Sunday, January 19, 2014

From The TESR Test Kitchen

After shoddy labor relations, Hostess went under.  It was liquidated in 2012 and that was the end of Ding Dongs, Twinkies and more.  Under new owners (Apollo Global Management and C. Dean Metropoulos and Company), the Hostess snack cakes returned to supermarket shelves last summer.  Hostess Brands brought back Twinkies, Cup Cakes, Zingers, Donettes, Suzy Q's, Mini Muffins, Ho Hos, Sno Balls, Cofee Cakes, Fruit Pies, Jumbo Honey Bun, Cinnamon Roll and, yes, the Ding Dongs.

Ding Dongs are part of America's cultural heritage -- so important, they even pop up in the movie Can't Stop The Music when Steve Guttenberg tells Valerie Perrine, "Anyone who could swallow two Sno Balls and a Ding Dong shouldn't have any trouble with pride."  They also happen to be our favorite Hostess snack cake.






The first thing you'll notice -- we spotlighted in in the photo above -- the Ding Dongs are no longer wrapped in foil.  Instead, each one is in a plastic sleeve.

Wrapping each Ding Dong in aluminum foil probably wasn't good for the environment.

Was it good for the taste?

We're not sure.

We think the cakes taste fresher now.

We also think they're being made a little lighter.  To be clear, the most recent any of us can remember eating a Ding Dong before the research for this test kitchen was 2009.  But we all remember the cake -- and especially the chocolate icing -- being thicker than on the current batch.

Each box contains 12 Ding Dongs.  That's how it's been since 1967 when the snack cakes first emerged. Today's box if 15.3 ounces; however, before Hostess went out of business in 2012, the boxes had always contained 17 ounces.

The 1.7 ounce difference in the 12 Ding Dongs is noticeable.

As a snack cake, we'd rate it an 8 out of 10.

But as a Ding Dong, we'd rate it a 4 out of 10.

The box tells you it's "THE SWEETEST COMEBACK IN THE HISTORY OF EVER."  The box lies.








You can still save the internet

Friday, US President Barack Obama declared,  "As the nation that developed the Internet, the world expects us to ensure that the digital revolution works as a tool for individual empowerment, not government control."  What world does he live in?

On the one we call earth, the country was already reeling from a court decision.  Thomas Gaist (WSWS) reported: :


The Washington, DC Circuit federal Court of Appeals ruled 2-to-1 Tuesday that the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) 2010 Open Internet (OI) regulations were based on a wrong legal argument and are void.
The ruling represents a significant blow against “net neutrality.” Net neutrality principles forbid discrimination by Internet Service Providers (ISP) against their clients. Essentially, net neutrality asserts that the Internet is an example of “common carriage,” a legal concept which protects the right of the public to access basic services and infrastructure. The common carriage concept, which has existed for centuries, was developed to prevent companies that operate railroads, ferries, airplanes, telecommunications networks and other universally necessary infrastructures from giving privileged access to certain types of customers.
The regulations, declared legally invalid by Tuesday’s ruling, required Internet service providers to disclose information about “congestion management” practices on their systems. Centrally, the OI regulations prohibited the selective blocking or slowing of legal Internet content by the Internet providers, ensuring equal access to broadband for clients, and prohibited “unreasonable” discrimination against customers.


Brad Reed (Information Clearing House) insisted of the ruling,  "Any semblance of net neutrality in the United States is as good as dead. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Tuesday struck down the Federal Communications Commission’s 2010 order that imposed network neutrality regulations on wireline broadband services. The ruling is a major victory for telecom and cable companies who have fought all net neutrality restrictions vociferously for years."


It's a bad ruling, to be sure.  But we hope the people can still fight back.





Save The Internet isn't going down without a fight:



Bad news: Three judges just dealt a huge blow to the open Internet.
Their ruling means that companies like Verizon can now block or slow down any website, application or service they like. And they’ll be able to create tiered pricing structures with fast lanes for those who can afford the tolls — and slow lanes for everyone else.
Tell the FCC to do everything in its power to fight back.

And click here for the take action form where you can put in your name, your e-mail and your zip code and let the FCC know how displeased you are with the decision.









True four decades ago, true today

If the Committee's recent experience is any test, intelligence agencies that are to be controlled by Congressional lawmaking are, today, beyond lawmaker's scrutiny.

-- The Pike Committee report, quoted in Aaron Latham's "Introduction to the Pike Papers," February 16, 1976, The Village Voice.























































Some things don't go as planned

Meeting seeks justice for Iraq (John Catalinotto)

Repost from Workers World:

Meeting seeks justice for Iraq

By on January 18, 2014


An increase in deaths in Iraq from internal fighting and bombing doubled in 2013 from a year earlier, reaching levels unseen since 2008. In early January, the Nouri al-Maliki regime launched an attack on demonstrators in Falluja and Ramadi, using the alleged presence of al-Qaida as a pretext and asking for U.S. military aid.

It is more than appropriate now for those who opposed the 2003 invasion to fight for reparation payments from the war criminals who invaded and occupied Iraq. The following notice from the Bertrand Russell Tribunal explains what is being done to accomplish this. In the U.S., the International Action Center is supporting this effort, as are others.

“The International Association of Democratic Lawyers, a nongovernmental organization having consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council, will hold its 18th Congress in Brussels, Belgium, April 15-19, 2014. This Congress will be the number one meeting, networking and exchange opportunity for hundreds of legal activists throughout the world.

“Two days of this Congress will be dedicated to several commissions on topics and themes in which legal activists worldwide are involved. In partnership with IADL the BRussells Tribunal will organize a commission on April 16-17 about ‘Accountability and Justice for Iraq.’

“The aggression against Iraq, launched by the ‘Coalition of the Willing,’ under the command of the U.S. and Britain, was not just immoral, it was properly illegal and fits the Nuremberg definition of a Crime against Peace. Such a war should have its legal consequences for the aggressors and rights for the victims under international law.

“To date, no official has been brought to justice for war crimes, crimes against humanity and for waging a war of aggression, the supreme international crime. We have to change that equation. All those who are responsible for the invasion of Iraq should be held accountable for the destruction of the country’s infrastructure, its economic and social structures, its historical past and its health and education.

“Reasonable legal experts should work towards the goal of making reparations to the Iraqi people, who have been so deeply affected by this war and its aftermath and they should bring the perpetrators to justice.”

Developing a ‘roadmap’ for justice


“The BRussells Tribunal intends to bring together international legal experts and activists who will explore the possibilities for legal actions against those responsible for the war of aggression against Iraq. Participants will also share their experiences about past and present legal procedures and will discuss the different forms of legal action.


“In participation with the International Anti-Occupation Network (IAON), the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalize War, the Geneva International Center for Justice and other humanitarian organizations, we will try to develop a legal roadmap that can be used by law professionals and activists worldwide.


“The Coalition’s military operations, including massive attacks on cities like Falluja, and the counter-insurgency policy, led to substantially increased mortality and massive displacement, affecting millions of people. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed or maimed, families have been destroyed, displaced, and forced into refugee status all over the world. Iraq’s education system has been destroyed and its society deconstructed.


“The sectarian political process, organized by the occupying powers, has created a failed state characterized by the complete collapse of all public services, and systematic violations of all aspects of human rights, including the right to life. The U.S. deliberately provoked various factions in Iraqi society in order to divide and rule the country. An ancient, deeply rooted culture has been destroyed, brutalized, thrown into chaos.


“People’s tribunals, citizens’ arrests and other forms of activism may represent the conscience of the world community and should be deemed necessary in the absence of implementation of international law, but that’s not enough.


“Legal action is essential and can take many forms: universal jurisdiction, defending Iraqi victims in court, seeking arrest warrants when former U.S. politicians want to travel outside the U.S., etc.


“We cordially invite you to join us in Brussels in April. If we want to restore the respect for international law; if we want international law to be enforceable; if we want to ensure the legal rights of the victims of illegal aggressions, Iraq should be high on the agenda of lawyers and human rights organizations.”

Contact: IADL@brussellstribunal.org. Follow this event on facebook: tinyurl.com/l7ouqy7.


Articles copyright 1995-2014 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Michigan Greens Oppose Trans-Pacific Partnership

The Green Party of Michigan opposes the under-covered new trade treaty.



Ecological Wisdom      *  Social Justice
Grassroots Democracy  *  Non-Violence


Green Party of Michigan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  www.MIGreenParty.org


**  News Release  **
**  ------------  **
  January 15, 2014


For More Information, Contact:
-----------------------------
John Anthony La Pietra, GPMI Platform Committee Chair
    jalp5dai@att.net
    (269) 781-9478



Michigan Greens Oppose Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
======================================================
GPMI Urges All Michigan Voters to Contact Members of Congress
to Oppose "Fast-Track" Authority for Secretive Trade Treaty

Leaks Provide Only Public Glimpses So Far at "NAFTA on Steroids"



    The Green Party of Michigan (GPMI) has unanimously adopted a
resolution opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) treaty -- and an
urgent position against "fast-track" authority for the United States
Trade Representative (USTR), to protect the public's chance to find out
about and openly debate the secretive trade treaty.

    GPMI urges all Greens and all voters in Michigan to call on their
US Senators and Congresspeople to vote "no" on fast-track for TPP.  That
procedural maneuver, promoted by Rep. Dave Camp (R, MI-04) among others,
has been re-branded as "Trade Promotion Authority".  But just as it
greased the skids for NAFTA, fast-track for TPP would still block all
amendments, limit Congress's oversight, and make it harder for the
people to hold their members of Congress accountable.

    It is particularly hard to have a real debate about the contents of
TPP when they have been so aggressively kept secret.  Negotiations have
been held in increasingly secret sessions for years -- but the only
texts publicly available are leaked drafts.  WikiLeaks revealed the
draft chapter on intellectual property in November, and the
environmental chapter just today.

    "The worst thing we know for sure about TPP," notes GPMI vice chair
Art Myatt, "is that the provisions have been negotiated in secret and
the terms are still kept secret.  When the terms are actually revealed,
then we'll know the actual worst.

    "The immediate action we can take -- feeble though it may be -- is
to urge our 'representatives' in Congress to deny fast-track authority.
  They should take whatever time and effort is necessary to make all the
currently secret clauses public -- and so should we.  I suspect this
treaty is worse than NAFTA, and I would very much like to know the
details the 1% want to keep secret until it is too late for us to object."

    Leaked proposals include allowing corporations to sue to override
national, state, or local laws and regulations in the US and eleven
other countries bordering the Pacific Ocean.  Protections for the
environment, food safety, and people's rights could be wiped out as
"barriers to free trade" -- or, more honestly, limits on unrestrained
corporate profits.  This is what has led some analysts to dub TPP "NAFTA
on steroids".

    Linda Cree, an Upper Peninsula member of GPMI, feels that President
Obama is attempting to keep the TPP secret and fast-track it because he
knows people will be very opposed once they realize what the TPP is
attempting to do.

    "From what we've learned, the TPP will consolidate even more power
in the hands of corporations, and tie the hands of citizens.  It will
greatly increase the difficulty of protecting ourselves from GMO foods,
environmental degradation, and any other abuse that will increase
profits for corporations.  It's incredible that our Congress should go
along with this effort in any way."

    "It would set up international tribunals to allow corporations to
challenge any laws they took exception to, and even to file pre-emptive
lawsuits against possible proposed legislation -- such as legislation
banning fracking!  If ratified, the TPP would make it impossible to
protect labor, food safety, or environmental standards in the twelve
nations involved."

    Adds Aimee Cree Dunn, GPMI member and Upper Peninsula resident:
"'Free' trade agreements such as NAFTA and GATT, and the rules
promulgated by 'free' trade organizations such as the World Trade
Organization (WTO), have undercut the sovereignty of local governments
and economies around the world.

    "They penalize countries for favoring local products over foreign
imports, for enforcing environmental and labor regulations, for banning
dangerous foods such as genetically modified meat, and more.  They also
undermine the health of local economies, non-corporate farmers and
businesses, and -- through the expansion of industrial projects such as
mines and oil drilling -- the very land upon which we depend for survival."

    Dunn continues, "The TPP is rumored to have even greater reach and
impact than NAFTA or GATT.  But Obama has not informed the US citizenry
about what exactly is in the TPP and who is party to it.  Not only has
the agreement been hammered out by the Obama Administration in secret,
Obama plans to fast-track the deal *without* informing American citizens.

    "Secrecy leads to tyranny.  It is not a trait conducive to
democracy.  Americans need to, at the least, demand that the full
details of the TPP be made public.  Without an informed citizenry, we
have no democracy."

    John Anthony La Pietra, GPMI's Platform Committee chair, agrees –-
and adds that the Obama administration initiated negotiations with the
EU a year ago for the equally secret Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership.  "If TPP sneaks through, TTIP will be next -- and the same
anti-democratic, pro-corporate agenda will take over 60% of the
worldwide economy.

    "A fair and open discussion of TPP is vital -- but transparency
alone isn't enough.  We need a genuine chance to affect the result of
the negotiations . . . to put people and the planet ahead of profits."

    For more information about TPP, visit the links given below.  For
more information about the Green Party of Michigan, its values, and its
candidates, visit:

        http://www.MIGreenParty.org/

    For GPMI's latest news, “like” the Green Party of Michigan US
Facebook page and follow the party Twitter feed @MIGreenParty.


#    #    #


created/distributed using donated labor

Green Party of Michigan
PO Box 504
Warren, MI  48090-0504
    313-815-2025
    www.MIGreenParty.org

    GPMI was formed in 1987 to address environmental
issues in Michigan politics.  Greens are organized
in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.  Each
state Green Party sets its own goals and creates its
own structure, but US Greens agree on Ten Key Values:

    Ecological Wisdom
    Grassroots Democracy
    Social Justice
    Non-Violence
    Community Economics
    Decentralization
    Feminism
    Respect for Diversity
    Personal/Global Responsibility
    Future Focus/Sustainability

For the latest news,
“like” the Green Party of Michigan US Facebook page --
and follow us at Twitter:  @MIGreenParty.


[====================================]


Selected Links for More Information
About the Trans-Pacific Partnership
(TPP) and Some of Its Secret Contents
=====================================
http://www.billmoyers.com/2014/01/09/fool-me-once-20-years-of-nafta-show-why-the-trans-pacific-partnership-must-be-stopped/

https://www.citizen.org/TPP

https://democracyconvention.org/2013-convention/earth-democracy-conference

https://www.eff.org/issues/tpp

http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/blogs/fast-track-the-tpp-and-our-fight/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/trans-pacific-partnership

http://www.powells.com/biblio/9781578051328

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140109/18282625830/lies-ustr-is-spreading-about-fast-track-authority-to-push-tpp-through-congress.shtml

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/27/pacific-free-trade-deal

http://www.wikileaks.org/tpp/
    AND
https://www.wikileaks.org/tpp-enviro/pressrelease.html


IFCO/Pastors for Peace resists IRS attacks (Workers World)

Repost from Workers World:


IFCO /Pastors for Peace resists IRS attacks

By on January 18, 2014


Once again the U.S. government is targeting the solidarity movement with harassment in an attempt to silence the progressive movement in this country.


IFCO (the Interreligious Foundation for Community Organization)/Pastors for Peace says it has become the victim of “political persecution and an aggressive harassment campaign by the IRS.” At the root of this recent attack, according to government documents, is IFCO’s work with Viva Palestina.


A faith-based, social justice agency, IFCO/Pastors for Peace was founded over 40 years ago and was the first national foundation, they proudly declare, founded and controlled by people of color. It has carried out some of the most groundbreaking and historic campaigns in solidarity with Cuba and has been a leader of principled actions that defy U.S. policy in bold and even heroic ways.


The co-directors of IFCO/Pastors for Peace, Gail Walker and Father Luis Barrios, issued a statement Jan. 6 on behalf of the organization alerting the progressive movement to a two-plus-year campaign by the Internal Revenue Service against IFCO.


This campaign has resulted in an attempt by the IRS to strip IFCO of its tax-exempt, nonprofit organizational status, commonly known as 501(c)(3). Hundreds if not thousands of social organizations in the U.S. use this status in order to raise badly needed funds and to save on costly government taxes.


If the government is successful in stripping IFCO of this status, it could be a blow to other organizations, too — such as those fighting for immigrant rights and the rights of the homeless, the poor, youth and countless other populations who depend on these organizations for services and survival.


It would send a chilling message to any organization and progressive movement that it could easily be targeted for harassment. But IFCO’s response to this harassment is another example that the movement will not be silenced and will fight back.

Muslim bashers behind IRS audit

IFCO representatives explain that the IRS audit was put into motion because of requests by Rep. Brad Sherman, a Democrat from California, and Sue Myrick, a retired Republican congressperson from North Carolina, in a rare show of bipartisan unity. They wrote to the commissioner of the IRS, the U.S. Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury alleging that IFCO “may be raising funds for Hamas.” Hamas is a Palestinian organization with broad grassroots support, especially in Gaza where it is the elected authority, but it has been labeled a terrorist organization by the U.S.


Former Rep. Myrick is an extreme conservative. According to the Charlotte Observer, upon her resignation from office last year, “Myrick may be best remembered for her outspokenness on illegal immigration and terrorism. Her supporters were plentiful … repeatedly casting their ballots to keep her in office. Her critics accused her of fomenting hate against immigrant and Muslim communities. She penned the forward [sic] to a book — ‘Muslim Mafia’ — whose researchers called Islam a disease. Citing the book, she joined other Republicans in 2009 calling for an investigation of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a pro-Islam nonprofit, accusing it of planting ‘spies’ within national-security committees to shape legislative policy.
“Said Jibril Hough, a spokesman for the Islamic Center of Charlotte, ‘I honestly believe that she really thinks there is a conspiracy behind almost any Muslim in public life. That’s what her legacy will be. Someone who promoted Islam-o-phobia and thinks there is a conspiracy behind every Muslim in public life.’” (Dec. 29, 2012)


In response to IRS charges, IFCO states, “This is a blatantly false allegation. IFCO is being persecuted because in 2009 we agreed to serve as a fiscal sponsor to the U.S. component of the project Viva Palestina. Viva Palestina is a ­British-based charity organization that provides food, medicine and essential goods and services needed by the civilian population [of the occupied Palestinian Territories], and that highlights the causes and results of wars with a view to achieving peace.”


Solidarity is not ‘terrorism’


Viva Palestina is an international solidarity campaign that brought material aid to Palestine in defiance of sanctions, blockades and other acts of war against the oppressed Palestinian people. It helped organize the delivery of $1 million in food, medicine and essential supplies to the Palestinian people, accompanied by such prominent figures as author Alice Walker, New York City Councilperson Charles Barron, British Member of Parliament George Galloway, former Congressperson Cynthia McKinney, former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark and many others, during some of Israel’s fiercest attacks on Gaza.


Co-directors Walker and Barrios add that the IRS is also attacking IFCO’s decades of solidarity work with Cuba. As the government escalated its years-long harassment with these recent charges, IFCO/Pastors for Peace and all the supporters and friends of IFCO immediately went into motion to challenge and resist this attack.


Countless groups and individuals called IFCO, Walker reports, to show solidarity and ask how they could help. An email campaign asking people to carry out solidarity tore up the Internet with phone calls and emails to the government.


A legal challenge is of course part of the response. The IFCO Appeal, according to Walker and Barrios, “eloquently described work we have historically done to advance the struggles of oppressed people for justice and self-determination. The Appeal proves that the projects we support and operate have faithfully furthered our mission and our organization’s tax-exempt purpose.”


The appeal also points out that the Viva Palestina project “was not designed to nor did it in fact support any terrorist group but was designed to provide ambulances and medical supplies to the people living in Gaza who had been suffering from the lack of such humanitarian supplies and equipment.”


Against blockade and ban
on travel to Cuba



In addition, IFCO/Pastors for Peace has for decades organized caravans filled with aid to Nicaragua and other places in Central America.


Because of entrenched animosity to the Cuban Revolution by U.S. imperialism, unlicensed travel and aid to Cuba, as well as spending U.S. dollars there, are all forbidden by the 50-plus-year blockade against that country.


But IFCO/Pastors for Peace decided heroically in the early 1990s to defy that ban because it is wrong. It not only took forbidden aid to Cuba through the U.S./Cuba Friendshipment Caravan, but refused to apply for any kind of license. And upon reentry to the U.S, the caravans and the Venceremos Brigade openly and publicly declare they have traveled to Cuba.


Each year ever since, dozens of cars, buses, vans and even trucks filled with all kinds of vital aid have made their way across the U.S., stopping in cities where forums, rallies and meetings explain what kind of country Cuba really is.


These caravans are groundbreaking, and will be part of the progressive and revolutionary history of the Cuban solidarity movement in this country.

During the second caravan to Cuba in 1993, with tons of aid stowed on a little yellow school bus and other vehicles, Pastors for Peace refused to sign legal documents that justified the blockade of Cuba. The caravan was prevented from crossing the U.S.-Mexican border for many days.

As a result, a hunger strike by dozens of the hundreds of participants began right there at the Texas-Mexico border and lasted for 23 days.

This struggle made national news on one of the rare occasions that anything positive is said about Cuba. Time Magazine wrote that the government “blinked” in the confrontation with IFCO.

The caravan and its aid were finally released, to the cheers of the hundreds of participants. This stalemate resulted in a victory not only for Pastors but for the millions in solidarity with Cuba ­worldwide.

It was this example of defiant heroic solidarity that earned IFCO the wrath of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Indeed, Pastors for Peace has continued to refuse to go along with any laws that justify the economic and political war against Cuba.

OFAC is the government entity that enforces the blockade of Cuba. It has attempted for over 20 years to harass IFCO, including with injunctions, but has failed.

The progressive movement is confident that today’s attack against IFCO/Pastors for Peace will result in another victory for IFCO and all those struggling for a better world. The organization will prevail because, as IFCO points out, aren’t conditions such as 15 million children in the world dying of hunger each year and 50 million living in the United States without health insurance real acts of terrorism? These conditions are the basis for a real fightback against the right.

IFCO writes, “We have no way of knowing how the IRS is going to respond to our Appeal, but we want you to know that as always, we are ready to fight; to defend and protect IFCO and its rich history. As we wage this battle we are counting on your support and participation in this vital campaign to defend ourselves and those that we support, against this brutal IRS attack.”

Indeed IFCO/Pastors for Peace deserves the support and solidarity of everyone. Cuba and Palestine and all those in struggle deserve no less.

For more information and to find out how to participate in the campaign to defend IFCO/Pastors for Peace, including making needed donations, visit ifconews.org or call the office at 212-926-5757.


Articles copyright 1995-2014 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Highlights



 This piece is written by Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude, Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix, Kat of Kat's Korner, Betty of Thomas Friedman is a Great Man, Mike of Mikey Likes It!, Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz, Ruth of Ruth's Report, Marcia of SICKOFITRADLZ, Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends, Ann of Ann's Mega Dub, Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts and Wally of The Daily Jot. Unless otherwise noted, we picked all highlights.




Thursday's "Iraq snapshot," Wednesday's "Iraq snapshot,  "Benghazi addressed in Congress," "Homeland Security Committee hearing," "Beto O'Rourke talks about Iraq" and  "US Rep Brian Higgins weighs in on Iraq" --  C.I., Ruth, Kat, Wally and Ava report on last week's House Homeland Security Committee hearing.

Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Duty" -- Isaiah on the new Gates' book.

"Kat's Korner: Limp Bruce" -- Kat reviews Bruce Springsteen's new album. 




"Ride Along," "Oliver Stone out on MLK biopic," "Redford, Whitaker, Bullock and Roberts," "whining for redford?," "Best male acting performance of the 20th century" -- Stan, Ann, Betty and Rebecca go to the movies. 



"community: cooperative polygraphy," "Sheri Shepherd putting the "ew" in The View," "Arrow," "Elementary and Time pimps mafia," "Revolution," "revenge (the good)," "The Mindy Project: Casey slams into Cliff," "revenge (the bad)," "The Good Wife echoes season 7 of The Practice" and "2 Broke Girls and Adolf and aliens" -- Rebecca, Marcia, Stan, Mike and Ann cover TV. 


"Roast in the Kitchen" -- Trina offers an easy recipe and Ruth continues her Benghazi coverage:


  • Benghazi and the Senate report
  • Senate Intelligence Committee on Benghazi

  • "He underwhelms again" and "THIS JUST IN! DO NOTHING DOES NOTHING!" -- Cedric and Wally rate Barack.



    "They say they come in threes" and "Three to read" -- Kat and Ann on threes.



    "Barack's out of the loop, Carney's just out" and "THIS JUST IN! SOCIAL MEDIA LEAVES HIM BEHIND!" -- Cedric and Wally on Barack and his sidekick Jay Carney.


    "Barack kicks the can again" and  "The illegal spying"-- Mike and Elaine on the spying.


    "One more time on net neutrality" and "Net neutrality" and "Illegal spying and net neutrality" -- Betty and Elaine on net neutrality.


    "The stolen artifacts," "Iraq and the avoidance," "Iraq," "The awful New Yorker" and "Turley on war profiteering" -- Ruth, Trina, Ann and Elaine cover Iraq.

    "She's rejoining the Mac" -- Kat on Fleetwood Mac.


    "Politicans and the lack of jobs" -- Trina breaks it down.




    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
     
    Poll1 { display:none; }