Monday, February 08, 2016

Truest statement of the week

The Obama Administration will hold the dubious distinction as the most hostile presidency towards whistleblowers in the history of the US. The administration’s unprecedented enmity towards individuals, such as Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, who were courageous enough to expose US war crimes, fraud and corruption was met with aggressive retaliation, imprisonment, exile and ham-fisted punishment.

-- Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo, "Clinton, Petraeus, Snowden and Manning: The Tail of the Two Americas" (BLACK AGENDA REPORT).



Truest statement of the week II

The Hillary Clinton email issue is developing into a real whodunit, complete with Clintonesque legal semantics. “I never sent or received any material marked classified,” she said with respect to the discovery of classified information on her private, unclassified email server. That surface denial nearly rivals Bill Clinton’s classic: “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” But this is no laughing matter. . . 

-- Colbert I. King, "Clinton email scandal: Why it might be time for Democrats to draft Joe Biden" (WASHINGTON POST).






A note to our readers

Hey --


A Monday.
 




First, we thank all who participated this edition which includes Dallas and the following:





The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen,
Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.


And what did we come up with?



Dr. Coleman-Adebayo gets a truest.
As does Colbert King.

Hillary's Iraq War vote is no small thing.  There should be consequences.

Ava and C.I. take on a number of issues -- including Gloria Steinem's tired 'leadership' -- in this report that covers Sarah Michelle Geller, Carly Simon, Tina Turner and a host of others.
Janet's landmark album gets noted by some -- though not all.
A genre went missing.  Ticket buyers noticed.  Did anyone else.
A parody piece of Hillary trying to be 'hip' and 'edgy.'
Cynthia McKinney Tweets some truth.

Gloria Steinem wins Dunce of the Week.
What we listened to while writing.
Look at who's supporting Bernie.
Repost from IAVA.
Repost from the UK SOCIALIST WORKER.
Mike and the gang wrote this and we thank them for it.


Peace.




-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.










Editorial: It should be a big deal

Cranky Clinton is still surprised that her 2002 vote to authorize a war on Iraq is an issue.


Jamie Novogrod (MSNBC) reports:


Appearing Sunday morning on NBC’s “Meet the Press”, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dealt gingerly with her Iraq War vote as she responded to a question about whether the American invasion thirteen years ago set the stage for the rise of ISIS.
“Well, I think that’s a hard conclusion to draw, because remember we had al Qaeda before we had ISIS,” Clinton said. Clinton added that al Qaeda had, by the start of the Iraq War in 2003, already launched 9/11 and before that had attacked U.S. embassies in Africa.
Pressed on whether the violence that followed the American removal of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein could be tied to the conditions that gave rise to ISIS, Clinton held firm.
“I think that’s a lot of jumps in logic that to me doesn’t really add up,” Clinton said. “The Iraq War, there’s no doubt, contributed to instability. I’m not going to in any way deny that. But you cannot draw a direct line.”

The remarks underscore trouble that Clinton continues to have addressing her 2002 vote as the U.S. senator from New York authorizing the Iraq War.



Last week, Hillary trotted out a new spin: Senator Bernie Sanders' 2002 vote against war on Iraq was not a plan to deal with the Islamic State.

The Islamic State did not exist in 2002.

And Bernie's never claimed that his vote was a way to deal with ISIS.

But it was the kind of lies and distraction we've come to expect from Hillary Clinton.


Some idiots fell for it.


C.I. takes down the idiotic VOX in "Cranky Clinton and other war addicts."



But most people saw it for what it was, a desperate measure by Hillary -- another desperate measure.



Other desperate measures quickly followed.


War Criminal Mad Maddie Albright used the weekend to declare that there was a special place in hell for women who don't support other women.


To which, the only logical response would be, "Is this special place in hell for women who don't support other women near or adjacent to the place in hell for women (and men) who are responsible for the deaths of over a million Iraqis?"


And then there was Gloria Steinem's desperate measures (which Ava and C.I. tackle here) as she deployed homophobia, transphobia, sexism and a general hatred for the young to insist that the young women supporting Bernie (and not Hillary) were only doing so to 'meet' boys.


When her supporters are this desperate it's worth noting what Carl Bernstein declared Monday on CNN, that his White House sources are saying everyone (at the White House) is in a panic over what a lousy campaign Hillary's running and what a lousy campaigner she's become.


Hillary just doesn't get that the Iraq War matters.

That her vote matters.

That the dead Iraqis matter.

That the dead troops sent into Iraq from the US, England and elsewhere matter.

As do the wounded -- Iraqi and foreigners.

That the huge increase in birth defects matter.


Someone needs to enlighten elderly fool Gloria Steinem: Birth defects are  a feminist issue.






"Findings suggest the enriched Uranium exposure is either a primary cause or related to the cause of the congenital anomaly and cancer increases," says a recent scientific report on the incidence of birth defects in Fallujah [Dr Samira Alani]
















 That's from Al Jazeera.



 This is from Justice for the Babies of Fallujah:


Another male born in FGH 2 days ago with multiple gross congenital anomalies in addition to CHD , he is the 1st baby to 2 young healthy couples with no previous history of any anomaly




Gloria's tired and sick fantasies appear to overlook reality.


Here's some reality:  Hillary's responsible for the above.


And, yes, it does matter.




TV: Women and Power

What is it that makes some women struggle with power?

We wondered that last week.


tv



First, we wondered it when we read Nellie Andreeva's DEADLINE piece  about a potential NBC series of CRUEL INTENTIONS:


NBC’s Cruel Intentions reboot, which was just greenlighted to pilot, picks up 15 years after the cult 1999 movie, which starred Ryan Phillippe, Reese Witherspoon and Sarah Michelle Gellar. It follows the beautiful and cunning Kathryn Merteuil — the character played in the film by Gellar — as she vies for control of Valmont International as well as the soul of Bash Casey, the son of her step-brother, the late Sebastian Valmont (Phillippe), and Annette Hargrove (Witherspoon).
With Gellar’s character featured in the followup series, it is probably not surprising that the Buffy The Vampire Slayer star would be on the producers’ wish list. And now I’ve learned that Gellar has been approached about reprising her role in the pilot. It is unclear yet whether it would happen or not; she is reading the script.


CRUEL INTENTIONS was a film Geller made while starring in the TV series BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER.  In both performances, she played strong characters and was rightly applauded for both.

Once BUFFY ended, SMG was playing all kinds of roles, none of them strong women.

It wasn't that she was giving bad performance -- she was very good in RINGER -- it's just that she seemed to run from the roles she was best suited for and the roles audiences wanted to see her in.

Was it scary playing a strong woman?

For a number of singers, it clearly has been.

Owning her power brought Alanis Morissette to fame with "You Ought To Know."

It was this same power that she ended up running from and ignoring on the follow up album.


On that album's "Thank You," she sang, "The moment I let go of it, was the moment I got more than I could handle."

Maybe so.

But it also cost her 4/5 of her audience.

Tina Turner lost 4/5 of her audience as well when she disowned her strength.

Strength evident in "Better Be Good To Me," "What's Love Got To Do With It," "Steel Claw," "Show Some Respect," etc resulted in her having the best comeback, as many noted, since Lazarus.  But she followed up PRIVATE DANCER with an album whining about her longing for "a typical male, a typical male" and much worse.  In the process, she lost the bulk of her audience.

Then there's the history of guilt so many women feel with regards to their power, with regards to their success.

In her best selling memoir BOYS IN THE TREES, singer-songwriter Carly Simon shares:

One afternoon, shortly after the New Year, someone from Elektra called with the news that NO SECRETS and its lead single, "You're So Vain," had both humped the charts from number 39 to number 1.  For me, a performer in her mid-twenties still saw herself as the stammering younger sister, the one eternally lagging behind, it was a wholly new experience.  By sheer coincidence, James's album ONE MAN DOG and its lead single, "Don't Let Me Be Lonely Tonight," had been released at approximately the same time as mine.  Even though James's new album was doing extremely well, it wasn't the monster of a hit that "You're So Vain" was turning out to be.  You would think I might have permitted myself a few hours, if not days, of satisfaction or pride, but I couldn't.  I had a crush on the song "Don't Let Me Be Lonely Tonight," similar to the crush I had on James, and the only thing I remember thinking was that I wished it were him, and not me.
It was the first time James and I had ever directly competed, and it confused me, not just because I'd always assumed James would be more commercially successful than I, but because my desire to make him happy was woven so intricately into the submissive side I'd cultivated in my childhood by bringing Uncle Peter milk shakes adorned with four-leaf clovers on top whenever he finished a tennis match.  What is it about men that allows them to be at ease as the successful ones, without feeling any guilt if their wives come up short?  Like many women of my generation, I wasn't remotely at peace with the idea of winning any competition with my man.


It's a strange relationship we have with power.


It's what leads a woman seen as the voice of rock for most of the eighties to turn her career over to her husband and watch it flounder from that moment on.  You never catch a wife changing her husband's successful sound let alone bragging about it the way Neil Giraldo did with Pat Benatar.


For every CherMadonna or Janet Jackson owning their power with aplomb there are so many more of us struggling.

And that brings up the other moment from last week, the shameful and embarrassing moment.

Oh, Gloria Steinem, please go away.

gs2

Just go away.

The woman went on hideous Bill Maher's hideous talk show.

Why?

Because she was still confused from her heavily applauded moment on Stephen Colbert's Comedy Central show years ago -- the one where she made an embarrassing spectacle of herself.

She did much more damage this go round.

How so?

Gloria attacked transgendered people early on.

She never really apologized for it until recently when the online world (including us) began making a big deal out of her bigotry.

Let's be really clear that before the online world, Gloria got away with anything and was never held accountable.

She and her cadre defended her and attacked critics instead of responding to criticism.


When she finally began addressing her historic bigotry, she tried to say she was misunderstood (she wasn't) before acknowledging (finally) that she was wrong.

She played it as a thing of the past.

So imagine the horror to see Bill Maher make sneers at Caitlin Jenner for who she was and, instead of addressing the bigotry, there was Gloria joining in with a swipe at Martine Rothblatt (born Martin Rothblatt).

In her revisionist 2013 essay for THE ADVOCATE, Gloria at least had the good sense to type, "I believe that transgender people, including those who have transitioned, are living out real, authentic lives.  Those lives should be celebrated, not questioned."

Yet there she was joining Bill Maher's mocking of Caitlin Jenner by mocking Martine Rothblatt.

Then there was her ridiculous homophobia and sexism.

Young women, she insisted, were supporting Bernie Sanders instead of  Hillary Clinton because they were trying to hook up with men ("When you're young, you're thinking, 'Where are the boys? The boys are with Bernie'.").

Excuse us?

Young women don't include lesbians (or the always overlooked bisexuals)?

Her hetero-normative assumptions and privilege were on full display.


And how insulting to straight women to insist that they are going to make their decision on who to support for president based on hormonal urges.

That insult?

It really goes to the failure that is Gloria Steinem.

Feminism, second wave, was moving forward with strength and purpose when Little Gloria shows up and refuses to stand up, time after time.  You can see Germaine Greer's "McGovern, the big tease" (HARPER'S, October 1972) and Vernoice Geng's "Requiem for the women's movement" (HARPER'S, November 1976) for starters.

Or you can just note that the strong and vocal Redstockings were silenced and attacked for standing up to Gloria (and noting her CIA connections), that 'feminist' Gloria used personal connections to silence the feminist group.

But mainly what you need to note is Gloria never shuts the f**k up.

At the age of 35, she publicly positioned herself as a feminist.

And good for her.

But within three years, she was battling with Betty Friedan to be the leader of the feminist movement -- and, yes, getting others to fight your battles is battling with Betty Friedan.

Betty was sidelined, too old to be the leader anymore, and Gloria filled the vacuum.

At 51, Betty was judged too old and 38-year-old Gloria assumed leadership.

And in the decades since, she has insisted she wanted to see young leaders rise up.

But she's done nothing to help that ever happen.

She's presented herself as the leader of feminism.

She's certainly the leader of the victim faction.

But at 81, she refuses to let go.

She refuses to step aside.

She and her cohorts forced Betty out when Betty was 30 years younger than Gloria is today.

And why won't Gloria step down?

Because she doesn't respect young women.

That's what came across loud and clear in her embarrassing conversation with Bill Maher.

Gloria came to power via character assassination.

She stood by while her cohorts attacked Betty Friedan.

She could have stopped it but she didn't.

And, in fact, she honestly encouraged it.

Prior to her crowning herself a leader, second wave feminism made huge strides on reproductive rights.

Once Gloria's a leader, it's victim, victim, victim.

There's no more standing up and demanding, there's settling for crumbs and watching Democratic members of Congress (and the Supreme Court) chip away at our rights.

Her long tenure of leadership is notable for one thing: The erosion of women's rights.

Gloria never really led any challenge to the system.

She whined.

She begged people to vote for the Democratic Party.

That's really all she's ever done.

She's weak and she's weakened feminism.

Worst of all, she's refused to step aside.

We loved Molly Yard and we love Patricia Ireland but if either woman had attempted to turn their tenure as President of NOW into a lifetime appointment, we would have objected.

The same way we object to Gloria Steinem's refusal to step aside and let other women come to the foreground.

Gloria's victim approach goes to the fact that she refuses to own her power.

She doesn't believe women have real power.

Which is why, in her book REVOLUTION FROM WITHIN, the best she can offer is a dream of a secret and safe room where women can meet to whisper to one another what needs to be done.

She also doesn't trust power.

Which is why she hijacks the media and refuses to share the spotlight or, better yet, surrender it.

At 81-years-old, she's really not fit to be the face of feminism.

And if anyone ever doubted that, they just needed to catch her brief moment with Bill Maher last week where Gloria managed to spout and sport bigotry towards LGBTs and all young women.

Women have had a strange relationship with power.  It's something we all need to work on.  Part of owning our power is demanding accountability from leaders and not looking away when they openly express bigotry.




















Celebrating CONTROL (and noting a few who ignored it)

Last week, we offered "Still Ms. Jackson 30 years later" about the 30th anniversary of the release of Janet Jackson's CONTROL album.


janetj


Reader Eddie H. notes, "You were first out of the gate!  In the days that followed I saw a lot of ink on this one of a kind, classic album.  Still it wasn't really enough.  This album is as much a classic as The Beatles' SGT. PEPPER'S LONELY HEARTS CLUB BAND or Dusty Springfield's DUSTY IN MEMPHIS."

We agree.

And so do a lot of you who also took the time to e-mail about your love for the album.

Like Eddie, Bernice T. noted that there was other coverage and asked if we could provide a link to some?


Sure.

Here's BILLBOARD from last week, CNN, THE ROOT, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, MTV, VIBE, FUSION, JEZEBEL and OUT MAGAZINE.


That's not a complete listing.

If you're wondering why we ignored NPR's coverage, it's because . . . there was none.

So-so White NPR can wax on -- and this includes the increasingly embarrassing Ann Powers -- about this and that male guitar band but they refuse to note the very real accomplishment and landmark that is CONTROL.


Well ROLLING STONE -- at least ROLLING STONE noted the anniversary, right?

Wrong.

They ignored it despite declaring on their Janet Jackson summary page:


Then John McClain, an A&M executive and family friend, suggested that Jackson work with Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis of the Time. Collaborating with these musician/writer/producers, Jackson recorded her breakthrough album, 1986's Control, which topped the pop and R&B album charts and spawned numerous hits: "What Have You Done for Me Lately" (Number Four pop, Number One R&B), "Nasty" (Number Three pop, Number One R&B), "When I Think of You" (Number One pop, Number three R&B), and, in 1987, "Control" (Number Five pop, Number one R&B), "Let's Wait Awhile" (Number Two pop, Number 1 R&B), and "The Pleasure Principle" (Number 14 pop, Number One R&B).



Even sadder, SPIN ignored the anniversary.

Why is that sadder?


SPIN put Janet on the cover first and did so for the best real-time reporting on CONTROL.

jj











The problem with films today






We use that image in our Film Classics of the 20th Century pieces and, looking at it, you may note women.

Among the women featured are Bette Davis, Jane Fonda, Goldie Hawn, Cher, Marisa Tomei, Meryl Streep, Drew Barrymore, Marilyn Monroe, Diana Ross, Diane Keaton, Lauren Bacall, Meg Ryan, Ruth Gordon, Tatum O'Neal, Whoopi Goldberg, Katharine Hepburn, Kathleen Turner, Bette Midler, Elaine May, Faye Dunaway, Demi Moore, Michelle Pfieffer and Barbra Streisand.

 And some of them are featured for comedies -- WILDCATS, DEATH BECOMES HER, BAREFOOT IN THE PARK, MERMAIDS, HOUSE SITTER, FIRST WIVES CLUB, LOVE AND DEATH, ANNIE HALL, ROMANCING THE STONE and THE PHILADELPHIA STORY.


2015 was a lousy year for film.

And we wonder where are the comedies?

And where are the women?

Did Norah Ephron's death also mean the death of romantic comedies?

Where are the romantic comedies?

No, TRAINWRECK is not a romantic comedy.


It's a grossly disappointing film.

Kevin James makes a movie and he's got a hottie.

Amy Schumer makes a film and she pairs herself with a whole lot of ugly (Bill Hader).


Applause for Melissa McCarthy who acts like a star in her films -- she has attractive men around her.


And applause for her for making real comedies.

We need them the way we needed WILDCATS, PRIVATE BENJAMIN and PROTOCOL, to name but three.

But we also need romantic comedies.

The rush to female-led gross-out comedies?

We applaud those films.

There aren't that many of them even after the success of BRIDESMAIDS.

But where are the films like WHEN HARRY MET SALLY . . ., SLEEPLESS IN SEATTLE, THE PROPOSAL, MUSIC & LYRICS, NOTTING HILL, YOU'VE GOT MAIL, BOOMERANG, RUNAWAY BRIDE, THE WEDDING SINGER, TWO WEEKS NOTICE, MAID IN MANHATTAN, HOW TO LOSE A GUY IN 10 DAYS, WHAT WOMEN WANT, PRELUDE TO A KISS, NEVER BEEN KISSED, HOPE FLOATS, THE WEDDING PLANNER, MADE IN AMERICA,  MONSTER-IN-LAW, KATE & LEOPOLD, SHE'S ALL THAT, FORCES OF NATURE, THE MIRROR HAS TWO FACES, and SOMETHING'S GOT TO GIVE?


2015 was a summer without love.

Pretty much true of the entire year.

And it's part of the reason that 2015 was a lousy year for film.





Cranky Clinton's desperation moves

wrong


With young voters glomming on Senator Bernie Sanders and avoiding War Hawk Hillary Clinton, the Clinton campaign is concerned.


In a bold move, they're trying out ways to make the brown noser seem 'edgy.'

One suggested slogan?

"I've always believed -- whether it be a democracy or an orgy -- the more people the better."











---------------------
[This is a parody piece before anyone takes it seriously.]
















Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }