Monday, April 15, 2024

Book Talk (Dona, Ava and C.I.)

1summerread

 

As we did in 2021 and 2023, we're attempting to again increase book coverage in the community. After a review posts, we try to do a discussion with the reviewer.  This go round, we're talking to Dona about her "THE LESSONS OF MAMA TEMBO (Dona)."  Dona?

 

 Dona: The book I went with is a children's book.  We've got two kids now -- Jim and I -- the youngest is five and we needed a new book to read and I was too tired to go to the bookstore.  So I used our tablet to pull up KINDLE UNLIMITED and we found The LESSONS OF MAMA TEMBO.  We found it -- together.  And this was a case of judging the book by the cover.  Sam Burk does the illustrations for the book including on the cover and they are arresting images.  Each page contains one.  The words are written by Jimmy Dirsdom.  It's a wonderful book.

 

You note that it addresses the way we're connected.

 

Dona: It does.  Not just the animals but the people need nature.  Mama Tembo is saddened by the fact that the forest is being torn down and replaced with a city.  And she's wise and loving.  Finn is her child.  We all have to get along, Mama Tembo explains, and that's humans and animals.  The truest that you two brought up, David A. Love,  "Green Spaces Are The Key To Restoring Our Bodies, Minds and Soul" (THE BLACK COMMENTATOR).  I think it fits in -- same message.  And, yes, the book does have a moral or a point to make.  Sometimes its fun to just read a silly book to your child but there are times when you do want a book that conveys the importance of the world around us.


You didn't do a book review last year.


Dona: No, I didn't.  I had before.  Marcia's the main reason we're doing the books this year and not taking a year off. She asked me what my objection was and we talked about it and I said I just didn't want homework.  I've got two kids now and I don't feel like doing a 16 page book review.  With the youngest, I'm pretty much just reading picture books these days.  And she said that's fine, and that a book review could be two paragraphs.  So, with that understanding, I said I'd support us again covering books.  And mine is a short review.  If you're a parent, you'll probably be happy about that.


Thank you, Dona.

-------------


Previous book discussions:

 

"Book Talk (Ty, Ava and C.I.)

 "Book Talk (Mike, Ava and C.I.)"

 

"Book Talk (Stan, Rebecca, Ava and C.I.)"

"Book Talk (Mike, Ava and C.I.)"


"Book Talk (Ann, Marcia, Trina, Ava and C.I.)"


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, a children's book published last year.  The text is written by Jimmy Dirsdom with Sam Burk doing the illustrations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE LESSONS OF MAMA TEMBO (Dona)

What you need to know for right now is that Mama Tembo is an elephant and Finn is her child.

 Remember that.

 

Mama Tembo is walking through the forest with baby Finn when she stops and looks longingly across the vast farmland.

Finn asks, "Mama Tembo, what are you looking at?"

"Oh, Finn, it's not what I see now but what I no longer see," replies Mama Tembo. 

Finn looks at Mama Tembo with concern, "Is your eyesight failing you?" 

"No, Finn, I see very well," reassures Mama Tembo as she playfully pats him on the head. 

Still curious, Finn asks, "What do you no longer see when you look at the farmland?"

Mama Tembo looks at Finn.  "I no longer see the beautiful forest that once stood in the farmland, nor the forest that stood where the city now stands."


That's the opening of The LESSONS OF MAMA TEMBO, a children's book published last year.  The text is written by Jimmy Dirsdom with Sam Burk doing the illustrations.

 It's a book that was a big hit with me and with my youngest (five-years-old).  It was a book about the importance of nature, the importance of our respecting our world.  And MPASS EDUCATION is a publisher that cares about these topics and puts them into book form that kids can easily understand.

 This was a book we both enjoyed -- KINDLE UNLIMITED subscribers can borrow it for free -- and one that was worth reading.  If your a parent who reads to your children you know that combo is not always easy to come by.

I highly recommend this book.


 

From The TESR Test Kitchen

1stove

 

Ruffles keeps serving up firey flavors.  We sampled the Flaimin' Hot.

 

 Ruffles, Potato Chips, Flamin' Hot, 8 oz Bag

 

 They're not kidding.


These are hot.  Extremely.  Two of the eleven us who sampled found them two hot, in fact.  Ty had to go throw up after three chips.  Kat took a pass after only one.


These are hot.  What do they taste like?  Hot.  The heat kind of destroys any real flavor.


If you like hot things, Flamin' Hot Ruffles will probably be your thing.  Otherwise?  Stick to plain Ruffles or Queso flavored.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2024 Passings

ceme

 

 

 

 

1) "bad news (settlers shot a child in the back and adan canto has died)" -- Rebecca covers the passing of THE CLEANING LADY and DESIGNATED SURVIVOR star.

 

 2 and 3) "David Soul and Glynis Johns have passed" -- two passings -- one you knew from STARSKY & HUTCH, the other you knew from MARY POPPINS.


4) "Mary Weiss, The Leader of the Genre?" -- Elaine notes the passing of the leader of The Shangri-Las. 


5) "The death of Norman Jewison and the death of Taraji P. Henson's career" -- Stan notes the passing of film director Norman Jewison.

 

 6) "Melanie: Queen of the Music festivals ," "Thank you to Melanie (Jess)," "Jon Stewart to return to the desk," "Melanie, REACHER, young voters," "When are they going to arrest Kari Lake?," "We lose Melanie and Dexter King but are still stuck with Jonathan Turley?," "my top five melanie albums," "Ugly Chaya Chachi Ratchik," "Where's Florida's "Don't Say Southern Baptist" law?," and "Melanie, Mary Weiss, Green Day" -- remembering singer-songwriter Melanie.


"Norman Jewison and Melanie" -- Ruth notes Melanie and Norman Jewison's passing. 


7) "Chita Rivera" -- a trailblazer's life is noted by Elaine.  


8) "Carl Weathers" -- Stan covers the actor and the athlete's passing.

 

9) "Richard Lewis" --  Ruth notes the passing of a stand up comic and actor.

 

10)  "Eric Carmen" -- Kat notes the passing of a singer-songwriter.

 

11)  "Louis Gossett Jr." -- Stan notes a passing.

 

12) "I do Barbara Rush" -- Betty notes a passing.

 

13) "Joe Flaherty" -- Stan notes a passing. 


14) "Robert MacNeil" -- Ruth notes a passing.

 

 

Book List

books

 

 

1) "J Randy Taraborrelli's awful Beyonce book" -- Ann reviews a book on Beyonce.

 

2)  "Sheila Weller's Carrie Fisher: A Life On The Edge" -- Marcia reviews a puff piece bio.

 

3)   "Sheet Pan Fajita Shrimp in the Kitchen" -- Trina reviews a cookbook.

 

4) "Container Gardening (book review), Idiot of the Week, and Kylie Minogue performed at the Brit Awards" -- Mike covers a book on container gardening. 


5) "Type II Diabetes (books)" -- Stan reviews four books on diabetes.


6) "faye dunaway" -- Rebecca reviews a biography of Faye Dunaway.  

 

7)  "THE FIVE-INGREDIENT COOKBOOK FOR MEN" -- Mike reviews a cookbook. 

 

 

8)  "SILENT SISTERS: PROFILES OF THE SHORT LIVES OF KAREN CARPENTER, PATSY CLINE, CASS ELLIOT, RUBY ELZY, JANIS JOPLIN AND SELENA" -- Ty reviews a sketch book.

 

9) "THE LESSONS OF MAMA TEMBO (Dona)" -- Dona reviews a children's book.

 

 

Video of the week in humor (Janeane Garofalo as Katherine Harris)

 

I'm done with THE CLEANING LADY (Rebecca)

Repost of Rebecca explaining why she's done with THE CLEANING LADY:


episode six and i'm done with 'the cleaning lady'

i watched my last episode of 'the cleaning lady.'

done.

not going back.

episode 6 of the season and they killed off arman finally.  they dedicated the episode to adam canto who played arman and died on january 8th.  he never filmed an episode of this season.  he was too ill and then he died.

but they've used footage of him to pretend for six episodes.

this 1 had him die when thony did something.

stupid?

i think the whole thing was stupid so it's a difficult call to make, you know?

so we saw him throughout the episode.  at 1 point, thony goes into an apartment and is talking with him and fi tells her no 1 is there. shortly after, she and fi and her latest boyfriend (why are all the men on this show obsessed with her and do they really think that arman, garrett and all these other men should do her bidding because of her amazing charms?) see arman in a vehicle.  he's being taken to where nadia is for a trade - they're paying the ransom money - nadia, his aunt and his cousin.  thony feels something is wrong and calls nadia.  she wants to know where nadia is.  nadia has to hang up but texts her where they are.  thony & company speed that way.  they see the car carrying arman and begin tailing it when suddenly the feds descend.  (who let the feds know?)

then the car with arman and the truck thony's in break off the car pulls up beside thony and they try to shoot thony but arman stops it and the car with him goes over a huge cliff leaving every 1 in the car dead.

so they played you.  they played you for a fool.  they knew arman was not coming back because the actor died.  they spent six episodes pretending he was alive to screw you over.

i don't take that from t.v. shows.  maybe you do?

i'm done.  and i hope the show gets cancelled.  what a rude way to treat the fans and how hideous to the memory of adam canto.

no surprise, this is now the lowest rated episode of the series with only 1.14 million viewer.  this is a show that used to get over 3 million viewers an episode.  


if you didn't read stan's 'The math ain't mathing (aka Terrence Howard goes on a lying streak)' yet, please make a point to read it now.

let's close with c.i.'s 'Iraq snapshot:'


Wednesday, April 10, 2024.  War Criminal Netanyahu continues his killing spree, when not killing children he arrests them, Joe Biden tut-tuts and wags a useless finger throughout, and much more.


We're going to start with a column written by Mischa Geracoulis and Heidi Boghosian at COMMON DREAMS.  I like Heidi so I was going to link to it.   I don't like the column.  This is not me disagreeing with it.  I've read it three times and I honestly can't tell you anything concrete that they're arguing for.  They shift focus constantly -- this is supposed to be about opinion columns but, for example:

The Interceptpublished an analysis of media coverage during the first six weeks of the Israeli assault on Gaza, which helps to quantify the misuse of op-eds. The open-source inquiry into more than 1,000 articles revealed coverage that regularly favored the Israeli narrative. Consistent bias against Palestinians in The New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times disproportionately described Israeli losses in emotional, humanizing language.


THE INTERCEPT analyzed news article -- use the link.  The paragraph above even notes "1,000 articles."  Over and over, this is a poorly written article.

The Council on Foreign Relations?

You're talking about a blogger 'documenting' that organizations (over) influence?  There is real work done on that.  Jeremy Scahill, for example, by real journalists.  Refusing to note that makes it look like you're trying to have a circle jerk of click bait.  

I also don't need the gaze of Australia on America, by the way.  I don't know what is about Australian bloggers -- fear? -- but they can attack the US for this and that and Sibel Edmonds (remember Luke?) but they can't hold their own government accountable.  Ever.  Maybe if they did, Julian Assange would be free.

Time and again, the column written is nonsense.

They want to censor.  

Why?

Because Americans are just too stupid apparently.

Then you educate.

The two COMMON DREAMS columnists are being stupid with their own nonsense.

The problems they are listing are largely issues of disclosure and honesty.  We should demand that from the media.  That's not a new position for me or for this site.  It was 2004 when I wrote  "When NPR Fails You, Who You Gonna' Call? Not the Ombudsman," calling out NPR for bringing Robert Kagan on as an analyst on how John Kerry was doing in his presidential campaign.  Kaplan was presented as objective.  He never should have been brought on air.  Why?  His wife was Dick Cheney's right hand:


What is Kagan's conflict of interest appearance? (An issue NPR has still not addressed.) It's not that he writes an op-ed for The Washington Post. Dvorkin does toss out the "hawk" issue but without ever addressing it. But he also doesn't address a very important fact: who is Robert Kagan married to?

He's married to Victoria Nuland. For all I know, she's a wonderful person. But that's not the issue. The issue is who Ms. Nuland works for. Want to take a guess on that?

Did you guess Dick Cheney? If you did, you may be more informed than Dvorkin or Montagne because possibly they are unaware of that fact. Possibly, they haven't done the basic work required -- Montagne to know about the "guest" she is introducing; Dvorkin to address the issue of Kagan as a commentator/interpreter of John Kerry's remarks.

Michele Norris' husband worked for the Kerry campaign. (Warning: we're going down a very basic road here. But apparently, it's not one that NPR can navigate by themselves so let's move slowly to allow them to keep up.) Since Norris' husband is involved with attempting to get what we will call "team A" into the White House, Norris has the appearance of a conflict of interest and her reporting duties can not include commenting or covering the campaigns. That's a simple path to follow whether you agree with it or not.

But with Kagan, the path has a huge u-turn and veers off to God knows where. Kagan's wife works as Cheney's deputy national security adviser. That's Ms. Nuland' s title. So in effect, Ms. Nuland's employed by "team B" -- she's apparently not working on team B's campaign, but she works for team B. Potentially, Kagan has a vested interest in the outcome of the 2004 election.



FAIR is noted (briefly) in the column (maybe if they were an Australian blogger they'd get more linkage love?).  FAIR is an outlet that's done work providing context and conflicts in the media coverage.  A far better recommendation to end the column on would have been a call to donate to FAIR (or to PROJECT CENSORED -- I believe they're the reason the column was written in the first place).

And I'm going to say one more thing about this Australian blogger.  It's bad enough in the US when supposed 'lefties' went out of their way to support the Proud Boys and other Nazi groups but to cite an Australian who did so as well?  Oh, no.   (Rage Against The War Machine was a faux-test that most on the left opposed because it required you to stand with neo Nazis and Proud Boys -- the Australian supported it -- read WSWS for the realities of that event, start here.)  I don't need an Australian giving hugs and kisses to racism in the US and I'm honestly appalled Heidi cited that mental midget to begin with when the Council on Foreign Relations is a topic that's long been discussed, addressed and called out on the left here in the United States.





 US president Joe Biden has said prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s approach on Gaza was a “mistake” and urged Israel to call for a ceasefire, in an interview that aired on Tuesday.

Biden’s comments were some of his strongest criticism yet of Netanyahu amid growing tensions over the civilian death toll from Israel’s war on Hamas and dire conditions inside Gaza.

“I think what he’s doing is a mistake. I don’t agree with his approach,” Biden told Univision, a US Spanish-language TV network, when asked about Netanyahu’s handling of the war.


Biden reiterated that an Israeli drone attack last week that killed seven aid workers from a US-based charity in Gaza – and sparked a tense phone call with Netanyahu – was “outrageous”.


Yes, it was an outrage.  When an outrage occurs, it needs to be addressed.  What's Joe gonna do because observations aren't doing a damn thing.  





AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now! I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González.

As we continue on Gaza, lawyers representing Germany at the International Court of Justice delivered their concluding remarks at The Hague today in a case brought by Nicaragua, which has accused Germany of facilitating the commission of genocide in Gaza by providing military and financial aid to Israel. Nicaragua has asked the U.N.'s top court for emergency measures ordering the German government to halt its support to Israel. Germany is Israel's second-largest arms supplier after the U.S. In 2023, Germany approved arms exports to Israel valued at over $353 million, roughly 10 times the sum approved the previous year.

For more, we’re joined by Kenneth Roth, visiting professor at the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, served for nearly 30 years as the executive director of Human Rights Watch. He’s joining us now in New York.

Welcome back to Democracy Now!, Ken. It’s great to have you with us. Can you explain why Nicaragua is simply taking on Germany, and the significance of this case, another case being brought to the U.N.’s top court?

KENNETH ROTH: Obviously, the United States would have been the ideal target. The U.S. is the principal armer of the Israeli military. But the U.S. has a much more limited acceptance of the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. It basically has to consent to every suit. And it was not going to consent to this suit. Germany has a much more open-ended acceptance of the jurisdiction, so Germany being the second-largest armer of the Israeli military, it was the target.

Now, in terms of the significance, the court has already found that this is a plausible case of genocide. And Nicaragua is saying, “Germany, you are arming potential genocide.” They also have added that Germany is arming actual war crimes, violations of international humanitarian law, which it clearly is. Now, there is a precedent for this. If you remember back to Charles Taylor, the former president of Liberia, he was convicted of aiding and abetting war crimes in neighboring Sierra Leone, and is actually currently serving a 50-year prison term in Britain for that crime. So, the International Court of Justice is a civil court. It’s not a criminal court. But Nicaragua is basically pursuing the same theory, saying, you know, “This is at least war crimes. It’s plausible genocide. You’re arming it. That’s aiding and abetting. You should stop.” That’s the essence of the case.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: I wanted to ask you, Kenneth — there were 40 Democratic members of Congress, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who have written to President Biden, urging him to halt new arms transfers to Israel in the wake of the killing of the World Central Kitchen aid workers. What’s your sense of the prospects for possibly halting or at least significantly reducing U.S. arms shipments to Israel?

KENNETH ROTH: Well, you know, Juan, that has been the line that Joe Biden has been unwilling to cross. He has spoken, at this point quite eloquently, pushing Israel to stop bombing civilians, to allow more food and humanitarian aid into Gaza. But these, from Netanyahu’s perspective, are just empty words, because Joe Biden never backs them up with consequences. And the obvious consequence, the obvious huge leverage that the U.S. government has, is the $3.8 billion in annual military aid it gives Israel and the regular shipment of arms, you know, almost every week in the course of this conflict. And Biden has not been willing to explicitly condition those, that aid, those arms sales, on ending the bombing and starving of Palestinian civilians.

Now, we heard last week that in the private phone call with Netanyahu, Biden suggested that at some point in the future this might be conditioned, you know, that U.S. relations will depend on how Israel responds. But it was all very vague. And, of course, Netanyahu responded with equal vagueness. He says, “OK, at some point I’ll open up the new crossing into northern Gaza to allow more food aid in, but that will take a few weeks, and I’m not saying anything about whether I’ll impose the same kind of obstructions in the north as I’ve imposed in the south. And I won’t say anything about Israel’s shooting at Palestinian police officers so that there’s chaos when you try to distribute the food. You know, none of that is on the table.”

So, in essence, Biden is not using this huge leverage, despite the pleas of an increasing number of lawmakers in Washington, you know, despite rapidly changing U.S. opinion polls saying Americans are tired of the U.S. actively supporting these war crimes, this plausible genocide in Gaza.

AMY GOODMAN: Why is he doing this? I mean, it is amazing to see the split in the Democratic establishment. I’m not just talking about the protesters on the streets, who definitely are driving this split. But, you know, you have now Senator Warren of Massachusetts saying she believes Israel’s assault on Gaza meets the legal definition of genocide. You have Christopher Coons, who I consider a Biden whisperer, who is now talking about halting weapons sales to Israel. But you have Biden resisting, though he has talked about a ceasefire. Why is this so difficult for him? What do you think it would take, especially now that you have Netanyahu saying that he’s set the date certain for an invasion of Rafah?

KENNETH ROTH: He just won’t tell us what that date is, yes. Amy, that’s the big psychoanalytic question, and we just don’t know. I mean, part of it, I think, is that Joe Biden, you know, who is an older man, as we know, thinks of Israel back in 1967, when it was the David surrounded by the Goliath of all the Arab states attacking Israel. He doesn’t think of Israel today, the regional superpower, a nuclear-armed state, a state that has been occupying Palestinian territory for decades and is imposing apartheid. You know, that’s just not in his mind.

More to the point, he seems to be making a political calculation. And he’s always been focused on the movable middle, the handful of independent voters who could go either way in the six swing states. And what he seems to be discounting is the progressives. And clearly, the Michigan primary was a bit of a wake-up call, suddenly the large number of “uncommitted” votes in a swing state. And so, we’ve seen him being more attentive. But I think he still calculates that progressives have no place to go. They’re not going to vote for Trump, and abstaining is effectively a vote for Trump, so when push comes to shove in November, they’re going to have to hold their nose and vote for Biden. And that seems to be what is pushing him at this stage.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, Ken Roth, I want to ask you to stay with us as we continue our discussion about U.S.’s foreign policy, visiting professor at the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, served for nearly 30 years as executive director of Human Rights Watch.

When we come back, Rwanda marks 30 years after the 1994 genocide. We’ll speak with a survivor, and we’ll look, with Ken Roth, at how the U.S., France and other nations stood by, refusing to say the word “genocide,” afraid it would trigger, force the use of the Genocide Convention. Stay with us. Back in 20 seconds.

[break]

AMY GOODMAN: “The Meaning of Death” by the Rwandan gospel singer Kizito Mihigo, a survivor of the 1994 genocide. In 2020, he was found dead in his cell in Rwanda after being arrested days earlier. The song was released a decade ago, banned in Rwanda.



This morning, CNN reports, "An Israeli airstrike on a residential building in the Nuseirat refugee camp in Gaza killed 14 people, most of them women and children, according to a hospital spokesperson." THE NATIONAL adds, "Social media footage showed the bodies of at least five children at a nearby hospital."  That's who Joe's still standing with and still supporting, War Criminal Netanyahu who bombs a refugee camp to kill women and children.  AP notes:

An Israeli air strike hit a home in central Gaza on Tuesday evening, killing at least 11 people, including seven women and children, hospital officials said.

After the strike hit in the town of Zawaida, Associated Press footage showed one man carrying the limp body of a little girl and laying her with the bodies of other dead children on the floor at the main hospital in nearby Deir Al Balah.

Hospital officials said the dead included five children and two women.



When not killing children (over 13,800 so far), Netanyahu is arresting them.  THE NATIONAL reports:

Israeli troops detained three children in Jerusalem, the Wafa news agency reported.

It comes as dozens of people are arrested across the occupied West Bank.

A child was arrested in Jerusalem's Bab Al Amoud Square, with the two others arrested in Silwan, Wafa reported.

One of the children was arrested at his home.

Palestinians were also detained in Bethlehem, Nablus, Jenin and Beit Ummar.

Six people were also arrested in Tulkarm.

More than 8,000 Palestinians have been detained across the West Bank since the Gaza war began in October.




Netanyahu's War Crimes are killing Palestinians but the harm goes far beyond Gaza, Netanyahu is destroying the world.  ALJAZEERA notes:

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has called Israel’s “disproportionate response” in its war on Gaza a regional and global threat and says the recognition of a Palestinian state is in Europe’s “geopolitical interests”.

“The international community cannot help the Palestinian state if it does not recognise its existence,” he told members of parliament on Wednesday, adding that such a move was “just” and “what’s demanded by the social majority”.


THE WASHINGTON POST notes this morning, "The World Health Organization and U.N. partners supported the Gaza Health Ministry in organizing burials of unidentified bodies found at al-Shifa Hospital, WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said Tuesday. The hospital was the site of a days-long raid by Israeli forces, which left it in ruins."  The bodies?  CNN notes:


Health workers have exhumed at least 381 bodies from mass graves in and around Al-Shifa Hospital, after they said Israeli forces killed hundreds of Palestinians and left their bodies to decompose during their two-week siege of the site. That number does not include people buried within the grounds of the hospital. World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said several United Nations agencies are helping to retrieve bodies and provide "dignified burials." 



Motasem Salah, director of the Gaza Emergency Operations Centre, told AFP the scenes on Monday at the sprawling medical centre were “unbearable”.

“The stench of death is everywhere,” he said, as a digger went through the rubble and rescue workers pulled decomposed bodies from the sand and ruins.

Salah said Gaza lacked the forensic experts needed to help identify the dead or determine what had happened to them. So they are relying on “the expertise of the WHO and OCHA (UN humanitarian office) delegation”, he said.

They are trying “to identify the decomposed bodies and the body parts that were crushed” from wallets and documents, Salah told AFP.

Relatives were also there “to ascertain the fate of their sons, whether they have been killed, are missing, or have been displaced to the south,” said Amjad Aliwa, the head of Al-Shifa’s emergency department. He said they wanted to identify “their sons and ensure they receive a proper burial”.


For over six month now, War Criminal Netanyahu has been allowed to target hospitals as he terrorized Palestinians.  "At least 381 bodies."  These are War Crimes.



 

AMY GOODMAN: Israeli warplanes bombed areas across northern Gaza today while ground troops conducted raids as the assault on the territory entered its seventh month. Forensic experts from Gaza’s Health Ministry are still removing bodies from the yard of Shifa Hospital, once the largest medical facility in Gaza, that was burned down and destroyed by Israeli forces. Health officials say the number of dead following Israel’s raid on Shifa is still not known, but is in the hundreds.

Meanwhile, in the south, Palestinians who tried to return to Khan Younis, Gaza’a second-largest city, following the withdrawal of Israeli troops Sunday, say it is now unlivable. An estimated 55% of the buildings in the Khan Younis area, around 45,000 buildings, have been destroyed or damaged, according to two mapping experts at City University of New York and Oregon State University who have been using satellite imagery to track destruction.

This comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has escalated his pledge to invade Rafah, where more than 1.4 million Palestinians — well over half of Gaza’s population — are sheltering. In a video statement Monday, Netanyahu said, quote, “It will happen. There’s a date,” he said, without elaborating. He spoke as Israeli negotiators were in Cairo discussing international efforts to broker a ceasefire deal with Hamas.

The official death toll has now topped 33,300, including over 14,000 children. That number does not include thousands missing under the rubble and presumed dead. Nearly 76,000 people have been wounded.

Israel has been accused of using starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza, where the spread of hunger and malnutrition has been described as unprecedented, with famine setting in.

For more, we’re joined by Arwa Damon. She just returned yesterday from a humanitarian trip to Gaza. She’s an award-winning journalist and the founder of INARA, the International Network for Aid Relief and Assistance, a nonprofit currently providing medical and mental healthcare to children in Gaza. Arwa Damon is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. She previously spent 18 years at CNN, including as a senior international correspondent. Arwa Damon joins us now from Istanbul, Turkey.

Welcome to Democracy Now!, Arwa. Can you start off by talking about what you saw in Gaza and what you think needs to be done?

ARWA DAMON: You know, on the one hand, that would seem like a simple question. And yet, on the other hand, it’s so extraordinarily difficult to actually put what I witnessed into words. In fact, Gazans themselves can’t actually grasp the fact that this has become their reality.

In Rafah, in the southern area of Gaza, where you have a crush of about 1.5 million people, it feels as if you’re moving through a sea of misery. There is no empty space left. Tents are spilling out of both U.N. shelters and other makeshift shelters that have emerged. They’re spilling out onto the sidewalks. There’s stalls that have been set up. The movement of people clogs the streets. You have people having to move around on donkey carts because there’s not enough fuel or diesel to power vehicles. And then you just have the sheer need of this entire mass of humanity that is — to a certain degree, feels as if it’s absolutely suffocating, because they need everything. They are reliant on others for just about everything, from food to water to medicine to baby formula to diapers.

We stepped out in this one area called Mawasi, which is sort of a beachy area. It was Gaza’s beachfront. And there, it’s just tent after tent after tent in the sand. There’s no sewage systems, and so sewage is sort of running along these makeshift canals. There’s no proper toilets. There’s no nothing. And all of the mothers there are just shoving these emaciated babies at you, you know, begging for proper formula, begging for proper care. They’re begging for medicine for children who are epileptic. You walk into a tent, and with each step your foot takes, a cloud of mosquitoes and flies just swarms up. I mean, it’s inexplicable.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And, Arwa, Israel has in recent days said that it’s opening up new entry points into Gaza for aid. Could you talk about the aid that you saw coming in, which still has not reached the level, the number of trucks per day, before the war even started?

ARWA DAMON: Right, and there’s a number of things that I think everyone would be best served to understand about aid and distribution. So, yes, if more aid is able to get in, absolutely that is going to help. However, when it comes to getting aid to those who need it, it is beyond just opening up additional crossings. The aid trucks that come into Gaza all get searched by Israel, and that is a process that can take around two to three weeks to begin with. You do see aid being distributed. The problem is that the quantity of the aid is insufficient.

Additionally, it’s important to note that once the aid gets inside Gaza, getting it distributed within this, you know, tiny little space, yet at the same time extraordinarily difficult to navigate area, poses great and additional challenges. There’s a process that’s called deconfliction — this exists in all war zones — whereby which aid organizations wanting to reach a certain area will notify warring parties about their intent and will secure permissions to be able to safely move to that area. This is a process that has not and does not work inside Gaza. And the tragic, horrific strike that we saw on the World Central Kitchen convoy is clear evidence of that. And that really sent huge shockwaves within the humanitarian community, because the World Central Kitchen has some of the best deconfliction mechanisms, has some of the best lines of communication to the Israeli side.

And so, you have these additional layers upon layers of challenges. Add to all of it, the lack of aid has created a very understandable level of panic among the population. What that means is that whenever aid arrives to a certain area, there is chaos and there is panic. And this is why you keep hearing people speaking about the need to flood the zone. The zone needs to be flooded not only with aid, so that people can stop panicking and have a certain measure of confidence that they will be getting a stable supply to food, water and other basic necessities, but also the zone needs to be flooded with humanitarian workers, people who know how to address this level of a humanitarian crisis.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And could you talk, as well, about the impact of this war, the mental health impact, especially on the children of Gaza, that you have spoken so eloquently about in recent days?

ARWA DAMON: I’ll give you one example. A mother came up to me, and she was — she had heard about the fact that, you know, we do work with mental health, specifically with children. It’s also important to note that, you know, when an area, a population is still in crisis, is still in an emergency, all you can really provide is basic mental health, especially for children. And what does that actually look like? It really just looks like a distraction, so creating activities and ways for them to express themselves that can sort of help them distract themselves from all of the horror and the nightmare that they’re going through. But this mother comes up to me, and she says, “I don’t know what to do with my 7-year-old right now, because every single night he screams at the top of his lungs, and he goes into what look like convulsion and seizures.” And he started doing this after he saw his sister’s head blown off during a strike that hit their home, that also wounded other siblings.

You know, you walk around Gaza — and I’m talking specifically about the children right now, but you see this also very deeply in the adults. And you know that sparkle that’s normally supposed to exist in a child’s eye? It’s not there anymore. That’s not to say it can’t come back and it can’t be brought back with these activities. You know, there are these beautiful, heartwarming moments where you are able to create a scenario for a child to be able to laugh and smile, albeit briefly.

But you really feel as if you are walking through a population that is — they’re ghosts. And they describe themselves as ghosts. They’re ghosts of their past. They’re the ghosts of who they used to be. And they’re constantly haunted by the ghosts of everything that they have lost. And the trauma doesn’t end. It comes at them from multiple different directions every single day. The mental health impact of this is unlike anything that I personally have ever seen 20 years working in war zones, just the immediacy of the need, the speed with which this all happened. And even people in Gaza, when you talk to them right now, you know, despite having lived through this for six, seven months, they still tell you that they feel as if this can’t be real. Right? Like, this can’t have happened. This has to be a nightmare from which one day they’re going to wake up.

AMY GOODMAN: Arwa, you have said — you’ve pointed out that what’s happening in Gaza right now is absolutely egregious, that the Western world, the ones providing the weapons, cannot pressure Israel into allowing more aid and medical staff. Can you talk more about that? I mean, this isn’t, you know, a natural disaster, where an earthquake happened and people can’t get to the people. Explain exactly Israel’s role in preventing this aid from getting to those in need.

ARWA DAMON: So, nothing goes in and out of Gaza without Israel’s approval. Nothing. That includes aid, and that includes people. There’s a whole process for that. And this is a process that actually existed before October 7th. It is, since October 7th, extraordinarily and excruciatingly long. In addition to that, since 2008, there has been a list of items that are banned entry to Gaza. This list also exists to the West Bank. Now, since October 7th, there have been additional items, that are not part of this list, that have been rejected. There is no formality to this rejection. We in the humanitarian space end up finding out about items being repeatedly rejected, and, as such, there’s no point of trying to send them in, because of repeat rejections. These items range from things like solar panels to wheelchairs to certain kinds of medicine to sleeping bags in some cases — anything that the Israelis say can be deemed to be dual-use. But the problem is that it feels very illogical, and, again, there’s no formality to it, so you don’t know if an item is going to get rejected until you actually try to send it in. Some organizations have even had children’s toys be rejected. You know, you try to put together these hygiene kits for families, and the nail clippers in them get rejected, and, as such, the entire truck gets completely turned around. And so, it’s extraordinarily difficult to try to navigate that kind of a situation. And, obviously, this creates an even greater and more desperate need inside Gaza itself.

Now, what is very difficult to comprehend, as you were saying there, is the fact that Israel is an ally to the United States and other very powerful Western nations. Is this the first time that we’ve seen an area under siege? Absolutely not. Look, I covered Syria very extensively. The regime of Bashar al-Assad, a dictatorship, along with their Russian allies, did, yes, put entire neighborhoods and areas in Syria under siege. But there we were talking about a dictatorship with Russia as its ally. We saw ISIS besiege entire areas in both Syria and Iraq. But we’re talking about ISIS. We’re not talking about a democratically elected nation-state that is an ally of the United States. And that is what makes it so difficult for anyone inside Gaza to comprehend how it is that the United States is allowing Israel to continue to besiege the Strip in such a way. And remember, it was on day one that Israel cut off electricity, water and basically vowed to cut off any form of assistance. They cannot comprehend this. They cannot comprehend how it is that this is being allowed to happen to them — on top of that, happening to them, and the United States is still continuing to fund the war effort.

AMY GOODMAN: Arwa Damon, I want to ask you about the journalists killed, estimates between 90 and 130, 140 journalists killed by Israel in Gaza alone. You were an award-winning journalist for CNN for 18 years, covered the U.S. attack on Iraq. I wish we saw your reporting more. You mainly did it for CNN International, which would show the picture of the statue of Saddam Hussein coming down in a split screen with the casualties of war, whereas CNN domestic would just show the statue of Saddam Hussein coming down hundreds of times. But your reporting was extremely important. I want to talk about seeing the images of casualties on the ground in Gaza. Right now Israel doesn’t allow international journalists in, and domestic journalists in Gaza, so many of them, have been killed. Can you talk about the significance of this? Because that leads to people around the world caring, to put more pressure.

ARWA DAMON: You know, this is the first time, I would argue, that Gazans have control over the way that their story is being told. And that has made, to a certain degree, the understanding that the Western world has about what’s actually happening in Gaza and the toll of all of it shift slightly, because the Western media does not control Gaza’s story anymore. Gazans do.

I have to say, I mean, I have so much respect and admiration for all of Gaza’s journalists, because, you know, when we go into a war zone, wherever it is, as journalists, there comes a point when we get to rotate out. Right? You can tap out. You can say, like, “I need a break. Send in the next crew.” They have not been able to tap out for six months. And they’re not reporting on something that is happening to a different population. They’re reporting on their own people, what’s happening to their own families and to their own loved ones.

This ongoing effort, however, it would most certainly seem, to try to silence Gaza’s journalists is extraordinarily disturbing. But it is, sadly, part of this whole overarching desire to control the narrative. And right now, though, it’s not working, because Gaza’s journalists and Gazans, they’re not going to stop. And they deserve to be commended for that and for the awareness that they’re actually raising about what is happening to them.

And it’s very, very disturbing, but to a certain degree makes sense from a PR perspective, that Israel is not allowing Western journalists in, because if the scenes that Gazans are witnessing every single day were part of the regular broadcasts that are happening, there would be a much bigger and stronger outcry than what — than anything that we’re seeing right now.

I mean, you know, I went into the European Hospital, which is basically southern Gaza’s currently largest and only really remaining, you know, significantly functioning hospital. You walk into the hospital courtyard, the outdoor pathways, and it’s streams of tents, and there’s sewage lines running next to the tents. And this is inside a hospital. And people have crammed themselves into the hospital corridors themselves. You have bed after a bed of injured and the injured children with amputations, with horrific burns. I walked into the ICU, and there, there was a 10-year-old boy, and the ICU nurse said he’s a gunshot victim. He took a gunshot bullet straight to the head. It’s just — 

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Arwa, I wanted to ask you —

ARWA DAMON: I mean —

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: We only have about a minute for this segment, but I wanted to ask you — we’ve mentioned that you were a CNN reporter for 18 years, covered many conflict zones. How do you look at the coverage of CNN since October 7th and the degree to which not only CNN but most Western media outlets are always deferring to Israel to make sure that Israel gets a chance to comment on every single story that they write or that they produce?

ARWA DAMON: You know, October 7th happened, and then the coverage began, and I immediately was catapulted back to the post-9/11 era. And I was in New York when 9/11 happened. And I just — my hair stood on end, because it was the same level of, you know, dehumanization that we saw back then. It was the same sort of panicked, kind of one-sided, to certain degree, reporting that we saw back then. And it was extremely upsetting, because one would hope that, you know, we, the journalism world, the Western journalism space, would have learned the lessons of post-9/11 and that we wouldn’t sort of default into this whole dehumanization of the other.

And I think it’s really important that all journalists are cognizant and should know — you know, we go all over the world. You know, there’s a basic fact that we should all know, and that is that people, we’re the same. We love the same. We laugh the same. We live the same. We feel pain in the same way. And yet there was this default back into this dehumanizing rhetoric, this sort of “us against them” issue. And it was absolutely devastating and gutting and heartbreaking to witness and see that we defaulted back into sort of that same rhetoric and that same dehumanization of a population, that perhaps, you know, for very superficial reasons, we don’t perceive as being like us, and this desire to sort of inflict collective punishment on an entire people.

AMY GOODMAN: Arwa Damon, I want to thank you for being with us, just returned from a humanitarian trip to Gaza, award-winning journalist with CNN but now founder of INARA, a nonprofit currently providing medical and mental healthcare to children, also nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, spent 18 years at CNN as a senior international correspondent.




Gaza remains under assault. Day 187 of  the assault in the wave that began in October.  Binoy Kampmark (DISSIDENT VOICE) points out, "Bloodletting as form; murder as fashion.  The ongoing campaign in Gaza by Israel’s Defence Forces continues without stalling and restriction.  But the burgeoning number of corpses is starting to become a challenge for the propaganda outlets:  How to justify it?  Fortunately for Israel, the United States, its unqualified defender, is happy to provide cover for murder covered in the sheath of self-defence."   CNN has explained, "The Gaza Strip is 'the most dangerous place' in the world to be a child, according to the executive director of the United Nations Children's Fund."  ABC NEWS quotes UNICEF's December 9th statement, ""The Gaza Strip is the most dangerous place in the world to be a child. Scores of children are reportedly being killed and injured on a daily basis. Entire neighborhoods, where children used to play and go to school have been turned into stacks of rubble, with no life in them."  NBC NEWS notes, "Strong majorities of all voters in the U.S. disapprove of President Joe Biden’s handling of foreign policy and the Israel-Hamas war, according to the latest national NBC News poll. The erosion is most pronounced among Democrats, a majority of whom believe Israel has gone too far in its military action in Gaza."  The slaughter continues.  It has displaced over 1 million people per the US Congressional Research Service.  Jessica Corbett (COMMON DREAMS) points out, "Academics and legal experts around the world, including Holocaust scholars, have condemned the six-week Israeli assault of Gaza as genocide."   The death toll of Palestinians in Gaza is grows higher and higher.  United Nations Women noted, "More than 1.9 million people -- 85 per cent of the total population of Gaza -- have been displaced, including what UN Women estimates to be nearly 1 million women and girls. The entire population of Gaza -- roughly 2.2 million people -- are in crisis levels of acute food insecurity or worse."  Yesterday, ALJAZEERA noted, "153 killed, 60 injured in Gaza in last 24 hours: Health Ministry.  The casualties bring the total number of people killed in Gaza since October 7 to 33,360, with 75,993 wounded, according to the ministry."  Months ago,  AP  noted, "About 4,000 people are reported missing."  February 7th, Jeremy Scahill explained on DEMOCRACY NOW! that "there’s an estimated 7,000 or 8,000 Palestinians missing, many of them in graves that are the rubble of their former home."  February 5th, the United Nations' Phillipe Lazzarini Tweeted:








And the area itself?  Isabele Debre (AP) reveals, "Israel’s military offensive has turned much of northern Gaza into an uninhabitable moonscape. Whole neighborhoods have been erased. Homes, schools and hospitals have been blasted by airstrikes and scorched by tank fire. Some buildings are still standing, but most are battered shells."  Kieron Monks (I NEWS) reports, "More than 40 per cent of the buildings in northern Gaza have been damaged or destroyed, according to a new study of satellite imagery by US researchers Jamon Van Den Hoek from Oregon State University and Corey Scher at the City University of New York. The UN gave a figure of 45 per cent of housing destroyed or damaged across the strip in less than six weeks. The rate of destruction is among the highest of any conflict since the Second World War."






The following sites updated:




Iraq

Repost from THE COMMON ILLS:


Iraq

FOX NEWS is doing their usual garbage where they pretend to care about veterans.


They don't care about veterans, they never have.  They're led by chicken hawks and put nothing but chicken hawks on the air.  Jesse Watters, for example, began 'serving' in FOX NEWS back in 2003, two years after graduating college.  He didn't serve in the military but he loves to puff up that breasty chest of his and pretend to be all about veterans.


Unless they are gay.


Or women.


In an article so bad it took two FOX NEWS 'journalists' to write -- Aubrie Spady and Andrew Murray (no link to trash) -- the network tries to defend Tim Sheehy.


Sheehy's a liar and there's no defense for it.


You can refer to Elaine's "If Tim Sheehy's not lying, he should have kept his mouth shut" where she goes through step by step.


I'm going to do it much shorter because I'm trying to make this an Iraq post because we've focused on Gaza and I don't think I've done much more than briefly note Iraq in at least two weeks.


Tim's a liar.


It's recently emerged that he was in a National Park and went to the hospital.  He was cited for firing a gun -- by accident -- and the gun left him wounded.


If that is true, Tim's lied about his wound because on the campaign trail -- he's trying to replace Jon Tester in the US Senate -- Tim's been saying he was actually shot in Afghanistan.


So he's a liar that way


He's also a liar if his new claims -- shot in Afghanistan -- are true.  


He's a liar because he concealed an event that should have been reported, should have been written up and should have been investigated.  He lied to the US military -- if he's telling the truth now.


He wants you to believe that he's telling the truth now.  If he is, he was a liar back then but he's also something worse.  He's a glory hog.


He took part in a cover up and now he's blasting the news of that.  He's not just implicating himself if he really was shot by 'friendly fire' in Afghanistan, he's implicating the person who shot him and the others who were part of the cover up.


You can't lie about stuff like this in the military.  


If he organized and took part in a cover up, as he now insists he did, the US military is going to have to investigate and people who were part of the cover up -- even in if they're not still in the service -- can face consequences for that -- including a reduction in rank that would lower the benefits that they are entitled to.


This is not something minor.  However, it's FOX NEWS so they rush to defend the liar.  


There is no happy outcome resulting from this.  And Sheehy needs to get honest about which is the lie -- he covered up an Afghanistan shooting or he really did shoot himself in a National Park.


MANGALOREAN reports:

Iraq suspended all civilian flights within its airspace on Saturday, as a precaution to ensure the safety and security of civil aviation amid regional tensions, the Iraqi Civil Aviation Authority said.

The closure became effective from 11:30 p.m. local time on Saturday to 5:30 a.m. local time on Sunday, the authority said on Saturday, indicating that this suspension might be prolonged if necessary, Xinhua news agency reported.


ALJAZEERA explains, "Iran has launched dozens of drones and missiles at Israel, the country’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) confirmed, after Israel said Tehran had begun attacks. The IRGC said on Saturday that it had released the drones and missiles under the operation “True Promise”, adding that the move was part of the punishment for 'Israeli crimes'."


Turning to politics,  October 10, 2021, Iraq held parliamentary elections.  That should mean that they hold them again in the fall of 2025.  Should mean.  It's true, however, that it was over a year later, October 22, 2022, before a prime minister was named.  This was due largely to the inept Moqtada al-Sadr who -- even with boosting from the US government -- could not assemble enough support within Iraq to either become prime minister (he's always insisted he doesn't want that job) or to name one of his loyalists to the post of prime minister.  He was out maneuvered by his bitter rival -- former prime minister and forever thug Nouri al-Maliki.  After many failed attempts and months and months of humiliation  Moqtada announced August 29, 2022, that he was drawing the veil and retiring from political life.  He's apparently finally sick of licking his own wounds and trying desperately to get back in the game.  SHAFAQ reports:


A prominent leader within the Sadrist Movement revealed, on Saturday, the movements of various Shiite factions outside the Coordination Framework (CF) towards the leader of the Movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, aiming to join the Patriotic Shiite Movement (PSM).

The leader, speaking to Shafaq News Agency, stated that "different political and popular Shiite forces outside CF have conducted and met in Baghdad with prominent Sadrist figures to join PSM, recently announced by Muqtada al-Sadr."

The Sadrist leader, who preferred anonymity, added that "independent Shiite deputies have also conveyed their desire to join PSM to Sadrist leadership in Baghdad and some governorates. Therefore, this movement will be the broadest politically and popularly for the Shiite component and will be a front to confront the majority of Shiite CF during the coming period."


THE NEW ARAB Tweets:




CHANNEL 8 Tweets.



No confirmation on whether or not Moqtada's managed to shed pounds during his long self-imposed exile or whether he's returned ready for swimsuit season.

December 18th, Iraq held provincial elections so Moqtada's return -- if it's happening -- would be for the parliamentary elections.  Moqtada boycotted those elections.  Nouri did not and his State of Law candidates won 35 seats in the governorates.  Nabi, led by PMF leader Hadi al-Amiri, won the most seats across Iraq with 43.  It's thought that the current prime minister, Mohammed Shia' al-Sudani, will be starting a new coalition or party ahead of the parliamentary elections. 
 
 
And what's Nouri up to?

If true, it would certainly explain the firing of missiles by Iran at Israel today.  That's why Iraq has closed its air space.  Who but the US government would still have faith in Nouri al-Maliki.  

The following sites updated:

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }