Tuesday, September 06, 2022
TV: Some shows don't need or deserve more than one season
Kat explains how there's only one Cher
From KAT'S KORNER (of THE COMMON ILLS):
Cher
There's only one Cher.
There was not a Cher before Cher. She's not based on anyone. She's not Madonna coming up trying to be Marilyn Monroe.
Everything she did was the 'wrong' thing. In the 60s, gossip columnists like Hedda Hopper couldn't stop trashing her. What she and Sonny wore was considered outrageous. She became a rock star when few women did. And she did it by singing some really tough songs. She wasn't blond, she wasn't Lesley Gore.
The sixties ended and ended the popularity of many big acts from that period. Dusty Springfield didn't have hits, etc, etc. It was over. Cher was no more.
Except, surprise, there she was on TV and she quickly became a TV star -- and she ended up with more hit songs including three number ones.
The 70s ended and so did Cher. That's what people said. She did an act in Vegas. Not much else. The hits were gone on the radio. Then, boom, she was a movie star: SILKWOOD, MASK, THE WITCHES OF EASTWICK, SUSPECT, MOONSTRUCK, MERMAIDS -- and an Oscar for MOONSTRUCK.
And she was back on the music charts -- "We All Sleep Alone," "Just Like Jesse James," "Heart of Stone," "If I Could Turn Back Time" . . .
The 90s. She does the infomercial.
Her career is over.
But we'd heard that before, right?
She ends up with her first solo number one "Believe." She's amazing in TEA WITH MUSSOLINI.
She's never gone. She's never over.
And she's her own template.
Cher is Cher.
Why am I saying this?
A Tweet led to some insisting Dua Lipa is this "generation's Cher" and NME reports:
Another user quote-retweeted the post, writing, “So much truth in one Tweet.” They tagged both artists, to which Cher responded somewhat shadily. “How many [years] are in a generation,” the 76-year-old pop icon wrote alongside an emoji of a thinking face. See that exchange below:
I agree with Cher.
Dua's been around for a few years. Trying doing it for decades before being compared to Cher and try also being an original and not a copy. No woman sang like Cher before Cher.
I feel a little sorry for Dua because it's not a compliment. By that, I mean, a comparison with Cher has always left the other one exposed because they are not Cher. That was Rebecca's point last October when an idiot was insisting Lady Gaga was going to win the Oscar (she didn't, did she) and was the new Cher.
Closing with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Stan explains the reality of Brad Pitt
From OH BOY IT NEVER ENDS:
Brad Pitt is not box office by himself
Ryan Scott (FILM) has finally noticed what everyone else has: There are no efforts by the studios to fill August and September. This is their fault, he's right. They should have planned better. This is from his article:
2021 had some big breakout hits, but most of them were superhero movies like "Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings" and "Venom: Let There Be Carnage." Heck, "Spider-Man: No Way Home" even made the vast majority of its money in 2022 since it came out in December of last year. :ast year had few unexpected hits while every single Warner Bros. movie went to HBO Max the same day it hit theaters. It was a step in the right direction, but far from a return to normal.
Meanwhile, 2022 has seen hits not connected to franchises: "The Lost City," "The Black Phone," "RRR," "Everything Everywhere All At Once," and "Elvis." But those movies weren't being counted on as the only games in town. At the same time, expected franchise hits like "The Batman," "Minions: The Rise of Gru," and "Sonic the Hedgehog 2" were doing their thing, along with the aforementioned hit blockbusters. "Maverick" has led the way with more than $1.4 billion globally, but it hasn't been operating alone.
Many of the other breakout hits that weren't franchise-based were kind of secondary to the steak and potatoes hits that were being supplied to theaters. Now? It's only side dishes like "Dragon Ball Super: Super Hero." I think it's great that anime has found a foothold at the box office in North America, but movies like that alone can't carry theaters alone. Granted, it's not the fault of Sony that "Bullet Train" didn't break out as big as they hoped, nor is it Universal's fault that "Beast" wasn't a bigger hit. The relative disappointment of films like that, as well as "DC League of Super-Pets," has only served to further highlight the issue.
Going out with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Mike weighs in on the Hulk and other MARVEL issues
From MIKEY LIKES IT!
The Hulk, MARVEL and other issues
Mark Ruffalo was asked in an interview with Variety if he plans to stay with Marvel or retire as Phases 5 and 6 loom. He had this to say:
"I mean, I'll probably do it as long as they'll have me, if people are interested, and I can bring something that's interesting to me to it, and interesting to the fans. But I have no idea. I mean, you know, when you look at the comics, there's some pretty grizzled, old versions of him. I'm like, OK, the 67-year-old Hulk, that would be interesting - if all of us are still here making movies and there's a world that allows for us to do that anymore. With what we're living in and heading towards, the future feels more precarious than any other time. So I don't want to get too far ahead of myself. But I hope I'm still around to do it."
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Rebecca covers the series finale of ANIMAL KINGDOM
After six seasons, ANIMAL KINGDOM came to an end. Rebecca covered it in multiple posts:
- other reactions to the end of 'animal kingdom'
- adrian sucked deran down to the hairy root and then ...
- animal kingdom - was smurf killed off too soon?
- the end of 'animal kingdom'
including the one we're highlighting below:
the end of 'animal kingdom'
let's close with c.i.'s 'Iraq snapshot:'
Elaine on the Trump raid
From LIKE MARIA SAID PAZ:
A special master needs to be appointed immediately
The arguments raised by the Justice Department are not just familiar but transparently weak. The government argues that Trump lacks standing because the records belong to the United States, not him. However, that is the point. The court is trying to determine who has a right to these documents. The Justice Department itself recognizes that it may have gathered some attorney-client privileged documents in this ridiculously broad search. It allowed the seizure of any box containing any document with any classification of any kind — and all boxes stored with that box. It also allowed the seizure of any writing from Trump’s presidency.
Moreover, the court itself has ample authority to appoint a special master to help sort through such material.
The government and its allies, in my view, misconstrue the impact of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g), which provides
” A person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure of property or by the deprivation of property may move for the property’s return. The motion must be filed in the district where the property was seized. The court must receive evidence on any factual issue necessary to decide the motion. If it grants the motion, the court must return the property to the movant, but may impose reasonable conditions to protect access to the property and its use in later proceedings.”
However, the Special Master is being used by the Court to determine the status, classification, and categorization of the documents. The Court has the inherent authority to seek such assistance in an independent review of material. Special masters are fairly common helping courts establish the record for ruling on the merits of motions. It may turn out that most or all of this material is properly held by the government, but a Special Master can help establish the record for that decision, including the status of material acknowledged as potential attorney-client material.
The Justice Department also makes the same type of arguments used to oppose the release of a single line of the affidavit in redacted form. It claims that both its investigation and national security would be harmed. That is even less compelling here. A special master would be reviewing documents in a secure facility and would presumably have a clearance. Many of us who have handled national security cases have been cleared for TS/SCI material.
Notably, however, the Justice Department states in a footnote that “the government is prepared, given the extraordinary circumstances, to unseal the more detailed receipt and provide it immediately to plaintiff.” That sounds like (as with the redacted affidavit) that they clearly can release more information, particularly to avoid a Special Master appointment.
The use of such arguments after the release of the redacted affidavit only undermines the arguments further. The Justice Department insisted that the court should not release a single line of the affidavit and that any substantive disclosure would unleash a parade of horribles, from damaging national security to sacrificing witnesses.
For those of us who have litigated cases against the Justice Department, it was an all-too-familiar claim by a department notorious for over-classification and over-redaction arguments. For a week, media pundits mouthed the same exaggerated claims and challenged those of us who argued that it was clearly possible to release a redacted affidavit; liberals suddenly shuddered at the thought of doubting the Justice Department. Then the government produced a redacted version that caused no such harms while confirming important facts in the case.
The raid. Merrick Garland's actions do not instill confidence. The whole thing was questionable to begin with. Donald Trump is expected to run for the presidency in 2024. Joe Biden states he plans to run and his people go after anyone who says otherwise (like Carolyn Maloney). Joe is in charge of the Justice Dept and the JD raids the home of the person who some polls say could beat Joe.
I don't know why I'm so shocked that they don't care about appearances.
They didn't care when it just appeared that Hunter Biden was acting in an unethical manner. Now that we know more, Hunter Biden was using his father's office to enrich his family and how "the big guy" (Joe) knew about it all along.
They need to appoint a special master and do so immediately. It is needed and the longer this is avoided, the more doubts that we the American people are going to have.
"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Isaiah reviews a 90s comic book (actually four issues)
Repost from THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS:
ZERO HOUR CRISIS IN TIME
ZERO HOUR CRISIS IN TIME
Marcia weighs in on Olivia Wilde
Repost from SICKOFITALLRADLZ:
Olivia Wilde, shut up
Before any idiot wants to e-mail me that Laura Flanders is my friend, she's a self-loathing lesbian. I don't have time for her. In 2008, Barack Obama put homophobes on stage at his campaign events. Laura endorsed him. She didn't bat an eye. He promoted conversion 'therapy.' Laura didn't say boo. Bitch can go f**k herself.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

