The New York Times and Washington Post have each tried to downplay the significance of the memo’s contents.
In an article titled “The Nunes memo won’t stop Robert Mueller,” Washington Post
writer Eugene Robinson begins by implying that the memo is all smoke
and no fire: “Cough, cough, cough. The smoke around here is so thick I
can hardly breath.”
The New York Times’ Bret Stephens wrote an op-ed titled
“Devin Nunes’s Nothingburger” in which he writes: “There is no there
there…in modern parlance we’d call it a nothingburger, but the bun is
missing, too.”
This contradicts the fact that before the memo was released, leading
Democrats and intelligence agents were screaming that the memo’s
publication would have a devastating impact on “national security.” But
the memo does not reveal troop movements, base locations, or secret
codes. Instead, the information in the Nunes memo does show
that the Obama administration used fraudulent pretenses to
unconstitutionally wiretap political opponents of the Democratic Party.
-- Eric London, "Democrats defend FBI as Republican memo shows anti-Russia campaign built on illegal spying" (WSWS).