Sunday, November 14, 2010

Truest statement of the week

Maddow is a pampered child in a nation whose discourse is badly broken. She rarely shows any sign of understanding the depth of that problem -- of how much effort it will take for real progressives to fix it. If a tax cut proposal makes sense to her, she seems to assume it "makes sense" in an absolute way. But it may not make political sense in a nation full of people who get their ideas from Rush Limbaugh and Fox, as Maureen Dowd's brother does.

The tax cut issue pretty much isn't a gift, especially after last week's elections But Maddow doesn't understand this. She's full of self-confidence -- but she isn't especially smart about politics. (Beyond that, she isn’t real honest.) Sadly, she's making the liberal world dumber -- as she stuffs those millions of dollars down her self-confident pants.


-- Bob Somerby, "TWO MILLION DOLLARS OF CRAP! Maddow doesn’t understand politics, as she made clear Monday night" (Daily Howler).

Truest statement of the week II

The Barack magic is over or at least very challenged.

-- Hermene Hartman's "The Barack Magic Is Over and the White House Is Out of Touch" (Huffington Post).

A note to our readers

Hey --
Latest we have ever been.

Thank you to all who worked on this edition which includes Dallas and the following:

The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen,
Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.


It was the worst edition ever. Time wasted, you name it. This will be a shorter note than usual because I (Jim) am aware that C.I.'s still got to do The Common Ills and she's also got to do two entries because Isaiah wanted to continue working with Third which meant C.I. benched him. We had worked or 'worked' all night and only Ava and C.I. had an article. At which point a stoppage was called and everyone went to sleep. Isaiah wanted to rejoin the group this evening and C.I. allowed that only if Isaiah would take the night off. So she's got two entries tonight.

To speed up our process when we regrouped, we farmed truest out to Mike and the gang -- to Mike, Cedric, Elaine, Rebecca, Ann, Stan, Marcia, Ruth, Isaiah and Trina. I think that's everyone. I hope so. That ended up being more work for them than they planned. This one went to Somerby.
And this one went to a writer new to truest.

We had two long editorials we did this evening. They didn't work. Finally, Dona said: "Let's just do what we threatened last week only with Gates." So we did. We hope to roundtable the SOFA next week, FYI.

Strongest piece of writing. Ava and C.I. wrote this. They were done and rejoined us in the midst of a loud argument. They said, "You know what? We're going to polish our piece." And they left. When they came back there was no more arguing but nothing was accomplished. At one point -- Dona was sick -- Dona was saying, "Let's just post Ava and C.I.'s article and leave it at that." We did come close to doing that.

Elaine suggested this piece. We were desperate for content and quick content this evening when we regrouped. Elaine said the midterms were the easiest thing to write about and that ended up into this piece. Rebecca found the photo and if her photo shop had worked, it would have been a standalone. She wanted to emphasize the woman on the far right by making a square of her as big as the photo but Rebecca had problems with photo shop.


This is explained in the roundtable. I believe this is Betty, Wally, Jess and Ty. The illustration is of Fisherman's Wharf and Kat and Rebecca worked on the illustration which is a photo Kat added touches to physically and then Rebecca photo shopped electronically.

We had the gang pick truests. As part of their picking process they had to search. The problem with that was that it led to a discussion that they ended up writing up. "You don't have to use this," Mike and Rebecca told us over the phone. Don't have to? We're thrilled to be able to. Great piece and thank you to them for that. Ask Rebecca or Mike where the illustration is from, we have no idea.

While they were picking out truest -- and, it turns out, writing an article -- we were roundtabling. We grabbed as many e-mails as we could. Christian, I hope to grab your e-mail next week. We ran out of time. If I'm not able to, Ty says he'll try to write a Ty's Corner on it.

A parody piece we planned for back when Valerie made her idiotic remarks. We were unable to find time for it then. When we regrouped, Ava and C.I. worked hard on finding pieces that we never made time for. That's how Betty, Wally, Ty and Jess' poem ended up in this edition as well.

From ETAN.

Mike and the gang wrote this and we thank them for it.

And we thank you for reading. We'll see you next weekend. Peace.

-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.

Editorial: Robert Gates speaks

robert gates in malaysia

Last week, Anne Gearan (AP) broke the news (Tuesday morning) that US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated publicly today in Kuala Lumpur that the US military may stay in Iraq beyond 2011. She quotes him stating, "We're ready to have that discussion if and when they want to raise it with us." Donna Miles (Defense Dept's press department) adds, "But Gates said he wouldn't expect such a request, at least until the Iraqis have selected a president, prime minister and speaker of the council of representatives and made ministerial-level appointments."

[Refer to "Editorial: Everybody knows?"]

TV: Comedy dos and don'ts

This week, Meryl Streep continued her performance as Camilla Bowner. At the 2004 AFI Tribute to Meryl, Goldie Hawn likened the sixteen times Academy Award nominated actress to a Stradivarius, Shirley MacLaine hailed her as "other worldly," Diane Keaton used the term genius -- and those were just some of the sung praises. In the current issue of Vanity Fair, Cher takes her turn praising Meryl. Meryl's considered one of the finest actresses of all time and we're rather surprised that when she wades into new waters, the press shows so little interest.

111



Camilla Bowner is Meryl's first online role, therapist to Fiona Wallace's politician husband whose in the midst of a sexual scandal being the latest in a long line of conservatives outed as gay. Camilla is practicing "aversion therapy" to "cure" Kip Wallace -- in part by having sex with him.

Camilla: If I can reveal myself to you, I can tell you that God touches me -- down there, I feel a little tingling. And he taps me for this work he says, "Get in there and do what you can, Camilla."


Fiona: How interesting that he taps you there when a shoulder is so available.


Meryl's done a three-episode appearance on Web Therapy -- Lisa Kudrow and Don Roos' online situation comedy. The Emmy winning Kudrow (for her performance as Phoebe on Friends) plays the vain and shallow Dr. Fiona who, after some Wall Street 'indiscretions' in her previous career, has now recast herself as a therapist, specifically as an online therapist. Kudrow's been consistently touching and hilarious and her guest stars -- Rashida Jones, Molly Shannon, Courtney Cox, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Alan Cummings, Selma Blair, Julie Claire, Dan Bucatinsky, Jane Lynch and more -- have done the same. Kudrow's breathed life in Fiona from the start and long before her sister Shevaun (Louis-Dreyfus) recounted some of Fiona's issues.

Shevaun: Our childhood was the -- polar opposites. I was adored. You were detested. I was beautiful. You were hideous. I was thin. You were obsese. I was intelligent. You were possibly mentally challenged. I was elegant. You were -- what is the opposite of elegant?

Fiona: Coarse? Unrefined?


Shevaun: Thank you, perfect
.

Fiona: Well frankly all I can remember from my childhood is sun dappled meadows and lollipops dispensed and -- and rainbows. I don't know -- gambling lambs.


Shevaun: I-I'm not surprised you remember lollipops dispensed. They weren't really dispensed. They were stolen. Do you remember that you stole those lollipops? Don't you remember that you were beaten? Do you not remember our father hitting you with his shoe? You don't remember this? Remember, it was right after they shaved your head for lice?


Fiona: Yes.


Shevaun: Remember they had that big thing of lollipops?


Fiona: Yes.


Shevaun: And they would give one to the child when they left because they were sick and they had their prescription filled and blah blah blah blah blah.


Fiona: Right.


Shevaun: And you took the entire container. Do you not remember this?


Fiona: Yes -- oh, yes. That's right. Because I felt like I deserved something. They'd never given me one before.


Shevaun: And then Daddy took his shoe --


Fiona: Yes.


Shevaun: -- and remember he hit you in the head. Don't you remember?


Fiona: Oh, yes. Like a tap in the head.


Shevaun: It was a tap shoe. It wasn't a tap in the head. It was a tap shoe, remember? Because he was dancing.




Fiona is screwed up. But Fiona doesn't think she's screwed up. And whether it's Kudrow or any of her guest stars, all the characters have their own humanity. The jokes spring from the characters, the characters are not the joke.

And all of the above is not just our effort to encourage you to check out Web Therapy if you haven't already, it's also our way of noting how you do comedy as opposed to how you don't.

For examples of how you don't, you can generally check out the career of Greg Garcia. And you don't have to stop with Mayberry on Crack (My Name Is Earl). It also includes Yes, Dear and Family Matters. None of the three had a thing to do with life. None of the three -- despite major efforts on the part of Jaime Pressly -- dealt in characterization. It was all sketch, it was all thinly drawn characters and the entire point was to feel superior to them. You could watch every episode of all three shows and never, ever recognize humanity in any of it.

Greg Garcia is a hack. While he did shows like Family Matters and Yes, Dear, he was to be avoided and easily so. But doing the same bad show but without a studio audience gave the hideous My Name Is Earl 'depth' to the Water Cooler Set. The show was a huge bomb -- Union Square did better on NBC Thursday nights than did My Name Is Earl -- and drove off viewers each season. Alyssa Milano was added at one point with the network hoping that she could provide "heat" but she couldn't. No one could have, not with those scripts.

Earl's biggest problem was not just the thinly written characters, it was also the fact that these characters were mocked and ridiculed. It made for bad TV but, as one multiple Emmy winning sitcom producer pointed out, "Who would have thought that someone responsible for Yes, Dear would have the audacity to look down on anyone?"

Indeed. And it was this sneering, snotty point-of-view that doomed Earl. The show was like the first episodes of Roseanne, before Roseanne staged her walk out and made clear that as long as the scripts were ha-ha-look-at-the-fat-woman and ha-ha-poor-people-are-so-stupid-and-crass, she wasn't doing the show. That took real strength, it took an artist.

Greg Garcia has/is neither.

Which is why it's so surprising that Raising Hope is the rare Fox live action sitcom (second hour of prime time Tuesday nights) which actually works -- so far.

Give credit to Martha Plimpton first and foremost. The always amazing Plimpton can't be praised enough. And it's good to see her for more than a single episode. If you write mere sketches, you need an actress who can flood your thinly drawn role. Martha doesn't find the humanity in the role, she creates it, she births it.

Martha's playing Virginia Chance, mother of Jimmy (Lucas Neff), wife of Burt (Garret Dilahunt), granddaughter of Maw Maw (Cloris Leachman) and grandmother to the infant Hope that they're "raising." We can't think of another woman who could play Virginia and make this show work. Martha's bringing so much more than the scripts to each performance and taking the on-the-page ridiculed Virginia and turning her into a relatable and recognizable woman. We're not sure how long Martha can pull that feat off because we've read the scripts and still marvel at all that she's managed so far.


The show was sold as a look-at-these-idiots series. The premise is that Martha and Burt move in with Maw Maw and never leave. Maw Maw suffers from a highly fluid memory which is constantly in flux. Martha and Burt's young son Jimmy works with Burt in the landscape business while Martha cleans homes. On a really bad day, Jimmy hooks up with a gorgeous woman (Lucy played by Bijou Phillips) in what appears to be a life-changer for Jimmy. It does turn out to be such an event, but in a different way. Lucy's killed several men and ends up on death row and pregnant. Shortly after she gives birth, Lucy visits the "electric bye-bye chair" and Jimmy is left to raise their daughter (Princess Beyonce until Jimmy changes his daughter's name to Hope).

A gifted talent could take that premise and turn it into a screwball comedy. Greg Garcia's not gifted. And the scripts never fail to demonstrate that. For example, who has a problem with words? This can be a character trait. Carroll O'Connor's Archie Bunker was infamous for his malapropisms, for example. But what might be a trait for Virginia gets shifted to Burt, gets shifted to . . .

Are their characters being written here because, on the page, there's no evidence that they are. Character traits shift from episode to episode. Garcia's very lucky to have a talented cast who can make this believable and flesh out stick figures.

And if it were a single-season show, we'd be less concerned about how all this turns out. But Garcia's record demonstrates that he gets worse with each season. If that turns out to still be the case, not only will the cast be unable to save him but some of the Water Cooler Set might have to notice what they've ignored: Just how hateful this show is written.

Do you see the working poor as idiots? That's how Greg saw them in My Name Is Earl and how he sees them in Raising Hope. The pilot is the worst episode of the series thus far because the actors were still feeling their way around and were too dependent upon the script which really drove home the ha-ha-these-people-are-stupid-and-poor.

It's rather amazing that no one wants to notice that aspect of the show and how Garcia's stil sneering and looking down at the characters. Not only does spoofing really not work for a longtime audience, there's also the reality that if Garcia finds these characters something to sneer at, he might try remembering that he's the one who created them.

Fox might try remembering Garcia's record and, at the first sign of a significant drop in viewers, muscle Garcia out of the way and bring on a real writer. Right now the actors are able to rise above the 'jokes' about how lazy the poor are but, as far as we can tell, the most indolent person -- and the real unskilled worker -- is Greg Garcia.

Easy Come, Easy Go

Taking the shade out of the sun,
Whatever made me think that I was number one?
I ought to know easy come, easy go.

-- "Easy Come, Easy Go," written by Diane Hildebrand and Jack Keller, recorded by Cass Elliot on her Bubblegum, Lemonade, and Something for Mama album

Poor Barry, it was never supposed to be this way for the Christ-child. Having been gifted with both the Democratic Party's presidential nomination and a press pool too timid to point out his robotic way of speaking -- a stop-start style only heard prior in the monologues of Sandy Dennis, Barry was supposed to soar in the polls and it would be left to history to point out that the Corporatist War Hawk pulled the wool over everyone's eyes in real time.

Poor Barry, like a model turned actress, he believed his own hype.

He mistook celebrity for talent and his already well known vanity only grew and grew.

As he prepared to push his Corporatist War Hawk agenda which would alienate the left, the right and the center, he was convinced his own popularity was neither fleeting nor an aberration. US House Rep Marion Berry would explain that when he brought up the 2010 mid-terms and expected losses, "The president himself, when that was brought up in one group, said, 'Well, the big difference here and in '94 was you've got me.'"

But that turned out to be no great gift at all, did it?


"It feels bad," whimpered Barack.

Segments of the press corps continued to shower Barry with press love immediately after the election such as when some made a big to-do over whether Sarah Palin's endorsed candidates won or lost but 'forgot' to rank Barack as king maker. His losses were much more great. Equally true, unlike Palin, Barack endorsed a large number of incumbents and incumbents generally have more resources than their challengers.

The 2010 mid-terms saw the Dems lose seats in the Senate and in the House -- in fact, control of the House flipped to the Republican Party. Barack thought the big difference between 1994 and 2010 was that Dems had him. Turns out having him was no great plus.


hero_www_11-12-10

Desperate to escape the humilitation of the midterms, Barack traveled overseas for photo ops -- in which he came off less than impressive -- and for his big 'get' -- the G20.


But Barack struck out there as well. One of the kinder evaluations was found in Sewell Chan, Sheryl Gay Stolberg and David E. Sanger's "Obama's Trade Strategy Runs Into Stiff Resistance" (New York Times). Not since he attempted to bring the Olympics to Chicago had he failed so publicly overseas. And this comes on the heels of the embarrassing rejection of Barack by puppets in the US-client state of Iraq, whose actions Thursday left the bragging White House with, as Michael Jansen (Irish Times via Gulf Today) pointed out, "nothing to boast about."

Slowly, the press begins to break ranks and talk about how "touchy" he was, how "prickly" and, yes, how "vain."

Carol E. Lee (Politico) portrays him today as "defensive and frustrated" and quotes him -- sounding like Norma Desmond all over again -- asking the press, "What about the compliments?"

Yes, Barry, what about the compliments?

Never has he come off more like the caddish Corliss of A Kiss Before Dying.

And never before has he so alarmed the Democratic Party power structure that once embraced him.

In today's Washington Post, Douglas E. Schoen and Patrick H. Caddell get quickly to the point, "To that end, we believe Obama should announce immediately that he will not be a candidate for reelection in 2012." They note:
We do not come to this conclusion lightly. But it is clear, we believe, that the president has largely lost the consent of the governed. The midterm elections were effectively a referendum on the Obama presidency. And even if it was not an endorsement of a Republican vision for America, the drubbing the Democrats took was certainly a vote of no confidence in Obama and his party. The president has almost no credibility left with Republicans and little with independents.

Hermene Hartman (Huffington Post) may have beat the two to the punch, observing last week, "The Obama administration is at a critical stage; they may very well have destroyed the Democratic Party. Their creditability is seriously impaired. It would not be surprising if the party asked Barack Obama not to run for a second term, for fear of losing."


Taking the shade out of the sun,
Whatever made me think that I was number one
?
I ought to know easy come, easy go
. . .

Sundays before dawn

On Sunday mornings,
in the hour before sunrise,
when the world hasn't quite woken up

You can walk through the street
Encountering nearly no one
Exchanging a complicit, shared smile
With that rare stranger

Who may tell you
"Sundays before dawn
are a New England morning."

fisherman's_wharf_32.JPG

On those truest statments . . .

[This piece is written by Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude; Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix; Mike of Mikey Likes It!; Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz); Ruth of Ruth's Report; Trina of Trina's Kitchen; Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ; Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends; Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.]

How do we determine a truest?

Each week we offer "truest statement of the week." Some think we play favorites. That's not the case.

Dalia Hashad was really the inspiration for the feature because she would just lay it out there on any number of topics when she was a co-host of Law and Disorder. And we might not be covering an issue that week so we couldn't include her in an article. Dona's always urged short features to break up the visual spacing of the site and we came up with "truest" as a result.

Most readers of this site are familiar with David Sirota's bullying e-mails to C.I. (Click here for one example, if you're late to the party.) Despite those e-mails, C.I. has nominated Sirota for a truest -- the rest of us shot it down both times. The truest has to stand as a truest and, if it does, it ends up with the honor -- many times there are two truests each week.

Dalia probably has the most -- or close to the most -- "truests" of anyone and she's probably closely followed by Cindy Sheehan who will overtake her this year if the pattern holds. We've gone with politicians and MSM journalists when they've earned it. There's no set rule other than what you state has to be true, strongly true.

Visiting Corrente this weekend, we saw this post by Lambert. He recommends two posts by two women. And as we read along with one of the posts, by Riverdaughter of The Confluence, we think, "Oh good, we can give it to Riverdaughter this week." We are not close to her, we are not one with her but we're happy to give out an accolade to anyone in the PUMA-sphere even Riverdaughter.

But then we read her next paragraph. Where she refers to "the delusional left, like Chris Hedges and Will Bunch . . ."

riverdaughter

Oh, so sorry. We didn't realize that Riverdaughter was the arbitrar of political good taste. Probably because we well remember 2008 and what rumors Riverdaughter ran with. And now she wants to slam Chris Hedges?

Chris Hedges who worked overtime to alert people to the reality of Barack Obama? Chris Hedges who was trashed repeatedly in 2008 by Ton Hayden and others?

If we disagree with Chris Hedges today, we don't say a damn word. Now if he came out for war (which would require him pulling a Chris Hitchens), okay. But otherwise? Chris Hedges has a pass from us. When he stood brave in 2008, C.I. called a phone conference and said she'd heard that not only was Hedges standing brave, he was about to endorse Ralph Nader. At which point, we all knew that meant he would get even more villified. We made the choice at that time (and, yes, he did endorse Nader) that we would not engage in any public stoning of Chris Hedges, any calling him crazy or delusional or anything else.

Because he stood brave when others caved. When people who endorsed Barack publicly would tell us privately that they thought he was a failure but that they had to because there was so much pressure on this (especially true of C.I.'s friends in the entertainment world who were getting attacked by George Clooney and Susan Sarandon -- which is why we're all so thrilled Tim Robbins bailed on Sue), Chris Hedges stood strong.

We remember what 2008 was like. We remember being popular with lefties, independents and Democrats and suddenly losing huge portions of all three. We remember the strong arm tactics, the offers of "recant and we'll link" -- we remember it all. We are fortunate that we already had a community built up before 2008 so we lost some people but not enough to really suffer. But we also don't try to make a living at our writing. Chris Hedges does. At his writing and at his speaking. And yet he told the truth when you can be sure he had plenty of offers to hop on board the Bambi Bus and ride the gravy train to Corporate Moneyville.

So when Riverdaughter wants to insult Chris Hedges as part of the "delusional left"? She's yet again showing her immaturity and ignorance. And, in the end, that is why we had to break with her and insist that she delink from our site. She's not very educated, she's woefully uninformed and yet she writes and writes and writes.

Her positions are often good ones, it's just she lacks the maturity and the knowledge to back them up.

Today she trashes Chris Hedges as part of the "delusional left" and yet he never drank the Kool-Aid. And yet, he's a Socialist not a Democrat -- a fact that -- like so many others -- Riverdaughter seems unfamiliar with.

As stupid as she is in that post -- and she's pretty damn stupid in that post -- we'd still be willing to highlight her as a "truest" one week. But that will never happen while she's attacking the people she should be making peace with. And it will never happen while she praises a man (Jim Webb) who's shared -- in writing, check out those novels -- violent and racist attacks on women. Again, it is her lack of knowledge that forever weakens any argument she might make. As she flirts these days with endorsing the sexist Jim Webb ("women can't fight"), Riverdaughter mainly reminds people that before she came around to supporting Hillary Clinton's primary campaign, she was supporting John Edwards.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }