Sunday, June 02, 2013
Truest statement of the week
Is punishment of so-called leakers surprising given this framework? Does assassination conduce to respect for the law on other occasions? Does “hit-lists,” an established fact of Terror Tuesdays as the National-Security gang sits around, at the Chief’s feet, planning summary executions from the skies, where habeas corpus, right to counsel, evidentiary preparation, are as remote as the 8,000-mile in distance from “pilot” of the drones to the victims, executed, vaporized, in plain sight. The Obama Team is one set of tough cookies, not to be restrained by reporters, whistle blowers, soon perhaps, even demonstrators, as we saw when one CP writer, Medea Benjamin, was ejected from Brennan’s hearings for DCIA. But now finally we are seeing some action in response to (a) abuses of the law, (b) the utter lack of government transparency, and (c) the chilling effect (a natural outcome of Obama’s own coldness with respect to civil liberties, as much else) on press freedom and the right to know in general, action, be it noted, taken by Republicans—not Democrats—and therefore easily dismissible by liberals, even when, as here, there is abundant merit in the criticism directed against government tactics in seeking to silence dissent and opposition.
-- Norman Pollack, "A Jurisprudential Cesspool" (CounterPunch).
Truest statement of the week II
Recently, Attorney General Eric Holder appeared before the House Judiciary Committee to answer questions about the administration's sweeping surveillance of journalists with the Associated Press. In the greatest attack on the free press in decades, the Justice Department seized phone records for reporters and editors in at least three AP offices as well as its office in the House of Representatives. Holder, however, proceeded to claim absolute and blissful ignorance of the investigation, even failing to recall when or how he recused himself.
Yet, this was only the latest attack on the news media under Holder's leadership. Despite his record, he expressed surprise at the hearing that the head of the Republican National Committee had called for his resignation. After all, Holder pointed out, he did nothing. That is, of course, precisely the point. Unlike the head of the RNC, I am neither a Republican nor conservative, and I believe Holder should be fired.
-- Jonathan Turley, "Fire Eric Holder" (USA Today).
A note to our readers
Hey --
Another Sunday.
First up, we thank all who participated this edition which includes Dallas and the following:
The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen,
Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.
And what did we come up with?
Mike and the gang wrote this and we thank them for it.
Peace.
-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.
Another Sunday.
First up, we thank all who participated this edition which includes Dallas and the following:
The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen,
Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.
And what did we come up with?
Norman Pollack gets a truest. It's a first for him here.
Jonathan Turley's had a truest before but not this year.
Do we love to pick on Prashant? We actually hadn't even thought of him but then a professor at Stanford called to ask C.I. and me (Jim) what the hell we were going to do about Prashant? What did he mean? Did we miss Prashant trashing The Lancet study? Yes, we had. Prashant, stick to what you know -- surely you know something. Maybe postage stamps or coin collecting, there's got to be something.
Ava and C.I. tackle The Water Cooler Set -- the failures of the set, the errors of the set and so much more.
Short feature. We all agreed they were needed this edition. Dona had loved Wally and Cedric's joint-post about the boardwalk from earlier in the week and went looking through The White House photos to find the perfect shot of the lovers.
We hadn't done one in a while. We also wanted to be sure that Ann and Cedric -- new parents -- had a chance to participate. Cedric participated in the editorial and Ann partipated in this feature.
Dona wanted another short feature and Betty had pushed for Curisoity this edition so that seemed like the best choice.
Ava and C.I. made a crack that I thought was funny and said they should turn into a full feature. They said they'd do it but only if they could bring in others. So they brought in Betty, Stan, Isaiah and Elaine. (They offered it to Marcia but she said she loved Revolution now and if she joined in on this, she'd pick a really bad moment from Revolution.)
We should have done this last edition. We even talked about it. We knew the collage would get some questions. And it did. This is really just identifying what's in the collage.
From Senator Patty Murray's office.
Repost from Workers World.
Repost from England's Socialist Worker.
So that's what we got. See you next week.
Peace.
-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.
Editorial: Piss Ant Rao's Propaganda
The United Nations revealed 1,045 Iraqis died in violence and another 2,397 were injured during the month of May.
The laughable AFP became a dirty joke last week or a dirtier one as they went around with their 'count' insisting that 500 was the total and then 600. They radically undercount.
That's bad enough as they distribute their disinformation.
What's worse is what they do behind the scenes, specifically what Prashant Rao does behind the scenes.
AFP's Twitter king Prashant Rao is a one-man propaganda team. Rao is responsible for AFP's death toll so when he 'forgets' to include deaths, that's on him. He also 'forgets' to note rape or issues around rape in Iraq.
One of the worst things he's done recently involves CNN.
CNN hired Fran Townsend, former Homeland Security and CounterTerrorism advisor to Bully Boy Bush. Townsend questioned Prashant's Syria propaganda -- in 2.5 years -- the alarmist Prashant shouts -- almost as many people have died in Syria as have died in Iraq since 2003.
Let's look at the conversation:
@_R_S_S_ @FranTownsend Yes, but Lancet figures have been called into question repeatedly. Widely accepted figures are closer to 110-120k.
Please grasp, a former Bush official is noting the validity of The Lancet figures and AFP Whore Prashant Rao, little weasel and liar that he is, is insisting The Lancet is not correct.
The Lancet is a medical journal and it used sampling the same way the United Nations does. It is the accepted method. Not that a weasel who never took social sciences would know a damn thing about sampling.
But Piss Ant Rao always knows so damn litte.
Watch him prove where he gets his 'wisdom.'
@_R_S_S_ @FranTownsend Nope, it has not. @JoelWing2 has summarised problems with it, though: http://bit.ly/17dMnTp + http://bit.ly/17dMpdL
The laughable AFP became a dirty joke last week or a dirtier one as they went around with their 'count' insisting that 500 was the total and then 600. They radically undercount.
That's bad enough as they distribute their disinformation.
What's worse is what they do behind the scenes, specifically what Prashant Rao does behind the scenes.
AFP's Twitter king Prashant Rao is a one-man propaganda team. Rao is responsible for AFP's death toll so when he 'forgets' to include deaths, that's on him. He also 'forgets' to note rape or issues around rape in Iraq.
One of the worst things he's done recently involves CNN.
CNN hired Fran Townsend, former Homeland Security and CounterTerrorism advisor to Bully Boy Bush. Townsend questioned Prashant's Syria propaganda -- in 2.5 years -- the alarmist Prashant shouts -- almost as many people have died in Syria as have died in Iraq since 2003.
Let's look at the conversation:
-
Incredible that despite how violent Iraq has been for a decade, Syria has nearly caught up, in terms of death toll, in less than 2.5 years.
-
@prashantrao@FranTownsend Are you sure? 2.5 yrs into the Iraq war the British Lancet was claiming over 600K Iraqis dead
-
@prashantrao@FranTownsend I know but Lancet has not retracted its initial report that I know of.
Please grasp, a former Bush official is noting the validity of The Lancet figures and AFP Whore Prashant Rao, little weasel and liar that he is, is insisting The Lancet is not correct.
The Lancet is a medical journal and it used sampling the same way the United Nations does. It is the accepted method. Not that a weasel who never took social sciences would know a damn thing about sampling.
But Piss Ant Rao always knows so damn litte.
Watch him prove where he gets his 'wisdom.'
TV: The return of summer schedules on broadcast TV
The broadcast commercial networks are attempting to make the summer break competitive once again. As we've noted before, summer used to be where shows got try-outs. The Sonny & Cher Comedy Hour started out as a summer replacement show and went on to be a huge hit for CBS.
This summer NBC is airing the variety show America's Got Talent (Tuesdays starting July 10th), the reality show America Ninja Warrior on Mondays (starting July 9th) paired with the reality show Get Out Alive With Bear Grylls on Monday nights (starting July 8th), the scripted show Camp starring Rachel Griffiths on Wednesdays (starting July 10th) and it's already airing a great show we'll get to in a moment.
ABC's popular summer drama Rookie Blue returned to Thursday nights May 23rd, the awful show Wipe Out returned, The Bachelorette returned last week on Monday nights, Motive is the new detective drama leading into Rookie Blue on Thursday nights. Returning last week were Extreme Makeover: Weight Loss Edition (Tuesdays) and What Would You Do? (Wednesdays). The end of the month sees a reality mystery show Whodunnit? (Sundays starting June 23rd) and the return of Celebrity Wife Swap (same night, same channel) while June 3rd (tomorrow) sees the premiere of the drama Mistress starring Alyssa Milano, Rochelle Aytes, Yunjin Kim and Jes Macallan. Through the end of the month, Wednesday nights finds ABC airing new episodes of the sitcom How To Live With Your Parents (For The Rest Of Your Life) paired with new episodes of the sitcom Family Tools (which finishes July 10th -- and Stan wrote about Family Tools last week at his site praising the show). Friday, June 22nd ABC also begins airing the last four episodes of 666 Park Avenue.
The CW has nothing scripted but their improv game show Whose Line Is It Anyway? returns Tuesday, July 16th and the dating game Perfect Score debuts the same night. Reality show Breaking Pointe debuts July 29th and reality show The Hunt on July 31st.
Fox's scripted show The Goodwin Games (sitcom starring Scott Foley) is already airing Monday nights. Reality shows Hell's Kitchen returned last month and is paired with reality show Does Someone Have to Go? on Thursdays. Supposedly, July 27th will see the late night Saturday debut of Animation Domination High-Def; however, that show was supposed to have debuted back in January so don't be surprised if the start date gets pushed back again.
CBS started airing the Wednesday night cooking competition show The Great British Bake Off last month. It's their only new episodes until the end of this month. First, Monday, June 24th, Under The Dome debuts. It's from the Stephens -- Spielberg and King. Then the reality show Big Brother returns June 26 (and begins taking up three nights on CBS' weekly schedule). Sunday, July 28th is when Poppy Montgomery's Unforgettable returns.
The summer return of this show is the only reason at least two execs at CBS still have jobs. CBS did not have a good season. This past season saw CSI:NY crater and saw new hour long dramas Vegas, Made in Jersey and Golden Boy bomb. May 2012, CBS was so cocky. They had Poppy's show bringing in an average of ten million viewers weekly. A huge hit. And they cancelled the show. Only after protests -- and some wise words about how bad things could be next May if their new shows didn't pan out and the president of the network started asking why they thought they could do better than Unforgettable -- was it quickly announced that the show would have a second season as a summer replacement show. If that hadn't happened, at least two CBS execs would be out on their asses.
The show should never have been cancelled. It was a hit and you cannot have too many hits. Execs at CBS thought otherwise in May 2012 but learned reality in May 2013. It will be one of the bright spots of the summer.
One. The brightest spot right now is NBC's Save Me, the Anne Heche sitcom airing on Thursdays. Anne plays drunk Beth Harper who chokes on a sandwich one night and survives the next morning. She now hears God speaking to her. Is she crazy or is God speaking to her? Something has her straightening out her life. She stops drinking, she tries to establish a relationship with her teenage daughter Emily (Madison Davenport) and she lets her husband Tom (Michael Landes) know that God's saying he's not really happy about Tom's affair. With his mistress (and employee), Tom's joking about how he's going to be smited by God. It's not so funny when the mistress shows up on Beth's front lawn and, after refusing to leave, gets hit by a thunderbolt of lightning.
The fact that she could be crazy should help stop some criticism of the show that would be in place if the premise was God is speaking to her. This is a funny show about redemption. Anne's perfect in it and Michael Landes is perfect as her husband. You believe them as a couple and you believe that, whatever's happening to Beth Harper, it's helping others. It's helped her daughter, it's helped an angry old neighbor, it's helped the friend who she betrayed when, while drunk, she came on to the friend's husband and stole the friend's espresso machine. Neither the stories nor the humor is obvious. It's a real adventure and it's a shame NBC couldn't have paired it up with Community or another out of the norm show. When Thursdays this November are bombing in the ratings, someone at NBC should be asked why Save Me wasn't on the fall schedule?
We're the ones who made the argument last year that CBS better turn Unforgettable into a summer show. We made that here and we made it in person. When we made it here we became the only critics to champion the show. The Water Cooler Set couldn't be bothered. Can they ever?
They certainly haven't rushed to note Save Me.
Last week, they did rush to weigh in on Arrested Development returning with new episodes on Netflix. With Hemlock Grove last April, The Water Cooler Set 'discovered' something: Netflix tossing out a full season of shows on one day wasn't a working model. It didn't allow people to absorb the show or discuss it the way that would have happened with a one-episode-a-week manner of unveiling.
We'd call them astute but we were making that observation in February about Netflix's House of Cards . . . and we were repeating because we'd already made that observation January 20th about Crackle's Chosen. Poor Water Cooler Set, incapable of original insight. They're forever the seat fillers at the Academy Awards who briefly rush in while the real people get up to go to the bathroom or stretch their legs.
All week long last week, The Water Cooler Set proved just how stupid they were as they tried to explain why Arrested Development was disappointing some people. The first 'genius' to get it wrong was Jace Lacob (The Daily Beast) but once he typed it, everyone rushed to repeat it:
Let's be honest here, he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. But that didn't stop everyone from repeating that lie. By the end of the week, it was even being repeated by the Marxist analysts of World Socialist Web Site. From Joanne Laurier's piece:
Reportedly, the series’ creators had difficulties coordinating the schedules of the leading actors who play the Bluths. This meant a format change in which each main character had to carry an episode (or more) essentially on his or her own—in some cases, doubles shot from behind stood in for other lead performers. Whether the problems were strictly logistical-budgetary, or the show’s own creators did not really understand why the original series worked so well, the results are not effective. Ripped out of the dynamic of the core ensemble, individual cast members are not able conjure up their former magic—or energy. While some scenes are funnier than others, no episode is entirely successful and most are plodding and rudderless.
Do those two and all the ones repeating in between them feel smart? Do they feel like they did a job?
We think they failed as critics and should find a new line of work.
If Arrested Development were live -- or maybe even taped before a live audience, they might have a point. It's not. It's filmed.
We're not fans of filmed comedies. Most of them suck. Most of the time with comedy, as Lucille Ball damn well knew, you need a live audience in front of you to feed off that energy and to see what's working.
But these idiots of The Water Cooler Set, they championed this return to 60s TV. That is what it is. It's all those bad comedies that, for the most part, are avoided and not big in syndication today. The shows weren't funny. At best, they provided whimsy. Sort of like My Name Is Earl -- a sitcom The Water Cooler Set drooled over and a sitcom that helped destroy NBC Thursday nights.
My Name Is Earl was never a huge hit outside of the pilot. By 2009, it was cratering. It had always damaged Thursday nights but you had to know how to read ratings -- not a difficult task we thought until we encountered The Water Cooler Set -- to grasp that. By the final season, there was no way to deny how bad it was doing.
But The Water Cooler Set had misled for so long that wanna be Water Cooler Setter Orrin Konheim had an online hissy fit that ratings led to the show being cancelled:
My first complaint is why are TV networks so oblivious to everything but Nielsen ratings? Just look up TV guide or Entertainment Weekly and see how often people are writing praises for My Name is Earl as opposed to a show like Yes, Dear or Two and a Half Men. Go to tv.com and imdb.com and see how many people have posted votes or reviews on a series like My Name is Earl. See how active the message boards are. Talk to people. See how many fans of these shows exist on facebook. Look at Q ratings. Look at the volume of My Name is Earl-related twitter messages. Look at traffic on your site. Look at itunes sales and hulu sales.
To Orrin, success was social media -- Facebook, Twitter. It was The Water Cooler Set that also invoked that shallow criteria. It was "itunes sales and hulu sales." My Name Is Earl didn't sell well on iTunes. It didn't sell at all on Hulu because Hulu doesn't sell episodes.
Hulu is factored in from time to time. As we noted in September of 2009, Hulu stats were what kept Cougar Town on the air for a second episode. The ratings were there but ABC was iffy because there was a campaign launched against the show. Was it a one-time thing? Nope. Because Hulu stats showed that people were watching the next day -- despite all the e-mails claiming the show was "disgusting" and that, having seen the first episode, they'd never watch it again. We explained that in our piece -- it's called reporting, and heaven help us, it's a chore that's been too often left to us.
Apparently, it's left to us to note the obvious as well.
One of the few 60s (and beyond) sitcoms that found a life in syndication was My Three Sons. We do have a point. When Barbara Stanwyck was getting ready to do The Big Valley, her friend and frequent co-star Fred MacMurray told her how he survived doing the TV show My Three Sons -- he only worked three months a year. He did all of his scenes first for the entire season. In three months, he was done and they were left to film the other scenes -- the non-Fred MacMurray scenes -- throughout the rest of the weeks each season.
When you're doing a TV show that's not live, you can do that. (The not live but filmed before a studio audience Three's Company filmed Suzanne Somers scenes separately at the end of her run on that show.)
You get what that means, right? There was no production troubles that prevented them from filming subplots to add in to other episodes. If Portia de Rossi could only work two weeks, for example, that would mean they had ten days to film scenes with Portia and that was honestly more than enough to fit her into any episode. They didn't have to be filmed in order.
Only a stupid and uninformed idiot would argue that 'production schedules' meant that each episode had to center on one character and you couldn't have subplots in the episodes.
The stupid and the uninformed Water Cooler Set goes a long way towards explaining the decay of commercial broadcast television. They never really cared for it, a little 'too common' for them. But they never championed it either.
Repeatedly, they got behind 'buzz' shows that had no audiences and usually had no audiences for good reason. They refused to champion entertaining shows that needed the good word of mouth. See, once upon a time, critics helped build word of mouth about TV shows. But in the '00s, The Water Cooler Set chased trends and buss to try to pretend that they were meaningful or at least 'cool.'
They have failed at their jobs repeatedly.
Everyone of us has power. We can choose to use it and how we use it. How very sad that The Water Cooler Set has nothing to show for a full decade. We, on the other hand, have spent years here making the argument for why commercial television needed to return to summer seasons.
It's not as if they even have a choice anymore. If they're going to remain competitive in the ratings, broadcast television is going to have start doing summer programming. We explained that, made that argument for years, and The Water Cooler Set was off raving over some man in a cable TV show.
Everyone of us has power. In the past, TV critics used their power to champion and to lead. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't. Today, what's 'trending' passes for a discussion of quality. The '00s produced no great show that changed the face of television. That's largely the fault of The Water Cooler Set who failed to promote, failed to push, failed to prod. They are responsible for the lack of quality in the decade. Hopefully, they -- like the decade they represent -- are now a thing of the past. TV viewers deserve better.
This summer NBC is airing the variety show America's Got Talent (Tuesdays starting July 10th), the reality show America Ninja Warrior on Mondays (starting July 9th) paired with the reality show Get Out Alive With Bear Grylls on Monday nights (starting July 8th), the scripted show Camp starring Rachel Griffiths on Wednesdays (starting July 10th) and it's already airing a great show we'll get to in a moment.
ABC's popular summer drama Rookie Blue returned to Thursday nights May 23rd, the awful show Wipe Out returned, The Bachelorette returned last week on Monday nights, Motive is the new detective drama leading into Rookie Blue on Thursday nights. Returning last week were Extreme Makeover: Weight Loss Edition (Tuesdays) and What Would You Do? (Wednesdays). The end of the month sees a reality mystery show Whodunnit? (Sundays starting June 23rd) and the return of Celebrity Wife Swap (same night, same channel) while June 3rd (tomorrow) sees the premiere of the drama Mistress starring Alyssa Milano, Rochelle Aytes, Yunjin Kim and Jes Macallan. Through the end of the month, Wednesday nights finds ABC airing new episodes of the sitcom How To Live With Your Parents (For The Rest Of Your Life) paired with new episodes of the sitcom Family Tools (which finishes July 10th -- and Stan wrote about Family Tools last week at his site praising the show). Friday, June 22nd ABC also begins airing the last four episodes of 666 Park Avenue.
The CW has nothing scripted but their improv game show Whose Line Is It Anyway? returns Tuesday, July 16th and the dating game Perfect Score debuts the same night. Reality show Breaking Pointe debuts July 29th and reality show The Hunt on July 31st.
Fox's scripted show The Goodwin Games (sitcom starring Scott Foley) is already airing Monday nights. Reality shows Hell's Kitchen returned last month and is paired with reality show Does Someone Have to Go? on Thursdays. Supposedly, July 27th will see the late night Saturday debut of Animation Domination High-Def; however, that show was supposed to have debuted back in January so don't be surprised if the start date gets pushed back again.
CBS started airing the Wednesday night cooking competition show The Great British Bake Off last month. It's their only new episodes until the end of this month. First, Monday, June 24th, Under The Dome debuts. It's from the Stephens -- Spielberg and King. Then the reality show Big Brother returns June 26 (and begins taking up three nights on CBS' weekly schedule). Sunday, July 28th is when Poppy Montgomery's Unforgettable returns.
The summer return of this show is the only reason at least two execs at CBS still have jobs. CBS did not have a good season. This past season saw CSI:NY crater and saw new hour long dramas Vegas, Made in Jersey and Golden Boy bomb. May 2012, CBS was so cocky. They had Poppy's show bringing in an average of ten million viewers weekly. A huge hit. And they cancelled the show. Only after protests -- and some wise words about how bad things could be next May if their new shows didn't pan out and the president of the network started asking why they thought they could do better than Unforgettable -- was it quickly announced that the show would have a second season as a summer replacement show. If that hadn't happened, at least two CBS execs would be out on their asses.
The show should never have been cancelled. It was a hit and you cannot have too many hits. Execs at CBS thought otherwise in May 2012 but learned reality in May 2013. It will be one of the bright spots of the summer.
One. The brightest spot right now is NBC's Save Me, the Anne Heche sitcom airing on Thursdays. Anne plays drunk Beth Harper who chokes on a sandwich one night and survives the next morning. She now hears God speaking to her. Is she crazy or is God speaking to her? Something has her straightening out her life. She stops drinking, she tries to establish a relationship with her teenage daughter Emily (Madison Davenport) and she lets her husband Tom (Michael Landes) know that God's saying he's not really happy about Tom's affair. With his mistress (and employee), Tom's joking about how he's going to be smited by God. It's not so funny when the mistress shows up on Beth's front lawn and, after refusing to leave, gets hit by a thunderbolt of lightning.
The fact that she could be crazy should help stop some criticism of the show that would be in place if the premise was God is speaking to her. This is a funny show about redemption. Anne's perfect in it and Michael Landes is perfect as her husband. You believe them as a couple and you believe that, whatever's happening to Beth Harper, it's helping others. It's helped her daughter, it's helped an angry old neighbor, it's helped the friend who she betrayed when, while drunk, she came on to the friend's husband and stole the friend's espresso machine. Neither the stories nor the humor is obvious. It's a real adventure and it's a shame NBC couldn't have paired it up with Community or another out of the norm show. When Thursdays this November are bombing in the ratings, someone at NBC should be asked why Save Me wasn't on the fall schedule?
We're the ones who made the argument last year that CBS better turn Unforgettable into a summer show. We made that here and we made it in person. When we made it here we became the only critics to champion the show. The Water Cooler Set couldn't be bothered. Can they ever?
They certainly haven't rushed to note Save Me.
Last week, they did rush to weigh in on Arrested Development returning with new episodes on Netflix. With Hemlock Grove last April, The Water Cooler Set 'discovered' something: Netflix tossing out a full season of shows on one day wasn't a working model. It didn't allow people to absorb the show or discuss it the way that would have happened with a one-episode-a-week manner of unveiling.
We'd call them astute but we were making that observation in February about Netflix's House of Cards . . . and we were repeating because we'd already made that observation January 20th about Crackle's Chosen. Poor Water Cooler Set, incapable of original insight. They're forever the seat fillers at the Academy Awards who briefly rush in while the real people get up to go to the bathroom or stretch their legs.
All week long last week, The Water Cooler Set proved just how stupid they were as they tried to explain why Arrested Development was disappointing some people. The first 'genius' to get it wrong was Jace Lacob (The Daily Beast) but once he typed it, everyone rushed to repeat it:
Due to necessity, the format is different for Arrested’s
fourth season; each episode focuses on a specific Bluth (Michael,
Lucille, Tobias, etc.) as locking down the schedules for all of the
actors for the entire production was impossible. Instead, an episode
doesn’t have a B- or C-storyline, but just a single arc, shuttling
backwards and forwards in time, to bring the audience up to date on the
efforts of George Sr. (Jeffrey Tambor) to build (or not build) a wall on
the U.S./Mexican border or whatever new depravity GOB (Will Arnett) has
embraced. (Bees, limos, and Christian magic are all on the table.)
This
new format relies on all of its characters being able to carry an
episode on their own (though a few other characters often do turn up
throughout), and I’ll be honest here: they’re not always able to.
Let's be honest here, he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. But that didn't stop everyone from repeating that lie. By the end of the week, it was even being repeated by the Marxist analysts of World Socialist Web Site. From Joanne Laurier's piece:
Reportedly, the series’ creators had difficulties coordinating the schedules of the leading actors who play the Bluths. This meant a format change in which each main character had to carry an episode (or more) essentially on his or her own—in some cases, doubles shot from behind stood in for other lead performers. Whether the problems were strictly logistical-budgetary, or the show’s own creators did not really understand why the original series worked so well, the results are not effective. Ripped out of the dynamic of the core ensemble, individual cast members are not able conjure up their former magic—or energy. While some scenes are funnier than others, no episode is entirely successful and most are plodding and rudderless.
Do those two and all the ones repeating in between them feel smart? Do they feel like they did a job?
We think they failed as critics and should find a new line of work.
If Arrested Development were live -- or maybe even taped before a live audience, they might have a point. It's not. It's filmed.
We're not fans of filmed comedies. Most of them suck. Most of the time with comedy, as Lucille Ball damn well knew, you need a live audience in front of you to feed off that energy and to see what's working.
But these idiots of The Water Cooler Set, they championed this return to 60s TV. That is what it is. It's all those bad comedies that, for the most part, are avoided and not big in syndication today. The shows weren't funny. At best, they provided whimsy. Sort of like My Name Is Earl -- a sitcom The Water Cooler Set drooled over and a sitcom that helped destroy NBC Thursday nights.
My Name Is Earl was never a huge hit outside of the pilot. By 2009, it was cratering. It had always damaged Thursday nights but you had to know how to read ratings -- not a difficult task we thought until we encountered The Water Cooler Set -- to grasp that. By the final season, there was no way to deny how bad it was doing.
But The Water Cooler Set had misled for so long that wanna be Water Cooler Setter Orrin Konheim had an online hissy fit that ratings led to the show being cancelled:
My first complaint is why are TV networks so oblivious to everything but Nielsen ratings? Just look up TV guide or Entertainment Weekly and see how often people are writing praises for My Name is Earl as opposed to a show like Yes, Dear or Two and a Half Men. Go to tv.com and imdb.com and see how many people have posted votes or reviews on a series like My Name is Earl. See how active the message boards are. Talk to people. See how many fans of these shows exist on facebook. Look at Q ratings. Look at the volume of My Name is Earl-related twitter messages. Look at traffic on your site. Look at itunes sales and hulu sales.
To Orrin, success was social media -- Facebook, Twitter. It was The Water Cooler Set that also invoked that shallow criteria. It was "itunes sales and hulu sales." My Name Is Earl didn't sell well on iTunes. It didn't sell at all on Hulu because Hulu doesn't sell episodes.
Hulu is factored in from time to time. As we noted in September of 2009, Hulu stats were what kept Cougar Town on the air for a second episode. The ratings were there but ABC was iffy because there was a campaign launched against the show. Was it a one-time thing? Nope. Because Hulu stats showed that people were watching the next day -- despite all the e-mails claiming the show was "disgusting" and that, having seen the first episode, they'd never watch it again. We explained that in our piece -- it's called reporting, and heaven help us, it's a chore that's been too often left to us.
Apparently, it's left to us to note the obvious as well.
One of the few 60s (and beyond) sitcoms that found a life in syndication was My Three Sons. We do have a point. When Barbara Stanwyck was getting ready to do The Big Valley, her friend and frequent co-star Fred MacMurray told her how he survived doing the TV show My Three Sons -- he only worked three months a year. He did all of his scenes first for the entire season. In three months, he was done and they were left to film the other scenes -- the non-Fred MacMurray scenes -- throughout the rest of the weeks each season.
When you're doing a TV show that's not live, you can do that. (The not live but filmed before a studio audience Three's Company filmed Suzanne Somers scenes separately at the end of her run on that show.)
You get what that means, right? There was no production troubles that prevented them from filming subplots to add in to other episodes. If Portia de Rossi could only work two weeks, for example, that would mean they had ten days to film scenes with Portia and that was honestly more than enough to fit her into any episode. They didn't have to be filmed in order.
Only a stupid and uninformed idiot would argue that 'production schedules' meant that each episode had to center on one character and you couldn't have subplots in the episodes.
The stupid and the uninformed Water Cooler Set goes a long way towards explaining the decay of commercial broadcast television. They never really cared for it, a little 'too common' for them. But they never championed it either.
Repeatedly, they got behind 'buzz' shows that had no audiences and usually had no audiences for good reason. They refused to champion entertaining shows that needed the good word of mouth. See, once upon a time, critics helped build word of mouth about TV shows. But in the '00s, The Water Cooler Set chased trends and buss to try to pretend that they were meaningful or at least 'cool.'
They have failed at their jobs repeatedly.
Everyone of us has power. We can choose to use it and how we use it. How very sad that The Water Cooler Set has nothing to show for a full decade. We, on the other hand, have spent years here making the argument for why commercial television needed to return to summer seasons.
It's not as if they even have a choice anymore. If they're going to remain competitive in the ratings, broadcast television is going to have start doing summer programming. We explained that, made that argument for years, and The Water Cooler Set was off raving over some man in a cable TV show.
Everyone of us has power. In the past, TV critics used their power to champion and to lead. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't. Today, what's 'trending' passes for a discussion of quality. The '00s produced no great show that changed the face of television. That's largely the fault of The Water Cooler Set who failed to promote, failed to push, failed to prod. They are responsible for the lack of quality in the decade. Hopefully, they -- like the decade they represent -- are now a thing of the past. TV viewers deserve better.
On a blanket with Chris Christie . . .
As Cedric and Wally noted last week in "The big make out under the boardwalk" and "THIS JUST IN! BARRY O GOES NECKING!," Barack got caught with lipstick on the collar -- and on the same day he was visiting the Jersey boardwalk in Asbury Park and New Jersey Govenor Chris Christie was winning him a stuffed bear.
Under the boardwalk, down by the sea . . .
On a blanket with Chris Christie . . .
That's where he'll be.
Under the boardwalk, down by the sea . . .
On a blanket with Chris Christie . . .
That's where he'll be.
Mailbag
Ty: We may or may not have a roundtable this edition but we are doing a mailbag of sorts. First off, one reason to do this is to remind people that our new e-mail address is thethirdestatesundayreview@yahoo.com. Please note that change. I'm Ty with The Third Estate Sunday Review and I've got Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude; Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man; C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review; Mike of Mikey Likes It!; Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz); Ruth of Ruth's Report; and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub. participating in this feature. For a change, we're going to talk about the receiving end of e-mails. We may have time for a few of your e-mails as well. Elaine, I want to start with you. Saturday, you posted "Mike posts and people whine to me" which was about how Mike wrote "The long day (and veterans issues are much more complicated than I ever knew)" Friday night and you ended up getting all these e-mails about it. For those who don't know, Mike and Elaine are a couple, they have a daughter. They also each have their own websites. Elaine?
Elaine: Well the post said it all but basically, I didn't appreciate the fact that if people had a problem with Mike's post they felt the need to gripe at me. These aren't my readers, I'd never heard from them before. Usually Sunny goes through my e-mails and she tells me who wrote about what. I'd never heard of or from these people before who felt the need to (a) gripe to me about what Mike wrote and (b) blame me for violating doctor-patient confidentiality. I shouldn't have had to have pointed out that Mike's friend was not and had never been a patient of mine. Mike made that point in his own post. In addition, Mike writing about a patient that one of my ex-lovers forced C.I. to deal with is not me breaking doctor-patient confidentiality. I wasn't treating that person, I never treated that person, I didn't write about the story until Mike did and then I only wrote about to explain to people what doctor patient confidentiality is. Everyone -- unless they're Christian Scientist or something -- is a patient. Because you got a flu shot last winter does not make you my patient and make me unable to share an observation I have of you. Just because I'm a doctor and you're someone's patient does not mean you and I share doctor-patient confidentiality.
Ty: Mike, did you get any of those e-mails, any of the people griping to Elaine gripe to you?
Mike: Not one. I checked right before we started this discussion because Ty asked me when I told him I hadn't to check again and be sure -- even check the spam folder. As Ty advised, I did. Nothing. I didn't have one complaint. I did have mail about the post but none of the people writing were griping and none of them were the ones who wrote Elaine.
Ty: C.I., this has happened over and over to you. Mike wrote about that this past week in "Norman Pollack, Ian Murphy." Where something goes up somewhere and you're the one people run to. I mean, not just 'people.' When we did our series of articles calling out The Nation magazine for having less than 1/3 of their bylines by females -- in the magazine -- The Nation finally responds by e-mailing you. That's so offensive, let me make clear before we go further. Now this was Ava and C.I.'s baby, they were asked to do this feature -- tracking the bylines based on gender -- by some feminist friends -- and I'll say it that includes feminist friends with their own outlets and I don't mean blogs on Blogger/Blogspot or Wordpress. These feminists wanted The Nation to be held accountable but didn't want to get their own hands dirty. Ava and C.I. were happy to run with it. So we had a regular feature, usually every week -- The Nation is a weekly magazine -- where we would count the bylines and then at the six month period, we all wrote a piece and at the 1 year mark, Ava and C.I. wrote the piece. Well to try to stop that feature while it was ongoing, The Nation writes C.I. The features running here at this site. And The Nation writes C.I. instead of contacting us. It is offensive. But that's not the only time it's happened. Okay, C.I., comment?
C.I.: Rebecca was the first person I got a complaint on. That's not surprising, her site started after mine. But, yes, I do get complaints on things written at other sites as I'm sure other community sites hear about how angry someone is about what I wrote. But what I usually do when this happens -- if there are several e-mails -- is put up a note that I'm not the Mommy, don't come complaining to me, no one likes a tattle tale and I'm going to stand with the community.
Ty: And Rebecca, you wanted to make a point.
Rebecca: Right. Elaine, C.I. and I went to college together. Ty, Jim, Ava, Dona and Jess went to college together. Ann and Cedric are married. Betty, her kids, Ty and his boyfriend live with C.I. Dona, Jim and their child live with Jess and Ava and their child. Elaine and Mike live together with their child. There are all these years of bonds that, if you're complaining about one of us in an e-mail, you just don't know anything about. Cedric and Wally spent over a month together in Texas in 2008 campaigning for Hillary. Wally and Marcia spent weeks in Indiana and other states campaigning for Hillary. Marcia and Stan are cousins. Ruth's young grandson and my daughter are friends and the reason they're friends is because Ruth and I used each other as primary babysitters when we needed to do an errand or a doctor's appointment. It was nothing for one of us to pick up the phone and say, "Hey, can you cover for me?" Mike's mother is Trina. Wally lives at C.I.'s if he's in California -- as opposed to Wally's home in Florida. Actually, he, Ava, Kat and C.I. now spend more time in the DC area at C.I.'s home there. Trina and Wally's mother are very good friend. Mike and Wally are very good friends. If I had time to go on and on, I'd be doing a diagram that went on forever. But the point is, that everyone's connected. This is a community. You're not going to have much like trying to split us up with an e-mail.
Ty: Okay, before we go further, let me just do something real quick. The Third Estate Sunday Review's is Dona, Jess, Ava, Jim and me; Rebecca does Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude; Betty does Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man; C.I. is The Common Ills and part of The Third Estate Sunday Review; Kat writes at Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills); Cedric at Cedric's Big Mix; Mike at Mikey Likes It!; Elaine at Like Maria Said Paz); Ruth at Ruth's Report; Trina at Trina's Kitchen; Wally at The Daily Jot; Marcia at SICKOFITRDLZ; Stan at Oh Boy It Never Ends; Isaiah at The World Today Just Nuts and Ann at Ann's Mega Dub. That covers everyone that Rebecca just mentioned. Ruth, two weeks ago, you did "Why did I write about Little Missy?" and the problem with the e-mail you were responding to was?
Ruth: There is a writer named Missy -- I do not want to publicize her. We used to highlight her, those of us with websites, back during the Bush era. These days we are not interested because she showed her true nature in 2008. Until the post in question, I last wrote about her in 2009, June, when she showed up to say 'some of us knew Barack Obama wasn't for real' or whatever she wrote. But in real time, she lied for him. She was not admitting to lying. She just showed up in June 2009 wanting to pretend like she had been a critic of then-candidate Barack Obama in 2008 when she had not been. So 2009, that is four years ago. It had been four years since I had written of her. And this guy shows up in an e-mail wanting to know why I wrote what I wrote about Missy. He does not tell the name of the post, does not give me a link to the post, does not tell me what date the post was published, nothing. And he expects me to sit here and, from memory, know a post I wrote in 2009 or 2008 criticizing Missy. I wrote many. I do not remember most of them. If you have a question or a problem with something that has been written, you really need to grasp that what you just read may not be anything we have thought about in years. What is fresh and new to you may already be forgotten to us.
Ty: Ann, are you able to come into the conversation now?
Ann: Sure. I actually can add to it. I know the type of e-mails Ruth's talking about. What I have done at my site is just ignore those e-mails. What happens is one of two things: I never hear about it again or the person writes back. If they write back, the smarter and nicer ones now state the title of whatever post they had a question about or issue with. The nastier ones write me an insulting e-mail about how rude and stupid I am for not replying. Then I get to reply, "I'm the stupid one? There are over 1,000 posts at my site and you're complaining about one of them but don't include the title, don't include the date and don't include a link. Who's the stupid one?" Right now, Sunny's handling my e-mails, Elaine's assistant and friend and thank you, Sunny, for that. I do not get a lot of hateful e-mails overall. It's weird because Betty can tell you being a woman makes you a natural target online. The only thing I can figure is I'm married to Cedric, when I started online we were married. Maybe that accounts for some of it.
Ty: When you get a hateful e-mail what is about?
Ann: I take a lot of stands at my site that others might not. Because I don't have a fixed topic. Ruth has to cover Benghazi updates, Betty's covering NASA -- especially the land rover Curiosity, Trina covers the economy, C.I. covers Iraq. So I can grab anything, any topic. And a lot of the times I make political calls and that tends to anger people. I get a lot of e-mails about how I'm the reason Bully Boy Bush got into the White House because I have voted for Ralph Nader in every election until 2012 when he didn't run. I am a Green. And I'm not a play-Green. I'm not one of those White people who slobbers over corporatist Barack Obama while swearing I'm a Green.
Ty: Betty, you get a lot of hateful e-mail.
Betty: I used to. I used to get it so bad that I wouldn't read my e-mails for a month at a time. They were making physical threats and anyway. What changed? My site changed. It used to be an online novel, comedic novel. I dropped that in 2008 when the sexism was too great in this country. Once I dropped it, people were no longer identifying me with Bettina, the character in the novel. I would blog about my kids or whatever. And I'm thinking, based on what Ann was talking about, I'm thinking that may have humanized me to some people who before didn't see me as a person. I also think it died down because by 2012 it was realized that I wasn't going to be an echo chamber. The hatred of 2008 should have made that clear. That was probably the most difficult year in terms of hate mail. I'm Black, I'm a woman, I've always voted Democrat and yet I wasn't going to whore for Barack -- or even vote for him. SO I got a lot of harassing e-mails then. What I get now or more concerned e-mails. Ann and I talk on the phone a few times a week. And sometimes I'll note something Ann said at my site. Something she said over the phone. And someone will misunderstand and write in concerned that Ann and I are having trouble. In fact, Ann gets e-mails like that too.
Ann: Betty has never been anything but kind to me. Betty is a friend. I have no idea why there's this concern that Betty and I don't get along. Betty wasn't at my wedding. That's pointed out. My wedding was falling apart. It was planned quickly and it fell apart immediately. I had just met Ruth when I asked her to be my maid of honor because my friend wasn't able to make it on short notice. Now everyone there pitched in -- Elaine, C.I., Wally, Ava, Rebecca -- but Ruth's pitching in was helping me directly, one-on-one, holding my hand and saying, "It's going to be okay." Because everything was falling apart. We even had to find a new venue due to a fire. It was a nightmare. But in terms of Betty, she didn't 'miss' my wedding because she hated me. She'd never met me. She was friends with Cedric and I certainly would have loved for her to have been there but it was very spur of the moment and she couldn't just say, "Hey, flying out of town so I'm going to miss work for the next days." I think maybe, Betty, tell me what you think, people assume that we knew each other before I married Cedric and they think you were boycotting the wedding?
Betty: That's probably it because those concerned e-mails usually do mention the wedding and how I didn't attend. I also wonder if it's a Black woman thing -- in that they want to be sure that we, Black women, are sending out a strong message of we-get-along. I used to get similar e-mails regarding Marcia.
Marcia: Right. That lasted for about three or four months and then people stopped wondering mainly because I'll write about anything at my site and that includes if I'm mad at someone. So people tended to get that they didn't need to wonder if I was mad at Betty since I wasn't writing, "I'm mad at Betty." The other thing going on here is that I am a lesbian and was never going to end up with Cedric. But I think for a lot of readers, there was hope that Cedric and Betty would end up together. They're great -- even now -- in roundtables together. Cedric and Betty can usually riff off one another, they have similar humor and a similar knowledge base. I started out a reader in the community and I did think, as did others, "Cedric and Betty are perfect for each other." And that's part of it. I believe. That's part of, "Betty and Ann don't fight!" Ann's so sweet, it comes across online, that no one can hate her -- even if they wanted Cedric and Betty together. And I think that's what's at the root of the constant panic that the two of you don't get along. Because there's never been a moment when the two of you have disagreed that I know of. And anytime Ann's walked out on a limb -- we pitch stories here every week and every one comes in with ideas and sometimes the only person supporting your idea is you -- so anytime Ann's had an idea that had zero support or felt like it might, Betty has rushed in and said, "Great idea." I don't know if anyone else notices that. And I also know that Ann's always praising Betty.
Ann: Thank you for saying that, Marcia. It's true. It's the elephant in the closet. Betty once tried to write about it and wrote about it very nicely but some readers still freaked out. Betty is a great person, she and my husband were never a couple. She is not a threat to me. I am not a threat to her. Betty's a gorgeous woman who can have her pick of men.
Betty: Ann's a very sweet liar. I'm far from gorgeous. But, yeah, I mean -- Yeah. Marcia and Ty are gay and can't be fixed up with each other. I think it was around the time of everybody hooking up that was going to. It was Mike and Elaine and Jim and Dona and Jess and Ava and Rebecca got married. But love was in the air and I think some people just felt that Cedric and I would end up together. I have no idea why. I've lived in Georgia and now California. Neither of those are Cedric's states. I don't know why people wanted that. Cedric's a great guy and Ann is perfect for him. I've stated before that I am single mother with three kids. I have three great kids. I had to work to support them. Their father has never provided child support, has had nothing to do with them since we broke up after I had my youngest. I'm not a super hero and I can't do everything. I was smart enough to realize that and smart enough to realize that I couldn't do a love relationship with a man and raise my children and work all at the same time. So I've put my love life on hold. And my kids are doing great in school, they're happy and life is good. It's not perfect, but it's good and that's great.
Ty: Rebecca, you had a point you wanted to make.
Rebecca: Right, you said we were going to talk about the e-mails we received and I went to my blog and started looking for e-mails. I did a post called "tear down the gates, don't appoint new gatekeepers" in April of 2005 and there are so many smart community members and smart readers who e-mail. There are a lot of great people mentioned in that e-mail and that includes Wally.
Mike: That's a really good point. Wally and I are about the same age. I knew of him and he knew of me via Rebecca's post and C.I.'s writing. And Wally and I talked the first time after I'd been blogging for about a month. I was really pissed about something and we ended up talking. And Wally really influenced what this community is. And did so for a long time without a website.
Ty: That's true. And maybe a good way to go out is quoting from Wally's first post. This is from October 15, 2005:
Thank you mucho to C.I. of The Common Ills. Mucho grande.
I'm Common Ills community member Wally and I toss out things every now and then to that site. This is just a brief background or bio.
I think my older cousin Will turned me on to The Common Ills. A lot of people were talking about it but Will's the one I listen to. There was a thing on a story in The New York Times about Florida and football and that's how Will got me to check it out. I discovered the other community sites and I have to do a shout out to Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude. I've got C.I. on the phone so I'm trying not to do too many links. C.I.'s talking me through the mechanics but I have to give a shout out to Rebecca. We'd read her and C.I. for class my last year in high school. And I have to do a shout out to my buddy Mike because if he hadn't stayed on my case, this site wouldn't be starting. Mike blogs at Mikey Likes It!
Mars once had a flowing water stream
Curiosity should have been Time magazine's choice for Person of the Year last December. Instead, they went with Barack Obama who is currently mired in many scandals. As Barack does nothing, the Land Rover on Mars continues to be a ground breaker.
Last week, Curiosity took photos that show the ancient stream that was once on Mars.
NASA explained:
NASA's Curiosity rover found evidence for an ancient, flowing stream on Mars at a few sites, including the rock outcrop pictured here, which the science team has named "Hottah" after Hottah Lake in Canada's Northwest Territories. It may look like a broken sidewalk, but this geological feature on Mars is actually exposed bedrock made up of smaller fragments cemented together, or what geologists call a sedimentary conglomerate. Scientists theorize that the bedrock was disrupted in the past, giving it the titled angle, most likely via impacts from meteorites.
NASA's Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity rover found evidence for ancient, water-transported sediment on Mars at a few sites, including the rock outcrop pictured here, named "Hottah". Rounded pebbles within this sedimentary conglomerate indicate sustained abrasion of rock fragments within water flows that crossed Gale Crater.
The key evidence for the ancient stream comes from the size and rounded shape of the gravel in and around the bedrock. Hottah has pieces of gravel embedded in it, called clasts, up to a couple inches (few centimeters) in size and located within a matrix of sand-sized material. Some of the clasts are round in shape, leading the science team to conclude they were transported by a vigorous flow of water. The grains are too large to have been moved by wind. Erosion of the outcrop results in gravel clasts that protrude from the outcrop and ultimately fall onto the ground, creating the gravel pile in the left foreground. The scale bar at lower right is 5 centimeters (2 inches).
Curiosity continues to get results.
Curiosity continues to work.
No one dares to call Curiosity a "lame duck."
Last week, Curiosity took photos that show the ancient stream that was once on Mars.
NASA explained:
NASA's Curiosity rover found evidence for an ancient, flowing stream on Mars at a few sites, including the rock outcrop pictured here, which the science team has named "Hottah" after Hottah Lake in Canada's Northwest Territories. It may look like a broken sidewalk, but this geological feature on Mars is actually exposed bedrock made up of smaller fragments cemented together, or what geologists call a sedimentary conglomerate. Scientists theorize that the bedrock was disrupted in the past, giving it the titled angle, most likely via impacts from meteorites.
NASA's Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity rover found evidence for ancient, water-transported sediment on Mars at a few sites, including the rock outcrop pictured here, named "Hottah". Rounded pebbles within this sedimentary conglomerate indicate sustained abrasion of rock fragments within water flows that crossed Gale Crater.
The key evidence for the ancient stream comes from the size and rounded shape of the gravel in and around the bedrock. Hottah has pieces of gravel embedded in it, called clasts, up to a couple inches (few centimeters) in size and located within a matrix of sand-sized material. Some of the clasts are round in shape, leading the science team to conclude they were transported by a vigorous flow of water. The grains are too large to have been moved by wind. Erosion of the outcrop results in gravel clasts that protrude from the outcrop and ultimately fall onto the ground, creating the gravel pile in the left foreground. The scale bar at lower right is 5 centimeters (2 inches).
Curiosity continues to get results.
Curiosity continues to work.
No one dares to call Curiosity a "lame duck."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
