "Back off".
It was Rumsfeld's decision to replace America's first Iraqi Viceroy, General Jay Garner after Garner wisely advised that we maintain the Iraqi military, leave many of the Ba'athists in the government (to maintain civil society) and convene leaders from the three main groups (Sunni, Shia and Kurds) to form a coalition government. This didn't square with Rumsfeld's plans to revolutionize Iraqi society and transform it into a neoliberal Valhalla; so Garner was unceremoniously dumped for Kissinger's protégé, Paul Bremer.
Once Bremer was installed, things started heading downhill fast and have only gotten worse ever since.

Rumsfeld has done a hideous job. Only Condi Rice matches him for his poor record but she had to fill two positions to equal how bad he's been at one. (Rice was the NSA before she was Secretary of State.) Now that's all the time I have tonight. Please visit Mikey Likes It! for Mike's take on today's events.


"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Friday, November 3, 2006. Chaos and violence continue in Iraq, US war resister Kyle Snyder tells his story to Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez on Democracy Now!, the Giddiest Gabor in the Green Zone mistakes himself for Jackson Pollock, Bully Boy finally wins at a poll but it's doubtful he'll be happy, nearly 60 corpses are discovered in Baghdad, eight US troops have died since Wednesday, John Dimitri Negroponte heads to Iraq for a surprise visit, and the US air force goes on a spending spree because, hey, it's not their money.
On Saturday, US war resister
Kyle Snyder returned to the US from Canada where he'd self-checked out to in April 2005. Tuesday, he turned himself in at Fort Knox only to learn that the arrangement between the US military and his attorney, James Fennerty, was being tossed aside. At which point, Kyle Snyder self-checked out again.
Today, he
spoke with Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez for Democracy Now! detailing his experiences in Iraq and Canada. Synder detailed the promises of recruiters and how they mirrored the empty promises of the agreement the military offered Synder's attorney: "They can verbally promise anything, but once you are in their custody they can do anything they want with you." Between the broken promises of recruitment and return came the assignment to tasks he wasn't trained for. This is the point of the stand Melanie McPherson has taken. McPherson was trained to be a journalist for the military (at Fort Meade, MD) in April 2000 and then, just as her contract was winding down, she gets orders to report to Fort Bliss to ship out to Iraq. She reports on July 23 of this year and discovers she'll be serving in Iraq as a military police officer, something she has not been trained. McPherson tells her own story here (scroll down).
Jim Fennerty was also a guest and he explained that the military wants to send him (Snyder) to Fort Knox (KY) and that he can't get a call returned from Fort Leonard Wood (MO). Fennerty also addressed the issue of another of his clients, Ivan Brobeck. Brobeck is from Virgninia and went o Canada after serving seven months in Iraq. Like Synder, Brobeck arrived in Canada in April 2005. Unlike Snyder, Brobeck is in the Marines. Fennerty spoke of the different processes in the different branches of the US military and that "Ivan will be taken into custody" and "he'll be placed in the brig" at which point he would most likely face a court-martial.
Snyder stated to the following when asked by Goodman what he would say to other soldiers: "To the soldiers that are in Iraq, for the third or fourth time. A lot of them are scared to make decisions about moral and consientious choices, they're told by their commanders that they can't make these decisions Just follow your heart if you feel that you need to be in Iraq and that you're doing the right thing, that's fine and I understand that. But if you feel like you're doing the wrong thing, please speak out. The G.I. resistance is very important in changing the policits of this country right now and I feel that as G.I.s start coming out that's what's going to stop this war. And that's the only thing that's going to stop this war. As far as the soldiers that are in Canada right now, I love every single one of you, just know that whatever happens here, just keep that in mind, and I'll be keeping in contact with them."
On those still in Canada,
Brett Barrouqere (AP) spoke with US war resisters Corey Glass and Patrick Hart who are currently in Canada. Glass is now reconsidering his own decision to return from Canada and both Glass and Hart consider the war to be based on lies. Glass states, "After what they did to him [Kyle Snyder], I don't see anybody going back." Hart says, "I could see going back under some kind of amnesty program or something like that. But I don't trust them."
More information on war resistance within the military can be found at
Center on Conscience & War, The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline, and the War Resisters Support Campaign. In addition Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. On the latter, Courage to Resist is asking supporters to call 502-624-2707 to speak to Major General Robert M. Williams and tell him "Discharge Kyle Snyder!"
In other news of deployment status,
Jamie McIntrye (CNN) reports that Santos Cardona will be sent to Kuwait and not Iraq, the Army has decided, due to the fact that Cardona was the "U.S. Army dog handler who was convicted of abusing detainees at Abu Ghraib prison". As to how he's been allowed to remain in the service? In June, Santos was "sentenced . . . to 90 days hard labor and a reduction in rank . . . found guilty of derelecition of duty and aggravated assault" (AP). The prosecution had recommended a discharge for bad conduct but apparently the actions fit into someone's understanding of 'service' and Cardona has managed to remain in the military instead of being drummed out of the service. On a similar note, AP reports that Steven D. Green has been indicted in a civilian court (he was discharged from the military before the allegations were public) in Kentucky for the "premeditated murder in the death of Abeer Kassem Hamza al-Janabi, her father, mother and 6-year-old sister in the central Iraqi town of Al-Mahmudiyah. Green is accused of raping the teen and then killing her after rounding up and killing her family with the help of other soldiers in his unit."
And in Iraq today.
Bombings?
CNN reports that mortar rounds in Baghdad claimed the lives of three and left six wounded. Reuters notes four police officers dead in Madaen from a roadside bomb, two young males dead from a landmine in Kut, and three people dead from a roadside bomb in Baghdad. (CBS and AP note: "Police Lt. Thaer Mahoud said the death toll in the rush hour bombing of a crowded market in Baghdad's Sadr City district Thursday had risen to 11 on Friday, with 51 reported wounded." Yesterday, the known dead from that bombing was seven.)
Shootings?
Reuters notes that "Resan al-Sayab, a local singer" was shot dead in Baghdad, while, in Kirkuk, a preacher (Sunni) and a gas station worker were shot dead (the preacher Thursday night), the shooting death of "a bodyguard of Shiite cleric Sadiq al-Hakim" near Najaf, and a cab driver shot dead in Baghdad.
Corpses?
Sinan Salaheddin (AP) reports that 56 corpses were discovered in Baghdad. Reuters notes that the corpse of Abdul Majeed Ismael Khalil, freelance journalist, was discovered in Baghdad in addition to the 56 other corpses and that a severed head was found as well.
Today the US military announced "
Three Marines assigned to Regimental Combat Team 7 died Nov. 2 from wounds sustained due to enemy action while operating in Al Anbar Province," "One Marine assigned to Regimental Combat Team 5 died from injuries sustained due to enemy action Thursday while operating in Al Anbar Province," "Three Multi-National Division -- Baghdad Soldiers died at approximately 2:15 p.m. Thursday when the vehicle they were riding in was strcuk by an improvised-explosive device in eastern Baghdad." That makes eight reported deaths for US troops since Wednesday. Iraq Coalition Casualties currently lists the toll for the month thus far as 11 dead (and 2829 dead since the start of the illegal war) which would indicate more announcements will be made later today or tomorrow. All as Italian troops prepare to leave Iraq and the so-called coalition continues to suffer from shrinkage.
Activst, author and Vietnam vet
Ron Kovic (Truthdig) reflects on the wounded US troops in Iraq, noting that he was paralyzed January 20, 2968 while serving in Veitnam, and describes the moments after: "They are being put on a helicopter, with the wounded all around them. They try to stay calm. Some are amazed that they are still alive. You just have to keep trying to stay awake, make it to the next stage, keep moving toward the rear, toward another aid station, a corpsman, a doctor a nurse someone who can help you, someone who will operate and keep you alive so you can make it home, home to your backyard and your neighbors and your mother and father. To where it all began, to where it was once peaceful and safe. They just try to keep breathing because they have got to get back. . . . They are alone in their rooms all over this country, right now. Just as I was alone in my room in Massapequa. I know they're there -- just as I was. This is the part you never see. The part that is never reported in the news. The part that the president and vice president never mention. This is the agonizing part, the lonely part, when you have to awake to the wound each morning and suddenly realize what you've lost, what is gone forever. They're out there and they have mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, husbands and wives and children. And they're not saying much right now. Just like me they're just trying to get through each day."
As for the man responsible for so many US troops wounded and dead, for so many Iraqis wounded and dead, the polls haven't been very kind to him of late. However,
the
Guardian of London is reporting that Bully Boy is 'Top of the Pops' in a new poll [ICM polled Isreal, Canada, Mexico and England for the poll]. Before Laura breaks out the good china and heats up the Frito Pie, the survey found that 69 percent of British respondents "believerd US policy had made the world less safe since 2001"; that 71 percent of British respondents felt the illegal war "was unustified, a view shared by 89% of Mexicans and 73% of Canadians"; and it "ranked President Bush with some of his bitterest enemies as a cause of global anxiety."
Anxiety was in the air as John Negroponte made a surprise visit to the heavily fortified Green Zone area of Baghdad. What exactly was the Director of National Intelligence doing in Iraq? Advising the death squads? Paying them off? He was a long way from Honduras or Nicaragua.
John O'Neil (New York Times) reports that Negroponte had no public statements (proving he's smarter than the Giddiest Gabor in the Green Zone). Al Jazeera reminds that Negroponte "had served as the American ambassador to Iraq before the current envoy Zalmay Khalilzad." For those who've forgotten, it was his security detail that fired at the car carrying Giuliana Sgrena who had just been freed from her kidnappers. Nicola Calipari was in the car and killed. Sgrena sustained serious injuries. As AFP notes, the trip followed Stephen Hadley's (National Security Advisor for the Bully Boy administration) trip by three days and followed the video conference held last Saturday.
Staying in the Green Zone for news of the Giddiest Gabor, as
Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!) noted, Willie Caldwell made a surprising remark yesterday. Apparently inspired by the 140 million dollars a painting by Jackson Pollock fetched the other day, Little Willie decided to jazz it up a bit. Briefing the press yesterday, the Giddiest Gabor began with a presentation including slides ("Slide please"). The presentation included the following prepared remarks (note, this was not in response to a question, this was part of the presentation): "A transition is not always a pleasant thing to watch as it happens. But when common goals are achieved, speed bumps and differecnes of opinion along the way are soon forgotten. Every great work of art goes through messy phases while it is in transition. A lump of clay can become a sculpture; blobs of paint become paintings which inspire." As most know, there's no scarier stage than when a starlet fancies herself an artist.
Meanwhile, after requesting what Reuters called "
a staggering 50 billion in emergency funding for fiscal 2007," the US air force quickly handed out contracts. Lockheed Martin got 30 million, DRS got $6.3 million, L-3 got $42 million and Boeing got a whopping $229.8 million. The whisper-it-to-the-press-but-don't-attribute 'reason' for the request in emergency funding is that, otherwise, wounded and dead US troops might not make it home. The shopping spree calls that 'reasoning' into question.
In more money being burned news,
Thom Shanker and David S. Cloud (New York Times) report that the Pentagon is created a new office which will include the "rapid response unit" that they hope and pray will make all the reality vanish the way those waves of Operation Happy Talk used to. Remember the discolored fingers? Remember the any-day-now turned corner? Even most of the press sees new attempts at waves as a wipe out so the Pentagon intendes to dispense with the messenger and lie directly to the people.
Until then, some reality news still comes out.
James Glanz (New York Times) reports that Stuart W. Bowen Jr. will be outed from his post as Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction next October as a result of Congressional legislation that no one in Congress appears able to explain or even able to figure out when that section entered the bill.
In election news,
Carol Britton Meyer (TownOnline) reports that, in Massachusetts, Mary Sochacki, Shirley Brown, Katharine Sangree, and Chartis Tebbetts were among those members of the South Shore Peace Forum gathering signatures to put a resolution on next Tuesday's ballot "calling for an immediate end of the war in Iraq".
In other peace news,
US war resister Mark Wilkerson reflects on his time in Iraq and notes: "Before I deployed to Iraq during OIF1, I was full of optimism for what we could do to help the people of Iraq. One of our missions, after all, was to 'win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people.' And in that regard, we have failed miserably. In the year I was in Iraq, I saw kids waving American flags in the first month. Then they threw rocks. Then they planted IEDs. Then they blew themselves and others up in city squares full of people. The only conlcusion I can come up with as to why this happened is the way the American troops have treated the Iraqi people as a whole. From random raids of whole city blocks, to checkpoints that interrupted the daily lives of the Iraqis, to incidents of torture and even massacres, a majority of Iraqis now feel as though the American soldiers, once hailed as heroes and saviors, are now seen as conquerors." Wilkerson still awaits news on what the army intends to do now that he's returned from his self-check out.
Wilkerson isn't the only war resister who has said no to war and still awaits a decision/ruling. Keeping the issue front and center,
Ehren Watada's father Bob Watada and his step-mother Rosa Sakanishi continue their speaking tour to raise awareness on Ehren -- the first commissioned officer to refuse to deploy to Iraq. Upcoming dates include:

Nov 3, TBA St. Paul MN. Location: Quaker Peace Center -- 1725 Grand AvenueSponsors: Veterans for Peace Chapter 27 Contact: Barry Reisch, (H) 651-641-1087 © 612-269-8934 bwrvfp@earthlink.net

Nov 4, 11AM Milwaukee, WI. Location: Great Lakes Arlington EventContact: Mark Foreman, 441-760-9991,
bethmark@execpc.comSponsor: VFP Chapter 102 * See the unveiling of a new "Arlington"

Nov. 5, 2PM Boston, MA Encuentro 5 33 Harrison Ave. 5th floor (Chinatown)Sponsors: Asian American Movement Ezine Asian American Resource Workshop Boston Hawaiian Club Chinese Progressive AssociationMassachusetts Global Action New England Japanese American Citizens League

Nov 5, 7PM Cambridge, MA. Location: Unitarian Church, Harvard SquareSponsor: Veterans for Peace Chapter 9, Smedley Butler Brigade and Chapter 45, Samantha Smith Chapter Contact: Lee VanderLaan, 978-257-2350

Nov 6, 2-4:30PM Boston, MA Location: University of Massachusetts/BostonSponsor: The Institute for Asian American Studies William Joiner Center for the Study of War and Social Consequence Time: 2-4:30 pm

Nov 6, 7PM Worcester, MA. Location: Clark University University Building, Lurie Room Sponsors: Veterans For Peace Chapter 10 Contact: Bob Flanagan, 508-755-1479,
IrishBob54@aol.com

Nov 7, 4:30PM Portland, ME Location: Meditation Center Sponsor: Veterans for Peace, Chapter 1 Contact: Doug Rawlings, 207-293-2580,
rawlings@maine.edu,

Nov. 7, 6-9PM Brunswick, ME Location: Morrill Room, Curtis Memorial Library, 23 Pleasant Street Pot luck supper and speaking engagement Time: 6 - 7:30pm

Nov 8, 7PM Albany, NY Sponsor: VFP National Location: TBAContact: Elliot Adams, 518-441-2697,
elliottadams@juno.com


A
full schedule can be found at Veterans for Peace and those interested in hosting a Bob Watada speaking engagement in their area are urged to contact Doug Zachary.

Kitchen Spotlight: Meatloaf in the Kitchen

The reality is the delay this edition was our fault. No Blogger/Blogspot problem, just a decision at the end of the edition that we wanted to go another way. Which meant a completely different online version. As a result, we tossed out: "Do you want highlights?" You did. Here's Trina's latest:

Meatloaf in the Kitchen

Okay, this week's recipe is one Cedric asked for last month. He was in a rush because he's working on turn-out-the-vote drives and he needed something that would be easy to cook, that he could munch on and enjoy as leftovers, and that would enjoy hot from the oven as well. He was very clear that he wanted something to bake so he didn't need to stand at the stove.

I asked him what he thought of meatloaf and, it turned out, he loves meatloaf but had never made it himself. I adapted this recipe for quickest and more time so if, in looking over the ingredients and directions, you start thinking, "I'm not using all of that or doing all of that" remember that there's also an easier way to make it. Ingredients with "*" are optional if you are in a rush and don't have them on hand.


Meatloaf
1 cup of finely chopped onion
1 bell pepper chopped*
1/2 cup of chopped green onions*
salt
pepper
1 15 ounce can of tomato sauce
catsup
3/4 pound of meat (ground beef, ground turkey, sausage)
at least 1 cup bread crumbs (some people enjoy more -- my youngest daughter will shred an entire loaf of bread if she knows I'm going to be making meat loaf because she enjoys the bread factor)
2 large eggs, beaten slightly

Before you begin chopping or mixing anything, preheat oven to 350 degrees F so it will be warm and ready.

If you have a bit more time you will cook, in a skillet, the onions and bell pepper, on a medium stove setting, for three to five minutes. You will salt and pepper for taste (or not, if you don't care for either or if you're on a low sodium diet you can skip the salt).

If you are a rush, you will not use the skillet, you will not cook the onions and bell pepper. Chop them and set them aside. (They will bake in the oven while the meatloaf is cooking.)

You will beat two eggs (whites and yolk unless you're watching cholesterol, in which case, use only egg whites). I use a wisk. If you don't have a wisk, use a fork.

You really need a big bowl to mix in, however, my second oldest son, after he moved out, was happy to discover he could mix in the same dish he was cooking in. If you're short on time or want to avoid one less pan to clean up, go for it. You can use a rectangular pan or a loaf pan. I use clear glass so I can see all of it. You can use whatever you like. But, if you're using an aluminum pan (not recommended for health reasons), please make sure that it's not flaking off. Those things do not last forever. When it's time to toss them out, toss them out. I don't cook in them (or teflon coated pans). But a friend once cooked a meat loaf in one and had little bits of 'silver' on the bottom and sides of the meatloaf. General rule, if the ingredient isn't listed in the recipe, your pans shouldn't be adding it to the dish.

In the bowl (or pan you're cooking in), combine the eggs, the meat, the bread crumbs, the onions and the bell pepper. Add in the tomato sauce. You can be really dainty and use a large spon to attempt to mix it, I use both hands. (Make sure you washed them first. You'll be washing them right after, but no one will need to remind you. Your hands will be covered and you'll know to wash them.) There are people who spend forever shaping it in the bowl. I don't. I mix it and am left with a round object at the end. I transfer that into the cooking dish and make sure, whether it's a square or a loaf pan, that it's evenly distributed by pressing it to fit the pan.
How much do you love catsup? That's your decision to make it here. I usually add a streak. My second oldest son adds a layer. (Like he's icing a cake only very thickly.) That's your call.
Allow the meatloaf to bake (and move the oven setting from 'preheat' to 'bake' if your oven has that option, it it doesn't you're already in bake mode) for one hour.

Remove from oven. Stick the meat loaf with a toothpick to be sure it's cooked through. (If it's not, you'll see a lot of moisture on the toothpick. If you don't have a toothpic handy, you can use a fork.) If it's done, serve and eat. If it isn't done, bake for ten minute more. (No more than ten, or you'll burn it.) (If you have used a glass, microwaveable pan, you can also put it into the microwave if the toothpick test says it isn't done. I'd try burst of five minutes, checking after each five minute period.)






The illustration, done by The Third Estate Sunday Review, is of Kyle Snyder. Rebecca's in the kitchen sipping coffee so she was talking me through posting but she didn't know how to make the illustration appear anywhere but at the top. Wally's mother called and I asked if Wally was there and, if so, was he busy? He wasn't and he talked us through 'floating' the picture. (He said that's what he and C.I. call it but it's probably not a technical term. They played around with their posts for sometime to figure out how to do this and couldn't. Then one day, Wally was doing an e-mail entry and it 'floated.' They decided to look at the language code and see what the difference was. The difference, Wally says, is only where the "a href" directions are in your post. So we just copied the language from the top where the illustration went when Rebecca and I got it into this post and moved it down to the midway point.)

Kyle Snyder is a US war resister. Yesterday, he was interviewed on Democracy Now! and I want to note the section of the interview where he explains how he ended up in the military and what happened in Iraq:

AMY GOODMAN: Kyle, can you talk about why you joined the military and when you joined?
KYLE SNYDER: Yeah, no problem. I had joined the military October 22, 2003, and I had originally joined for, basically, the verbal promises that were given to me at the time then, too. I was 19 years old. I wanted all of the things that this recruiter was promising me. I wanted military benefits. I wanted the $5,000 sign-on bonus. I wanted college. I wanted to continue my education. I had a fiancee at the time. We were planning on having a child. How am I going to take care of this child if I have one? So, for many reasons, but mainly the materialistic benefits that the military recruiters had promised, had persuaded me to sign the contract.
And it’s basically the same thing that’s happening now. They can verbally promise anything, but once you are in their custody, they can do anything that they want with you, which is completely the opposite of what a lot of these military officials are verbally promising, so --
JUAN GONZALEZ: And once you ended up in Iraq, could you talk to us about the changes that you went through that led you to the decision not to return?
KYLE SNYDER: Yes. And I actually had problems with the Iraq war before I had requested a discharge, actually. And sorry to get off of that subject, but I requested a discharge through my chain of command before deploying to Iraq, for medical reasons of manic depression. I had just lost a child. But I was in an engineering unit, and I wanted to reconstruct the civilization of Iraq, and I figured that's what an engineering unit in the United States military would be doing in Iraq or building roads, and we wouldn’t be patrolling the way that we were.
So, shortly after arriving in Kuwait in late December 2004, they quickly switched my MOS as a heavy construction equipment operator into that of a 50-cal. gunner, which is the huge machine gun mounted on top of the 1114 Humvees. And I knew something was changing, and I figured, okay, well, I'll go with the flow for a little bit. I'll do my duty, and I wanted to make sure that my friends got to point A to point B safely. And I did that until, I'd say, three months into my deployment.
One of the soldiers from my unit had shot an innocent man, who was injured. He was not killed. A lot of papers are saying that he was killed, but he was just injured. The man can no longer walk anymore, as I can recall. I'm the only soldier that even looked into his well-being after the mission. We wrote mission statements on this, and it was not properly investigated, as it should have been. There was no firefight. The soldier had fired upon an innocent civilian, and I wanted to know why five shots were coming from my vehicle. It couldn't be answered to me, so shortly after that I can't operate as a soldier, or I can't be in that military anymore, if that's the way that they operate in country.

I wanted to highlight that section because it's important. C.I.'s highlighting other important sections in the snapshot. The above has been covered in snapshots and at The Third Estate Sunday Review but I'm not sure the snapshots I've posted in my one week entries have covered it. If you click on Kyle Snyder, you're taken to the editorial they did on October 22nd about Synder and they note the man lost his leg. This week, when seeing some reports on Snyder, I did see that the Iraqi had 'died.' I wondered where they were getting the information? (The editorial the gang did provided links to show you exactly where the information was coming from which is probably why they knew that the man didn't die.) Since that was important to Synder and since I didn't post the editorial here (I should have), I wanted to include that as well.

Something Rebecca and I just found this morning while surfing around the net was the
Feminist Wire Daily's "AAUP Report Highlights Gender Inequities in Higher Education:"

The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) released a report last week that draws attention to disparities among female and male faculty in higher education. According to the report (PDF), women are obtaining doctoral degrees at record rates, but represent only a small portion of tenured faculty. The report notes nine doctoral institutions where women account for less than 10 percent of full professors, with women accounting for a mere 6.4 percent of tenured faculty at Polytechnic University. The report also illustrates the salary gap among women and men professors; at the University of Houston, the average salary for a woman assistant professor is only 79.4 percent the salary of a man. Martha S. West, a professor of law at the University of California at Davis and co-author of the report, said, "I think the significant thing is that we are releasing the data for individuals schools around the country, so people at their own schools can compare how their school is doing compared to others… Hopefully we'll generate some significant attention all over the country."
LEARN MORE
about the Feminist Majority Foundation's Education Equity Program

That really shocked me. All this time later, and there's still no change? I believe it was Susan Faludi's Backlash that disproved the lie that women were taking over universites and demonstrated that, despite Alan Bloom's crackpot rantings, women were still struggling for tenure and posts. That book came out in 1991. That the situation hasn't changed honestly did shock me. The make up of students has been changing for some time. Female students are now in the majority. But in terms of representation on the teaching side, they're still in the minority. Hopefully, other people, men and women, were already aware of this but I wasn't. Awareness is the first step towards action so I wanted to share the above in case anyone else was under the mistaken impression that I was, that the situation must have improved since it's been repeatedly identified for decades and since Faludi rightly disproved the lie that women were being represented (the Bloom crowd argued over represented) in academia.

Two things I want to note quickly, read "Kat's Korner: The death of Ani DiFranco?" and Betty's latest "Thomas Friedman enlists."

Now here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Friday, November 3, 2006. Chaos and violence continue in Iraq, US war resister Kyle Snyder tells his story to Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez on Democracy Now!, the Giddiest Gabor in the Green Zone mistakes himself for Jackson Pollock, Bully Boy finally wins at a poll but it's doubtful he'll be happy, nearly 60 corpses are discovered in Baghdad, eight US troops have died since Wednesday, John Dimitri Negroponte heads to Iraq for a surprise visit, and the US air force goes on a spending spree because, hey, it's not their money.


On Saturday, US war resister
Kyle Snyder returned to the US from Canada where he'd self-checked out to in April 2005. Tuesday, he turned himself in at Fort Knox only to learn that the arrangement between the US military and his attorney, James Fennerty, was being tossed aside. At which point, Kyle Snyder self-checked out again.


Today, he
spoke with Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez for Democracy Now! detailing his experiences in Iraq and Canada. Synder detailed the promises of recruiters and how they mirrored the empty promises of the agreement the military offered Synder's attorney: "They can verbally promise anything, but once you are in their custody they can do anything they want with you." Between the broken promises of recruitment and return came the assignment to tasks he wasn't trained for. This is the point of the stand Melanie McPherson has taken. McPherson was trained to be a journalist for the military (at Fort Meade, MD) in April 2000 and then, just as her contract was winding down, she gets orders to report to Fort Bliss to ship out to Iraq. She reports on July 23 of this year and discovers she'll be serving in Iraq as a military police officer, something she has not been trained. McPherson tells her own story here (scroll down).


Jim Fennerty was also a guest and he explained that the military wants to send him (Snyder) to Fort Knox (KY) and that he can't get a call returned from Fort Leonard Wood (MO). Fennerty also addressed the issue of another of his clients, Ivan Brobeck. Brobeck is from Virgninia and went o Canada after serving seven months in Iraq. Like Synder, Brobeck arrived in Canada in April 2005. Unlike Snyder, Brobeck is in the Marines. Fennerty spoke of the different processes in the different branches of the US military and that "Ivan will be taken into custody" and "he'll be placed in the brig" at which point he would most likely face a court-martial.


Snyder stated to the following when asked by Goodman what he would say to other soldiers: "To the soldiers that are in Iraq, for the third or fourth time. A lot of them are scared to make decisions about moral and consientious choices, they're told by their commanders that they can't make these decisions Just follow your heart if you feel that you need to be in Iraq and that you're doing the right thing, that's fine and I understand that. But if you feel like you're doing the wrong thing, please speak out. The G.I. resistance is very important in changing the policits of this country right now and I feel that as G.I.s start coming out that's what's going to stop this war. And that's the only thing that's going to stop this war. As far as the soldiers that are in Canada right now, I love every single one of you, just know that whatever happens here, just keep that in mind, and I'll be keeping in contact with them."


On those still in Canada,
Brett Barrouqere (AP) spoke with US war resisters Corey Glass and Patrick Hart who are currently in Canada. Glass is now reconsidering his own decision to return from Canada and both Glass and Hart consider the war to be based on lies. Glass states, "After what they did to him [Kyle Snyder], I don't see anybody going back." Hart says, "I could see going back under some kind of amnesty program or something like that. But I don't trust them."


More information on war resistance within the military can be found at
Center on Conscience & War, The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline, and the War Resisters Support Campaign. In addition Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. On the latter, Courage to Resist is asking supporters to call 502-624-2707 to speak to Major General Robert M. Williams and tell him "Discharge Kyle Snyder!"


In other news of deployment status,
Jamie McIntrye (CNN) reports that Santos Cardona will be sent to Kuwait and not Iraq, the Army has decided, due to the fact that Cardona was the "U.S. Army dog handler who was convicted of abusing detainees at Abu Ghraib prison". As to how he's been allowed to remain in the service? In June, Santos was "sentenced . . . to 90 days hard labor and a reduction in rank . . . found guilty of derelecition of duty and aggravated assault" (AP). The prosecution had recommended a discharge for bad conduct but apparently the actions fit into someone's understanding of 'service' and Cardona has managed to remain in the military instead of being drummed out of the service. On a similar note, AP reports that Steven D. Green has been indicted in a civilian court (he was discharged from the military before the allegations were public) in Kentucky for the "premeditated murder in the death of Abeer Kassem Hamza al-Janabi, her father, mother and 6-year-old sister in the central Iraqi town of Al-Mahmudiyah. Green is accused of raping the teen and then killing her after rounding up and killing her family with the help of other soldiers in his unit."

And in Iraq today.


Bombings?

CNN reports that mortar rounds in Baghdad claimed the lives of three and left six wounded. Reuters notes four police officers dead in Madaen from a roadside bomb, two young males dead from a landmine in Kut, and three people dead from a roadside bomb in Baghdad. (CBS and AP note: "Police Lt. Thaer Mahoud said the death toll in the rush hour bombing of a crowded market in Baghdad's Sadr City district Thursday had risen to 11 on Friday, with 51 reported wounded." Yesterday, the known dead from that bombing was seven.)

Shootings?


Reuters notes that "Resan al-Sayab, a local singer" was shot dead in Baghdad, while, in Kirkuk, a preacher (Sunni) and a gas station worker were shot dead (the preacher Thursday night), the shooting death of "a bodyguard of Shiite cleric Sadiq al-Hakim" near Najaf, and a cab driver shot dead in Baghdad.


Corpses?


Sinan Salaheddin (AP) reports that 56 corpses were discovered in Baghdad. Reuters notes that the corpse of Abdul Majeed Ismael Khalil, freelance journalist, was discovered in Baghdad in addition to the 56 other corpses and that a severed head was found as well.


Today the US military announced "
Three Marines assigned to Regimental Combat Team 7 died Nov. 2 from wounds sustained due to enemy action while operating in Al Anbar Province," "One Marine assigned to Regimental Combat Team 5 died from injuries sustained due to enemy action Thursday while operating in Al Anbar Province," "Three Multi-National Division -- Baghdad Soldiers died at approximately 2:15 p.m. Thursday when the vehicle they were riding in was strcuk by an improvised-explosive device in eastern Baghdad." That makes eight reported deaths for US troops since Wednesday. Iraq Coalition Casualties currently lists the toll for the month thus far as 11 dead (and 2829 dead since the start of the illegal war) which would indicate more announcements will be made later today or tomorrow. All as Italian troops prepare to leave Iraq and the so-called coalition continues to suffer from shrinkage.


Activst, author and Vietnam vet
Ron Kovic (Truthdig) reflects on the wounded US troops in Iraq, noting that he was paralyzed January 20, 2968 while serving in Veitnam, and describes the moments after: "They are being put on a helicopter, with the wounded all around them. They try to stay calm. Some are amazed that they are still alive. You just have to keep trying to stay awake, make it to the next stage, keep moving toward the rear, toward another aid station, a corpsman, a doctor a nurse someone who can help you, someone who will operate and keep you alive so you can make it home, home to your backyard and your neighbors and your mother and father. To where it all began, to where it was once peaceful and safe. They just try to keep breathing because they have got to get back. . . . They are alone in their rooms all over this country, right now. Just as I was alone in my room in Massapequa. I know they're there -- just as I was. This is the part you never see. The part that is never reported in the news. The part that the president and vice president never mention. This is the agonizing part, the lonely part, when you have to awake to the wound each morning and suddenly realize what you've lost, what is gone forever. They're out there and they have mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, husbands and wives and children. And they're not saying much right now. Just like me they're just trying to get through each day."


As for the man responsible for so many US troops wounded and dead, for so many Iraqis wounded and dead, the polls haven't been very kind to him of late. However,
the
Guardian of London is reporting that Bully Boy is 'Top of the Pops' in a new poll [ICM polled Isreal, Canada, Mexico and England for the poll]. Before Laura breaks out the good china and heats up the Frito Pie, the survey found that 69 percent of British respondents "believerd US policy had made the world less safe since 2001"; that 71 percent of British respondents felt the illegal war "was unustified, a view shared by 89% of Mexicans and 73% of Canadians"; and it "ranked President Bush with some of his bitterest enemies as a cause of global anxiety."


Anxiety was in the air as John Negroponte made a surprise visit to the heavily fortified Green Zone area of Baghdad. What exactly was the Director of National Intelligence doing in Iraq? Advising the death squads? Paying them off? He was a long way from Honduras or Nicaragua.
John O'Neil (New York Times) reports that Negroponte had no public statements (proving he's smarter than the Giddiest Gabor in the Green Zone). Al Jazeera reminds that Negroponte "had served as the American ambassador to Iraq before the current envoy Zalmay Khalilzad." For those who've forgotten, it was his security detail that fired at the car carrying Giuliana Sgrena who had just been freed from her kidnappers. Nicola Calipari was in the car and killed. Sgrena sustained serious injuries. As AFP notes, the trip followed Stephen Hadley's (National Security Advisor for the Bully Boy administration) trip by three days and followed the video conference held last Saturday.


Staying in the Green Zone for news of the Giddiest Gabor, as
Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!) noted, Willie Caldwell made a surprising remark yesterday. Apparently inspired by the 140 million dollars a painting by Jackson Pollock fetched the other day, Little Willie decided to jazz it up a bit. Briefing the press yesterday, the Giddiest Gabor began with a presentation including slides ("Slide please"). The presentation included the following prepared remarks (note, this was not in response to a question, this was part of the presentation): "A transition is not always a pleasant thing to watch as it happens. But when common goals are achieved, speed bumps and differecnes of opinion along the way are soon forgotten. Every great work of art goes through messy phases while it is in transition. A lump of clay can become a sculpture; blobs of paint become paintings which inspire." As most know, there's no scarier stage than when a starlet fancies herself an artist.


Meanwhile, after requesting what Reuters called "
a staggering 50 billion in emergency funding for fiscal 2007," the US air force quickly handed out contracts. Lockheed Martin got 30 million, DRS got $6.3 million, L-3 got $42 million and Boeing got a whopping $229.8 million. The whisper-it-to-the-press-but-don't-attribute 'reason' for the request in emergency funding is that, otherwise, wounded and dead US troops might not make it home. The shopping spree calls that 'reasoning' into question.

In more money being burned news,
Thom Shanker and David S. Cloud (New York Times) report that the Pentagon is created a new office which will include the "rapid response unit" that they hope and pray will make all the reality vanish the way those waves of Operation Happy Talk used to. Remember the discolored fingers? Remember the any-day-now turned corner? Even most of the press sees new attempts at waves as a wipe out so the Pentagon intendes to dispense with the messenger and lie directly to the people.

Until then, some reality news still comes out.
James Glanz (New York Times) reports that Stuart W. Bowen Jr. will be outed from his post as Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction next October as a result of Congressional legislation that no one in Congress appears able to explain or even able to figure out when that section entered the bill.


In election news,
Carol Britton Meyer (TownOnline) reports that, in Massachusetts, Mary Sochacki, Shirley Brown, Katharine Sangree, and Chartis Tebbetts were among those members of the South Shore Peace Forum gathering signatures to put a resolution on next Tuesday's ballot "calling for an immediate end of the war in Iraq".


In other peace news,
US war resister Mark Wilkerson reflects on his time in Iraq and notes: "Before I deployed to Iraq during OIF1, I was full of optimism for what we could do to help the people of Iraq. One of our missions, after all, was to 'win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people.' And in that regard, we have failed miserably. In the year I was in Iraq, I saw kids waving American flags in the first month. Then they threw rocks. Then they planted IEDs. Then they blew themselves and others up in city squares full of people. The only conlcusion I can come up with as to why this happened is the way the American troops have treated the Iraqi people as a whole. From random raids of whole city blocks, to checkpoints that interrupted the daily lives of the Iraqis, to incidents of torture and even massacres, a majority of Iraqis now feel as though the American soldiers, once hailed as heroes and saviors, are now seen as conquerors." Wilkerson still awaits news on what the army intends to do now that he's returned from his self-check out.


Wilkerson isn't the only war resister who has said no to war and still awaits a decision/ruling. Keeping the issue front and center,
Ehren Watada's father Bob Watada and his step-mother Rosa Sakanishi continue their speaking tour to raise awareness on Ehren -- the first commissioned officer to refuse to deploy to Iraq. Upcoming dates include:

Nov 3, TBA St. Paul MN. Location: Quaker Peace Center -- 1725 Grand AvenueSponsors: Veterans for Peace Chapter 27 Contact: Barry Reisch, (H) 651-641-1087 © 612-269-8934 bwrvfp@earthlink.net

Nov 4, 11AM Milwaukee, WI. Location: Great Lakes Arlington EventContact: Mark Foreman, 441-760-9991,
bethmark@execpc.comSponsor: VFP Chapter 102 * See the unveiling of a new "Arlington"
Nov. 5, 2PM Boston, MA Encuentro 5 33 Harrison Ave. 5th floor (Chinatown)Sponsors: Asian American Movement Ezine Asian American Resource Workshop Boston Hawaiian Club Chinese Progressive AssociationMassachusetts Global Action New England Japanese American Citizens League
Nov 5, 7PM Cambridge, MA. Location: Unitarian Church, Harvard SquareSponsor: Veterans for Peace Chapter 9, Smedley Butler Brigade and Chapter 45, Samantha Smith Chapter Contact: Lee VanderLaan, 978-257-2350
Nov 6, 2-4:30PM Boston, MA Location: University of Massachusetts/BostonSponsor: The Institute for Asian American Studies William Joiner Center for the Study of War and Social Consequence Time: 2-4:30 pm
Nov 6, 7PM Worcester, MA. Location: Clark University University Building, Lurie Room Sponsors: Veterans For Peace Chapter 10 Contact: Bob Flanagan, 508-755-1479,
IrishBob54@aol.com

Nov 7, 4:30PM Portland, ME Location: Meditation Center Sponsor: Veterans for Peace, Chapter 1 Contact: Doug Rawlings, 207-293-2580,
rawlings@maine.edu,
Nov. 7, 6-9PM Brunswick, ME Location: Morrill Room, Curtis Memorial Library, 23 Pleasant Street Pot luck supper and speaking engagement Time: 6 - 7:30pm
Nov 8, 7PM Albany, NY Sponsor: VFP National Location: TBAContact: Elliot Adams, 518-441-2697,
elliottadams@juno.com


A
full schedule can be found at Veterans for Peace and those interested in hosting a Bob Watada speaking engagement in their area are urged to contact Doug Zachary.


Reminder Kat's Korner is still active

At Kat's Korner, Betty filled in on Monday and wrote about reading and childhood, Ruth filled in on Wednesday and pondered the media, and C.I. filled in Friday and wrote about the upcoming KPFA elections.

Just a reminder that the site is not dead while Kat is in Ireland.


Sunday, October 29, 2006

A Note to Our Readers

Hey --
The nightmare Sunday.

Highlights? We got 'em:

Music Spotlight: Kat ponders Ani DiFranco
Humor Spotlight: Betinna scoffs at a column 'miracle'
Ruth's Report
C.I. offers a reality check
Blog Spotlight: Rebecca explains the realities.
Blog Spotlight: Mike lets his friend Tony pick his favorites of the TV reviews
Blog Spotlight: Elaine talks music and Zinn
Humor Spotlight: Wally and Cedric attempt a White House Intervention
Kitchen Spotlight: Appetizers in the Kitchen

We thank everyone for the permission to reprint.

New content, we got it and the following worked on it:

The Third Estate Sunday Review's Dona, Jess, Ty, Ava and, me, Jim;
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude;
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills);
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man;
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review;
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix;
Mike of Mikey Likes It!;
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz;
and Wally of The Daily Jot


That's right, we had input from Kat on this edition (for two features).

Reminder, Kat's site is still active -- Just a heads up and noting that Kat was able to work on two features for this edition.

Patricia Heaton's Pep Talk (parody) -- Oh Patty, you're so sick. (Sing to the tune of "Cocaine.") So Patty Heaton was there to attack the husband of Terry Schiavo and she's there now to prop up the attacks on Michael J. Fox. Ugly, ugly, ugly. Her ugliness has been on display for years but it's amazing how the left appears to know so little of it. The right knows every performer they disagree with. Know you enemy, her name is Heaton.

Gold Star of the Week: The Progressive -- TESR giveth and TESR taketh. This week we give a gold star to The Progressive. C.I. was going through the mail (C.I. and Dona both were out of town speaking Wednesday through Friday. C.I. had noted that at The Common Ills but didn't note on Dona not knowing if she wanted that public. An attitude we all had actually. Turns out Dona's got not problem with -- she had told her parents which the rest of us didn't know and was our big concern -- "Guess who's been skipping!" They were more than fine than with her missing class to speak out. And she'll be doing that again in a few weeks when C.I.'s headed to Dona's home state which will also allow Dona to catch up with her family.)

MyTV's Fascist House -- we continue to be surprised by the popularity of this feature but here's our latest attempt.

So what's up? -- Explaining what's up with the site. Here's what was up: Blogger/Blogspot was in out all night and all morning. At five a.m., we said screw it and went to sleep. We figured the problem would be fixed when we woke up. It wasn't. We got a few pieces posted and then it went down again. At which point, C.I. suggested we go to a party. So we were gone for about four hours. We came back, started posting and the problem's still there. Blogger/Blogspot doesn't seem overly concerned about. We're counting seven of seven days last week when there were problems with Blogger/Blogspt and this week? They're already off to a bad start.

Did war resister Kyle Snyder return to the US Saturday? -- Did he? We don't know. Read this feature. This was also the last thing we got up before Blogger/Blogspot went out and we went off to party.

13 Things You Can't Tell By Looking at Them (Movies) -- A roundtable! And one of the two pieces Kat participates in. We mention book roundtables at the end and we actually may have one sooner. Remember the mail earlier in the note? C.I. was also opening packages (Jim claimed the M. Ward CD) and there were a number of books including one we've been passing around since we got back from the party, Free Press: Underground & Alternative PUblications 1965-1975. We may grab that next week.

Oh, that 'campus' beat -- This is actually one of two-parts.

'Independent' media? -- This is the companion piece to the above.

Tina Turner: A retrospective -- Elaine wrote about Tina Turner last week and Dona and I (Jim) really enjoyed that. We called to compliment her on it and she offered to put off her expansion of the theme and let it be a group piece. She'd spoken to Kat in the past about Turner and felt the thing she wrote really summed up both their points. Saturday night, when Kat phoned, we were able to get additional input. Kat provided input on this and the roundtable. Everyone else other than the core six provided input on all features above.

TV: Kidnapped by the Water Cooler Set -- Ava and C.I.'s latest. It's up. Stop the e-mails asking where it is! Truly. We're awash with e-mails. It's up, readers can breathe easy. They were actually planning on going with another show and may grab it next week. A friend involved with the show they passed on asked them to watch and, if they liked, to note it. They did like it but they weren't in the mood, with all the problems with Blogger/Blogspot, to do it this weekend.


Editorial: Three Little Words -- this is just the core six. We assume that everyone who worked on other features would agree but this was written late today and it was by the core six. Note, there are typos, we're sure, in everything posted. Live with them, embrace them. The reality is we couldn't get into the program to do our entries. We had to do them elsewhere and then, in any moment we could log in, we had to copy and paste them in. (And do so quickly before it went out.)

So that's the edition. It's up. C.I.'s now headed over to The Common Ills to do "And the war drags on." We're all tired. C.I. says, "Do not expect much."


--Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.

Editorial: Three Little Words



"Troops Home Now." Three little words, but honestly, the way so many elected officials and members of the mainstream press are acting, you'd think we were asking for the letterman's jacket and class ring.

Apparently, it's still duck-and-cover time for the timid. Maybe they're under some mistaken belief that things are going wonderfully?

From CNN:

Insurgent attacks Sunday in the Iraqi cities of Baghdad, Baquba, and Basra killed more than two dozen police and civilians, local officials told CNN.
The deadliest attack came in the southern city of Basra, where insurgents kidnapped and killed 13 police academy employees, interior ministry spokesman Gen. Abdul Karin Khalaf said.
The gunmen nabbed the employees as they left work Sunday afternoon, he said.
Their bodies were later discovered in a nearby area, the spokesman said.
In Baghdad, a string of attacks killed nine people, most of them Sunni pilgrims returning from Mecca, Saudi Arabia, a Baghdad emergency police official said.
Gunmen attacked two buses carrying the pilgrims near Mohammed Sakran cemetery in northern Baghdad, killing one and kidnapping six others, the official said. The bodies of the six were later found dumped near a hospital not too far from the cemetery, the official said.

CNN goes on to report that the puppet of the occupation, Nouri al-Maliki, was the target of an attack in Baghdad -- in Baghdad! -- and that one guard in his convey was injured.

Three little words.

Art Jester, of The Lexington Herald-Leader (of Kentucky), reports that John Brady Kiesling, a US diplomate in the US Foreign Service from 1983 until 2003, has stated, the illegal war is a failure because "we, as outsiders, were not legitimate to the Iraqis."

An illegal war built on lies that's cost the lives of over 655,000 Iraqis, 2812 American troops, 120 Brittish troops, and 119 "other" troops. But three little words are just too difficult to say.

If the illegal war continues, at what point do the fatalities start to matter? What's the magic number?

Don't ask Bully Boy because he can't even get the number of US troop fatalities correct. Not that many bothered to tell you that. Here's how that went.

Wednesday morning, Bully Boy held a press conference. It was an attempt to persuade Americans (in time for the elections!) that he really did care about the dead, that he really was following what was happening, that he was hands on, that the U.S. military is Darwinian ("adapt or die" is the new unofficial slogan as C.I. pointed out a few months back). So he spoke. He tried to play sincere. And he noted that 93 US troops had died thus far this month.

The press? Big and small, no one called him out. Worse was how many people ran with that figure in their news coverage (big and small, we were especially saddened that KPFA was among the ones running with it).

Here's the problem. Wednesday morning, the US military said 91 troops were dead. Wednesday afternoon? Same number. Wednesday evening? Same number. Wendesday night? Still 91. Iraq Coalition Casualities, which goes by press reports, had 91 up all day.

In real time, the "Iraq Snapshot" for Wednesday pointed that out, pointed out that Bully Boy, while attempting to prove he cared, didn't even have the numbers right. Thursday morning, C.I. again pointed it out in "Bully Boy doesn't know the number of US fatalities but timid media can't tell you that." From that:

Bully Boy's never been concerned about Iraqi fatalities. He is, however, attempting to switch the debate by acting as though he's concerned about the 'toll' it's taken on 'all of us' (which, in his mind, translates as American voters). And to show his 'concern,' he tosses out a number of Americans troops who died this month in the Iraq war. The number is incorrect. That does matter.
The press covering for him (apparently the press is all press, big and small)? That's shameful.
The count was 91 until the US military announced the five today. Bully Boy doesn't announce the count. If you have a loved one serving in Iraq and you heard '93,' chances are (unlike the news media) you knew the count, you knew the number. Your first thought was, "Two more?" And your second thought was wondering if it was your loved one? If that was your story, you spent Wednesday trying to find out details.
Bully Boy got the count wrong. While pretending that he cares about American troops who have died while serving in his illegal war, he couldn't even be bothered with getting the number right and our media, big and small, seems too scared to tell the American people that fact.

Exactly correct. And with all the attempts by the media to election-ize every topic, you might have thought at least one commentator could have noted that. But it didn't happen. It may have happened over the weekend. (We've been too busy with Blogger/Blogspot problems while turning out this edition to notice.)

Bully Boy doesn't care. When the count was 91 he announced 93. The press didn't call him on it. Maybe they don't follow the numbers, maybe they just don't give a damn. But someone should have caught it and no one, NO ONE, in small media should have run with his "93" count.

A visitor e-mailed to The Common Ills Thursday evening to tell C.I. that of course Bully Boy hears of each death and that's why he noted "93." He knew the deaths the military would be announcing on Thursday (the following day). That e-mail makes us all laugh. But let's enter the world of fantasy for a moment and pretend it's accurate. Okay, so Bully Boy knows there are two more deaths when he gives his speech? Why didn't the military announce it? And picture yourself as someone who follows the count, unlike the media, with someone you know serving in Iraq. You're checking each day to make sure the person you care about is still alive. When Bully Boy announced 93 Wednesday morning, you had to wait until Thursday morning before there were any details released by the US military.

The military follows a policy on announcing deaths. They announce where it happened and with whom the troop was serving. They don't announce the name. They do that only after the family has been contacted. They do that out of respect for the family. If, which we don't believe for a minute, Bully Boy knew of two additional deaths Wednesday morning (that wouldn't be noted by the US military until Thursday morning), it wasn't his place to include in the count and doing so once again shows a lack of respect for those he (and he alone) has put in harm's way.

Troops Home Now.

Three words. Not surprising so few in official-dom can't say them when big and small media couldn't even tell you that Bully Boy, while trying to look caring and involved, didn't even know how many American troops had died this month in his illegal war.

TV: Kidnapped by the Water Cooler Set


When the fall season was starting and we (Ava and C.I.) were headed to DC in September, a number of friends were kind enough to provide us with copies and scripts of shows that would be airing. Some shows take time to find their footing. That's a given. Some shows just suck.

We watched two episodes of NBC Kidnapped (fast fowarding) and read over some of the scripts. The show sucked. There was no hope for it.

We called the friend who'd provided us with the Kidnapped material and conveyed that message. We were told the 'arc of growth' had only just begun. (Leaving us to wonder if we were dealing with a Carpenters fan?) We checked with a friend in programming at NBC. We were told "solid hit." We were told the network is fully behind it.

When we got back from DC, we checked again because any time a network's "solidly" behind a show, that's either a momentary thing or they're flat out lying.

We were being lied to. But on the post-DC call, we were still being lied to. NBC, we were told, was strongly behind the show and saw it as a tent pole for the season. Why, didn't we realize that if we panned it, we'd be a minority voice in the same company as The Wall St. Journal?

We're not fond of The Journal but we're really not concerned about calling something crap when it is just that. While we were checking with friends working on the show to find some reason or some excuse to hold out hope that the show might improve, NBC yanked it.

Not only have they yanked it, they're now burning off the original episodes (on Saturday nights) and it's clear to all involved with the show that there is no second season.

So what happened? It's a story of a bad show, it's also a story of the Water Cooler Set.

Wanting to be an attention-getter but playing with all the suspense of Bridget Loves Bernie, Kidnapped was supposed to be NBC's chance to ape Fox programming by offering a 'real time' show of their own. Each season, they were planning so far ahead before the first ratings came in, would revolve around a kidnapping being solved.

The show had a "movie look" was the talking point stressed by NBC. It looked like a film! It actually looked like a film by Sidney Lumet who is not really known for his visual sense. What he is known for is those moments of snap, those moments when an actor (Jane Fonda in The Morning After, Al Pacino in Dog Day Afternoon) grabs you on screen. Lumet's films offer strong performances (he's an actors' director), they just don't offer much visual and, when they try, movie goers are left with the likes of The Wiz.

Lumet usually films in New York City. This allows for shots of imposing buildings and a monochrome palette of hues. Dark suits, dark shadows. In that regard, Kidnapped did have a "film look."

Timothy Hutton has stumbled around onscreen. In Daniel, Ordinary People and Q&A, he's actually located the heart of a character. Two of those films (first and last) were directed by Lumet. Watching Hutton strain for a character from scene to scene of the first episode was enough to clue you in that not only was Lumet not directing this TV series, no one was.

What critics were ooh-ing and aah-ing over wasn't direction, it was set design. Any performer reading over a review knows to shudder when a review of a play opens with talk of 'strong sets.' It's usually a clear indication that the critic has nothing to nice to say about anything else. When Kidnapped reviews started coming in raving over "the look," everyone should have been concerned. We think all that time hanging around the mythical Water Cooler has allowed too many of today's TV critics to develop water on the brain.

How else do you explain critics zooming in on "the look" without realizing that very few people ever watch a show for "the look"?

People watch to be engaged and there wasn't and isn't a damn thing engaging about the show. Timothy Hutton stands around a lot and answers when someone says "Conrad" or "Mr. Cain." Dana Delany poses -- far less beautifully then she did during China Beach. While making Exit to Eden, some made the mistake of describing her as "plush" and she's stuck with that look. A mistake because her "plush"ness means her angular face (and any evidence of cheek bones) got buried.

Delany's not a great actress. The final seasons of China Beach convinced some that she was. In movies, she's mainly been awkward. With China Beach, she was as well -- playing the priss Colleen Murphy. What saved her from the purge that befell the Vietnam drama early on was the spark she had in scenes with Marg Helgenberger. Helgenberger played KC but you can consider her "the Fonz." KC wasn't intended to be a leading or driving character. However, Helgenberger's talents (which are immense) meant that post-purge, KC was one of the main characters.

As time went by on the Beach, Delany got to warm up. Conflict and warm moments with Helgenberger made her seem a better actress than she was. (She's always been the TV equivalent of Ann Archer -- someone she physically resembles more and more with each year.) All those years and the bits of detail they provided meant that when the show went out with its we're in the 60s, no, we're in the 70s, no, we're in the 80s, it gave the (false) impression that Delany was able to play haunted and scarred.

Were that true, there would have been something, anything, in her performances that followed. Instead she was strident in House Sitter (as a woman Steve Martin had a crush on his entire life -- which, when you consider the age difference, left a huge ick factor) and all that followed. She didn't wander back to TV because she never really left. So every few years, she gets to be a lead in a TV show and it's quickly cancelled.

We think she's very lucky that so few have caught on thus far.

While Hutton can't find his role (and no one's helping him), Delany knows just what Ellie Conrad is: a priss. She's such a priss that when the "help" (people looking for the kidnap victim) are around, she often resorts to speaking French with her daughter. What some writer must have thought would play 'clever' just left viewers even more uninvolved.

Leopold is the kidnap victim and, with a first name like Leopold, he was born for tragedy or at least playground teasing. Leopold is fifteen-years-old. Despite having a bodyguard, he's kidnapped.

Leopold not only has a bodyguard, he has a French speaking mother. Yes, Dana Delany is the mother. You don't care about her, you don't care about him, you can't care about Hutton's character (though you may feel sorry that a strong actor, when provided guidance, is showing up in this crap).

But somehow, water cooler critics felt, this was the show to watch, the show that would have the country talking. It wasn't, it didn't. Even NBC has lost faith in the show. But has the Water Cooler Set issued their mea culpas yet? No.

In a way, what the Water Cooler Set did was their version of covering the lead up to Iraq. They didn't use common sense, they didn't report on reality. They just told you what they wanted to. They told you it was a great show (it was a flea bitten dog from it's first opening). They told you it would be a hit. They praised it through the roof. They waxed on so hard and heavy that you almost expected Colin Powell to step foward to vouch for the show.

Ratings alone do not determine whether or not a show is "good." Many a great show has been cancelled. (And many an awful show has become a hit.) There are programs that never find a wide audience. With those shows, they do have a core following. They flood the networks with letters, e-mails, phone calls and faxes in order to attempt to save their favorite shows.

No such action is taking place for Kidnapped. No such action will. It won't be hailed as "one of the best shows you're not watching" because, outside of the Water Cooler Set, no one was watching after the first episode. (Actually, we're told ratings tanked at the mid-way point of the first hour aired.)

So what was going on?

The water cooler set responded to the 'trick,' to the notion of 'a puzzle.' Sometimes those can hook in an audience but rarely on TV. (The play Deathtrap hooked in a crowd, the film, directed by Lumet, sent audiences fleeing.) Kidnapped was never a TV show. It was a TV conceit. The kind of thing tossed off by Tony Perkins and Stephen Sondheim while sailing one weekend. (Apparently, we only thought we'd seen the last of Sheila.)

It wasn't that it was 'too clever for it's own good' (there is nothing clever about the show), it was that it thought it could break every rule -- and critics liked that. Now, as a viewer, you're not tuning in to see what show is going to go out of its way to bore you, but to the Water Cooler Set, this was seen as 'innovative.' Maybe they've been in the biz too long?

Maybe they're so bored that they get off on a show that will punish the audience? That's what Kidnapped does. 'Color' to the monochrome world was to come via the supporting cast. That was where the excitement would be!

But audiences don't watch an hour show for eight minutes of bits. Audiences need to care about the characters. Ellie and Conrad Cain were too rich, too removed (the reaction to the kidnapping played as though Leopold had brought home a C in conversational Italian), and, most importantly, too boring for anyone to care.

Without A Trace is the show Kidnapped's often compared to. They're nothing alike. But a film in the 80s of the same title, has similarities. That film starred Kate Nelligan and no one gave a damn about her character (the mother of a kidnapped child). The only life in the entire muddled movie came via Stockard Channing in a supporting role. Audiences didn't flock to that film because they didn't care about it. The same is true of this series.

It takes a lot of stink to come in dead last for the week, but that's the 'honor' Kidnapped achieved recently (dead last of the big four). Somewhere post-post modern, the water cooler set stopped caring about the audience and got a little too clever for their own good. That's also the story of Kidnapped. You can see how the show got aired to begin with. Many an exec would identify it. They'd also identify with a show-wife (Delany doesn't even qualify for 'trophy wife'). But viewers wouldn't and couldn't.

It's not because they're "dumb" or "stupid." It's because they don't take delight in watching cheese mold (slowly) on screen. If they're going to watch a show called Kidnapped, they expect to see characters with real emotions, parents who (unless they're involved in the kidnapping) will fall apart the way any person they know would.

Hutton's performance seemed to indicate what Donald Sutherland demonstrated in Ordinary People. Sutherland's performance got across to the audiences. But he was playing a man shattered before the film began. The scripts of Kidnapped are lousy so Hutton probably did about as well as any actor could have in that non-role.

Lousy writing is when you don't bother to establish any kind of a relationship for the characters in the moments before the kidnapping. When they don't care about each other, the audience doesn't care about them.

But the Water Cooler Set appears to get off on it -- in their post-post-modern daze. They turn cold when presented with Men In Trees but drool over this nonsense. They want to intellectualize a medium known for immediacy, not detachment.

The story of Kidnapped is the story of all that is wrong with TV (women as objects being the most obvious) and it's also the story of today's TV criticism which offers a lot of a stand-offish people the opportunity to pen reviews that require more work than the staid shows they're supposedly scrutinizing.

These days, we're back to filmed sitcoms, sitcoms without an audience, and that's part of the general detachment as well. We reviewed Twins (which aired on the WB) intending for it to go up here but pulled it at the last minute when we were informed that week would be a theme edition. (It ran in the print version of The Third Estate Sunday Review and also in the gina & krista round-robin.) As we said in the review, we really couldn't believe the hatred and scorn heaped on that show. Melanie Griffith was the most appealing she'd been since Working Girl. Sara Gilbert was shaping, episode by episode, her character (Mitchie) into an actual character and not just a mouth for one liners. As the CW (UPN and WB merged) struggles with their night of comedy (moved from Sunday to Monday with no real ratings increase), they might be struggling less if they'd realized the value of some of the shows they cancelled. (Eve and Twins among them.)

But how could they stand by Twins when the Water Cooler Set panned it? They couldn't. It didn't have ratings (though it had higher ratings than the CW's sitcoms) and it didn't have critical support. We noted before how what passes for TV criticism today (in print) harms television. Twins wasn't 'clever' enough for them. There was no detachment. There was no built-in conceit they could marvel over. There were four lead actors doing some of the most appealing work they'd ever done. (Mark Linn-Baker truly surprised us.) But instead of addressing what the show had to offer or its mistakes (and it did have mistakes), they focused on Melanie Griffith's lips. Apparently, they'd been hurting for the last twenty or so years while Griffith doing film work prevented them from weighing in on her cosmetically enhanced lips?

They were storing a lot of anger and they let it all out on Twins. As we wondered in our review, was this due to the fact that it was a show that revolved around women? Or, for them to tell if a scene has meaning these days, does it need to come with a voice-over?

Hey, let the anger out, we're all for it. Reviews should be passionate, alive. We can disagree strongly with the opinions of a review but still enjoy it for the passion on display.

We're also aware that our opinions are our opinions and someone else's opinions are their opinions. Opinions are personal. But we think if you've praised and hailed both Kidnapped and Vanished this year -- two of the worst dramas -- there's something strange going on.

There's no art in either and audiences haven't responded to them (for good reason). So we do wonder that Anne Heche (who is doing an outstanding job in Men in Trees) is this year's Melanie Griffith (punching bag) and at a time when women are the ones 'vanishing' from TV in leading roles, we think it's rather strange that bad television in the form of Kidnapped and Vanished is greeted with praise from the Water Cooler Set while they save their anger snits to go to town on women.

Bad writing, bad & non-existant acting, gets a pass because they like the 'puzzle.' A woman like Heche, who should be a contender for an Emmy this year, becomes the pinata as all the boys and some of the girls grab their 'sticks' (real and wished for) to strike with.

Opinion is opinion but there is such a thing as "goes to pattern." And we're seeing a pattern where a show that has a female lead or leads not existing to bolster the male lead's (fragile) ego
bring out the clock tower sniper in the Water Cooler Set while they give a thumbs up to everything else that comes down the line. Maybe they're reflecting the times?

All we know is that the "look" of Kidnapped told them the show had "class." It's not just TV that's gotten worse in the last few years, it's also the Water Cooler Set and their judgements.

Tina Turner: A retrospective



I'm a new pair of eyes
Every time I am born
An original mind
Because I just died
I'm scanning the horizon
For someone recognizing
That I might have been queen
-- Jennette Obstoj, Rupert Hines, James West Oram, "I Might Have Been Queen"

So opens Tina Turner's Private Dancer (1984). "Let's Stay Together" had already informed some listeners that Tina was back. But what would ultimately be billed as "the biggest comeback since Lazarus" was still under way when Private Dancer was released that summer. "What's Love Got To Do With It" was scaling the charts but had yet to hit number one.

For listeners new to Tina, that first track was going to make or break her. It's a well placed track. Tina's scaling the soundscape on the song that comes off very personal. There's a reason for that personal nature, Rupert Hines had her meet with Obstoj to craft a life story and Tina sang it like it was just that. Track for track, Private Dancer remains one of the strongest CDs of the 80s. The CD release only improved the American version by adding "Help" (top forty UK) to the mix. Ten songs ultimately and the hits included "What's Love Got To Do With It," "Better Be Good To Me," "Show Some Respect," "Private Dancer," and "Let's Stay Together."

An amazing comeback that led to her being crowned the Queen of Rock. Still one of her most talented singers, Tina Turner's albums have never matched that moment again. Largely, they've never come close.

What happened? It's important to remember the chart run included other songs as well. Her first chart hitting collaboration not from Private Dancer was her duet with David Bowie on "Tonight." She performed on U.S.A. for Africa's "We Are The World" (and contributed the pulsating track "Total Control" to the best selling album). She hit the charts with two songs from the soundtrack of Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome: "We Don't Need Another Hero" and "One of the Living." She hit via a hard edged duet with Bryan Adams entitled "It's Only Love."
All of that and appearance at Live Aid dueting with Mick Jagger (who ripped off her skirt during "It's Still Rock & Roll") added to the legend, added to the excitement.

Then it got killed. Not because Turner lost the chops. Tina still had the voice, still used it to maxium effect. But the songs?

The first sign of a problem with her follow up to Private Dancer came when a single was released ahead of the album. "Typical Male" was the A-side and a large number of dee jays ignored the designated signal and played the flip side instead, "Don't Turn Around." "Don't Turn Around" would become a mega-hit . . . for another artist (Ace of Bass). It could have been Turner's. It should have been Turner's.

But a deal with the songwriters of "What's Love Got To Do With It" (and the songwriters' own egos) worked to destroy Break Every Rule. First up was "Typical Male" which sailed to number two on the goodwill and interest she'd created. A hideous song that she never the less brings to life, "Typical Male" focuses on a woman's love for a lawyer, "a typical male" whom she begged to tell her "what to do." It didn't reflect anything Turner's music had stood for but it did appear to reflect fear of a strong woman on the part of the writers. Backlash may have given them lyrical 'ideas' but the music was all retread.

It wasn't just that the life had left the songs of Terry Britten and Graham Lyle (their last good moment was "We Don't Need Another Hero"), it was that all their songs sounded similar. An album of "What's Love Got To Do With It" would have made Tina Turner a one hit wonder. The charting of "Show Some Respect" should have underscored that point for everyone involved.

Instead, they were allowed to write the first five songs of Break Every Rule (which Terry Britten also produced as well as the sixth song, a cover of David Bowie's "Girls") and that's really when Tina Turner's recording career ended. Next up on the single release was "Two People" (the most obvious of there musical rewrites of "What's Love Got To Do With It"). While the hideous "Typical Male" had benefitted from being the first release and surprisingly made it to number two, "Two People" was a sign of what was to come as it stalled at number thirty on the Hot 100. No one cared, no one gave a damn, no one wanted to hear that shit.

It's not that Tina sang it badly, she did a wonderful job (note the bridge especially), it's just that it was a useless song about a useless topic and the sort of bland non-statement that could have appeared on sixty albums that year by people you never heard of and never missed.

Their retread of every other dumb song you've heard of ("What You Get Is What You See") was the closest to hard-driving rock and when it became the third single, it actually made it to number 13 and generated a little interest. But "Two People" (and the dopey factor of "What You Get Is What You See") had buried Tina's recording career and it's pretty much stayed there ever since.

Break Every Rule played like Follow Every Rule for the first six songs. Those who could endure the shit up to that point were actually rewarded with the last five songs. "Back Where You Started" was Tina rocking out with the help of writers and producers Bryan Adams and Jim Vallance. It was everything the opening track of Break Every Rule should have been. This was followed with Rupert Hine's "Break Every Rule" which, in terms of image, joined with Brittan and Lyle's songs, but in terms of listenability was actually strong. Mark Knopfler (who'd earlier given Turner "Private Dancer") once again demonstrated he grasped the power of the singer with "Overnight Sensation." "Paradise Is Here" was probably the finest vocal Turner had the album and "I'll Be Thunder" contained more than a nod to her Phil Spector produced masterpiece "River Deep, Mountain High."

But no one cared, no one gave a damn. The shit that Britten and Lyle thought was "genius" killed the interest in the album, killed the interest in her recording career. They really thought, proving what assholes they are, that what the world wanted from Tina Turner was love with a 'typical male.' Did they fear the strong woman?

That's how that shit plays, all five of their weak ass audio doodles posing as songs. Turner was elemental. She was larger than life. (It's what she's always been in concert.) It was as though they were trying to 'domesticate' her -- trying to play Darren to her Samantha. And America didn't want that shit. Tina Turner's comeback included her bestseller I, Tina (as told to Kurt Loder) and her narrative was so well known that when she repeatedly turned down Stephen Spielberg at the Grammys (for The Color Purple) no one held it against her. Everyone grasped what she meant when she said she didn't need to play the role, she'd already lived it.

She was speaking of the years of abuse when she was married to Ike Turner. And that was part of the successful comeback as well. Turner was a survivor. She was also one of the first public faces of someone who survived spousal abuse. While Private Dancer captured that strength, zoomed in on it, highlighted it, Britten and Lyle wrote as though they had Samantha Fox in the studio. Instead of existing to showcase Tina Turner, Break Every Rule existed to highlight Britten and Lyle and, if you wonder why you don't hear from them now on the charts, there's a reason. (Most don't wonder, they're just grateful.)

Along with not including "Don't Turn Around" on the album and instead making it a showcase for the weak 'writing' talents of stooges, there was no Holly Knight song. Knight, Mike Chapman and Nicky Chinn had penned "Better Be Good To Me," a powerhouse on Private Dancer. Knight, over the years, had written or co-written many hits including Pat Benatar's "Love Is a Battlefield" and "Invincible," Heart's "Never" and "There's The Girl," Animotion's "Obsession," and, for Tina at that point, "Better Be Good To Me" and "One of the Living." Knight knew how to tap into Turner's image and craft a song to it.

Even after the first three singles killed all interest in Break Every Rule, a Knight song on the album could have turned the tide. Break Every Rule entered the charts at number six on the goodwill all that had come before created. It began tanking quickly. (If you follow the week to week, you can trace the release life of "Two People" by how low the album dips each week.)

Next up was, Tina Live In Europe, a double disc live set that should have explained the career problem just from the audience reaction. They're going wild when she covers "Addicted To Love" and they're much more reserved during "Two People." The Britten and Lyle crap didn't go over.

Which may be why the next album wasn't a showcase for their doodles? Foreign Affair was an attempt to get back on track (1989) and you could hear the desperation with each listen. What was the magic formula? What was the answer?

One answer was bringing back Holly Knight (Knight's "The Best" would rise to number six on the Hot 100 and become an 'evergreen' for Turner). It's the sort of anthem that was missing from Break Every Rule. Also strong was the work of Robert Cray on "Steamy Windows" which promised more than the album ever delivered. "The Best" was one of those songs that never burnt out for radio. It played long after its chart life and just when you thought it was finally gone, it was back in rotation. No song from Break Every Rule managed that feat.

It could have been a resurgence for Turner. The song had a built in good will factor and was popular with lovers and sports fans. ("You're simply the best, better than all the rest, better than anyone . . .") But someone decided that "I Don't Want To Fight" was the answer for a theme song to the film What's Love Got To Do With It (based on the book I, Tina). The big scene in the movie is when Angela Bassett's Turner doesn't back down to Laurence Fishburne's Ike in the limo and fights back. Of interest, for ticket buyers, was the stunning comeback and the abuse. "I Don't Want To Fight" as the theme to this film?

After some dopey end rhymes and useless imagery in the first verse, the chorus comes up:

I don't care who's wrong or right
I don't really want to fight no more
Too much talking, babe
Let's sleep on it tonight
I don't really want to fight no more
Because it's time for letting go.

That's a song of survival? That's a song of a woman who's been battered? "Too much talking, babe"? Did the writers (Steve DuBerry, Lulu and Billy Lawrie) know one thing about Turner's life story? The defense offered on the song was that it reflected Turner's outlook when the film was being made. Considering that the film ends in 1984, her outlook in 1993 was besides the point.

More importantly, she comes off like a whiney little thing in the tiny little song. "Let's sleep on it tonight." 'Empowering' advice? We doubt it's being distributed at women's shelters across the country.

Next up was Wildest Dreams (1996). The big hit, in the US, was "In Your Wildest Dreams" which found Turner teaming with Barry White on a Holly Knight and Mike Chapman song. But Terry Britten and Graham Lyle are back for more dopey nonsense. "Do What You Do" is an attempt at rock that finds Tina Turner in the cornfields of Richard Marx. "Something Beautiful Remains" is destroyed the moment Britten tries to harmonize with Turner in the opening notes. (Listen closely if you've ever wondered what it would sound like if Tina Turner shared a mike with E.T.) The song lacks a riff (the telegraph sound appears to be someone's idea of a riff) and the lyrics ("as one day ends, a new day must begin") would make the writers at Hallmark blush.

While the bulk of the songs seem to have no idea what Turner's image is, Hanes did. They promoted this album and the tour with "Resilience: It's all about strength and beauty." It's a shame 'song crafters' couldn't realize what marketers did.

As the 90s wound down, Tina did a commercial for Target where she performed Prince's "Baby, I'm a Star." She sang it with all the conviction she possed (considerable) and it was enough to get people excited about Twenty Four Seven (1998). Those who purchased the CD had several disappointments. First up was the fact that the Prince cover wasn't on the album. Equally tragic, Terry Britten produced (and co-wrote) two songs. It was as though, back in the sixties, Mick and Keith decided to leave behind "Satisfaction" and 'tackle' "Daydream Believer."

Britten's not the only offender. The second song showcases dopey lyrics and really tacky wow-wow effect (at times, the music sounds like it's the soundtrack to a porn flick). "All The Woman" robs the excitement even before the casual listener grasps that, unlike Johnny Douglas and Paul Wilson, they know winds blow, not "the waters." Determined to sink the album, Terry Britten offers his producing and songwriting 'talents' on track four -- "Absolutely Nothing's Changed." Certainly not the fact that he's never grasped what listeners respond to in Tina Turner. This generic song sounds as though it's been recorded ahead of time for Sister Act IX.

Which is really too bad because the album offered two strong songs. "Whatever You Need" was probably the best single Turner had since "The Best." The bigger hit for the album was "When The Heartache Is Over" which found Turner trying to attempt the Cher Does Disco Comeback that was "Believe." It actually works and that's due to the power chorus, Turner's vocals and the fact that someone involved in writing the song (Brian Rawling and Mark Taylor) grasped that Turner is a survivor ("I can live without you/ I know that I can live without you"). Sadly, Britten shows up for the final track, the hideous "Twenty Four Seven" which appears to combine swing with surf music to ensure that the disc leaves a nasty after taste.

Turner's one of the most successful live performers (in terms of audience reaction as well as box office). Not just one of the most succesful females, one of the most successful across the board -- regardless of gender or race. That's because of what she brings to the stage and what she showcases. Her concerts usually include a few rock covers. Prior to recording Private Dancer, it was common to sit through a Turner concert and hear Prince ("Let's Pretend We're Married") and assorted others. Coming off all those years of club performances of solid songs she'd selected to bring to life, Private Dancer emerged. The tours since have continued to offer covers. They've also required too much Britten (and Lyle).

A lion roars. Britten and Lyle destroyed Turner's recording career by attempting to make a lion purr. Chart success is always difficult for women. They rarely enjoy the lengthy stays that male performers do. They also have to worry about appearances in a way that a Bob Dylan never has to. So Turner was going to hit a cold streak on the charts regardless of what she recorded. But it's equally true that the songs offered by Britten and Lyle (and Britten solo) seemed to be far removed from her strength and what she represented.

Had it been only a song or two, one might think they were attempted to show how versatile Tuner was. "She's not just strong! She's not just a survivor! She has a tender side!" Instead, looking at the bulk of weak ass, shitty songs they've anchored her with over the years, it strikes us as they have no respect for what she stands for and were bound and determined to weaken the charts' Wonder Woman.

As Turner flirts with another album, she should remember what made Private Dancer -- strength, power. There will always be a dozen weak sisters waiting in the wings. Let them sing-song about a 'typical male'; let them offer the generic. Don't waste a considerable talent breathing life into still-born songs. Dance around to the Stones A Bigger Bang. Think about bringing "Let Me Down Slow" or "Rough Justice" to life (on the latter, replace "you" with "I" in the first two lines, and make a similar swap in lines four and five and the song has Tina Turner written all over it). Remind us all of what you have to offer.

'Independent' media?


If you missed the memo (surpising since it's everywhere), the only thing you can do to save the world is vote Democratic in November's election.

That's all the power you have, to judge by the coverage.

Now most participating in the writing of this feature are going to vote Democratic and do so each election cycle. Straight ticket.

So it's not the memo that has us (and others) so bothered, it's the fact that it's the only story out there.

We expect it from the DNC and from their cronies. We don't expect it from independent media.

But these days, independent media seems to be little more than a house organ for the DNC. Quick, which Democratic candidate for Congress said, last week, that he was for abolishing the "death tax"? Once upon a time, independent media could have told you that, would have told you that, would have taken him to task for his remarks.

Now?

We're just hearing the "Sounds of Silence."Hello, darkness my old friend, indeed.

It's really, really important that you vote and that you vote Democratic -- we're told over and over. A few weeks back, independent media seemed determined to be MTV's Rock the Vote but now, it's gotten so bad, they remind us of Kelli Maroney's character Cindy in Fast Times at Ridgemont High and her speech about being a Spirit Bunny. It's tough, we're sure.

We're also wondering exactly when a third party could take off? Vote Green this election cycle?Do you want independent media to come down on you!!!! (Jess will be voting Green, he's not alone among those participating in this feature.)

You hear a lot about how the G.O.P. is using fear (again) and while that's true, what exactly is the Democratic Party using?

"The Torture Election!" screams one headline. To not vote Democratic is to be for torture?

Al Gore 'lost' in 2000 for one reason: the Supreme Court.

He didn't lose because of Ralph Nader. Ralph Nader couldn't 'take' votes from Al Gore. Ralph Nader won his votes. Al Gore could have had them, if he wanted them, by appealing to those voters. He didn't. (A stronger argument for votes 'taken' could be made using Pat Buchanan's amazing turnout in Palm Beach via the butterfly ballot.)

But that's how it will go down. (And it's interesting that a converse logic, that H. Ross Perot 'took' votes from George H.W. Bush and allowed Bill Clinton to win in 1992 isn't made by the same faction still crying that mean old Ralph Nader 'took' votes from Al Gore.)

Al Gore didn't 'own' any votes. He campaigned to get votes. He got the votes he earned. Ralph Nader got the votes he earned. Bully Boy got the votes his Daddy put on the Supreme Court.

No one "owns" your vote, no one has "dibs" on it. If they want it, they need to speak to you. If they don't, they don't get your vote.

It's pretty simple.

All the supposed indepedent media coverage telling you otherwise is providing cover to Democratic candidates who want to push to abolish the so-called death tax and hide behind other Republican sloganeering. Usually, they'll toss out other crap like how they love the Bully Boy. (Hello, Harold Ford Jr.!) Or they'll give a speech about how they're not like Nancy Pelosi and Ted Kennedy. That's true. They wouldn't know how to lead (even badly) if an opportunity opened up.

Whether Joe Lieberman manages to hang on to his seat or not, there's a whole new batch of Lieberman's hatching in the Democratic Party.

Failure to address that with their audiences doesn't make independent media come off trust worthy or reliable.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }