Sunday, May 29, 2011

Truest statement of the week

Second question: Why do so many “progressive” men seem to have so many misogynist slurs sloshing around in their heads?

Having asked those questions, let’s make a few observations:

Ed Schultz isn’t the first. Keith Olbermann engaged in open misogyny for years—and liberals kept their pretty traps shut. For years, we wondered if we were the only ones who were struck by this incessant behavior. (It wasn’t fun complaining about his conduct in the face of massive silence.)

Eventually, we got our answer: A bunch of liberal “intellectual leaders” had found his conduct repellent too—but they had refused to say so in public! See THE DAILY HOWLER, 1/28/11. Hint: Careerist “liberal leaders” may not be tremendous good people.

Ed Schultz isn’t the first. Chris Matthews engaged in ugly misogyny for the better part of a decade. In January 2008, a miracle occurred: The liberal world began to notice; incredibly, many liberals even began to complain! (After all those years, we have no idea why that suddenly happened.) In response, Rachel Maddow ran out and vouched for Matthews, big-time. One week later, she signed her first contract at The One True Liberal Channel.

(See THE DAILY HOWLER, 1/21/08; scroll down to “STARR REPORT.” Also, see THE DAILY HOWLER, 1/15/08.)

Today, Maddow is paid $2 million per year, if Newsweek knows its stuff. To us, this event raised the first warning flag about this self-impressed child. We do hope her money spends good.



-- Bob Somerby on Ed Schultz's suspension (The Daily Howler).

Truest statement of the week II

The liberal class, which attempted last week to discredit the words my friend Cornel West spoke about Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, prefers comfort and privilege to justice, truth and confrontation. Its guiding ideological stance is determined by what is most expedient to the careers of its members. It refuses to challenge, in a meaningful way, the decaying structures of democracy or the ascendancy of the corporate state. It glosses over the relentless assault on working men and women and the imperial wars that are bankrupting the nation. It proclaims its adherence to traditional liberal values while defending and promoting systems of power that mock these values. The pillars of the liberal establishment—the press, the church, culture, the university, labor and the Democratic Party—all honor an unwritten quid pro quo with corporations and the power elite, as well as our masters of war, on whom they depend for money, access and positions of influence. Those who expose this moral cowardice and collaboration with corporate power are always ruthlessly thrust aside. The capitulation of the liberal class to corporate capitalism, as Irving Howe once noted, has “bleached out all political tendencies.” The liberal class has become, Howe wrote, “a loose shelter, a poncho rather than a program; to call oneself a liberal one doesn’t really have to believe in anything.” The decision to subordinate ethics to political expediency has led liberals to steadily surrender their moral autonomy, voice and beliefs to the dictates of the corporate state. As Dwight Macdonald wrote in “The Root Is Man,” those who do not make human beings the center of their concern soon lose the capacity to make any ethical choices, for they willingly sacrifice others in the name of the politically expedient and practical. -- Chris Hedges, "Why Liberal Sellouts Attack Prophets Like Cornel West" (Information Clearing House).

A note to our readers

Hey --
Another Sunday. And we're late as usual.


First, we thank all who participated this week which includes Dallas and the following:

The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen,
Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.

And content?

Dona and I (Jim) worked on the Iraqi piece and only that. This edition was really steered by Jess, Ava and C.I. We thank them for that.


Peace.

-- Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, Ava and C.I.

Editorial: Who is the US military propping up?

It's truly amazing, week after week, to watch as so much of the US press pretends that Iraq is a democracy. Excuse us, as so much of the small portion of the US press which pays attention to Iraq insists that it's a democracy.

As in the US, Iraq has three branches of government: Executive, legislative and judicial. Iraq, like the US, has a Constitution. Like the US, the Iraqi Constitution outlines what the powers of each branch are.

Last week, New Sabah reported that Nouri al-Maliki was continuing to assert that he, as prime minister, has the right to write the laws and all Iraq's legislative branch, the Parliament, has the power to do is to vote up or down on the proposed legislation Nouri submits. Only he or the country's ceremonial president (Jalal Talabani), according to Nouri, can write laws.

This is what the US lost lives for? To install a new dictator?

This is why the US has to stay in Iraq past 2011? To maintain Nouri's dictatorship?

(On staying in Iraq past 2011, check out Kelly McEvers report for today's Weekend Edition.)

Nouri is targeting the press, he's targeting the Iraqi people (especially protesters) and the answer, to the White House, is to keep propping up Nouri?

Something was birthed in Iraq after the invasion, but it wasn't democracy.

Not Quite There




Illustration is Isaiah's "Not Quite There."

TV: The CW falls, The CW rises

"Our dark lord will be pleased," Christine Willes hissed as Granny Goodness in the series finale of Smallville but to our ears it sounded a lot like Lucie Salhany who created UPN, a netlette that merged with the WB TV to form The CW in 2006.


111


Smallville wrapped up this month after 10 seasons -- a feat which makes clear there was still more UPN than WB in The CW. Oh sure, there was the almost wedding of Clark (Tom Welling) and Lois (Erica Durance) drenched in pseudo Lilith Fair music (Sara Bareiles' "Breathe Again") and filled with the sort of things Dawson might have said to Joey years ago at the Creek like, "You've always believed in me. And I believe in you. And when you believe in someone, it's not just for a minute or for an hour, it's for forever." However, on the Creek, Dawson and Joey would have gotten hitched. Instead Chloe (Allison Mack) sounds an alarm about kryptonite and Clark yells, "Get everybody out of here!"

However, typical UPN, everybody had already pretty much left. After all, the season average rating was 1.2 with a rank of 131 -- putting it far behind other cancelled shows such as The Chicago Code (rank of 71), The Cape and No Ordinary Family (both tied for 83), Lone Star The Whole Truth and and Traffic Light (tied for 103), etc. (Click here for Nellie Andreeva's "Full 2010-2011 TV Season Series Rankings," Deadline.com.) And, to be clear, season ten's average rating wasn't a drop. It's consistent with the ratings the show received the season before. Both seasons averaged a little over two and a half million viewers. If it had been a film, it would have bombed.

The WB kicked off at the start of 1995 determined to do what Fox had done before -- become a netlette that captures ratings and buzz with the hope of one day moving to seven nights of programming (a feat Fox still hasn't managed to pull off). Season one was a bomb (though Unhappily Ever After, from that first season, would stay on air for four seasons despite lousy ratings). Season two was as bad. Season three saw the netlette make inroads with 7th Heaven and The Steve Harvey Show. But season four is when The WB turned it around. Buffy the Vampire Slayer caused chuckles in the advertising lead up but, once it started airing, it quickly became The WB's cult hit.

Sarah Michelle Geller starred in the action adventure as high school student Buffy who slayed vampires, demons and others as she and her friends dealt with the aches and pains of young love. It set the stage for the following season when Dawson's Creek would (mid-season) debut and become the network's first actual hit. Joshua Jackson, Michelle Williams, Katie Holmes and James Van Der Beek played four high schoolers dealing with family problems and, yes, the aches and pains of young love. That was The WB signature -- any show of any genre could potentially be a hit provided it included the thread of "the aches and pains of young love." Adhering to that formula helped turn Felecity, Roswell and Popular into immediate hits (only immediate ones) and Gilmore Girls into seven-season hit. And ignoring it helped insure that Angel never had any real impact or ever became much more than the little sister spin-off of Buffy.

More than any other show on The WB, the Shannen Doherty, Holly Marie Combs, Alyssa Milano and Rose McGowan starring Charmed (a sisterhood of witches) managed the formula allowing the show to be repeatedly moved around on the schedule and still pull in strong ratings for eight seasons. (Season eight had nearly twice as many viewers as this final season of Smallville did.) Charmed wrapped up after the spring of 2006 because UPN and The WB were merging and they just knew they could do better.

They never managed that feat. And we're sure there are many former execs of The WB and UPN who are laughing at the fact that the merger should have provided The CW with seven solid nights of programming; however, CBS and Warner Bros' execs just knew they could do better than all who had come before them. CBS being CBS, they were especially concerned about the whole women thing, women making CBS so nervous. (Which is why the network has long attacked its own women-led hits; see the network's treatment of Cagney & Lacey, Designing Women, Murphy Brown, Murder She Wrote, Cybill, The Nanny and Touched By An Angel among others.) So they didn't want to carry over the female-driven hit of Charmed to The CW from The WB and they didn't want to carry over UPN's Eve to The CW. If America's Top Model hadn't been reality tv, they probably wouldn't have carried it over either.

At the end of the series finale of Smallville, they teased viewers with the hope that Lois and Clark would get married after their aborted earlier attempt in the episode. "Are you ready?" asked Lois. Clark replied, "I've been ready for seven years."

The CW is only five years old. But since, unlike UPN or The WB, it wasn't creating anything new (merger's rarely do), it should have been ready from day one. Instead, it's wasted everyone's time thinking it could pull in young male viewers. "Free to be," it insisted in its first series of ads, and the poor souls honestly thought so, airing male-geared bombs 4Real and In Harm's Way thereby wrecking the Sunday night that Charmed built -- a night that they've never managed to get back. Fridays were WWE Friday Night Smackdown. That ratings bomb, pulled over from UPN, continued for the first two seasons on The CW despite hurting the ratings and complaints from affiliates. The UPN struggler (which never covered its budget in ad revenues) Veronica Mars was CBS' idea of a WB show. And they could never understand why it didn't take off. (Among other reasons because Veronica was a token female on a show dominated by males.)

"I need to figure out a way to break the darkness," Clark declared faced with the series' final obstacles. He might as well have been speaking for the netlette because the CW came dangerously close to extinction up until Gossip Girl and 90210 revived its fortunes.

90210 took Fox's hit show from the 90s, revamped it and turned it into a popular youth hit for the '00s and, at least so far, the '10s. Gossip Girl was Dynasty re-populated with teenagers. It's in 90210 that The CW finally showed some awareness. Featuring guest spots by original series stars Shannen Doherty, Tori Spelling and Jennie Garth, they knew the first season would have buzz and curiousity viewers, more than enough to pull them through to the end of that first season. But that season was a nightmare as the producer The CW cared about bailed and the two left kept trying to change what The CW had purchased. Muscling out those two to keep the show geared towards tweens and young women was the smartest thing The CW has done -- and the ratings back that up.

At the end of The WB, they weren't doing much right. 2001 marks the beginning of the downfall. The WB had become the most talked about netlette, it dominated the industry magazines and the consumer ones (like Entertainment Weekly) but then the consensus was, "Okay, now we're going to do what we really wanted to!" It's no surprise that the last great WB show (Gilmore Girls) was launched in 2000. 2001 is when they begin importing failing shows from other networks, shows that don't really fit The WB image. 2001 is when they begin to think they can muck with the formula.

'What the little girls want,' the suits decided, 'is pretty boys. As long as we do that, we can do any kind of show.'

They were wrong. But they just knew that they could do a horror show about demons that would bring in the fellows as long as they made the leads two young hotties. That's how you get Supernatural which, as we once pointed out, is "like really bad gay porn where the leads forget to take their clothes off." Smallville was a little smarter. If only when it came to disrobing. As we noted in 2005, "You're cued that the bod is supposed to be really hot by the opening credits where you see Tom Welling in stages of undress not once, not twice, but three times." It was a 'strategy,' it just wasn't a winning one. Neither show was ever a big hit (Smallville had a dynamic debut, that's all it had ratings wise) and their only real impact can be found online. That's where you can find the Wincest stories of the boys of Supernatural fooling around (and sometimes Sam gets Dean pregnant) or the gay erotic stories of Tom Welling where he usually ends up, if not flying, at least swinging . . . in a sling.

In a frantic moment of the series finale, Tom Welling basically turns to the camera and asks, "What if this is all wrong? My training, Smallville, the farm. My memories. What if it was all just a crutch?" Were we a former male model who never learned to act, we'd be worried as well.

At 34 and with 10 years of celebrity-dom (if not stardom), it's a bit late in the game to try to learn to act. And 34 is way too late to be hoping to ride the next teen or tween interest wave. Welling was smart to grasp that he couldn't be seen in the Superman suit because he'd packed on too many pounds around the middle. (Note the final scene with Welling on the roof. His guts hanging over his pants and when he starts removing the white dress shirt, they stop before his belly would have been exposed.) Sensing the teen throb gravy train was ending, Welling attached himself to a prospective TV series, Hellcats, as an executive producer -- a smart move for an actor who hasn't been able to get any work other than his TV series for the last six years and who still has nothing lined up for his future.

Welling was even smart enough to use his bargaining power to get The CW to pick up Hellcats for this past season (they really wanted the tenth season of Smallville despite the low ratings of the ninth). It's a shame that the power was used for a poorly written mess which Alessandra Stanley (New York Times) rightly described as "a soft-porn music video for teenagers." No, a soft-porn music video isn't generally the way to lure tween girls into a show. That was far from it's only problems. "Tell me the truth, please for once tell me the truth," a character whined in the bad show's trademark of having characters repeat themselves -- as if the writers needed to pad out each script.

While Welling used his power to get the show on the air, The CW used Welling. They waited until after they'd drained all the promotion gigs they could from Welling and after the series finale of Smallville aired to announce they were giving Hellcats the axe. (Smallville aried its last new epiosde Friday, May 13th. Four days later, The CW announced Hellcats was no more.)


Welling insisted in that series finale, "No one can push me or lead me anywhere. My whole life I've been trying to fit in to two different worlds and the truth is I don't belong to either one of them." If he's referring to acting and producing, we'd agree he's demonstrated nothing to indicate he has the skills for either. Where he goes now, we have no idea.

But The CW seems to be getting the point. The Vampire Diaries started off a bad show but followed The WB formula and improved. It, the success of Gossip Girl and 90120 and the continued performance of One Tree Hill have steered The CW back to its successful roots (which would be The WB). It's for that reason that they're so excited about The Ringer.

Sarah Michelle Geller returns to TV and The CW has her. One of the few bonafide stars of the small screen and they managed to grab her. The hope for the debut is that her Buffy fame will interest young girls and will also pull in the sizeable (when Buffy was on WB, not when it was on UPN) number of males and females who sailed through their teenage years with Buffy as guidance counselor. And after the debut? Friends at The CW swear this show will hook viewers immediately. We'd love to see that. But in the meantime, we're even more excited about The Secret Circle which not only has a great trailer and a Charmed vibe but returns Kevin Williamson to his roots in a way that The Vampire Diaries couldn't and didn't. Williamson was the genius who created Dawson's Creek.


Between now and the fall premieres, many networks will jockey for attention and buzz but, at this point in the game, only The CW deserves it. This could be the year if finally becomes the breakout network.

Has the White House broken the Hatch Act?

Is Twitter campaigning?

It's a question the FEC might want to probe. Barack Obama has a Twitter feed.

No we're not a sitcom actor or Arianna Huffington -- meaning we're not stupid enough to have ever believed Barack Obama does his own Tweets. So when the news broke in November 2009 (here for Marshall Kirkpatrick reporting it at Readwriteweb.com) that Barack had declared in a townhall that "I have never used Twitter," we weren't at all surprised.

But the Twitter feed, started after Barack became President of the United States, has managed to fool 8,309,213 people -- or help the fools delude themselves -- that he Tweets.

The White House has used the feed to communicate to citizens. But, uh-oh, you gotta' draw a line between government service and campaigning.


Barack's Tweets


Some might find that third Tweet -- congratulating Democratic candidate Kathy Hochul on her win -- as problematic. Our focus is on that second Tweet, the one right above it, the one that reads: "2012 Battleground States Director Mitch Stewart gives a video briefing on our summer organizing strategy. http://OFABO/8WKBaU" Where does it go?

The re-election page of the Barack Obama presidential campaign (see below).

barry campaign

To a page where you can sign up to volunteer on his campaign or you can click on a button and donate.

Does no one remember the furur over Al Gore using a phone in the White House to fundraise?

March 5, 1997, Democracy Now! (link is audio) addressed it. Then-Vice President Al Gore is quoted, from his March 3, 1997 press conference on the issue, stating of his fund raising efforts, "On a few occasions I made some telephone calls from my office in the White House using a DNC credit card. I was advised there was nothing wrong with that practice. The Hatch Act has a specific provision saying that while federal employees are prohibited from requesting campaign contributions, the president and the vice president are not covered by that act because obviously we are candidates."

David Rabin, then of Public Campaign, explained on the program, "He's accused of soliciting monies from a government office building I think that's the gist of the allegation and he is basically saying that his attorney has advised him there's no controlling legal authority that prevents him from doing that." Rabin said the problem is an appearance of impropriety. But he repeatedly noted he didn't want to talk about the issue of whether or not a crime was committed, he had (he thought) bigger fish to fry and wasted it on a (generic) lecture about campaign financing.

October 6, 1993, then-President Bill Clinton signed the Hatch Act and he declared:

The Federal Employees Political Activities Act, which I'm about to sign, will permit federal employees and postal workers on their own time to manage campaigns, raise funds, to hold positions within political parties. Still, there will be some reasonable restrictions. They wouldn't be able to run for partisan political office themselves, for example, and there will be some new responsibilities, which I applaud the federal employees' unions for embracing and supporting.

While we restore political rights to these millions of citizens, we also hold them to high standards at the federal workplace, where the business of our nation is done will still be strictly off limits to partisan political activity. Workers on the job won't even be allowed to wear political campaign buttons. At the same time, the reforms will maintain restrictions on the activities of workers in the most sensitive positions -- in law enforcement and national security.


That means the Twitter of Barack Obama's is going to need a few changes.

First off, no more Barack Obama pretense. Now that the Twitter feed is being used as a campaign tool, the American people need to know who is writing the Tweets to ensure that the Tweets are not being written on the tax payer's bill or at the federal workplace.

It was never a good idea for the president who has quickly become synomous with lying to pretend he did a Twitter feed. Now that his presidential Twitter feed is being used for partisan campaigning, it's, in fact, dangerous, and possibly illegal.

Just Another Iraq War success story

missing husband

Iraq. Where an illegal war has brought democracy and freedom.

For Little Saddam (Nouri al-Maliki) maybe.

But for the people?

Not really. And the woman above (screen snap from video at Free Iraq uprising) holds a photo of her husband. She took part in the False Promise Friday protest in Baghdad. The one the US media ignored. They couldn't shut up about Moqtada al-Sadr's 'protest.'

Moqtada, you may remember, announced his protest weeks ago. It was going to be huge. Huge. He was going to turn out his 2.5 million supporters in Baghdad, turn 'em out and turn 'em loose. It would be the protest to end all protests.

But the press ignored all those previous statements, all those prior boasts. Thursday that 'protest' took place. Allegedly 17,000 members of his militia marched through the streets of Sadr City. (Sadr City is a slum in Baghdad.) A functioning press would have asked, "What happened to the big demonstration in downtown Baghdad you swore was coming?"

They didn't ask. They didn't bother.

Reality: Moqtada quickly realized he couldn't turn out the protest he'd boasted of. At which point, he switched to a march by his militia.

The US press -- the same press that ignores actual protests in Iraq -- rushed to insist that "tens of thousands" took part. They got that number by turning observers into participants. The so-called "tens of thousands" (70,000, the AP wanted to insist) were nothing but residents of Sadr City opening their front doors to see what was marching past their homes.

And so a faux protests, a media staged event, proved that when the press wants to, it can cover Iraq. (For more on the press' Moqtada nonsense, see this by C.I.)

And, the next day, when actual protests took place, the same press again demonstrated that they weren't interested in real protests. At least four people were arrested protesting in Baghdad Friday. The Great Iraqi Revolution reported: "THE 4 YOUNG ACTIVISTS WHO WERE ARRESTED TODAY BY QASSIM ATTA AND TAKEN TO A PLACE UNKNOWN - 27.5.2011 - THEIR NAMES ARE: JIHAD JALEEL, ALI ABDUL KHALIQ, MOUAYED AL TAYEB AND AHMED AL BAGHDADI. We pray God to have them released very soon."

The Great Iraqi Revolution reported? Yes. And more and more they are the only outlet you can count on to provide the truth about what's going on in Iraq.

The woman in the screen snap is one of many who have taken to the streets of Baghdad (and around Iraq, in fact) holding photos of their missing loved ones. It's a story the US press has taken no interest in.

They're too busy trying to sell the 'success' of the Iraq War and, to pull off that fable, they have to bleach a lot of reality out of the story.

Diane Rehm manages to book even fewer women (Ann, Ava and C.I.)

If Republicans in Congress want to cut off NPR's government funding, we'd recommend they attach an equality clause to the funding. As our studies have demonstrated repeatedly, NPR's not at all interested in providing the same platform for women that it does for men. Last year, we spent the full 12 months following Terry Gross' Fresh Air. What did we find?

That women made up only 18.546% of the guests. 18.546%. Now, off the airwaves, in the US,
women are said to make up 50.1% of the population. To pretend that they were represented on Fresh Air requires a lot of stupid or a lot of drugs. Possibly, Terry Gross could provide you with both.

dr

We're now studying The Diane Rehm Show and already found dismaying results, as noted in "Diane Rehm's gender imbalance (Ann, Ava and C.I.)." The examination found that, for April, only 34.48% of her guests (only 34%) were women.


The month of May still has two days in it. Monday, May 30th, Diane intends to rebroadcast (one man, one woman -- the woman is the second hour and is Carly Simon, an interview worth listening to). Tuesday she has five guests scheduled for the first hout (US House Rep Michael Burgess, Norman Ornstein, Ron Pollack, Julie Rovner and Joy Johnson Wilson) and one guest for the second hour (Anthony Facui). Should that schedule change, we'll change our figures in the next installment and note that the scheduled line up changed. (If there's no change, we'll note that next time as well, just so we're all on the same page.)

But using the data for Monday and Tuesday, we're left with a total of 118 guests.

For those with poor math skills, 59 guests would have to be women for an equal number of women to have been booked. But 59 weren't women. You want to guess how many were women?

Thirty-two were women, eight-six guests were men. Which breaks down to, for the month of May, 27.11% of her guests were female. From the embarrassing 34% of April, Diane Rehm managed to actually drop lower, to 27%.

Some might think Diane doesn't notice this. Really? When twice this month she did an entire two hour broadcast with not one female guest, you think she couldn't notice that? Do you also think she doesn't notice that her show doesn't book women for 'hard news'? Especially when the panel is discussing debt or science, Diane can provide three and five guests but she and her producers really seem to struggle to find a woman to include.

Time and again, Diane sends the message that women are good as artists (Carly Simon) and as readers (book discussions) but they're not good at the sciences. And even when she allows that women are good as artists and readers, please note men fair much better there and that book discussions are usually about books written by men.

If NPR applied Diane or Terry Gross' percentages to hosts, a good number of on air women would be on the unemployment line. Time and again, NPR seems to intentionally broadcast this message from their female staff: I got mine.

That's neither fair nor reflective. We won't hold our breath waiting for NPR's ombudsperson to tackle the issue. When we did our year-long study of Fresh Air, the ombudsperson was "curious" and "interested" but apparently still falling back on her (false) claim that she can't comment on Fresh Air because it's not an NPR show. Of course, NPR broadcasts the show. Of course, NPR holds the copyrights to the show. In fact, that detail alone makes it legally an NPR show but legalities aren't taught in J-school. Equally true is that she has commented on Fresh Air several times before including when Terry felt the need to use the n-word on air. So it's really just that Alicia Shephard doesn't comment on Fresh Air unless she wants to. The Diane Rehm Show, as we have noted before, is regularly identified as an NPR show by the press. (The New York Times among them.) No requests for correction come in on that.


With the exception of Monday and Tuesday's guests, you can find tallies in the posts below (from Ann's site):



2 of 10

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
 
Poll1 { display:none; }