Monday, June 13, 2022

Truest statement of the week

The United States continues to shoot itself in the foot in its futile effort to damage the Russian economy. It is also asking other nations to do likewise and live with inflation, food scarcity, and rising energy prices. European countries have gone along with the sanctions which cut off their natural gas supplies from Russia when there is no logical alternative source for them. However, the rest of the world has refused to join in U.S. and EU condemnations or accept that they must live with privations caused by the reckless actions of other nations.

Of course, the ongoing state of delusion just continues the fantasy foreign policy decision making in Washington. The Countering Malign Russian Influences in Africa Act, HR 7311 , is just one example. But while the U.S. makes up nonsense as it goes along, the real problems that African nations have with the U.S. and their desire to have good relations with Russia go unaddressed.

Russian president Vladimir Putin recently welcomed Macky Sall, president of Senegal and Chairman of the African Union (AU) to a summit meeting. African countries are particularly hard hit by sanctions against Russia. They depend on Russia and Ukraine for supplies of wheat and other grains. When the sanctions regime removed Russia from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system, it impeded Africans ability to pay for commodities, including food and fertilizer. In a virtual meeting with the EU, Sall said, “When the SWIFT system is disrupted, it means that even if the products exist, payment becomes complicated, if not impossible.” In other words, Africa has to go hungry because of the U.S. obsession with an impossible mission of breaking up Russia or turning back the clock to the 1990s when compromised Russian leadership allowed their country to be open to international thievery.

 

-- Margaret Kimberley, "U.S. Effort to Hurt Russia Undermines Itself and the World" (BLACK AGENDA REPORT).

 

 

 

Truest statement of the week II

The idea that the U.S., or any Western nation for that matter, involved in the ongoing imperialist project, could seriously see itself as a protector of human rights is bizarre and dangerous, and must be countered. The fact that the U.S. will still attempt to advance this fiction reflects either the height of arrogance or a society and administration caught in the grip of a collective national psychosis. I am convinced it is both, but more on that later.

A cognitive rupture from objective reality, the inability to locate oneself in relationship to other human beings individually and collectively in the material world are all symptoms of severe mental derangement. Yet, it appears that this is the condition that structures the psychic make-up of all of the leaders of the U.S. and the collective West. 

It is what I have referred to as the psychopathology of white supremacy: 

A racialized narcissistic cognitive disorder that centers so-called white people’s and European civilization and renders the afflicted with an inability to perceive objective reality in the same way as others. This affliction is not reducible to the race of so-called whites but can affect all those who have come in contact with the ideological and cultural mechanisms of the Pan-European colonial project. 

How else can you explain the self-perceptions of the U.S. and West, responsible for the most horrific crimes against humanity in the annuals of human history from genocide, slavery, world wars, the European, African and Indigenous holocausts, wars and subversion since 1945 that have resulted in over 30 million lives lost – but then assert their innocence, moral superiority and right to define the content and range of human rights?

-- Ajamu Baraka, "For the Peoples of our Region, the Failure of Biden’s Summit of the Americas Would be a Welcome Event" (BLACK AGENDA REPORT).

 

 

 

 

A note to our readers

 

Hey -- 

Sunday!!! Where we are, on the west coast, anyway.

It's okay, check your breath.  We know you're shocked.  We are as well.



Let's thank all who participated this edition which includes Dallas and the following:



The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen, Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.



And what did we come up with?

 

 

 


Peace.

 

-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.

Editorial: When will MSM admit how useless they've become?

October 10th, Iraq held elections.  The western press immediately proclaimed Moqtada al-Sadr a ''kingmaker.''  He'd never been one before and nothing in his past or present indicated he could become one now.  The October Revolution?  They had no use for Moqtada.  He tried to ride their popularity and then tried to control them.  The young Shi'ites that made up the revolution rejected the cult leader and he began verbally attacking them.  He trashed them, for among other things, allowing males and females to protest together.  This led to the young people mocking him even more.  The 2021 election saw his turnout fall significantly indicating that Sadr City still being a slum after all these years of 'leadership' from Moqtada was leading to more losses.  


Eight months ago, the western press -- especially the MSM in the US -- was proclaiming him a "kingmaker."  At what point are they going to admit that they were wrong?


Never, of course.


But right now would be the time to do so.


ALJAZEERA reports:

Iraqi lawmakers from firebrand Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr’s bloc resigned on Sunday, the parliamentary speaker said, a move ostensibly designed to end eight months of political paralysis.

“We have reluctantly accepted the requests of our brothers and sisters, representatives of the al-Sadr bloc, to resign,” parliament’s speaker Mohammed al-Halboussi said on Twitter after receiving resignation letters from the 73 lawmakers.


He was never a kingmaker.



TV: STAND OUT -- maybe, but not in the good way

Friday night Azealia Banks stormed off stage at a Miami Pride event, flipping off the audience after ranting about the venue's various issues.   The storming out, the flipping off, the complaints about security and dry ice?  None of that surprised us.  The only thing that made us raise our eyebrows was why the hell was she invited to perform at a Pride event?


Yes, she does claim to be bisexual but how long ago was it that she was launching a homophobic rant against gay men and had to publicly promise to never again use the f-word again?  And how many times has she verbally attacked the trans community?


Why in the world invite her to perform at a Pride event?  No one's that desperate.


3 JESS

Or so we would have thought it we hadn't caught NETFLIX's hideous new comedy special.  After watching, we had to check the press release to make sure it was supposed to be comedy.  Yep, it was supposed to make you laugh:


Stand Out: An LGBTQ+ Celebration is a stand-up comedy special hosted by none other than Billy on the Street‘s Billy Eichner. The special includes various comedians belonging to the LGBTQ+ community, all of whom take to the stage to tell their own hilarious stories.


Their own hilarious stories?  That may generate more laughs than the special did.


Can Billy Eichner do standup?

 

We know he can act.  He was part of one of the finest sitcoms of the 2010s (DIFFICULT PEOPLE).  We know he can do funny street interviews.  But we watched STAND OUT and we're still not sure he can do stand up -- at least we're not sure if he can do good stand up.


He's the host which means he delivers a monologue and then introduces guests who introduce the comedians.  The monologue?


Not since Budd Friedman hosted AN EVENING AT THE IMPROV have we seen such bad comedy.  Billy may have been nervous -- that would explain the hideous timing -- but that wouldn't explain the material.  It was awful.  Here's the big joke he did (which is also pretty much his complete monologue):


We all know how backwards and dangerous the Don’t Say Gay laws are. Queer people, and especially trans people, are under legislative attack in this country. Trans people are being demeaned. They're trying to dehumanize trans people. They're trying to erase trans people. And I'm not even talking about Florida. I'm talking about Dave Chappelle's latest Netflix special!


Did you write it for a bad, generic 90s sitcom, Billy?  Because it sounds that way.  Obviously, Dave Chappelle is not doing "laws" or "legislative" so the rule of the three you're operating under that takes you to Dave Chappelle isn't a real clear path, is it?


Maybe that's why people weren't laughing.  


Sure, they applauded.  Applause at a comedy show, instead of laughs, mean that they agree with the sentiment, not that they find the material funny.


There wasn't much to find humorous in the special.


There was Tig Notaro, she was hilarious.  But too much of it wasn't.  Bob The Drag Queen?  Maybe he had an off night but it just wasn't funny.  


Patti Harrison wasn't funny.  But she tried.  We'll give her credit for that.  She came out with a prepared bit.  It probably plays very well in backwater clubs.  She pretends to be Stevie Nicks on stage.  Sometimes she sounds a little bit like Stevie in terms of the singing voice.


But is Stevie Nicks just a singer?  No, she's a songwriter.  She gave Fleetwood Mac the group's only number one hit ("Dreams").  So if you're going to do Stevie Nicks singing as a comedy bit, you have two choices.  Part of the joke can be Stevie singing someone else's song -- say, Stevie sings "Wooly Bully."  Or you can do a joke about Stevie singing a song that she wrote or supposedly wrote.  Patti's song is not like anything Stevie would sing.


We know Stevie and we love her.  But we still laugh our asses off whenever we watch Lucy Lawless as Stevie Nicks in the SNL skit "The Fajita Roundup."  


If Patti wants to do a Stevie Nicks impersonation, she needs to learn about Stevie -- there are many things that pop up in her songs -- fog, mirrors, velvet, moons, stairwell, lace, lightning, wind, rain, storms, the sea, dreams, dreaming, crystal visions, blue crystal mirror . . . -- and then she might try writing a song Stevie would sing.  A baby being being left in the sun on the beach?


That is so unlike Stevie -- both in terms of her lyrics and in terms of her life (Stevie has avoided the sun for decades which is why her skin still looks so good).

What's especially sad is she's being doing that parody for years now and no one -- friend or foe -- has cared enough about her to be honest and tell her it's half-baked and really needs more work before you perform it publicly.

Patti wasn't awful and her bit could be fined tuned.  We can offer notes for her.  The others?  They're beyond notes.


Marsha Warfield was funny and so were Margaret Cho, Fortune Feimster and Trixie Mattel.  Other than that?  There was a male comedian.  Parts of his act were funny.  We're not so sure he should have been invited for that act when they want to be so anti-Chappelle.  The comic was anti-White -- including to his own boyfriend.  More to the point, he engaged in bottom shaming.  That's not a minor point among gay males.  In fact, that may be the next big hot spot -- at least in the G part of the LGBTQ community.  It's not a minor point to a vocal number of gay men.  And we'll also note that no one came on and did any top shaming.


Does that seem picky?  We don't think it is when you present yourself as better than others.  Billy saw himself as better than David Chappelle and since he clearly isn't when it comes to stand up, we'll assume he just thinks he's a better person than Dave.  A better person wouldn't lack sensitivity on issues in his own community.  Just be clear for those who aren't gay men or don't have gay male friends -- a lot of gay men find it easier to come out to non-gays as being gay than they do as being bottoms.


In fact, if the people in the special are trying to present themselves as better than Dave Chappelle, they've got a lot more work to do than they realize.  For example, Dave's African-American. Dave's straight.  He's spent his whole public life being both.  It sure was funny to see a number of faces talking about being out and proud and telling stories -- one telling a story about the 80s -- when the reality is that during the '00s, they were still pretending to be straight.


No, we don't mean Lily Tomlin.  Lily came out in 2000 to US magazine.  Some on the special continued to hide past that date.  We're not referring to Marsha either.  She's been very vocal about her mother making her promise not to come out until she (her mother) was dead.  We're talking about other people.  They know who they are, don't worry.


But while we're on Lily . . . 


Oh, Lily.  Why?


Seriously, why?


Why did you introduce Sandra Bernhard?


You thought it was funny when she made the comments in 2008 about Sarah Palin being raped?  Or that she stereotyped African-American men in those 'jokes'?  That she thought, a White, Jewish woman like her could speak for African-American men?


Or maybe you've found her use of the N-word hilarious?  


We can't imagine that's it, Lily?


But, here's the thing, Lil, others aren't willing to gloss over it.  It's gone on far too long.  It wasn't funny in the 80s, it wasn't in the nineties and it wasn't in the '00s.  Fortunately, Naomi Campbell isn't shy about going there.



 

As Naomi and Mariah Carey discuss how Sandra used the N-word to describe Mariah (turned it into an adjective, actually, but let's not promote Sandra's 'joke'),  Naomi said of Sandra, "Honey, let's remember what you said because those things will come back to haunt you."


And they should.  Which is why we were appalled to see Lily introducing "my friend Sandra Bernhard."  (For the record, one of us, C.I., is friends with Naomi.)  


We were even more appalled to see Sandra onstage at the event.


How low was the bar?


Pretty damn low.


Sandra didn't have a routine per se.  Just the insults you know.  She wanted to be political and she got them all to their feet.


Which only begged the question of why was she there even more loudly.


Sandra wanted to 'joke' or 'riff' or whatever she passes observations off as now about . . . abortion.


Huh?


LGBTQ.  


We don't imagine many lesbians end up pregnant by accident.  Nor gay men.  Nor transgendered people.  Abortion really isn't an issue for any in that community other than the female Bs.  


Unless, they're raped and get pregnant that way.  But Sandra knows to stay away from her rape 'joke,' she learned the hard way after women's centers cancelled her bookings when she made the rape 'jokes' about Sarah Palin.


Sandra didn't belong there.  She didn't belong on that stage because of all the time she's spent in the closet.  She didn't belong there because of her material (abortion, honestly, that was her bit for this special) and she especially didn't belong up there after her non-stop use of the N-word throughout her career.  She's been hurtful with it.  Mariah is not the only one who has been harmed.


But Billy wanted to take on Dave Chappelle.  


Billy, it's not just the fact that you're not a funny stand up, it's also that you're not a good enough person.  Don't throw stones at Dave when you're inviting a racist on stage.  


The special wrapped with Rosie O'Donnell leading everyone in a version of Cyndi Lauper's "Girls Just Want To Have Fun" with "Gays" substituted for "Girls."  


That was an entertaining and joyful moment.  And the special really needed it but it's a shame they couldn't make room for Rosie to actually do stand up.  Rosie knows how.  So many on the stage didn't have a clue.


If the point had been to talk about LGBTQ issues, the special would have gotten a B-.  But the point was to be funny.  And the bulk of it wasn't.  It felt like we were watching a taped walked through -- not even a dress rehearsal.  It was boring and to be boring is bad for a comedy special but to boring and offensive?  The people behind STAND UP need to sit down already, they've embarrassed themselves enough for the whole year.







 

Roundtable

Jim: Roundtable time again. We'll be talking about Iraq, independent media and who knows what other topics.  Remember our e-mail address is thethirdestatesundayreview@yahoo.com but you can also use common_ills@yahoo.com.  Participating in our roundtable are  The Third Estate Sunday Review's Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava, and me, Jim; Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude; Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man; C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review; Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills); Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix; Mike of Mikey Likes It!; Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz); Ruth of Ruth's Report; Trina of Trina's Kitchen; Wally of The Daily Jot; Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ; Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends; Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub. Betty's kids did the illustration. You are reading a rush transcript.




Roundtable


Jim (Con't):  First up, let's start with you, Trina.  You wrote "My sympathies are with the Iraqi people." Talk about that.


Trina: Sure.  Jim Fitton has been in the news since March.  Last week, he was tried in Iraq.  Found guilty.  Sentenced for a maximum of 15 years.  He is a geologist and his family wanted us to know -- in March and in April that he wouldn't break the law because he was so smart and he would never try to steal artifacts from Iraq.  Then it became he didn't know any better!!!!  I don't care.  He's a grown man who went into a war torn country by choice, he grabbed things he knew were not his and that he had not purchased and got caught at the airport as he was trying to leave with them.  His family insists that they were 'just' shards.  They're centuries old.  And if they're so unimportant, why did he want to take them home?


Jess: That's a good point.  He placed some value on them or he wouldn't have taken them.  And it's insulting that not only did he take the items but, having stolen them, his family and his supporters want to insist that they aren't important, that they are ''just shards.''  Your father's stolen the items and now you want to be even more insulting and tell the country what the stolen property is and that's unimportant because it's "just shards."


Elaine: The xenophobia just reeks.


Trina: Agreed.  And Iraq has a long history of seeing its antiquities stolen.  That's not a hidden story.  So the man -- supposedly educated -- should have known better.  And he and his family, as C.I. has pointed out, should have long ago been publicly apologizing.  He might have gotten a shorter sentence.


Dona: He was supposed to get the death penalty.


Trina: Right.  And the minute the sentence is announced -- instead of a death penalty, 15 years, the whining British family that's been insisting we had to save their father from execution launches into, "How dare they sentence him for 15 years!"


Cedric: Not even a pause to say, "We're so glad he wasn't sentenced to die."


Trina: They look so ungrateful and they're so damn stupid.  Let's say my son Mike was in Fitton's place.  I wouldn't be offering the 'just shards' defense.  I'd be saying something like, "On behalf of my family, I apologize for what happened.  Clearly, this is seen as disrespectful to the people of Iraq.  We apologize and we are sorry.  It was wrong for Mike to have taken those items."  Why would I do that?  He's convicted.  He's not getting out on appeal.  Give it up, not in Iraq.  


Mike: Not in Iraq on a good day and especially not in the midst of the political stalemate when overturning the conviction would make Iraqis even more outraged at their courts.


Trina: Good point.  So what we would need to do, if this were Mike, would be to humbly go before the press and make statements of remorse.  That's the only thing might work.  That's why C.I. noted it.  And they don't want to do that.  Your father's convicted.  He can serve 7 years or he might be able to get out earlier if your family would show remorse and appeal to the Iraqi people.


Jim: Thank you.  Ty, you have an e-mail.


Ty: Right.  Ray Dunlap e-mailed and wanted a reaction to THE DAILY BEAST's apology to John Paul Mac Isaac for saying he had stolen the Hunter Biden laptop.  Ruth, you cover the Bidens a lot, so let me toss to you.


Ruth: Okay.  I think you should have tossed to C.I.  When this story broke, the first two weeks, C.I. went over this over and over in the Iraq snapshots.  She noted repeatedly that the laptop was not stolen.  I believe she made the argument that a repair shop is not a storage facility and that if you fail to return to pick up and pay for your laptop being repaired, the store owns it.  They are not required to hold it for you.  Jonathan Turley, Glenn Greenwald and others were covering the laptop, C.I. was the only one raising that issue repeatedly.  


Dona: And she did so because she knows basic journalism: If the property is stolen, you can't have it.  The Pentagon Papers?  Had to have copies.  Watergate?  Needed a copy.  Stolen property is not supposed to be anything you can use for reputable coverage.  And, as she pointed out then, those saying it was stolen, those press outlets saying that, knew they were lying and were using that lie to try to hush the story up.


Ruth: Right.  THE DAILY BEAST can no longer hush up the story and they are now being sued so there is no real cost to them to apologize.  It is meaningless and they should be sued.  And I hope they lose in court.


Jim: Ruth recently wrote "If Hunter's name was Roger, he'd be crucified by the MSM by now" where she notes that if Roger Clinton had half the scandals that Hunter Biden has, the media would have crucified him by now.


Marcia: That is true.  She specifically noted, though, that he has a 'sugar brother' paying off millions he owes and paying for his monthly bills as well and that Roger would have been nailed to the cross for that.


Stan: As would Billy Carter or Marvin Bush.


Isaiah: She's right.  Stan's right too.  But, yeah, Hunter has gotten a pass.  We know about the prostitutes, we know about the drug use, at a time when some are calling for gun control we know that he obtained a gun a few years ago by lying on his application -- a federal crime.  We know he is under investigation by a grand jury.  We know that no sooner did his brother Beau die then he started screwing Beau's wife, we know that Hunter's wife learned of that affair because one of their daughter's saw texts about it, we know he's getting fatter and going bald -- wonder if Lena Dunham still finds him sexy -- and we know that although he tried to pretend he didn't know his baby mama in court, she was on the payroll for his company for a year.  We know that he did anything -- including lying -- to avoid paying child support.  Crack addict, dead beat dad, man who asks strippers to put dildos up his ass, unethical business dealings with Ukraine and China, having sex with his sister-in-law, there's so much there -- all of it repugnant. 


Rebecca: Just two things off that long list would have been enough for the media to be putting Roger Clinton on trial.  But they bend over backwards for Hunter.  And, yeah, he is going bald -- reminding me of Joni Mitchell's "Just Like This Train:" "Dreaming of the pleasure I'm going to have watching your hairline recede, my vain darling."

 

 Mike: Watch it, Rebecca, Jada Pinkett will order Will Smith to slap you for that.


Rebecca: To be sure!


Jim: Now let's talk about so-called independent media.  I'm going to toss for the summary or overview to Ann because she is a Green.  Ann?


Ann: Independent media.  In the early '00s, we were told it was DEMOCRACY NOW! and that it was FAIR's COUNTERSPIN and that it was THE PROGRESSIVE and THE NATION and various PACIFICA RADIO stations and they all proved that they were independent.  Various blogs did as well.  DEMOCRACY NOW! with the war on Libya, for example, went all in with empire.  They'd also dropped Iraq war resisters in 2006 to avoid embarrassing the Democratic Party and soon they'd drop the Iraq War for the same reason.  The Green Party convention?  If we were lucky we'd get a paragraph from Amy Goodman in her DEMOCRACY NOW headlines whereas the Democrats got a full week of coverage from Amy every time they held a convention. CJR and COUNTERSPIN were just damn hypocrites and there are far too many examples so I'll just note that they both jump on any conflict of interest stories -- especially if the reporter is sleeping with a member of the government.  They elected to ignore Gina Chon's affair and then marriage to Brett McGurk.  Despite the fact that THE WALL STREET JOURNAL fired her because she let Brett, a US government employee, vet her copy while they started their affair in Iraq.  Brett had been Bully Boy Bush's boy then but when the news leaked out he was now Barack's boy and the 'independent' media didn't want to call out Barack.  Before an asshole from CJR e-mails about this roundtable, yes, you did finally cover it.  Only after you were covering some reporter covering a fire department, or something, while she was sleeping with a fire officer.  When you did that, with no sense of irony at all, this community's Martha called you out in the comments.  You then posted, noting that Martha had called you out, a weak ass item on Brett and Gina.  THE PROGRESSIVE is nothing but a leftist lifestyle magazine -- no real issues, just lifestyle coverage.  And THE NATION is just a sad joke as it employs known liars like John Nichols.  A number of us trusted these outlets and were repeatedly let down by them.


Wally: And there are so many more examples.  Including the fact that they avoided the sexist attacks on Hillary Clinton in 2008.  As Ava and C.I. noted, for example, despite being a weekly program, COUNTERSPIN ignored the sexism week after week until finally 

 

One of the most disturbing features of the media coverage of the Democratic presidential race is the way racism and sexism have been expressed. CNN viewers were treated to one pundit explanation that people might call Hillary Clinton a bitch because well isn't that just what some women are. Not everyone's so out in the open. MSNBC host Chris Matthews opened his May 18th show wondering how Barack Obama would [. . .]


Wally (Con't): COUNTERSPIN went on and on after the part I've stopped on -- but only about racism.  They actually had covered racism throughout the primaries beginning 2007.  They continued it through 2008.  But the only time, in those two years, that they covered sexism was that single sentence above.  As Ava and C.I. noted, "The first time this year CounterSpin can note any of the sexism, it's when Hillary's called a bitch and it produces a single sentence in which the 'pundit' isn't even named."  They're fake asses.  They're like John Nichols running to DEMOCRACY NOW! when AP reports that Barack's campaign has told Canada that the NAFTA talk isn't for real and that, if he becomes president, Barack will not work to overturn NAFTA.  Barack's not who the voters think and John Nichols can't let that sink in, so he goes on DEMOCRACY NOW! where he lies that he's going to have a story published shortly explaining that this isn't true and that it was Hillary's campaign!!! There was no story to be published because AP was correct.  But John Nichols lied long enough to take the heat off Barack. They're whores.


Ann: And we were their tricks.  We were the idiots giving them money.  So they could lie to us.  Now we've got another wave of 'independent media' -- send money now!!!! Excuse us if we don't want to pay off whores again.  CONVO COUCH, Jackson Hinkle, Sabby Sabs, Jimmy Dore, HARD LENS MEDIA and so many more engaging in a circle jerk and trying to pass off as independent media.


Marcia: Let me note something since my childhood Kate Jackson crush was noted by me and by my cousin Stan, I belonged to the Kate Jackson fan club.  I paid five dollars -- my parents did -- I think it was.  I got a welcome letter, I was supposed to get regular newsletters for a year -- I only got one -- and I got an autographed photo of Kate -- which was more than worth the five bucks.  I bring that up because I've been in a fan club.  I'm not anymore and stop passing off fan clubs as independent media.  Sabby Sabs looks like an idiot as she prostates herself before every White man from Jimmy Dore to Jackson Hinkle.  And whether or not Jimmy's been dissed by this person or banned by Twitter or -- I'm not in the Jimmy Dore fan club.  I don't want to be.  He has his own program.  If he has problems, he can discuss them there.  We don't need 'reports' -- fan club updates, actually -- from Sabby and HARD LENS MEDIA and everybody else.  It's pathetic.  Every week, the drama queen's in another tiff and Sabby and others do segments on it instead of real news.


Elaine: None of them cover Iraq.  They've got all the time in the world to do their D-listing coverage of celebrity Jimmy Dore but they can't cover Iraq.  US troops are still there on the ground.  As we're doing this roundtable, MEHR NEWS agency is reporting, "Iraqi news sources on Sunday reported that a military logistics convoy belonging to the army of the United States was targeted in Iraq."  But, hey, Ryan Grim said something that hurt Jimmy's feeling so let's file an E! celebrity report on that instead of focusing on real news and real issues.


Cedric: That one really was the last one for me. When all these so-called 'independent' media outlets started filing 'reports' on Ryan Grim.  Nobody participating in this roundtable is a fan of Ryan Grim.  But we do appreciate that the program for THE HILL that he's apart of has done some very good coverage of very real issues and that has included some of the COVID coverage Grim led on.  I'm not a fan of his.  But I also don't see him as the enemy.  Who's an enemy to me?  Any program that promotes Scott Ritter.


Betty: Preach!


Cedric: Jimmy Dore did.  Jackson Hinkle did.  CONVO COUCH did.  Richard Medhurst did.  And lots and lots of others.  It was outrageous to watch them bring him on their programs and slobber over him -- UN weapons expert, author -- all the credits they gave him.  Except the one he deserves: Pedophile.  Three times arrested.  Now a registered sex offender because he went to prison for it.  Now I'm like C.I., bring on who you want, but be honest.  If you're bringing on a convicted pedophile, you note that.  If you don't, you're giving him your stamp of approval and when someone gets hurt because of it, you are an accomplice.  Shame on you.  It's disgusting.


Kat: And they are disgusting, Cedric.  They lie to their audience about Scott Ritter and they lie to their audience being independent.  There are real stories that need coverage.  Jimmy Dore is not one of them.  When they're all pimping Jimmy the same week, you know that they're not independent.  There's a lot going on behind the scenes that the people begging money from have no idea about.  Don't send them a penny.  


Stan: I won't.  If they've got a pretty much daily program and they can't note the Iraq War -- the ongoing Iraq War -- I don't need to hear from them.  They're not offering news, they're doing con jobs and wasting our time promoting their friends.  F**k you all posing as 'independent media.'  I'm serious.  I'm tired of the fake assery.  Could you imagine if, in the last six weeks alone, they'd given as much time to Mumia Abu-Jamal?  That's a real story.  He remains in prison.  His is a story that needs to be amplified.  Segments on how Ryan Grim misunderstood Jimmy's joke or whatever nonsense, that's not news.  And also to be clear, THE HILL and BREAKING POINTS do real news segments.  No, they're not as left as I would like them to be.  But they're not wasting 20 minutes on what someone said on Twitter about Jimmy Dore.  So maybe before you slam Krystal or Ryan on your own program, you take a look at your own program and notice how little work you're doing.  And Sabby Sabs, do some damn work.  Stop covering entertainment because you think you know stuff and you don't.  Whenever you talk about music or movies and TV, you are so wrong.  You don't know the context, you don't know the history and sometimes you even get the people wrong.  Stop.  For the love of God, Sabby, stop.


Betty:  Yeah, she hasn't turned out to be who I hoped she would be either.  But Ann got that right immediately.  Ann's long called her out for fact-free attacks on Howie Hawkins.


Ann: The fact that she knows nothing about Howie has never stopped her from attacking him.  For those who don't know, he's an activist and he was the Green Party's 2020 presidential candidate.


Jess: And as Ann often points out, after the 2020 election, he did not do what every Green Party presidential candidate before him did: Vanish.  He has worked very week since then posting at least one video about Green issues -- at least one.  Who the hell is she to slam Howie Hawkins when she doesn't even know what he's done or what he's doing.


Ann: She does it because, like Jimmy Dore, she's expressed the belief that the Green Party should have given the nomination to right-wing Jesse Ventura.  Jesse didn't run for it, but he should be gifted with it.  They have no ethics and they prove it when they say that.  They're calling for someone who didn't even run for the nomination to be given it.  How is that democracy?  It's not.  They're pathetic.


Kat: And I am sick of them shoving Jimmy Dore down my throat.  I actually had no opinion of him one way or the other.  I don't watch him.  I've never watched him.  But this non-stop coverage of 'poor Jimmy Dore' has made me loathe him.  They're like a cult and they make me hate this person that I don't even know or even know his work.  It's enough already.


Jim: Okay, Betty, on the list of topics, you put down Iraq.  Not sure what issue you're taking on but I'm tossing to you.


Betty: Thanks.  If you've missed it, for at least two weeks now, Iraq's been getting some attention from the western media.  Why?  A city, that might be the ancient city of Zakhiku -- dating from 1550 to 1350 BC -- has been discovered -- a place, several buildings.  And this is resulted in giddy coverage.  And maybe it deserves that because of the discovery.  But the coverage should include the reality that this not good news.  This is the result of climate change.  The city, over 3,400 years old, has only been discovered because climate change is impacting Iraq and the water level of the Tigris River has gotten dangerously low.  Again, cover the discovery.  But at least equal space to the fact that we're seeing the effects of climate change.  As much I appreciate the discovery of the city, I'm more concerned with the Iraqi people who are about go through a very hot summer and do so facing water shortages and drought.


Mike: Very good point, Betty.


Jim: C.I., you wanted to note a bill.  And for those participating by phone, C.I.'s finishing up note taking and I'm waiting for Ava to start taking notes.  Their note taking is how we get these transcripts.  Okay, C.I.


C.I.: I just wanted to note, from Jordan Williams and Rachel Frazin report for THE HILL, "The Senate is set to vote this week on the Sgt. First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our PACT Act to expand healthcare and other benefits for a new generation of veterans who were exposed to toxic chemicals. The bill would largely benefit those who served after 9/11 and were exposed to toxic substances during that time."

Jim: So if it passes the Senate?


C.I.: It differs from the House bill so it would have to get approval from the House as well.  For those new to this issue, I would encourage you to visit Burn Pits 360.  I would also report that we've been here before repeatedly and, hopefully, this is the time that something actually gets done.


Jim: Thank you.  Ava, we're reposting the piece you've done at Ann's "Michele Dauber, let's play your game (Ava)" and I wanted to ask about the feedback you've gotten on it, if any?


Ava: Some are appalled by what I wrote.  Good.  My whole point is I'm appalled by what Dauber is saying about Camille Vasquez.  I'm giving her a taste of the treatment she's giving Camille.  I also stand by my remarks that if your child is struggling, you cut back and focus on your child.  Jess and I have a child together.  If our daughter was struggling, it's our job to put on hold other things in our life.  I know a lot more than I wrote and I couched many statements as questions -- even though I know the answers.  Dauber should have protected her daughter.  She didn't.  She got three or four degrees instead, while her daughter needed her, she clerked instead, she served different organizations and her daughter was suicidal.  The tragic outcome of that isn't a surprise to anyone and shouldn't have been to Dauber.  If Jess or I ever fail our daughter like that, please call us out.


Jim: Some were appalled?


Ava: About 11% of the e-mails according to Martha and Shirley.  The rest either got what I was doing or don't like Dauber so they were glad to read it.


Jim: Okay.  We're going to wrap up with that.  This is a rush transcript.  



2022 deaths

Each year, people are born and people die.  Reader Troy Montgomery e-mailed noting that many community sites note passings and thought we could keep a running link page on that.  That's a good idea.  We'll try to include this in future editions this year as sites cover additional deaths.  You'll note a lot of links go to Ruth because she tends to cover passings more than anyone else in the community.  The list may not be complete and the only order for the first twelve is the order of what we remembered while we were doing this -- the order we remembered the deaths in. 

 

 

1) Sally Kellerman -- see Ruth's "Sally Kellerman"

 

 2) Ronnie Spector -- see Betty's "Ronnie Specter," Ruth's "Ronnie Spector" and C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot"


2) Naomi Judd -- see Kat's "Grace Slick, Naomi Judd," "One more time honoring Naomi Judd" and "Naomi Judd"

 

3) Sidney Poitier -- see Betty's "A great actor passed -- not a great person, not a great lover, not a great activist"

4) Ray Liotta -- see Ruth's "Ray Liotta"


 5) Peter Bogdanovich -- see Stan's "Peter Bogdonavich"


6) Andy Fletcher -- see Kat's "Andy Fletcher"

 

7)  Bo Hopkins -- see Ruth's "Bo Hopkins"

 

8) William Hurt -- see Ann's "Not sure if I believe Marlee Matlin now"

 

9) Meat Loaf -- see Kat's "Meat Loaf"

 

10) Howard Hessman -- see Ruth's "Howard Hessman"

 

11) Rosa Lee Hawkins -- see Ruth's "Rosa Lee Hawkins"

 

12) Dwayne Hickman -- see Ruth's "Dwayne Hickman"



Twitter burn!

Pedophile loving Jackson Hinkle was thrilled to bring convicted and registered sex offender Scott Ritter onto his program, so thrillled he Tweeted about it -- and he got burned.

Replying to @jacksonhinklle
Don't think ur young enough for that pedo

Apr 11, 2022 · 6:27 AM UTC · Twitter for Android




Jackie and his tiny Hinkle got burned!





 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }