Taking these four elements together, we begin to see a reasonably
clear picture of the economic mechanics of the American empire. Imperial
power backstops cheap imports and the ability to run endless budget and
trade deficits. Various countries absolutely have been brutally
subjugated to protect the profits of American businesses over the years.
Others have been trapped in debt peonage by U.S.-backed IMF austerity
programs, while the grinding poverty of the Global South effectively
protects America’s disproportionate share of world resources.
But here’s the main point: The downsides, even for Americans, are far
more numerous. American prosperity—by which I mean the standard of
living of typical Americans—in no way depends on this empire,
and the broad American public is in no way the major beneficiary of the
system it promulgates. Instead, it is run in the interests of a tiny
class of business executives, investors, and military contractors. The
American people are routinely victimized by the same ruthless bankers
and pharmaceutical executives running riot in the Global South.
And this leads to an important political conclusion. It would be very
possible to reform the world economic structure to allow poorer
countries to build up their prosperity without truly harming the broad
American public. Above all, the U.S. economy would have to be become
drastically more efficient—which should be possible given technological
developments. Carbon- and pollution-spewing coal and natural gas power
plants could be replaced with renewables (which are now
price-competitive with fossil fuels) and nuclear power. Gas-guzzling
SUVs could be replaced with smaller electric cars. Heating and cooling
for buildings could be made drastically more efficient with electric
heat pumps and improved insulation. And all without sacrificing
growth—one model suggests a green U.S. economy could be 158 percent
larger by 2050.
-- Ryan Cooper, "The Empire Strikes Out: How American empire is a net drain -- even for Americans." (DEMOCRACY).