Are elected Democrats bound to be losers forever? We kind of hoped not. We kind of hoped that as the nation suffers through its worst crisis, elected Dems were learning just like, hopefully, the left trash that pretended attacking Kamala Harris wasn't helping to put Donald Crump back in the White House.
We wondered that this morning during CNN's STATE OF THE UNION when Dana Bash spoke with Senator Mark Kelly who was apparently eager to lick all the salt of Donald Chump's nut sack. Right now, more than ever, we need leaders not those who scrape and bow.
Kelly was tonguing Chump's balls for a peace plan.
Did it feel good, on his knees in front of Donald, debasing himself for a 'peace plan'?
Since he gets off on shame, we've got some news for him: It was all for nothing. He humiliated himself for nothing.
There is no peace plan. Phase one, the only thing that most are aware of and the only thing Hamas has really agreed to, is a release of any living hostages in exchange for 2,000 Palestinians being held in Israeli prisons and let's Israel retain control over much of Gaza in a manner. In fact, William Christou and Jason Burke (GUARDIAN) observe, "If negotiators have closed gaps between Hamas and Israel over the details of the first phase of the 20-point plan announced by Trump in the White House last week, it was not immediately certain whether the parties had made any progress on thornier questions, such as how Hamas will be disarmed, as Netanyahu has demanded, and the eventual governance of Gaza."
Exactly.
This could very well be yet another pause masked as a cease-fire.
A true peace plan probably wouldn't result in what took place September 29th -- that's when Chump announced it . . . with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at his side -- with only Netanyahu at his side.
The wilful stupidity on the part of the press and the part of elected officials when it comes to this fact speaks to a very anti-Muslim point of view. We get that, right? When Chump pretends to have talks of peace re: Ukraine, the press and politicians notice if a Ukrainian representative is not present.
But leave, for example, Izz al-Din al-Haddad out of the announcement and it doesn't matter?
It matters and it's very significant.
There is no peace plan -- certainly not one that's going to benefit the Palestinian people.
How do you miss that? If it's not assuming that Palestinians are less human -- the anti-Muslim point of view we noted above -- then it's just exhaustion over this conflict that didn't begin in October 2003. But even that exhaustion goes to anti-Muslim bias. Because you're ready to embrace anything just to see it 'ended' -- you're willing to ignore the Palestinian needs.
Israel, to kind of Malcolm X it, didn't land on an empty land in 1948, it landed on Palestine.
Maybe because the United Kingdom has publicly struggled with this issue longer (as opposed to the US media and officals which tended to run with Israel-is-a-saint-Palestinians-are-always-to-blame), their press has been much more honest Take Katie Stallard's conclusion at the end of her piece for THE NEW STATESMAN:
The key clause here is "if agreed," because, as Trump meandered on, it became clear that his peace plan had not, in fact, been agreed by Hamas. “We’re at a minimum, very, very close,” he said, despite the fact that his proposal was not shared with the militant group until after the press conference. By the following day, Hamas officials had said they were reviewing the plan “in good faith” but at the time the New Statesman went to press it was unclear when a response would be issued. In April, Hamas rejected demands to give up their weapons as a “red line”. During his press conference, Trump warned that “if Hamas rejects the deal” then Netanyahu would “have our full backing to do what you would have to do”.
Or take Alex Boyd and Tom Bateman's BBC NEWS report tonight, "Many details for the later phases of the peace plan could be hard to reach agreement on - such as the governance of Gaza, the extent of Israeli troop withdrawal, and the disarming of Hamas."
Senator Mark Kelly did not look reasonable praising Chump for a fake deal. He looked deeply stupid and deserved to. Why is it that all the Democratic senators and House representatives and MSNBC hosts are just going along with bulls**t as opposed to telling the truth that Elaine did in "Stupid Donald Chump works to create a quagmire" -- Chump's putting US troops in the region. Not to protect Palestinians. So why are they there and, more to the point, considering all of known history, why is left to Elaine to explain he's creating a quagmire for the United States?
What we were left with from STATE OF THE UNION was the impression that Senator Kelly could handle questions about the scent of Chump's taint but not much of anything else as demonstrated when ever Dana Bash was more aware of reality than Kelly.
She asked him, "You mentioned looking forward, and I should mention that you visited the region several times during this conflict. There are multiple sticking points in the 20-point plan, particularly when we get to like point six, and the whole question of whether or not Hamas will lay down its arms. How realistic is that?"
Like the stereotypical beauty queen pageant drivel of "world peace," Kelly insisted, "I think it’s possible, I am concerned, that they may change their minds here."
Who is this 'they'? Hamas has not signed off the 20-point plan (especially true of disarming).
Mark's stupidity is only matched by CODEPINK's gross ignorance. They spent the fall of 2024 electing Donald Chump. That is the reality. They now spend their final days following Kamala Harris around on her book tour, screeching and disrupting.
Kamala Harris is not the president of the United States -- CODEPINK worked hard to ensure that. And they're too scared to protest Donald Chump -- weren't out at Walter Reed on Friday, for example, despite days of notice that Chump would around for his 'annual' six-month check up. But they managed to boo and his Kamala.
The whole country suffers today due to the actions of CODESTINK and their allies.
And those dumb quacks haven't learned one damn thing. Instead of apologizing to the country for the work they did to put Chump in the White House, they want to distract and waste time by going after Kamala Harris -- who, for the record, is not president of the United States and was not president of the United States. Palestinians are getting screwed over with Chump's supposed peace plan and CODESTINK too busy wasting more time to fight for the people of Palestine or even to garner attention for their plight.
Kelly's actions demonstrate that, even all these months later, we can't count on our elected Dems and CODEPINK's misdirected hysteria makes it clear that they're no one to depend upon either.