Tuesday, November 05, 2019

TV: It's tricky

Run DMC nailed it years ago -- It is tricky.  It's tricky especially when it comes to comedy.

3 JESS

Daniel Sloss struggles with comedy.  Most of the time it lands him on his ass.

His HBO special -- billed as a comedy event -- debuted November 2nd on the channel.  Watching it, though, you felt like it was a rebroadcast of a 90s comedy special and you wanted to grab your phone to Google him and find out how much weight he'd put on and how badly he looked now that he was no longer in his 20s because he is not going to age well.

Sadly, we'll have to wait another 20 years for all the lines and creases and sags and bulges in his face to really set in.  What we can see right now is that he's really not that funny.

He just isn't.

He lacks a rhythm.  All the greats have a rhythm -- Richard Pryor, Lily Tomlin, Joan Rivers, Dave Chappelle, Jack Whitehall, George Carlin, Roseanne Barr, John Mulaney, Wanda Sykes, etc.  The others?  They're just a bunch of kids trying to repeat what they heard on TV the night before.  Maybe someday they'll grow into comics.

"Stuff going up your butt," Sloss says at one point.  He wants you to know that, "I'm not really comfortable having a homophobic opinion" these days.  Yet he does.  He has many homophobic opinions.  We're not even talking about his routine about a finger being inserted.  We're talking about how all of his jokes about his friends (who are all male -- unless he's doing a tampon joke or the last third of the special) are built around how it is funny if you are a man and you look gay to your friends or, if you are a man, you make fun of your male friends, yucking it up over how they come off gay.


It's not a let's-make-everyone-laugh kind of special.  It's pitched to men over and over and he doesn't get most of what he's saying.

For example, he talks about a friend who is dating a woman (ten dates, all they've done is kiss):

'I think she really likes me.' She f**king doesn't, man.  'Oh, how can you tell?'  Because your nose still smells like your nose. It's a very simple equation.

We laughed at that.  We thought it was a funny joke.  If you're doing oral with anyone, your nose doesn't smell like nose.  Good joke.

Except he, Daniel Sloss, didn't get that.

Instead, he insisted, "If you get that reference you're no better than me."  And you may, like we did, think he's talking about oral sex period.  Nope.  In his mind, this is just a joke about men going down on women.  (Gay men and lesbians exist only as punchlines in his world, not as people.)

We hate to break it to Daniel and we're surprised he honestly doesn't know this already but he doesn't smell like roses -- or a nose -- in his groin.  And if a woman's going down on him, her nose is going in his pubes and her nose is going to smell like that.  Maybe it would be easier, for Daniel, if we put it this way, "Her nose is going to smell like your hands does several times a day."

In the last third, he wants to talk rape.  A friend of his (female) is raped by another friend (male) which, he insists, is what this is all about, the special.  Everything has led up to this so he can awaken you.

You know what, do your PSA somewhere else.

He's like Hannah Gadsby, he wants to awaken you.

He should work harder at the comedy (as should she).  Like Hannah, he's a foreigner (for US audiences).  He mentions Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein -- leaving us to wonder is #MeToo just an American issue?  Why do these foreign comics, even if they tape their special outside the US, who are so 'woke' and so 'wonderful' refuse to call out their own?  We noted that when Hannah taped her special, there was a big rape scandal in Australia.

Like Hannah, he's just a big chicken.  Alex Salmond is a big political name in Scotland -- is that why little Danny Sloss can't name him?

It's strange how these 'woke' comedians say they want to change the world but the people they know who raped or attempted to rape are never named and, when they do name abusers, it's always some American who was publicly named over three years ago -- at least three years ago.

Exactly who do these prigs think they're waking up?

Daniel's not funny.  Even the last third of the show doesn't qualify as funny or, for that matter, edgy.  Building a third of your act around what happened to a woman you know -- even if you insist she gave her permission -- isn't really funny.  And while it might (it might not be) funny to hear her tell three rape jokes, what really makes you think you've earned the right to repeat those?  Daniel wasn't raped.

He claims, as the special is finally winding down, that he can talk to other men in ways that other people can't -- women, for example.  Well, go talk to them.  Don't bore us all with a special -- one billed as a comedy -- built around your attempts to convert knuckle draggers like yourself.

It's tricky.

ATYPICAL's third season is now on NETFLIX.  It's a comedy about a family facing both dramatic and mundane issues.  Yet they never feel the need to set everything aside and hit pause to lecture the audience.  They grasp that entertainment -- with or without a message -- needs to entertain.

In season three, ATYPICAL really hits its stride.

Sam (Kier Gilchrist) is navigating college life as a freshman.  New cast member Sara Gilbert has two things working against her.  First of all, her character, Professor Judd, isn't cute or funny in how she treats Sam.  Does she not know that he's autistic?  Did it never enter her head?

She punishes him for being unable to navigate a free-flowing discussion/argument.

He gets an F.  Later, she lets him write a paper as a make up and gives him a C on it.

Yes, he will go on to navigate the nonsense that passes for a discussion in her class; however, we really think the character is a problem -- one who would face discipline in a real work setting.  Structure is a big issue with people who are autistic.  If the professor wants to grade on verbal participation, she should make a point to invite Sam into the conversation.

This isn't, toss the child in the pool and they'll learn to swim.

Sara's second problem is she never grew up.

Her face did -- and then some -- but she didn't.  That's not as noticeable when she's playing Darlene.  When she's doing any other role, however, you wonder why this woman -- so self-amused with herself -- acts like a young girl?  She can't inhabit an adult character, that's very clear.  Fortunately, her role is so unimportant.  Eric McCormack's role isn't that much bigger but he creates a character and holds your attention.  He's not the only one.

Jennifer Jason Leigh has been amazing as Sam's mother Elsa but in season three she really delivers.  The writers deliver as well, providing her with minor scenes that she runs with and that deepen Elsa and our understanding of her (these include the scenes revolving around the plants and her scenes with Jenny O'Hara).  Michael Rapaport and Brigette Lundy-Paine also deliver but examine the dance that Jennifer Jason Leigh and Michael Rapaport do around a Fleetwood Mac concert and marvel over the layers the two actors bring to that scene.

ATYPICAL was always a solid program.  In season three, it's become the best thing NETFLIX has to offer.  It's deepened and the relationships are more intertwined.  It's also even funnier.  And the quiet moments stay with you -- a hug that Brigette gives Jennifer followed by a quick (and requested) second hug.  These moments are realistic and they are lived in.

You watch and you recognize life.  You watch Daniel Sloss stumble around onstage and you recognize someone who isn't able to pull together a coherent act, let alone anything you can laugh at with recognition.  Like Run DMC once observed, "It's tricky."





Roundtable

Jim: Iraq is consumed with protests.  It should be a major news item.  It's not really been that in the western press.  Remember our e-mail address is thethirdestatesundayreview@yahoo.com and we can also be reached at common_ills@yahoo.com.   Participating in our roundtable are  The Third Estate Sunday Review's Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava, and me, Jim; Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude; Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man; C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review; and Mike of Mikey Likes It!.  Betty's kids did the illustration. You are reading a rush transcript.




Roundtable




Jim (Con't): The Iraq protests.  What do they mean?



Mike: They mean that the Iraqi people have been patient, they have waited and waited for a responsive government.  They've had enough and more power to them.



Betty: I found it hilarious that, on Sunday, Prime Minister Abdul Abil-Mahdi was calling on the protesters to cease protesting because, he insisted, it was hurting Iraqi businesses.  Does he not grasp that many of the protesters are protesting the lack of jobs?  How out of it is he?



Dona: One thing I've especially enjoyed at THE COMMON ILLS is how we're able to see a wide range of protesters.  Women are participating, the disabled and challenged are participating.  It's a real cross section of society.



Jim: When were the last big protests?



C.I.: Me?  There have been protests constantly.  Last year saw some very big protests.  I think, in terms of intimidating Iraq's puppet government, there hasn't been anything like this since the second half of 2011 and continuing on through February of 2012.



Jim: What ended those?



C.I.: Those protests were about many things.  Among the issues were corruption.  After these protests began, the Arab Spring emerged in the region -- though Iraq was not lumped in with that by the press.  The emergence of the Arab Spring frightened then prime minister -- and forever thug -- Nouri al-Maliki.  He announced that if the protesters would cease protesting and go home, he would end corruption in 100 days.  They took him at his word.  He did nothing.



Jim: And currently Mahdi's insisting that he will step down.



Ty: But he hasn't.  It's another Nouri move.  I'll step down, I'll step down.  When?



Jess: I wouldn't trust any prime minister if I was in Iraq.  And the protesters have called for him to step down as has Shi'ite cleric and movement leader Moqtada al-Sadr.



Rebecca: I don't get, excuse me on this but maybe someone else is confused, how he became prime minister, Abdul Adil Mahdi, to begin with?



Jim: They do have elections.  It's a different system.  And sometimes it's not really a system.  C.I.?



C.I.: Per the country's Constitution, after the election, the group that got the most vote puts forward someone who is named prime minister-designate by the President of Iraq.  Per the Constitution, that person then has 30 days to form a Cabinet.  That is the only duty they have to be moved from prime minister designate to prime minister.  At the end of October, Mahdi was moved to prime minister despite the fact that he had failed to form a full Cabinet.  For example, the head of the security ministries -- the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Defense -- were empty.  He should not have been moved to prime minister.  The President of Iraq should have instead named someone else to be prime minister, per the Constitution.



Jess: And this has gone on repeatedly, this move, but Mahdi was supposed to follow the process and had insisted he would.  Not only did he not follow it, it was the end of May before he named a Minister of Defense and a Minister of the Interior.



Rebecca: So it's really no surprise that he can't govern.  That's why that test -- the only requirement -- exists.  It's to see if you can govern.  If you're unable to horse trade and whatever to put together a Cabinet in 30 days, you're going to be unable to govern and he certainly was.





Betty: One thing I'll bring up is Nathan Irish died in Iraq last week.  He was a US service member.  He'd been there only a brief time.  C.I.?



C.I.: Per his FACEBOOK account, he deployed to Iraq in August.



Betty: Thank you.  So when we talk about this at my work, I encountered a number of people who did not know that US troops were still on the ground in Iraq.  It's really amazing how this is news to so many people.



Ty: And it's news because the media really doesn't cover it.  And it's news because CODESTINK and so many others that we are supposed to trust do nothing about these wars.  They're not trying to stop them, they're not insisting that US troops come home.  They dabble.  And when they're not making demands, it's very easy for people to forget because they think, "They must be gone or CODESTINK would be raising hell."



Jim: No one raises hell these days, they all just go along to get along.


Dona: So true.  Ava?



Ava:  There just isn't a lot of effort being made regarding anti-war activity.  That's the truth.  Is there interest?  Yes, we see it on campus after campus.  But there's Mike Prysner and that's about it in terms of anything resembling work to end the wars.  I wish that wasn't the case but it is.  Go to even World Can't Wait and marvel over how far through their posts you have to go before coming up with a post about the wars.  You have to drop back to May 26th and this is November 4th.  That's ridiculous.  I don't have a lot of respect for them.



Jess: I think one of the reasons -- Let me back up.  The reason the antiwar crowd packed their tents and went home was because Barack Obama got elected in 2008 and that was all some of them cared about.  They just the war as a club to hit Bully Boy Bush was.  Now some of us hoped that if these wars were still going -- and they are -- after Barack was out of the White House that we'd see a real movement towards ending the wars start back up.  Now this is what I was going to say before.  Maybe it's hard to call for an end to wars since Trump is president?  He wants to end the Syrian war -- or says he does -- and because it's him, people who should be saying, "Hell yes!" are instead whining and complaining.  I didn't vote for Trump.  But I don't plan my life around him.  If he wants to pull all US troops out of Syria, I'd say that's a good thing.  I'd applaud that no matter who did it.



Jim: Good points.  What else do we have?



Betty: I'd like to point out something C.I.'s been noting.  The western press will do anything in the world to cover anything but the protests in Iraq.  And C.I.'s been noting that for weeks now but, starting Sunday, you will see various people in the Arab world also Tweeting about this.  I had said I'd pass on the next roundtable just because I felt like I was hogging time but when Jim said it was going to include the protests, I had to participate because this really matters.



Rebecca: I agree.  I would also note that Mike's covered the protests at his site.  Of course, here at this site we've noted the protests from the beginning.  But I could do more and I should so I'll blog about them tonight.  Betty, hold me to it.



Ty: That'd be good but let's also point out, Rebecca, you do repost the Iraq snapshot in full each day you post so that does include the news that way.  And, for example, you writing about DYNASTY in a post pulls fans of that show over and provides the opportunity for them to read the snapshot and be informed.





Mike: Do we think the government is going to be responsive to the protesters?



Dona:  What do you think?



Mike: I would hope so.  This is really a sign of how much the whole thing has failed.  That's the puppet government.  That's the system that the US imposed.



C.I.: Mike, do you think it was intended to fail?  Naomi Klein's "Baghdad Year Zero" and all of that.



Mike: That's a good point.  I think a strong argument can be made that we, the US government, set it up to fail.  We wanted the people divided so that they couldn't resist -- the Iraqi people.  We put terrorists and thugs in charge for that reason.  It would make perfect sense, when you think in that mindset, for the plan all along to be to create a system that worked against the people and prevented real change.  Yes, I would argue that it was intended to fail.


Jim: I think that we're all in agreement on that.  Reminder, this is a rush transcript.







The race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination



Beto has dropped out.   Already Mike Gravel, John Hickenlooper, Eric Swalwell, Jay Inslee, Seth Moulton, Kirsten Gillibrand, Bill de Blasio and Tim Ryan have dropped out.  (Richard Ojeda dropped out before the primaries began.)



Who's still in?



War Hawk Joe Biden.  Said to be the most electable -- this despite the fact that he currently is fourth in Iowa -- the first state that will make their preference known.  War Hawk Joe loves to sniff women and girls.  But he's electable.  He's often unaware what city or state he's in.  But he's electable.  He's against Medicare For All and anything that would benefit the people and not the corporations.  But he's electable.



Really?  He doesn't seem electable at all.  And Wally, Kat, Ava and C.I. speak around the country every week.  They speak to, among others, college students and high school students.  And they've seen no enthusiasm at all for Joe.  No growing enthusiasm, no waning enthusiasm, no enthusiasm at all.



In the last election, Hillary supporters like to point out that Clinton got more votes than anyone who's run for president before.  And yet it wasn't enough to win the election.



Hillary had a large number of supporters -- not just people who voted for her, but people who actively supported her.  She also had going for her the fact that she would have been historic -- the first woman elected president of the United States.



Yet even with all of that -- not to mention a media that was in the tank for her and, as her campaign wanted, promoted Donald Trump on the GOP side -- she didn't end up in the White House.



So the notion that a candidate who promotes no enthusiasm at all is going to beat Donald Trump?



Donald Trump still has strong core support.  And THE COMMON ILLS pointed out in 2016 that the polls were not reflecting reality for Trump support.  That was because (A) the press was insisting he was a bad candidate (not opinion journalist, but reporters) which brought shame and embarrassment if you identified as a Trump supporter and B his supporters were angry and wanted to mess with the press so they were giving false responses.



Though non-Trump supporters may have hardened against him, his supporters continue to support him.



2020 is going to require a candidate who can excite voters.



That's not Joe Biden.



It could be Bernie Sanders.  It could be Elizabeth Warren.  It could be Kamala Harris.  It could be Pete Buttigeig.  It could be Marianne Williamson.  It could be Andrew Yang.  It could be Tulsi Gabbard.  It could be Julian Castro.  It could be Cory Booker.  It could be -- Honestly, it could be anyone but Joe Biden.



You're harming yourself if you're arguing otherwise.  If your most important goal in the 2020 election is defeating Donald Trump, you really need to get honest.  Joe has no momentum.





Admitting that the day after the general election is not going to help anyone.



Joe is currently in fourth place in Iowa.



Grasp that.



No one in the race is better known than Joe.  And he's at number four.   That should bother anyone determined to oust Donald.



Joe does well nationally because he has name recognition.  He's inhabited the Senate for years -- like a bed bug that you couldn't get rid of.  When he did finally leave, he did so to become Vice President.



No one's better known than Joe.



Which makes him an easy answer to furnish -- especially if you aren't paying attention.



The first two states that will make their preferences known?  Iowa and New Hampshire.



And they're paying attention, they're making their choices.  Guess what?  Joe's not their choice.



If you're paying attention, Joe's not your choice.



Even his campaign has stressed to the press that he will probably lose in Iowa and New Hampshire.



That's our most electable candidate?  Someone who currently is running fourth in Iowa?



He's behind Elizabeth, Bernie and Pete right now.



Pete has no national name either than what's come about this year as he's run for the nomination.  And Pete is kicking his ass.  Bernie and Elizabeth are also kicking his ass.



So stop pretending that Joe is the most electable.



He's the easy answer for people who are called on the phone and asked who they are supporting even though they're not really paying attention.  It's really easy to say "Joe Biden."



Don't be fooled right now unless you're hoping to gift Donald Trump with a second term.  If that's your goal, keep pretending that Joe Biden -- who has no real support among young people -- is going to inspire and create a huge turnout.



Grasp that he can't just match Hillary's turnout.  He has to do better.  And Joe lacks the excitement that Hillary created.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }