During a pretrial hearing in January, the government maintained that
they would have prosecuted Manning for espionage and "aiding the enemy"
whether he leaked to Wikileaks or The New York Times. In fact, prosecutors stated they saw no difference between the two. While Wikileaks and the Times are
different animals, they do have this in common: Both use their sources,
as all journalists do, and they both used Bradley Manning, to maximum
effect. The Times may have ignored Manning's initial call, but
it ultimately profited greatly from his leaks by "partnering" with
Wikileaks on both the war logs and the cables, which the Times' managing editor at the time, Bill Keller, referred to as a "treasure" that "contained the makings of many dozens of stories." Julian
Assange, the far greater profiteer, became a celebrity while his
source, who has never betrayed any personal knowledge of him, languished
in prison.
-- Janet Reitman, "Did the Mainstream Media Fail Bradley Manning?" (Rolling Stone).