Senator Patty Murray is the Chair of the Senate Budget Committee and serves on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee (which she formerly Chaired). Her office issued the following:
For Immediate Release                                                      
CONTACT: 
Murray (202) 224-2834
Isakson (202) 224-7777
Monday,
 November 24, 2014                                                 
                                
Murray, Isakson Lead Bipartisan Letter Pressing Army Secretary on “Grave Concern” Over Retirement Benefits
In
letter to Army Secretary McHugh, Senators call for immediate reversal of policy forcing officers to retire at highest enlisted rank
Current policy results in significant decrease in lifetime retirement benefits, for some as much as $1,000 per month or more
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Johnny Isakson (R-GA) led a bipartisan group of colleagues in
sending a letter to U.S. Army Secretary John McHugh over the 
Army’s treatment of a significant number of captains and majors who 
are former non-commissioned officers and are being forced to retire at 
their highest previous enlisted rank as a result of the Army’s use of 
Enhanced-Selective Early Retirement Boards (E-SERB).
 This will result in a significant decrease in lifetime retirement 
benefits for the impacted soldiers, for some as much as $1,000 per month
 or more, or just over $1 million over a 40 year retirement in the case 
of a captain forced to retire as a sergeant first
 class.   
“These
 former non-commissioned officers answered the Army’s call for 
volunteers to attend Officer Candidate School as the Army expanded its 
officer corps to fight the
 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Now, despite having served for years as 
commissioned officers and rising through the ranks to become captains 
and majors, these dedicated soldiers will soon be forced to retire at 
their highest previous enlisted rank,”
the Senators wrote in their letter.
“To
 demote these soldiers in retirement is an injustice that devalues their
 service and will materially disadvantage them and their families for 
the rest of their lives… We strongly
 urge you to take the necessary steps to rectify this situation in order
 to allow these soldiers to retire at the rank they have earned and 
appropriately honor their service to our nation.”
Under
 current law a soldier must serve at least 8 years of active service as a
 commissioned officer in order to retire as a commissioned officer.  
Soldiers who serve 20
 years total, but less than 8 years as commissioned officers are retired
 at their highest enlisted rank.  During the “Grow the Army” effort the 
Army dramatically increased the number of officers commissioned via its 
Officer Candidate School (OCS).  The Army
 expanded to a post 9-11 peak of 570,000 soldiers in 2010 and is 
currently executing an aggressive end strength reduction designed to 
shrink the Army to 450,000 soldiers.  Many of those OCS graduates are 
now being forced to retire through the E-SERB process
 as the Army shrinks.  Officers with more than 18 years active service 
are screened by E-SERB and those selected will be forced to retire on 
the first day of the month following the month they reach 20 years of 
service. These former non-commissioned officers
 stepped up and volunteered for OCS at a time the Army badly needed 
officers and served honorably for between 6 and 7 years.  Now, many are 
being retired at enlisted ranks they have not held in years.  This is 
particularly disturbing because had they ignored
 the Army’s call for officers most would have been promoted at least 
once more and been eligible to retire at a higher enlisted rank.
Senators Murray and Isakson were joined in sending the
letter by: Senators Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), 
Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Susan Collins (R-ME), Tom Harkin (D-IA), Mike 
Johanns (R-NE),
Tim
 Johnson (D-SD), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Claire 
McCaskill (D-MO), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Bernard Sanders (D-VT) and Jeanne 
Shaheen (D-NH).
Read a one-page summary of the issue
here. 
The full text of the
letter is as follows:
November 19, 2014
The Honorable John McHugh
Secretary of the Army
101 Army Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-0101
Dear Secretary McHugh:
We
 write to express our grave concern over the Army’s treatment of a 
significant number of Army captains and majors who are former 
non-commissioned officers.   These
 former non-commissioned officers answered the Army’s call for 
volunteers to attend Officer Candidate School as the Army expanded its 
officer corps to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Now, despite 
having served for years as commissioned officers and
 rising through the ranks to become captains and majors, these dedicated
 soldiers will soon be forced to retire at their highest previous 
enlisted rank.  This will result in a significant decrease in lifetime 
retirement benefits for the impacted soldiers, approximately
 $1,000 per month or just over $1 million over a 40 year retirement in 
the case of a captain forced to retire as a sergeant first class.  This 
is simply unacceptable. 
These
 former non-commissioned officers have been placed in this untenable 
position as a result of the Army’s use of Enhanced-Selective Early 
Retirement Boards (E-SERB). 
 Officers selected by the boards are forced to retire as soon as they 
reach 20 years of service. Unfortunately, under current law a soldier 
must serve at least 8 years of active service as a commissioned officer 
in order to retire as a commissioned officer. 
 Soldiers who serve 20 years total, but less than 8 years as 
commissioned officers are retired at their highest enlisted rank.  While
 this requirement makes sense in the case of soldiers who choose to 
retire, are passed over for multiple promotions, or are
 forced to retire due to misconduct, none of those cases applies to the 
soldiers in question.  On the contrary, Army Human Resources Command has
 explicitly acknowledged that E-SERB will separate fully qualified 
officers “who have rendered quality service to
 the nation.”  To demote these soldiers in retirement is an injustice 
that devalues their service and will materially disadvantage them and 
their families for the rest of their lives.
Rather
 than forcing these officers to retire as soon as they reach 20 years of
 service, the Army could modify its E-SERB policy to delay the mandatory
 retirement date
 of affected soldiers until the first month after they become eligible 
to retire as commissioned officers.  For many of the affected soldiers 
this would extend their time in service by only a few months.  We 
strongly urge you to take the necessary steps to
 rectify this situation in order to allow these soldiers to retire at 
the rank they have earned and appropriately honor their service to our 
nation. 
Sincerely,
Patty Murray                                                              
United States Senator                                                 
Johnny Isakson
United States Senator
###
---
Meghan Roh
Press Secretary
Office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray
Mobile: (202) 365-1235
Office: (202) 224-2834