Wednesday, February 07, 2024

Shame on the Grammys for what they did to Tina Turner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There was only one Tina Turner.  Sadly, she passed away in 2023.  In the community, we noted her passing in the following posts:

"Iraq snapshot," "Tina Turner (1939 to 2023)," "The groundbreaker Tina Turner," "Tina Turner," "Lauren Boebert gets burned by AOC," "MAX and NETFLIX, Eva Longoria," "Tina Turner, Eric Swalwell, John Roberts," "They've ruined their reputation," "Hate merchant Tulsi Gabbard," "tina turner passed but the hideous gop lingers," "Tina " and "The wrong people are dying"


We got how significant and important and one-of-a-kind Tina was.


Sunday, the Grammys claimed to honor Tina but they didn't.


As Kat notes:

I like Fantasia but thought her performance was bulls**t and insulting.


Miley did a better job nodding to the great Tina Turner.


But they chose Fantasia -- a great singer -- to perform a 'Tina song.'


So she sang . . . a song Tina made famous with Ike.


That's not how you salute Tina.  She was a victim of domestic terrorism.  


As a solo artist, she won Grammys for singing "One Of The Living," "Better Be Good To Me," "What's Love Got To Do With It" and "Back Where You Started."  Her only number one -- solo or with The Revue -- as "What's Love Got To Do With It."


We didn't need to hear "Proud Mary."  


Tina had talked in her final year about how hurtful the domestic abuse and the fascination with it that the press had were to her.  


It did not honor Tina Turner to use that song to note her passing.


Shame on the Grammys.


Elaine notes:

 

Please read Kat's "Shame on the Grammys (the dishonor of Tina Turner) and what did work."  I agree 100% that the Grammys having Fantasia perform "Proud Mary" and not one of Tina's hits -- bigger hits -- from her solo career was insulting and disgusting.  It was supposed to be a moment to remember Tina.  The Grammys had to drag her abuser into it.  "What's Love Got To Do With It" is Tina's only number one single and from her solo career.  That's the song Fantasia should have been singing.  Instead, the Grammys elected to celebrate domestic abuse.  Shame on them.


And Stan notes:

Good evening, all.  My name is Giana Levy and I'm an idiot who writes for GRIO. A really really really big idiot.  And I write for a crap-ass outlet where other dumb idiots work



Did you watch The Grammys?  I think I did.  I write to praise Fantasia for honoring Tina Turner.

Fantasia's fat where as Tina was a thin, small woman.  Yes, Fantasia looked like an idiot onstage but I see that as an honor.

I also see her singing "Proud Mary" as honoring Tina.

Why?

Because I'm a fat idiot.  I'm so far, my body weight is 92% government cheese. 

 
Fantasia and The Grammys saw fit to 'honor' Tina Turner by emphasizing the most painful time of her life when she was married to a man who beat her repeatedly.  They could've honored Tina with one of her big hits -- like her only number one "What's Love Got To Do With It" -- but instead they chose to spit on an African-American woman by bringing up the lesser period of her artistic life, the time when she was being beaten and put in the hospital.

Shame on the Grammys.  Shame on Fantasia.  Shame on fat ass Oprah Winfrey.  Shame on me and THE GRIO.  And shame on every one who applauds The Grammy's spitting on Tina by honoring abuser Ike Turner.  Shame on you and F**k you. (See Kat's "Shame on the Grammys (the dishonor of Tina Turner) and what did work.")


If you're not getting how awful this 'honor' was, drop back to 2021 and read Ava and C.I.'s "Media: The failures of HBO and NPR" where they talk about how awful that period was for Tina and how, even after it, she suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress.  She had 43 solo hits.  43.  And the Grammys could have had Fantasia perform any of those.  Instead, they reached back to a period where Tina was tortured daily, terrorized endlessly and pretending that they were honoring Tina.  


"What's Love Got To Do With It" is Tina's only number one and Fantasia could have performed that. "Typical Male" and "We Don't Need Another Hero" were songs that made it to number two -- bigger hits than "Proud Mary."  "The Best" was not a huge hit in real time but it became one as it was used for sports clips on newscasts over and over. "One Of The Living" won her a Grammy as did "Better Be Good To Me" and "Back Where You Started."  She won two Grammys for "What's Love Got To Do With It."


There were better songs to pick.  Songs that honored and celebrated Tina.  The Grammys chose to celebrate the violence against her and that's disgusting.





2024 passings

At the request of readers, we're going to continue this feature we started last year.

 

"bad news (settlers shot a child in the back and adan canto has died)" -- Rebecca covers the passing of THE CLEANING LADY and DESIGNATED SURVIVOR star.

 

 "David Soul and Glynis Johns have passed" -- two passings -- one you knew from STARSKY & HUTCH, the other you knew from MARY POPPINS.


"Mary Weiss, The Leader of the Genre?" -- Elaine notes the passing of the leader of The Shangri-Las. 


"The death of Norman Jewison and the death of Taraji P. Henson's career" -- Stan notes the passing of film director Norman Jewison.

 

 "Melanie: Queen of the Music festivals ," "Thank you to Melanie (Jess)," "Jon Stewart to return to the desk," "Melanie, REACHER, young voters," "When are they going to arrest Kari Lake?," "We lose Melanie and Dexter King but are still stuck with Jonathan Turley?," "my top five melanie albums," "Ugly Chaya Chachi Ratchik," "Where's Florida's "Don't Say Southern Baptist" law?," and "Melanie, Mary Weiss, Green Day" -- remembering singer-songwriter Melanie.


"Norman Jewison and Melanie" -- Ruth notes Melanie and Norman Jewison's passing. 


"Chita Rivera" -- a trailblazer's life is noted by Elaine.  


"Carl Weathers" -- Stan covers the actor and the athlete's passing.



Commentary video of the week

 

Music video of the week

 

 

That's singer-songwriter Melissa Manchester's "Just Too Many People." She wrote the song with Vini Poncia and recorded it for her third album (1975's MELISSA). The video version above is new and part of her planned album RE: VIEW which finds her recording some of her favorite songs -- such as "Whenever I Call You Friend" which she wrote with Kenny Loggins and which was a hit single for Kenny and Stevie Nicks.



This edition's playlist

diana cover 2 

 

1) Diana Ross' THANK YOU.

 

2) Chase Rice's THE ALBUM

 

3) Adele's 30.  

 

4) Green Day's  'SAVIORS.'

 

5) Robbie Williams' XXV.

 

7) Fiona Apple's FETCH THE BOLT CUTTERS.


8) Ashford & Simpson's STREET OPERA.

 

9) Joni Mitchell's JONI MITCHELL ARCHIVES -- VOL. 3: THE ASYLUM YEARS (1972 - 1975).

 

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

Truest statement of the week

Though advocates don’t describe them this way, anti-abortion policies clearly aim to push women both into more unplanned pregnancies and down the ladder of civic power. Likewise, anti-gay and anti-transgender policies aim to push the growing group of young people who identify as LGBTQ back into the closet, and into heterosexual relationships and more pregnancies, planned and unplanned. It’s not a surprise that we found that in Texasafter the state imposed a six-week abortion in 2021, the 2022 teen birth rate (and specifically the rate of births to non-white teens) rose for the first time in 15 years, though slightly, while fertility rates for Hispanic women 25–44 (ages with greatest likelihood of inability to travel for an abortion due to having children already at home) rose markedly—foreshadowing post-Dobbs 2023 birth (and poverty) data to come, in Texas and many other states as well.

-- Elizabeth Gregory, "From 'Don’t Say Gay' to Abortion Bans, There’s a New Pronatalism Afoot" (THE NATION).

 

 

 

 

A note to our readers

Hey --

Tuesday.


Let's thank all who participated this edition which includes Dallas and the following:


The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen, Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.


And what did we come up with?

 

 

Elizabeth Gregory gets a truest.

Repost from THE COMMON ILLS.

Ava and C.I. cover the attacks on BARBIE.  By the way, I (Jim) changed the title on this about two hours after it went up from "The Attacks On BARBIE" to "Punching BARBIE."

Loving those ads on AMAZON, are you?

Who doesn't love popcorn?

Latest in our ongoing feature.

Heart's going back on tour!!!

They drag down and destroy our country.

Jacquie Luqman.

Paul Rudnick.

What we listened to while working on the edition.

 

Peace.

 

-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.

 

Gaza

Reposting C.I.'s snapshot for today:

 

Iraq snapshot

Tuesday, January 30, 2024.  Israeli forces invade a hospital and shoot people, Nancy Pelosi is rightly called out, we look at the latest from the campaigns of Marianne Williamson and Little Robbie Kennedy Junior, and much more.


As we noted in yesterday's snapshot, Nancy Pelosi is using McCarthy tactics, is slandering in the same way Donald Trump does and she owes the people an apology.  Amy Goodman (DEMOCRACY NOW!) notes "former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has urged the FBI to investigate pro-Palestinian protesters calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. Without sharing any evidence, Pelosi claimed on CNN that the protesters may have ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Pelosi said, 'For them to call for a ceasefire is Mr. Putin’s message'."

Here's THE MAJORITY REPORT on Nancy's outrageous remarks.


Here's THE HUMANIST REPORT on Nancy's offensive remarks.








At THE NATION, Katrina vanden Heuvel responds to US House Rep Nancy Pelosi's ridiculous remarks:


According to a December New York Times/Sienna poll, a plurality of Americans—44 percent—±support a ceasefire, including 50 percent of women, 62 percent of 18–29 year-olds, 59 percent of Democrats and 58 percent of those who voted for Biden in 2020.  

Sixty-seven members of the Democratic caucus in the House, including 13 members from Pelosi’s California delegation have already joined the call. These include centrists like Don Beyer, Debbie Dingell and Judy Chu, Pelosi allies like Jan Schakowsky and Jared Huffman, as well as progressive leaders like Pramila Jayapal, Barbara Lee, Jamie Raskin and members of the “Squad.” They are joined by leading Senate Democrats including Elizabeth Warren, Jeff Merkley, Chris Van Hollen and Dick Durbin.


The White House has labeled such calls “repugnant and disgraceful.” Pelosi attributes them to Putin’s machinations. But it is the White House and the former Speaker that are out of touch with the country and the world. In reality, the growing support is not a product of Putin’s “financing” or of Russian disinformation but of people moved by their conscience and their sense of decency.  

Which leads one to ask the former Speaker, to paraphrase Joseph Welch’s famous query to Joe McCarthy in the 1954 Army-McCarthy hearing: “Have you no sense of decency Madam?”


She has no sense of decency.  Few in the US government do as they rush to cut off funding to UNRWA.  From yesterday's DEMOCRACY NOW!



AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. I’m Amy Goodman.

Palestinian officials and human rights groups are denouncing the move by the United States and at least 12 other countries to temporarily suspend funding to UNRWA — that’s the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees — after Israel accused 12 UNRWA employees of helping Hamas stage the October 7th attack. Nine of the employees have been fired. UNRWA said two of the accused employees are dead.

UNRWA is one of the largest employers in Gaza, with a staff of over 13,000. It provides aid to most of Gaza’s 2.3 million residents. The agency has long been targeted by Israel. Since Israel’s assault on Gaza began, over 150 UNRWA staffers have been killed.

Francesca Albanese, U.N. special rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, said on social media, quote, “The day after @ICJ concluded that Israel is plausibly committing Genocide in Gaza, some states decided to defund UNRWA, collectively punishing millions of Palestinians at the most critical time, and most likely violating their obligations under the Genocide Convention,” unquote.

Meanwhile, UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini condemned the freezing of funds at a time when famine looms in Gaza. He said, quote, “Palestinians in Gaza did not need [this] additional collective punishment. This stains all of us,” he said. And the U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres has urged donor nations to continue supporting UNRWA.

For more, we’re going to Oslo, Norway, where we’re joined by Jan Egeland, secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council. Norway has decided to continue its funding of UNRWA.

Jan, thanks so much for being with us. Can you start off by responding to the cutting off of funding at a time when, among other things, Gaza is under bombardment and is on the edge of famine?

JAN EGELAND: Yeah, it’s the worst possible reaction to these allegations that some — I mean, maybe a dozen — of the 13,000 UNRWA aid workers betrayed our humanitarian principles of neutrality and independence and participated in the horrific attacks on Israel. That, however, was met immediately with the response of UNRWA by, as you said, firing these staff and now having an independent investigation. What the donors did — the U.S., the U.K., Germany, Italy, Finland, Netherlands, Australia and some others did — was to cut all aid to the children of Gaza, to the women in Gaza, to the completely innocent there. It’s the worst possible move, at a time when this trapped population is under bombardment. Do not punish the many innocent for the sins of the few who did very wrong, it seems.

AMY GOODMAN: Now it will be interesting to see if Israel hands over the evidence for the U.N. to investigate this situation, because we’re talking about an immediate cutoff by many of these nations, suspending weapons. I wanted to read you a clip of the former Israeli official Noga Arbell, who said, “It will be impossible to win the war if we do not destroy UNRWA, and this destruction must begin immediately.” The Prime Minister Netanyahu said there will be no UNRWA in postwar Gaza. Your response, Jan Egeland? And talk about the — you’re the head of large humanitarian aid group. How important is UNRWA to all of the groups, not to mention the people on the ground?

JAN EGELAND: UNRWA is completely essential. I mean, it’s true that I lead the NRC, Norwegian Refugee Council. We’re a large humanitarian group, across the world. We’re on all sides of all conflict lines, for the displaced and the refugees. And we’ve been in Gaza for two decades. We’ve been funded all over the world by the United States and by 40 other donor nations and international agencies.

In Gaza, we have to recognize that all of us combined other groups are not even close to be what UNRWA is for the people of Gaza. UNRWA was the response to the creation of Israel and the 1948 War that displaced so many of the original Palestinian population to Gaza, to the West Bank and elsewhere. UNRWA was then created to give them relief and works. Since then, there has not been a political, peaceful settlement. And that is because the international community has not been able to force the parties, Israel and the Palestinians, to settle this conflict, and thereby we end up by having humanitarian groups like, first and foremost, UNRWA provide for the population.

So, to undermine and undercut UNRWA as extremists, which the Israeli government are doing, is basically to say, “We’re going to punish the women and children, the innocent, on the other side for what some extremists have done, in a situation of utter turmoil and perpetuous conflict, that we’re not ourselves willing to try to settle with talks on a future.” It’s very wrong.

And the international donors must stay with the humanitarian organizations, like Norway did. Norway is a large donor, giving much more per capita to Palestinians than any other donor. We stay with UNRWA, and we say, “Good that you terminated all of those contracts and fired these people, and good that there is an investigation, and then we’ll draw the conclusions what we should do for the future.”

AMY GOODMAN: Jan Egeland, what evidence is there of Israel’s charges? Have they handed over the evidence?

JAN EGELAND: As far as I know, it’s not been received by UNRWA or by the U.N. investigators. I hope they will be received, so that they can do a thorough investigation of this, very serious allegations. I read about them in The New York Times. And if it’s true, again, they betrayed all of our principles, really — neutrality, impartiality, etc. — that is so important for us, who are unarmed humanitarian workers in the crossfire around the world.

But, of course, no one who’s working across the Middle East can guarantee that there are not people within our midst that may, in the end, have hidden agendas. Palestinians cannot do that. Israelis cannot do that. We know of many Israelis who have done very bad things in Gaza, shooting at people with white flags. It’s documented and detailed. They’ve even shot their own people with white flags. They have settler organizations, Mafia-style settler organizations, displacing unarmed women and children and families across the West Bank. Many of these are recruited to the Israeli Defense Forces. They belong in jail, but they are in the Israeli Defense Forces. No one can guarantee that there are not problems. Therefore, they have to be investigated, and there has to be action taken every time something happens. But don’t cut funding to people in great need. It’s the worst possible response.

AMY GOODMAN: Jan Egeland, I want to thank you for being with us, secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, speaking to us from Oslo. I’m Amy Goodman. This is another edition of Democracy Now!



International aid agencies have said they are “deeply concerned and outraged” at the “reckless” decision by major donors to cut funding to a UN Palestinian aid agency after Israel accused some of its workers of taking part in Hamas’ 7 October attack.

“We are shocked by the reckless decision to cut a lifeline for an entire population by some of the very countries that had called for aid in Gaza to be stepped up and for humanitarians to be protected while doing their job,” the coalition of 21 agencies, including Oxfam, Save the Children and ActionAid, said in a statement on Monday.



  Amnesty International on Monday joined the growing global chorus denouncing Israel's allies for suspending aid to the United Nations' Palestinian refugee agency even as they continue to support the Israeli military's war on the Gaza Strip, risking complicity in genocide.

Agnès Callamard, Amnesty's secretary-general and the former U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial killings, said that while Israel's claim that a dozen staffers at the refugee agency played a role Hamas' October 7 attack is "serious and must be independently investigated," the "alleged actions of a few individuals must not be used as a pretext for cutting off lifesaving assistance in what could amount to collective punishment."

"Some of the very governments that announced they will cut off funds to UNRWA over these allegations have, in the meantime, continued to arm Israeli forces despite overwhelming evidence that these arms are used to commit war crimes and serious human rights violations," said Callamard. "Rushing to freeze funds for humanitarian aid, based on allegations that are still being investigated, while refusing to even consider suspending support for the Israeli military is a stark example of double standards."

"Instead of suspending vital funding to those in need," Callamard added, "states should be working to halt arms transfers to Israel and Palestinian armed groups and pushing for an immediate and sustained cease-fire and full humanitarian access to help alleviate devastating suffering." 


Gaza remains under assault. Day 116 of  the assault in the wave that began in October.  Binoy Kampmark (DISSIDENT VOICE) points out, "Bloodletting as form; murder as fashion.  The ongoing campaign in Gaza by Israel’s Defence Forces continues without stalling and restriction.  But the burgeoning number of corpses is starting to become a challenge for the propaganda outlets:  How to justify it?  Fortunately for Israel, the United States, its unqualified defender, is happy to provide cover for murder covered in the sheath of self-defence."   CNN has explained, "The Gaza Strip is 'the most dangerous place' in the world to be a child, according to the executive director of the United Nations Children's Fund."  ABC NEWS quotes UNICEF's December 9th statement, ""The Gaza Strip is the most dangerous place in the world to be a child. Scores of children are reportedly being killed and injured on a daily basis. Entire neighborhoods, where children used to play and go to school have been turned into stacks of rubble, with no life in them."  NBC NEWS notes, "Strong majorities of all voters in the U.S. disapprove of President Joe Biden’s handling of foreign policy and the Israel-Hamas war, according to the latest national NBC News poll. The erosion is most pronounced among Democrats, a majority of whom believe Israel has gone too far in its military action in Gaza."  The slaughter continues.  It has displaced over 1 million people per the US Congressional Research Service.  Jessica Corbett (COMMON DREAMS) points out, "Academics and legal experts around the world, including Holocaust scholars, have condemned the six-week Israeli assault of Gaza as genocide."   The death toll of Palestinians in Gaza is grows higher and higher.  United Nations Women noted, "More than 1.9 million people -- 85 per cent of the total population of Gaza -- have been displaced, including what UN Women estimates to be nearly 1 million women and girls. The entire population of Gaza -- roughly 2.2 million people -- are in crisis levels of acute food insecurity or worse."  THE HINDUSTAN TIMES notes, "At least 26,083 Palestinians have been killed and 64,487 injured in Israeli strikes on Gaza since Oct.7, the Gaza health ministry said in a statement on Friday."  AP has noted, "About 4,000 people are reported missing."  And the area itself?  Isabele Debre (AP) reveals, "Israel’s military offensive has turned much of northern Gaza into an uninhabitable moonscape. Whole neighborhoods have been erased. Homes, schools and hospitals have been blasted by airstrikes and scorched by tank fire. Some buildings are still standing, but most are battered shells."  Kieron Monks (I NEWS) reports, "More than 40 per cent of the buildings in northern Gaza have been damaged or destroyed, according to a new study of satellite imagery by US researchers Jamon Van Den Hoek from Oregon State University and Corey Scher at the City University of New York. The UN gave a figure of 45 per cent of housing destroyed or damaged across the strip in less than six weeks. The rate of destruction is among the highest of any conflict since the Second World War."  Max Butterworth (NBC NEWS) adds, "Satellite images captured by Maxar Technologies on Sunday reveal three of the main hospitals in Gaza from above, surrounded by the rubble of destroyed buildings after weeks of intense bombing in the region by Israeli forces."   


ALJAZEERA notes this morning, "Israeli special forces dressed as doctors and nurses killed three Palestinians inside Ibn Sina Hospital in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday." CNN adds, "The Palestinian Ministry of Health condemned the attack and the targeting of a health center. They called on the UN General Assembly and NGOs to provide the necessary protection for medical treatment centers and emergency crews." THE PENINSULA offers this description of the events:

Israeli forces disguised as civilian women and medical workers stormed a hospital Tuesday in the occupied West Bank, and opened fire inside the wards of Ibn Sina Hospital in Jenin, killing three. 

The Palestinian Health Ministry condemned the raid and called on the international community to pressure Israel's military to halt such operations in hospitals. A hospital spokesperson said there was no exchange of fire, indicating that it was a targeted killing. 



CNN notes, "Israeli shelling killed dozens of people and wounded others east of Gaza City on Monday, the official Palestinian news agency WAFA said. CNN is unable to independently verify the report. Elsewhere, the Palestine Red Crescent said it lost contact with a team dispatched to rescue a 6-year-old girl trapped in a car in central Gaza after it was fired upon. The Red Crescent said the girl's father and four siblings were killed in the attack."



“They are weak now, they always have diarrhea, their faces are yellow,” Hanadi Gamal Saed El Jamara, 38, whose family was displaced from northern Gaza, told CNN on January 9. “My 17-year-old daughter tells me she feels dizziness, my husband is not eating.”

She tries to feed her kids at least once a day, she says, while tending to her husband, a cancer and diabetes patient.

As Gaza spirals toward full-scale famine, displaced civilians and health workers told CNN they go hungry so their children can eat what little is available. If Palestinians find water, it is likely undrinkable.

When relief trucks trickle into the strip, people clamber over each other to grab aid. Children living on the streets, after being forced from their homes by Israel’s bombardment, cry and fight over stale bread. Others reportedly walk for hours in the cold searching for food, risking exposure to Israeli strikes.

Even before the war, two out of three people in Gaza relied on food support, Arif Husain, the chief economist at the World Food Programme (WFP), told CNN. Palestinians have lived through 17 years of partial blockade imposed by Israel and Egypt.

Learn more about the looming famine in Gaza.


Let's wind down on US politics.



Marianne Williamson is running for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.  She came in third in New Hampshire.  Dean Phillips came in second (Joe Biden won).  Dean is not news.  Dean has never been news.  He doesn't know how to make news.  Marianne is news.  She's making news by going all out for Nevada and by going all out on social media.  It'll be interesting to see what happens in Nevada.  It may be no different.  But it is news.  For her latest YOUTUBE videos, click here.  For her Twitter feed, click here. And click here for her campaign site.  What she's doing is news and should be covered as news.  How's this going to turn out?  The media should be paying attention.  It could be very humiliating for her.  It could shake up things.  It's absolutely something poli sci majors with an emphasis in campaign politics should be following.

Marianne may end her campaign and seek the Green Party's presidential nomination.  I don't know that she will.  She didn't in 2020.  But based on what we're about to quickly talk about, I want to be clear that if she does the following does not apply to her.  She would have gone from a run in the Democratic Party to a run for the Green Party's nomination.

Yes, it's time to talk about Little Junior and his Daddy issues that led to his embarrassing campaign.

Robert Kennedy Junior started out running for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination but no one wanted him.  So then he announced he was an independent candidate!  

But he's had trouble getting on the ballot -- he's only made the ballot for one state.  He and his corrupt cronies looked around and saw that he'd have less requirements to make the ballot if he pretended to have a political party so they'd just create a political party.  As we noted weeks ago, that is called fraud. Worse yet, it's intended fraud that can be proven because they were stupid enough to publicly state their plans and goals.  It's fraud.  Realizing that he will face challenges -- legal  challenges -- on any ballot that he makes due to some newly created 'political party,'  Junior's floating a new idea.  He's thinking about pursuing the presidential nomination of The Libertarian Party.

He seems to think he would be the obvious choice.  Is Junior back on the heroin?

The Libertarian Party is fine with losing as long as they feel they keep their principles.  They're in for the longterm and they're not lured by celebrity.  So there's not real need for them to get a 'name' on their ticket.

Second, The Libertarian Party wants a cease-fire. Junior has repeatedly rejected a cease-fire and has championed the Isreali government's 'right' to carry out a slaughter.  

Again, is he back on the drugs?

He really needs to shut down his embarrassing campaign that has disgraced the memories of his father and his uncle as well as every living member of his family.  See Ruth tonight for more on this topic.



The following sites updated:


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }